Category: Komentar

Send in your opinion to [email protected].
Kirimkan pandangan anda kepada [email protected].

  • Walid J. Abdullah: Racism Only Exists When It Is Not Spoken By Them

    Walid J. Abdullah: Racism Only Exists When It Is Not Spoken By Them

    It’s funny how some people are so bent on using anecdotes -parliamentarians especially love to talk about their personal experiences – to display the truly multi-racial nature of Singapore, and to prove racism doesn’t exist.

    ‘My son didn’t want to bring a ham sandwich to school to respect his Muslim friends; see, there is no racism!’

    ‘I saw an Indian man calling an ambulance for a Chinese lady, and a Malay dude was the medic. Singaporean multiracialism ftw!’

    ‘I got into the lift and saw a Malay man, and i smiled and had a conversation with him. Only in Singapore do you get this.’ (somehow, speaking in a polite manner to other humans is uniquely Singaporean, and shows racism is absent!)

    —-

    But when these people come across other anecdotes that actually work against their ‘all is hunky dory’ theory, they will find all sorts of excuses to dismiss them.

    ‘Oh, our MP wasn’t being offensive. She just proposed the fence because it was practical. She gets along well with Indian workers, you know. Her suggestion is nothing like Trump’s.’

    ‘Oh, the portrayal of a hijabi as parking attendant in the children’s book is actually a good thing and does not reinforce stereotypes. Exposes children to the hijab. Good job author!’

    ‘The blackface incident was just something light-hearted. Please don’t be so sensitive. We must learn to laugh at ourselves.’

    ‘Yeah he said Malay and Indian workers cannot speak English properly. But that’s not what he really meant. We must look at the context.’

    And, the get-out-of-jail card for when one cannot perform intellectual gymnastics and is forced to admit that an incident is racist:

    ‘Yes, this was racist. But racism exists everywhere else. So be thankful for what you have here.’

    —-

    Yeah, continue telling yourselves that racism doesn’t exist. Continue glorifying your own experiences as the norm, and continue dismissing others’ encounters with racism as anomalies.

     

    Source: Walid J. Abdullah

  • LGBT Community Given A Lot Of Public Space In Singapore, Why Pushing For More?

    LGBT Community Given A Lot Of Public Space In Singapore, Why Pushing For More?

    Dear All Singapore Stuff,

    This is what I saw this Sunday on my MRT ride back home. Two men openly kissing on the train. Everyone was looking at them. I was kind enough to take the pic without a direct shot of the boy’s face.

    I respect everyone’s rights, but this is Simply Disgusting in a public space.

    What if my children saw this and asked “Mummy, why are the two men kissing?”

    Would I have to answer “It’s the same as normal love and marriage. The only difference is that one man opens his buttocks for the other man to put his private part inside but in the end, no babies come out. They only get AIDS”?!

    Is this another publicity stunt by the gay community?

    Most people in SG already know they exist but would prefer that they just go back inside the closet and stop seeking attention.

    Recently, Minister Chan Chun Sing bravely spoke out against public displays of homosexuality in Singapore. These were his words “I’m not going to discriminate … (You’re free to do) whatever you do behind your bedroom doors … It’s not my problem. I’m not a sex policeman … But if you tell everyone to champion pro-LGBT or anti-LGBT (causes), it (might) cause social divisions, so (I have to step in) to be the policeman in the middle.” (source: http://m.todayonline.com/singapore/chan-chun-sing-urges-youth-go-beyond-…)

    It seems that we really need sex policemen like Mr Chan and stricter laws to keep the urges of the gay community in check. The gay minority can do whatever they want in their bedroom but they should not be going around promoting the gay lifestyle and demanding for gay marriage. They can be gay but we have our right not to accept their behaviour in public. A vast majority of Singaporeans do not approve of gay marriage and are unlikely to change our minds anytime soon. Singapore should not degenerate into a free-for-all where gay men can brazenly go around wrecking young boys’ buttocks in the name of love, without fearing the consequences of their actions.

    Homosexuals should be thankful that they have their annual Pink Dot. We as the moral majority have already given them enough public space. What more do they want? Gay sex parties? Gay parades? To be able to teach kids about gay sex? Some of them are not contented with Pink Dot and intimacy in private. Instead, they want to flaunt their gayness in public and ‘confront’ normal heterosexual couples until they accept them as normal and see them as equally ‘married’. No, homosexual relationships are not normal and therefore will be never be equal to a real marriage between a man and a woman. We have to draw the line at some point. For many of us, life is not just about fulfilling sexual fetishes that are falsely attributed to genetics.

    Melinda
    A.S.S Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

     

  • Foreigners Eat BBQ Pork At Halal Section @ Newton Hawker Centre

    Foreigners Eat BBQ Pork At Halal Section @ Newton Hawker Centre

    Hi All Singapore Stuff,

    Over the weekend, myself and a few of my muslim friends was having dinner at Newton food centre. We were having Halal BBQ seafoods.

    During the dinner, I saw a couple was queuing up to buy BBQ suckling pig from this stall named “THE PIG STOP”. After buying, They brought the foods to the muslim section and sit right beside us. As a result, my muslim friends was feeling very uncomfortable. In the end, we decided to move further away.

    I know is free sitting in Newton food centre and taking into consideration that they are foreigners. Just hope that we can respect and be more sensitive towards each other religion in future to prevent such incident from happening again. Thanks.

    Jer
    A.S.S. Contributor

     

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

     

  • Ustaz Abd Al-Halim: Is ARS Just A Mechanism For Asatizahs To Be Controlled By The State?

    Ustaz Abd Al-Halim: Is ARS Just A Mechanism For Asatizahs To Be Controlled By The State?

    AsSalaam’alaikum!

    I recently attended a seminar on making the Asatizah Recognition Scheme mandatory. It is clear that asatizahs are worried that if they resist the ARS scheme i.e. teach even if they are without ARS, they could be arrested and put to jail. One person actually asked that question during the Q & A. Of course, there is as yet no passing of any laws. There is no police force to watch over the asatizahs for now. But the indications that the speakers gave is that there will be law enforcement. One speaker spoke of levying fines upon asatizahs who do not comply. It is one thing to come up with a questionable policy but entirely another to implement it. I wonder if such enforcement is to be done by the government which is, by the way, secular. If so, will we have a secular non-Muslim government sending police officers out to arrest asatizahs who do not have ARS but are nonetheless qualified to teach given that they have been teaching for years and years and that they have been appointed to teach by ulama before ARS came along?

    I spoke to a senior person who is knowledgeable in Islam afterwards. He is not convinced that making ARS mandatory is about stemming “ajaran sesat” (deviant teachings). Instead he, like many others know that this is becoming a draconian mechanism to control the asatizahs. He further quipped that if they are concerned with ajaran sesat, there are many ideas that the religious authorities themselves seem to propagate that can be classified as “ajaran sesat” such as the idea that all religions are the same and that it is ok to praise Lee Kuan Yew who is a non-Muslim (Kafir) in the mosque during Jumaat sermon even though the Jumaat sermon is part and parcel of our ibadah and that the Masjid should not be politicised.

    It is glaring that the President of Pergas had to assure the audience that those behind making ARS mandatory are not agents of the government – pointing to the panelists and making the audience repeat after him several times that they are not agents of the government but instead they are Warathatul Anbiyaa’ (Inheritors of the legacy of the Prophets).

    I was there and those who were there and reading this can verify or debunk what I say here.

    May Allah swt save this ummah from internal and external enemies. Amiin!

     

    Source: Ustaz Abd Al-Halim

  • Indonesia President Joko: Chemical Castration Will “Wipe Out” Paedophilia

    Indonesia President Joko: Chemical Castration Will “Wipe Out” Paedophilia

    Indonesia could “wipe out” paedophilia with its new policy of chemical castration, President Joko Widodo has told the BBC.

    He said Indonesia respected human rights but there would be “no compromise” when it came to punishing such sexual crimes.

    Indonesia passed controversial laws earlier this month authorising chemical castration for paedophiles.

    The laws were subject to fierce debate in parliament.

    The Indonesian Doctors Association says its members should not be involved as the procedure would violate medical ethics.

    Chemical castration is the use of drugs to reduce sex drive and libido, without sterilisation or removing organs.

    The paedophiles who want treatment

    President Widodo said “our constitution respects human rights, but when it comes to sexual crimes there is no compromise”.

    “We are strong and we will be very firm. We will hand out the maximum penalty for sexual crimes.”

    He added: “In my opinion… chemical castration, if we enforce it consistently, will reduce sex crimes and wipe them out over time.”

    In a wide-ranging interview with the BBC’s Yalda Hakim, President Widodo – also known as Jokowi – discussed topics including the South China Sea, corruption, a recent tax amnesty and the government’s stance on homosexuality.

    Earlier this month, an advert for a new youth ambassador position stipulated that members of the lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) community need not apply.

    The government advert said the post was only open to applicants not involved in “sexually deviant behaviour”.

    President Widodo said there was no discrimination against minorities, but he added: “We are the world’s largest Muslim nation and we have religious norms. You have to remember that and know that. We have social norms.”

     

    Source: www.bbc.com