Category: Politik

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew Is Self-Serving Opportunist

    Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew Is Self-Serving Opportunist

    The last few days, the PAP Internet Brigade had been trying to promote their party and the “late great LKY”. The way they speak of him is almost Messianic.

    Let us understand who Lee Kuan Yew was. Let us understand his values..

    He is someone who will do anything for his own benefit.

    During the Japanese occupation, Lee Kuan Yew was a collaborator.

    He worked with the Japanese Propaganda service (the Hodobu). At the Hodobu, Lee Kuan Yew translated English language news for the Japanese propaganda department.

    He admitted to being well informed about the progress of the war “because for a year and a half….(he) was working in the propaganda department…” (Han, Fernandez, Tan 28)

    And yet, this hypocritical self-interested collaborator criticised the locals who collaborated with the Japanese during occupation. He said:

    “Young locals learnt enough Japanese to be employable, but beyond that most people were decent. They did not want to cooperate or collaborate with the enemy…”

    Further, he referred to those who worked closely with the Japanese as
    opportunistic.

    The luckiest of the opportunists according to Lee Kuan Yew were “contractors whom the Japanese needed to obtain basic supplies, or who were in building construction.”

    However, he admitted to being one of this “lucky” opportunists. He was in construction and did work and supplies for the Japanese military.

    With his partner, “a Shanghainese called Low You Ling… a small contractor in the construction business…we got odd jobs from Japanese companies and from the butai, the regiments that garrisoned Singapore.”

    He also teamed up with a Japanese civilian Mr Kageyama to supply the Japanese military and companies.

    When the Japanese started to lose the war, Lee Kuan Yew became worried.

    “I decided it would be better to get out of Singapore while things were still calm, I could resign from Hodobu without arousing suspicion over my motives. I applied for leave and went up to Malaya to reconnoitre Penang and the Cameron Highlands, to find out which was the safer place.”

    When he came back from Cameron Highlands, he found out that the Japanese Secret Police had become suspicious of him. He decided to stay put.

    According to Lee Kuan Yew, after the Japanese surrender, “anti-Japanese groups took the law into their own hands. They lynched, murdered, tortured or beat up informers, torturers, tormentors and accomplices- or suspected accomplices- of the Japanese… But in the last days, many collaborators managed to melt away, going into hiding or fleeing upcountry to Malaya or to the Riau islands in the south.

    The liberation did not bring what everybody wanted: punishment for the wicked and reward for the virtuous. There could be no complete squaring of accounts…”

    If all the collaborators were arrested and punished, we probably would not have the PAP today.

    References:

    Han, Fook Kwang, Sumiko Tan, and Warren Fernandez. Lee Kuan Yew: The man and his ideas. Singapore Press Holdings, 1997.

    Yew, Lee Kuan. The Singapore Story: Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew. Vol. 1. Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd, 2012.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Zulfikar Shariff: PAP Perpetuating Racism In Singapore

    Zulfikar Shariff: PAP Perpetuating Racism In Singapore

    Inevitably, the discussion about PAP’s racist policies bring in those who defend these policies.

    But what I noticed is that the divide is not between the different races.

    These policies that discriminated against the Malays were not implemented by Chinese or Indians or Eurasians or any other race or nationality in Singapura.

    It was created and implemented by the PAP.

    Those who came to defend and seek to perpetuate this racism….appears to be mainly if not solely..

    PAP members or supporters.

    The Malays, Indians, Chinese, Jews, Armenians etc do not really have much of an issue with each other.

    The racists who defend these policies do so because it implicates their party.

    We can see how the different nations in Singapura, when left to their own, will support each other.

    As can be seen during the Tradegy Natra (Maria Hertogh) in 1950, Chinese in Singapura, supported the Malays.

    And they persuaded the British to help the Malay community.

    According to Assoc Prof Khairudin:

    “The largest Chinese daily newspaper, the Nanyang Siang Pao, urged the British to ‘think thrice’ before making a legal decision in the upcoming appeal trial. The move to restore Maria Hertogh to her foster mother and husband would be of no great loss to Britain’s diplomatic ally; the Dutch.

    On the other hand, the Malays were an important and integral part of the British Empire. The British should therefore ensure the repatriation of Maria Hertogh back to Singapore to avoid the violation of the religious rights of the Muslims, which could potentially lead to further bloodshed and violence.

    The Kuomintang newspaper, Sin Chew Jit Poh, called upon the British, the Dutch and the Muslims to allow Maria Hertogh to decide for herself whether she wished to reside in the Netherlands or Malaya.

    The paper stressed that Dutch diplomatic relations with other Muslim countries, such as Indonesia and Pakistan, would most certainly be jeopardized if custody of Maria Hertogh were to be awarded to her natural parents.

    Another observer who identified himself as a ‘Straits Chinese’ expressed his regrets that the ‘very good name of the Singapore Malays and Muslims, who are regarded as a most law-abiding community in the colony has been besmirched (Straits Times, 17 December 1950).”

    If any such events are ever to happen again, I have no doubt the ordinary Chinese, Indian, Eurasian etc in Singapura will once again defend the Malays.

    And I have no doubt…the PAP Internet Brigade will lead the charge against the Malays.

    Reference:

    Aljunied, Khairudin. Heng, “Beyond the Rhetoric of Communalism:
    Violence and the Process of Reconciliation in 1950s Singapore” Derek Thiam Soon, and Syed Muhd Khairudin Aljunied, eds. Reframing Singapore: Memory, Identity, Trans-regionalism. Vol. 6. Amsterdam University Press, 2009. p. 73

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Pemerintah Singapura Harus Mengambil Langkah Untuk Membasmi Diskriminasi Terhadap Kaum Muslimah

    Pemerintah Singapura Harus Mengambil Langkah Untuk Membasmi Diskriminasi Terhadap Kaum Muslimah

    Alhamdulillah, telah berlalu hampir 4 bulan sejak saya diizinkan Ilahi waktu berkempen di pilihanraya yang lalu untuk menyuarakan isu-isu diskriminasi terhadap penduduk Singapura yang berbangsa Melayu dan beragama Islam seperti hak kebebasan beragama dalam memakai tudung untuk wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang beragama Islam sewaktu menjalankan tugas sebagai seorang jururawat. Malangnya masih belum terdengar apa-apapun perubahan dasar yang akan dibuat untuk membetulkan ketidak-adilan ini. Isu ini menjadi sesuatu keaiban kepada maruah kita sebagai orang Melayu dan orang Islam yang tidak mampu membela hak segolongan wanita kita yang ingin bertudung sambil berkerjaya sebagai seorang jururawat. Diskriminasi ini adalah suatu perkara yang di luar kefahaman rasional kerana tidak ada sebab yang munasabah samada daripada aspek kebersihan mahupun dari aspek sosial yang boleh mempertahankan suatu dasar yang begitu kuno di zaman moden ini.

    Kebelakangan ini, pemerintah Singapura telah menunjukkan teladan yang sangat mengalakkan dengan penerimaan AP Melayu wanita PAP yang bertudung untuk menerajui sebahagian kepimpinan Negara. Namun pada masa yang sama menjadi suatu keanehan apabila wanita lain yang berbangsa Melayu ataupun kaum lain yang beragama Islam, masih lagi tidak dibenarkan bertudung semasa bertugas sebagai seorang jururawat mengikut dasar yang masih wujud oleh pihak-pihak yang berkewajiban. Alasan pakaian seragam jururawat sebagai halangan adalah suatu yang kurang peka dan sangat memperbodohkan kita yang berfikiran rasional kerana negera-negara yang lebih maju di barat telahpun menerima pemakaian tudung sebagai seragam seorang jururawat tanpa halangan kepada tugas profesionalnya. Alasan lain seperti kekuatiran ianya akan menimbulkan sifat kurang senang oleh para pesakit langsung tidak logik memandangkan betapa biasanya seorang wanita Islam yang bertudung boleh kelihatan di masyarakat umum. Malahan Dokter wanita Islam yang ingin bertudung dibenarkan tanpa masalah di hospital-hospital Singapura sekarang ini. Tiada bukti langsung untuk alasan keberadaan jururawat wanita Melayu atau dari kaum lain yang bertudung akan menimbulkan keresahan dan tidak senang oleh kaum lain. Malah alasan ini seolah-olah beranggapan kaum lain sekarang merasa kurang senang apabila melihat wanita Melayu Islam secara umumnya bertudung yang berlaku dalam banyak lagi kerjaya lain seperti guru-guru di sekolah pemerintah dan sebagainya.

    Baru-baru ini pemerintah Singapura telah menanda-tangani Konvensyen bagi Membasmikan Semua Jenis Diskriminasi Kaum (International Convention on the Elimination of All Forms of Racial Discrimination) pada 19 Oktober 2015. Sebagai rakyat Singapura yang berbangsa Melayu dan beragama Islam saya mengalu-alukan tindakan ini, kerana ia membuka peluang untuk kita mengubah dasar-dasar pekerjaan dan lain-lain yang bersikap diskriminasi kepada orang Melayu Singapura. Sekarang telah tiba masanya untuk tindakan dalam bentuk perlaksanaan dengan membasmikan dasar-dasar pekerjaan yang terang-terang besifat diskriminasi terhadap wanita Melayu dan wanita kaum lain yang beragama Islam dari bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Kali ini, Rakyat Melayu Singapura tidak mahu lagi menerima alasan yang tidak munasabah dari pihak-pihak yang berkewajiban termasuk Pemerintah sendiri kerana alasan-alasan itu bercanggah langsung dengan apa yang telah ditanda-tangani oleh Pemerintah Singapura dalam Konvensyen tersebut. Rakyat Singapura yang berbangsa Melayu dan beragama Islam sudah hilang keyakinan dengan ketelusan pemimpin Melayu Islam pemerintah dan pihak-pihak lain yang berkewajiban kerana kegagalan mereka dalam bertindak adil dan jujur untuk menamatkan terusnya berlaku diskriminasi terhadap wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang beragama Islam untuk bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat. Rakyat Melayu Islam Singapura khususnya dan semua Rakyat umumnya berhak bersuara apabila berlakunya ketidak-adilan dalam melaksanakan dasar yang jelas mendiskriminasikan wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang ingin bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Saya secara peribadi kedepan dalam usaha ini melalui wadah lelaman FB ini dengan usaha semampu saya untuk mendesak campur tangan dan kebijaksanaan Pemerintah supaya menghentikan diskriminasi terhadap wanita Melayu dan kaum lain yang ingin bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat. Usaha ini adalah lanjutan daripada usaha-usaha lain yang telah saban tahun berlaku di mana orang Melayu Islam hanya mampu merayu dengan penuh adab dan sopan melalui wadah-wadah yang sedia ada ataupun diadakan. Tiap kali jawapan pihak berkewajiban dan juga Pemerintah sama sahaja malah telah menimbulkan kemarahan rakyat Melayu Islam Singapura yang menganggap ini sebagai mencabar dan memperlekehkan maruah wanita bangsa Melayu dan wanita kaum lain yang beragama Islam dan juga maruah orang Islam umumnya. Namun kita masih bersabar, berusaha terus dan berharap.

    Melalui wadah ini mudah-mudahan ia akan menjadi tempat menyuarakan dengan jelas dan lantang kepada semua Rakyat Singapura bahawa orang Melayu Islam memang merasa didiskriminasikan oleh dasar-dasar pihak-pihak berkewajiban yang menghalang wanita-wanita Islam tak kira bangsa yang ingin bertudung dari bertudung semasa menjalankan tugas sebagai seorang jururawat. Wadah ini juga akan menjadi sumber maklumat untuk usaha-usaha lain yang akan dijalankan seperti rapat-rapat umum untuk menjelaskan isu ini jika tindakan itu diperlukan memandangkan jawapan yang bakal diterima dari pihak yang berkewajiban dan Pemerintah sendiri. Rakyat Melayu dan kaum lain yang beragama Islam juga harus mempertimbangkan untuk membawa isu diskriminasi ini langsung ke makhamah untuk mendapat pengadilan berdasarkan undang-undang Negara dan undang-undang antarabangsa demi membela hak kebebasan kaum Hawa kita yang ingin bertudung dan bekerjaya sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Jika pemerintah melihat usaha ini sebagai suatu yang ingin menimbulkan huru-hara dan kekecohan di masyarakat, itu adalah silap kerana ini adalah usaha murni seorang rakyat yang menggunakan wadah yang ada dan dengan penuh tanggungjawab dan pertimbangan rasional. Tiada apapun muslihat memecah belahkan rakyat malah sebaliknya ia adalah usaha menjalinkan jembatan kepada semua Rakyat Singapura tidak kira apapun bangsa dan agama, terhadap isu diskriminasi yang telah bertahun-tahun berlaku kepada wanita Melayu dan bukan Melayu yang beragama Islam kita dalam isu bertudung sebagai seorang jururawat.

    Pemerintah juga harus bersikap terbuka selari dengan kemajuan baik mereka untuk mendengar keluhan Rakyat yang kurang senang terhadap isu-isu semasa. Ia juga boleh jujur mempertimbangkan tujuan usaha ini dan usaha-usaha lain dengan tujuan yang sama yang telah bertahun-tahun berlaku di mana rayuan dan desakan dilaksanakan secara aman, jelas dan rasional melalui hujah-hujah yang munasabah, hanya untuk diketepikan tanpa penghujung dan tidak tahu berapa lama lagi penyelesaiannya. Adalah kesilapan besar untuk Pemerintah terus mengenepikan dan mempelekehkan isu maruah wanita Melayu Islam yang telah lama menjadi pekung yang menyakiti rakyat Melayu Islam Singapura. Semoga Pemerintah benar-benar mengkotakan nilai keadilan yang termaktub dalam ikrar Negara yang kita saling pegang sesama rakyat.

    Sebenarnya isu ini adalah isu yang seharusnya sudah lama diselesaikan dengan cara perbincangan dengan penuh kejujuran, berhikmah dan adil. Hakikatnya ialah isu ini masih lagi membelenggu kita dan ia hanya mencerminkan kelemahan kuasa menyuara pemimpin Melayu Islam kita dan pada masa yang sama kurang keprihatinan oleh Pemerintah yang mungkin belum benar-benar mendengar keluhan perasaan orang Melayu terhadap isu ini yang jelas berupa isu diskiriminasi yang mengguris hati kita semua. Semoga usaha ini mendapat sokongan sewajarnya oleh semua pihak yang berkewajiban dan Pemerintah juga dengan bertindak mengakhiri diskriminasi terhadap segolongan Rakyat kita. Ini akan menunjukkan kematangan kita sebagai sebuah masyarakat Singapura yang rasional, beretika, waras dan bersikap adil terhadap semua rakyat.

    Majulah Singapura!!!

     

    Source: Singaporeans For Ending Discriminatory Practices Towards Muslim Women

     

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Don’t Dilute Role Of Malays In Building Singapore

    Zulfikar Shariff: Don’t Dilute Role Of Malays In Building Singapore

    Growing up, I read and heard about Lim Boh Seng, Tan Kah Kee, Tan Tock Seng, Elizabeth Choy.

    And I wondered, apart from Lt Adnan and a few other rarely mentioned names, where are the Melayu, Indian, Eurasian personalities?

    Surely Singapura was not built solely on the back of Chinese migrants.

    It was later that I realised how Singapura’s history is Sinicised.

    And why we need to make sure we magnify the history of the other communities. Insha Allah in this post, I will briefly discuss a little bit of the colonial history of the Indians in Singapura.

    There were more than 100 Indians who arrived with Raffles in 1819, including Sepoys, clerks and the famous trader Naraina Pillai.

    Naraina Pillai was a trader and philanthropist who gave out substantial amounts of his wealth to build temples and other social causes.

    By 1873, there were about 12,000 Indians resident in Singapura. They were mainly labourers, financiers, traders, administrative workers and shopkeepers.

    But the British also brought a substantial number of Indian convicts. When the British left Bencoolen in 1825, they brought 600 Indian convicts with them. By 1860, there were 2,275 convicts residing in Singapura.

    However, British residents were not happy with the arrangement and by 1873, the remaining convicts were sent to the Andamans islands.

    Skilled Indian convict labourers contributed substantially to the city’s development.

    As Governor of the Straits Settlements, Colonel Blundell noted

    “The whole of the existing roads throughout the Islands… every bridge in both town and country, all the existing canals, sea wall, jetties, piers, etc., have been constructed by convict labour. But not only is the community indebted for these essential works to the mere manual labour of convicts, but by the introduction among them of a system of skilled labour, Singapore is indebted for works which could not otherwise have been sanctioned from the State funds.”

    The next time we walk pass St Andrew’s cathedral or the Istana….take note…

    They were built by Indian convict labourers.

    Reference:
    Sandhu, Kernial Singh. “Some Aspects of Indian Settlement in Singapore, 1819–1969.” Journal of Southeast Asian History 10.02 (1969): 193-201.

    Picture: Construction of the Government House (Istana)

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Analysts: Critical For Diverse Views To Be Heard

    Analysts: Critical For Diverse Views To Be Heard

    The need to refresh the political system as Singapore’s circumstances change highlighted by President Tony Tan in his opening address to the 13th Parliament last night (Jan 15) caught some political observers’ eyes, as they suggested the Government could tap new approaches to better capture the full spectrum of diverse perspectives on the ground.

    While they acknowledged the Government’s efforts to this end, in terms of dialogues and public consultations, the analysts said going beyond these existing initiatives would go towards Dr Tan’s call for Singapore to stay cohesive and move forward together.

    Calling for views to be gathered from avenues beyond Government-endorsed dialogues, such as blogs, forums or civil society, former Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) Siew Kum Hong said: “There needs to be the recognition that disagreement, dissent and conflict are not necessarily unhealthy, as without those things, we are doomed to fail.”

    “If you want to be fully inclusive, bring (these groups) in and engage them on their own terms.”

    In the face of greater diversity of views in society, changing Singaporeans’ mindsets is also important, said former NMP Eugene Tan. Singaporeans also need to be open-minded when considering different perspectives and allowing robust debate could help drive this mindset change, he added.

    “(Diverse views) reflect a society that is becoming more complex … The only way you can deal with it is for people to be able to engage in robust debate … and not treating the differences in values as existential challenges,” said the Singapore Management University law don.

    Institute of Policy Studies’ deputy director Gillian Koh noted, however, that a government-society partnership is not without challenges since ideas being pushed for may be driven by personal interests.

    “The argument should be done with integrity and for that purpose and not with some hidden agenda … We want shared governance, but this is the real danger of that shared governance going wrong,” she said.

    The experts also cited a list of other possible tweaks when it comes to refreshing the political system, including expanding the Non-Constituency MP slate and changing the selection process for NMPs.

    Smaller Group Representation Constituencies could also be instituted, they said.

    On the five key aims set out by Dr Tan for Parliament’s new term, the political observers flagged the focus on renewing the economy as the most pressing concern to Singaporeans.

    Not only will Singaporeans be keeping close tabs on how the Government rejuvenates the economy, Associate Professor Tan said they will look at how the authorities will help those who could emerge as “losers” with economic restructuring.

    Dr Alan Chong from the S Rajaratnam School of International Studies also flagged the dark clouds over the economy now, citing the stock market turbulence in China and the US Federal Reserve raising interest rates.

    The economy and urban infrastructure like transport are naturally closely-watched as they are tangible aspects that will affect daily lives, he added.

    Assoc Prof Tan said security is also likely to be one of the Government’s top priorities, given the string of Islamic State terror attacks, including most recently in Jakarta two days ago.

    “(The Government will) want to assure not just people living here but people who are invested in Singapore, people who might want to invest in Singapore,” he added.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu