Category: Komentar

Send in your opinion to [email protected].
Kirimkan pandangan anda kepada [email protected].

  • Lee Hsien Loong Is Right – Singapore Is Not Ready For Gay Marriage

    Lee Hsien Loong Is Right – Singapore Is Not Ready For Gay Marriage

    Many bloggers took PM Lee to task for one of the article recently.

    http://www.straitstimes.com/news/singapore/more-singapore-stories/story/singapore-not-ready-same-sex-marriage-society-still-cons

    Apparently one of the journalist asked PM Lee about gay marriage in Singapore and he said that Singapore is not ready for it because we are conservative society. He also noted that “We do not harass them or discriminate against them” and also that most Singaporeans would not want LGBT community to the the tone for Singapore society.  He, of course, warned against pushing the agenda too hard in case of strong pushback and that the views are very entrenched and that people get angrier as they discuss it.

    Personally, I feel that journalist had asked the wrong question. Of course, PM Lee is right that we are not ready for gay marriage because we are jumping the gun on this. With penal code 377a still looming over the heads of gay men and an unofficial policy of non positive portrayal of “gay lifestyle”, we still have a long way to go before we discuss about gay marriage. So I feel that some folks are being unfair to PM Lee on this because the question was the wrong one to ask.

    Now me saying that Singapore is not ready for gay marriage doesn’t mean that if today, the government decides to make marriage equality a real thing, I will not support it. However, with 377a still looming there is a lot of to be concerned with then just marriage.

    You know, I love it whenever our leaders says we are not ready for something. They are treating us like some children who couldn’t deal with real issues in a mature manner, in other words, you are not ready to ride a bike, not ready to hike up Mt Kinabalu, not ready to go toilet on your own… you get the idea. Of course, we know this is all political speech because Singaporeans were not ready for casinos (in fact many people opposed it), not ready for over-liberal migrant policies, bubble-gum ban and no alcohol after 10 pm. We are also not ready for a non-Chinese PM, even I though I have not issues if Tharman or Tarmugi were made PM, instead of another useless military Chinese elite MP. My question is whether the Singapore’s “not readiness” is a problem with Singaporean or something deliberately engineered by our ruling party keeping them immature.

    It is pretty scary to hear or read that our ruling party and media have adopted the conservative Christian’s political language. Terms like “gay agenda” and “gay lifestyle” is primarily used by Christian right groups to promote and keep discrimination, hatred and divide society and used to in political engagement particular in the West. The successs of infiltration of such language tell us that either the conservative Christians are strongly in control of our government or by proxy (aka rich and powerful persons) or our government don’t put too much thought into such decisions which impacts thousands of families and people. In the Christian political arena, “gay agenda” and “gay lifestyle” has a negative conoctation and this is meant to be so. “Gay agenda” is meant to be insidious and militant which is why we often hear the govt warning of not “pushing the agenda” too much. “Gay lifestyle” is meant to be hedonistic and irresponsible which is why there is a general displeasure at “promoting gay lifestyle”.  And the problem even extends to people who supports gay equality, using “gay lifestyle” to support gay equality. A gay agenda do exists (but I saw discuss this some other times) but not what the govt and anti-gayers make it out to be. The gay lifestyle doesn’t exists, just as a non-gay lifestyle, a bi lifestyle or a trans lifestyle doesn’t exists.

    Lastly, what makes me more pissed is the govt blaming the victims for upsetting the abusers. Reading what some #wearwhite people got to say about gay folks and the death threats and hatred meted out in groups like WeAreAgainstPinkDot, it is no wonder some people are angry. I said it before, we are trying to mend a divided society, those against equality are the ones that the govt need to deal with, because they want to keep society divided and keep families divided. The way the govt handles this is like a domestic violence where the drunk husband keeps beating the wife and the lawyers tells the wife not to talk about divorce or file police report because it will cause the husband to be angrier… this is exactly what PM Lee meant in this reply.

    Yes, Singapore is not ready of gay marriage because basic equality is not even in place and we need to elect a government with more balls to protect it citizens than the current one.

     

    Source: https://saltwetfish.wordpress.com

  • Are We Falling In To Religious Fundamentalism?

    Are We Falling In To Religious Fundamentalism?

    “Muslim fundamentalism is an ideology which stands against choice, hope, change, and humanity. Islamism is a danger for the Muslim population. It is a danger for us.”

    So what is Islamism and Muslim fundamentalism? These two terms are often interchangeable and most times mean the same thing. We see it being used a lot, but what does it really mean?

    Marieme Hélie-Lucas, Algerian sociologist and founder of Women Living Under Muslim Laws, described fundamentalisms generally as “political movements of the extreme right which in a context of globalisation… manipulate religion… in order to achieve political aims.”

    Now that we have established the meaning of fundamentalism, it is important to now understand that Islamist movements are primarily political, not spiritual. So if you think that their aim is to guide you to the “right path”, think again.

    Islamism is a type of Islam that uses religion as an ideology to create a totalitarian political platform, which means creating a centralised government that does not tolerate parties of differing opinion. This kind of rule exercises dictatorial control over many aspects of life, including the will or thought of the people of its nation.

    To fundamentalists, their social model is the only one that can exist, it is the “absolute truth”.

    The most common line you’d hear from a fundamentalist would be, “This is Islam, and you cannot question it!”

    They deny the possibility of interpretation and reinterpretation, even though their adherents have been a part of it for centuries. I mean, how else could you explain the emergence of the different schools of thought?

    Fundamentalists embrace absolutism and refuse to accept questioning, insisting on a monolithic system of Islam based on their beliefs, and prosecuting you for thinking against their conventional thoughts.

    Islamists denounce secularists, often painting those who support secularism as anti-religion. They are against an ideology that promotes religious harmony because they wish to govern the state under their own rules, in this case, “Islamic rules”.

    In a Muslim-majority country, what easier way to make people succumb to you than by using religion as a tool to garner support?

    Fundamentalists aim to bring political religion into all spheres of life. They will police, judge and change anyone that is Muslim into their monolithic system. Sometimes even going overboard and demanding non-Muslims to conform.

    A lot of times, they aim sharply at women’s rights, policing and restricting our clothes, speech, and career, but this is usually bolstered with the soothing language of respect and protection. No doubt, there are women fundamentalists who advocate for these movements, but usually they don’t realise that they do so at the expense of other women as well.

    Most people associate Islamism and Muslim fundamentalism with violence, advances that are physical. But there is one type of fundamentalism that is just as deadly, and that fundamentalism is given the term “diffused fundamentalism.” This kind of fundamentalism is naturalised into your daily lives, and most times we don’t even realise it.

    They are absorbed and then spread through Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, the internet, television, radio, sermons and word of mouth.

    A lot of times, they are being spread as forms of entertainment. Shows on who is a good Muslim or who is not, talk shows in which you can enquire about what kind of sex you can have with your spouse and still “be a good Muslim”, pronouncements (with a little bit of humour added in) on how to talk, walk, dress, eat, sleep and all the little things you do in your daily lives.

    This fundamentalism is invisible in its pervasiveness and that’s what makes it so dangerous. Once absorbed and socially accepted, they become hard to combat and overturned. Diffused fundamentalism has essentially taken the beautiful and aesthetic religion that I grew up with, and turned it into a series of bodily functions.

    Diffused Muslim fundamentalism is dangerous because it is the seed that supports the growth of a society that condones violence and discrimination. It is the seed that sprouts the mentality that excuses the actions of Islamist groups such as ISIS, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Boko Haram. It is the seed where it all begins.

    Any kind of fundamentalism creates an oppressive environment. That, we all know. It’s not rocket science. After everything that we have seen so far, in the news and media, are we falling into religious fundamentalism?

    You be the judge.

    Just always remember: Go into politics with Islamic values, but never politicise Islam.

    * This is the personal opinion of the columnist.

     

    Source: www.themalaymailonline.com

     

     

  • PKR Believes Pakatan Will Rise From The Ashes While PAS And DAP Think Otherwise

    PKR Believes Pakatan Will Rise From The Ashes While PAS And DAP Think Otherwise

    Just like a phoenix, Pakatan Rakyat will rise from the ashes, said a PKR leader in response to DAP’s declaration that the coalition is dead.

    PKR’s strategic director Sim Tze Tzin said the coalition will be having a meeting either tonight or tomorrow to look for a solution to the problems they’ve been having.

    “We saw it coming but Pakatan will rise again.”

    However, DAP lawmaker Charles Santiago said that there is no recovering from the move taken by PAS, which during its Muktamar earlier this month had approved for a motion to cut ties with the secular based party to be discussed by its central committee and Syura Council.

    “This is best move for us as PAS has made its decision so there is no point in us lingering around.

    “PAS left us with no choice but to declare Pakatan Rakyat dead.”

    PAS’ former central working committee member Khalid Samad said the next step for the pact, if there was to be one, is to come up with a new name.

    This is because “Pakatan Rakyat” is a coalition consisting of three component parties and should any party leave, the pact cannot go on the same way it always has.

    “Without either one of the component parties, there is no Pakatan Rakyat. So the next step has to be decided by the leadership.

    “Will we form a new coalition comprising of only two parties or will we go our separate ways and be individual parties the way we were before.

    “But either way, Pakatan Rakyat is dead,” he said to The Rakyat Post.

    DAP leaders, party supremo Lim Kit Siang and secretary-general Lim Guan Eng, have said that Pakatan Rakyat is dead and done with, blaming PAS as having killed the opposition coalition.

     

    Source: www.therakyatpost.com

  • Khalid Samad Criticises PAS’ U-Turn On Coalition

    Khalid Samad Criticises PAS’ U-Turn On Coalition

    Former PAS central committee member Khalid Samad criticised the U-turn by the party’s highest leadership following the passing of a motion to cut ties with its Pakatan Rakyat coalition partner DAP at its recently concluded muktamar.

    The Shah Alam MP questioned the logic for the motion slated to go before the Syura Council and the central committee for decision-making.

    He said both bodies attended the recently concluded PAS muktamar and did not object when the motion was passed without debate.

    “Wasn’t the Syura Council ulama at the meeting? Weren’t the central committee members there?

    “If they approved it in the meeting, don’t tell me now they want to reject the motion outside the muktamar.

    “If the muktamar approved it, that means the Syura Council also approved it, the central committee approved it, Dewan Ulama approved it, Dewan Muslimat and Dewan Pemuda approved it.

    “So all the delegates from across the country have already approved it.

    “What else is there to say? Don’t tell me the leadership does not understand the muktamar process,” he said at a dinner event in Muar, Johor, yesterday.

    Khalid added that DAP, in accepting the decision and announcing the end of Pakatan Rakyat, showed that the party understood the workings of PAS better than the  Islamist party.

    “Even DAP understands better, they said already disbanded, there is nothing else there,” Khalid added.

    DAP secretary-general Lim Guan Eng yesterday announced that PR ceased to exist, adding that it would only work with PKR and “other forces” to end Barisan Nasional’s hold on the federal government.

    PKR is expected to announce its stand today following a party leadership meeting last night.

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com

  • Of Muftis And Gymnast

    Of Muftis And Gymnast

    This letter stems off the recent Gold Medal achievement of national gymnast Farah Ann Abdul Hadi.

    But the weight of this letter is for those in Malaysia who think that they have the right to ridicule others and judge whether one’s actions are properly Islamic.

    Recently, the Mufti of Perak Tan Sri Dr Harussani Zakaria claimed that gymnastics is not for Muslim women because of its attire. Alongside him, plenty others condemned Farah for her outfit, evidently incapable of comprehending the amount of hard work and practice required to achieve what Farah did.

    The irony of it all comes back to the lost condemners, the ones who think they have the authority to judge other Muslims.

    No matter who you are, no matter your family or your political authority, as Muslims, no one has the right to tell others whether Allah will accept you.

    As Muslims, we are taught to focus primarily on our own connection with Allah and not to be running around wagging our fingers.

    I may not be an Islamic scholar, but as a Muslim, I know that the basic truth of Islam is its non-compulsion.

    As stated in Surah Al-Baqarah, “Let there be no compulsion in religion,” (2: 256) meaning that Islam comes from within; it is a personal decision and a faith that can only be developed when the individual decides to engage with the Quran.

    Similarly, in Surah Yunus, the Quran asks rhetorically: “Can you compel people to believe against their will?” (10: 100).

    Islam’s very definition is “submission to God”.

    No one has the authority to make you submit, no one is allowed to push your forehead to the ground when praying.

    During the time of prophet Muhammad (SAW), Islam represented a belief that empowered the poor and the oppressed of Mecca, the prophet’s first revelation was concerned on aiding the poor. Today Islam is being used by old men to maintain control of a society where women are increasingly taking roles of leadership.

    In specific regards to Harussani, it is inadvisable to take your recommendations and advice seriously considering how, just this April, you proclaimed that wives are unable to refuse when the husband asks for sex, that apparently women lose their right to decline intercourse after the dowry has been paid: “Once she got married…she can’t refuse unless when she’s [on her] period.”

    What perhaps makes this statement more alarming is how you cite Prophet Muhammad SAW to justify this rapist assertion. Let it be clear, Prophet Muhammad SAW, who had even been criticized by his fellow companions for giving equality to women in Medina, would never condone such an animalistic behavior from any man, let alone a Mufti of Perak.

    Stepping back, its easy to recognize that the ignorant criticisms on Farah’s gold medal success is just another chapter in the extending story of Malaysia’s skewed and wrongfully authoritarian view of Islam, but ignoring or even allowing individuals such as the Mufti of Perak to spread false rumors about Islam is detrimental to our national societal maturity.

    It is dangerous to our democracy.

    The example of South Africa’s apartheid is a case in point. In one of the most morally corrupt regimes in world history, it is vital to note that apartheid held its strength from the state Church, from—now very clearly false—interpretations of Christianity.

    In the 1960’s and 70’s, the Dutch Reformed Church (DRC) in South Africa upheld the belief that God had made man of distinct color so each would have his own way of life, they proclaimed: “God had established nations as cultural communities, each having its own identities and man dare not misinterpret God’s will in a manner which would upset the order which he established.”

    As a result, the church ensured that the different ethnicities in South Africa would maintain segregation. Church’s were built separate for whites, for coloureds and for Africans.

    Eventually, South African apartheid leaders used the Church to justify their rule of segregation and oppression of the African community. Eventually, the apartheid government invaded school books to ensure that children of South Africa had no conception of a world without division.

    The point here is not that Malaysia lies vulnerable to be an apartheid state but that it is important to comprehend religious “authorities” as individuals who hold their own personal beliefs: if you are a racist and a Christian, you’re a Christian racist, if you’re a sexist and a Muslim, then you’re a Muslim sexist who uses Islam and the Quran to justify your beliefs.

    There are plenty of religious leaders today — and especially in Malaysia — who make outlandish statements then cowardly hide behind Islam to justify their claims.

    As a growing and maturing society, it is pivotal for us to remember that when religious leaders say, “the Quran says,” part of the “saying” comes through their interpretation, you don’t listen to the Quran speak, you have to read it.

    And when you read it, it is up to you on how you comprehend the message. This is the miracle and empowerment that the Quran gives to its readers, that everyone has the ability to pick it up and make your own conclusions through your own interpretations.

    It is a direct connection with Allah SWT.

    Last week, I attended the Friday prayer at New York University and listened to their Islamic Chaplain, Khalid Latif talk about the troubling feature of Muslims today; how Muslims now are too focused on the do’s and don’ts, on what’s haram and what’s not, that we’ve forgotten to focus on the primary message of Prophet Muhammad SAW of showing unrelenting love to all peoples.

    It is from the Prophet that we must remember to not cast judgment on those we disagree with, it is through the Prophet that we should remember to always respect the person in front of us, no matter if they’re Muslim or non-Muslim, man or woman.

    “Kita manusia sama saja. Tiada tinggi, tiada rendah.”

    Congratulations Farah on your success in gold!

    Your passion for gymnastics is and should rightfully be an inspiration to all in Malaysia.

    * This is the personal opinion of the writer, Shamil Norshidi, and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail Online.

     

    Source: www.themalaymailonline.com

deneme bonusu