Category: Politik

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Discussion Of The Singapore System Will Open Minds, Helps Uncover Better Solutions For Malay-Muslim Community

    Zulfikar Shariff: Discussion Of The Singapore System Will Open Minds, Helps Uncover Better Solutions For Malay-Muslim Community

    A common response made against activists who operate on social media is to tell them to stop discussing on these platforms and instead to do something.

    There are several misconceptions exhibited in such suggestions.

    First, it assumes that social media discussions, especially those that involves substantive exploration and interrogation of ideas is not doing something.

    Our understanding of the world, of systems that are created and sustained in our political system, policy choices and preferences, are all based on ideas.

    The government does not craft policies independent of their values, preferences, beliefs or interests. All these ingredients of policy formulation are based on ideas.

    So is the system we live in. The rules that define what we can or cannot do, who represent us, the platforms we are allowed to use, the actions we can take, are all based on ideas.

    To challenge, clarify and develop ideas is to do something that will have a much greater impact than simply acting without clarity.

    We should acknowledge, embrace and celebrate the role of ideas and its formulation in our community.

    Second, before we act, we need to know why we act, know how to act, what the scope and limits of our action.

    Too often, we act without knowing the why, how and what. We assume to know what we do but do not understand what defines our behaviour.

    I have seen so many Muslim leaders discuss engagement with the government to modify policies.

    And yet, they do not understand the context of the policy. They do not know the values, preference and interests that not only allow but create the conditions for the policy to exist.

    So they engage, in expectation of a change, while being constrained by the very system they exist in.

    The policies, (whether hijab, imposition of leadership, domestic and international preferences) are based on a system that defines what can be done and the preferences of the elites.

    To assume that all we need to do is engage on policy is to ask for a meal while trapped in a well.

    Understand the system. Understand what creates the preferences.

    And then we can understand what we can do.

    And these understandings can only be gained when we discuss ideas.

    Whether it is done in a classroom or social media, these discussions have to take place.

    Social media provides amazing access to activists. We can reach out to hundreds or thousands of followers and friends.

    Unlike using the mainstream media, our voice and opinions do not need to be filtered. There are no gatekeepers to decide what we can say or how we can say it.

    We can develop and share ideas.

    We can explore, provide clarity, impart knowledge and mobilise.

    Every discussion is an opportunity shift a position.

    An effective discussion will create new understanding or solidify old ones. Or create perceptual drifts.

    Social media discussions, even if limited, can change society.

    And that is more substantive than what many realise.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Bilahari Kausikan: Singapore’s Undiplomatic Diplomat

    Bilahari Kausikan: Singapore’s Undiplomatic Diplomat

    I like him, I like him not. I have listened to some of his speeches, sat in on some of his briefings and followed his Facebook posts closely.

    Ambassador at large Bilahari Kausikan impresses with his intellect, witty rejoinders and say-it-as-it-is statements. He can go berserk when attacking critics of Singapore. In a recent Facebook post, he said a freelancer was writing critical articles about Singapore for a Malaysian website because of the money she can make out of it.

    And just the other day, Kausikan had this smart-ass post on Han Hui Hui, who is facing charges of causing public nuisance during a protest rally at Hong Lim Park: “I think HHH… should plead not guilty for reasons of insanity.”

    Nothing seems to scare him, even making unsavoury statements about  politics and politicians of other countries. Earlier this month, he waded into Malaysian politics when he wrote that Chinese Malaysians were being delusional if they think the principle of Malay dominance can be changed. “Malay dominance will be defended by any means,” he thundered. Malaysian opposition politician Tony Pua hit back calling Singapore the mercenary prick of South-east Asia.

    He brings back images of an era when Lee Kuan Yew reigned supreme with his undiplomatic attacks on countries like Malaysia, Australia, India. Kausikan, as the permanent secretary in the Ministry of Foreign Affairs, was at the centre of it all when LKY and Mahathir Mohamad were taking relations
    between the two countries to the edge of the cliff.

    It is the school of LKY that Kausikan graduated from and you can see heavy doses of what he has learnt in his responses. Recently, he got into a verbal fight with France and its European allies when he accused Paris of being “hobbled by its own absolutist beliefs” on human rights. Two European ambassadors responded but Kausikan wanted to have the last word.

    “Why throw the weight of the state against discrimination against one religion or group, while acquiescing in the systematic vilification of another religion, Islam, in the name of freedom of speech?” he asked in a pointed reference to the satirical Charlie Hebdo magazine.

    There are enough examples like these to show how undiplomatic this diplomat has become. No one in government seems to have pulled him back and so far his messy musings don’t seem to have affected Singapore’s relations with other countries.

    Maybe, they have come to terms with a man they consider to be a loose cannon who doesn’t have policy-making powers. It might also be possible that Singapore considers such a character useful to tell the world what Singapore really feels about world affairs but does not articulate publicly.

    Kausikan is a breath of fresh air in the civil service where officers hardly say a word in public for fear of reprisals from their bosses. Kausikan is an open book; his views, whether you like them or not, are there for readers to agree with or dispute. And I am sure he will be ready to respond robustly against his detractors.

    A good measure of the man is available in an interview he gave to a Public Service Division publication, Challenge.  “I say what I think. I’m me, I can’t be anything but me,” he said.

    For all his candour, he remains rather cagey when it comes to commenting on Singapore’s policy missteps. He has been silent on how Singapore got into a mess when the public housing policy backfired under Mah Bow Tan or when the exuberant immigration policy caused a transport nightmare for the government.

    History will salute him if he does that.

    P N Balji is a veteran Singaporean journalist who is the former chief editor of TODAY newspaper, and a media consultant. The views expressed are his own.

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • SDP Chairman, Jeffrey George, Arrested For Drug-Related Offences

    SDP Chairman, Jeffrey George, Arrested For Drug-Related Offences

    Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chairman Jeffrey George (pictured above, second left) has been arrested for drug-related offenses.

    George, an engineer, was elected as SDP chairman in October 2013. During the September general election, he acted as an election agent for secretary-general Chee Soon Juan and SDP vice-chairman John Tan.

    Chee told The Straits Times the party was shocked by the news, and requested that Goerge’s family’s privacy be respected.

    The Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) said investigations are ongoing.

    Yahoo Singapore has also reached out to the SDP for comment.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Lee Hsien Loong: Singapore Must Prepare For Economic Slowdown

    Lee Hsien Loong: Singapore Must Prepare For Economic Slowdown

    With the global economy facing cyclical headwinds, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has warned that Singapore must brace itself to handle a possible downturn.

    At a dinner organised by the labour movement on Monday, he spoke of how the United States – the world’s largest economy – was soft, while Europe was in a stagnant state and China was experiencing a slowdown of its own.

    Here in Singapore, exports are flat and port operator PSA is handling fewer containers, he said. Gross domestic product expanded just 1.4 per cent year on year in the three months ended September, slowing from 2 per cent growth in the June quarter.

    “We have to be prepared for a slowdown, and possibly a downturn,” Mr Lee told some 1,100 unionists, business leaders and overseas guests at the opening dinner of the National Trades Union Congress’ (NTUC) national delegates conference.

    Among those in attendance at the Orchid Country Club were Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say, labour chief Chan Chun Sing and visiting International Labour Organization director-general Guy Ryder.

    In a 40-minute speech, the prime minister outlined two main challenges facing the world today. He cited globalisation, which brings the benefits of a worldwide division of labour but also puts workers under pressure as they have to compete with those from other countries.

    Advances in technology, meanwhile, is also disrupting industries and displacing workers at all levels, be they blue-collar workers in the factories or professionals such as lawyers and doctors.

    These trends are putting pressure on wages and causing them to stagnate, said Mr Lee, adding that old jobs were being lost as whole industries and companies experience changes.

    “Skills become obsolete faster than before. New jobs come in but they take time, and to learn new skills takes time. For workers to change jobs and industries, fit into a new niche and become productive again, and earn the same as before but hopefully more, it’s not always so easy, especially for older workers.”

    He made the point that Singapore, a developed economy, could not afford to resist globalisation or hold back the progress of technology.

    “If we try to do that, our economy will stagnate, our workers will become uncompetitive, and Singapore will be left behind,” he warned.

    The way forward for the Republic must be to “ride the wave” and use the power of free markets to its advantage.

    Mr Lee stressed that the Singapore government had already played a major role in this effort. The state has created the basic conditions for markets to operate properly, set the rules and helped mitigate the excesses and negative effects of a market system.

    He shared how Singapore had strengthened the country’s social safety nets, rolled out a progressive wage model and will be implementing new initiatives such as MediShield Life and Silver Support soon.

    The government is also upgrading the economy to keep businesses and workers competitive, said Mr Lee. To drive this effort, a new committee on the future economy, led by Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat, will review Singapore’s economic strategies.

    “We know our direction, (which is) to improve productivity so that we can sustain higher wages for all. But we need to review specific measures – how to help our domestic sectors grow, how to attract investments and help companies develop new markets, and how to make best use of the foreign workers and talent that we need in Singapore,” he said.

    Overall, Singapore is in a better position than most other countries to tackle the tough challenges ahead. Mr Lee highlighted the Republic’s strengths such as a well-educated population, an ethos that is outward-looking, a tech-savvy society and competent unions.

    The prime minister also spent time talking about Singapore’s unique tripartism model, a “relationship of trust” among the three parties that has been built up over decades.

    “Over the last 50 years, we’ve nurtured a special model of tripartism that enabled our people to excel, our businesses to grow, and our nation to thrive. It’s been a major ingredient of our success and it comes down to having good (tripartite) leaders.”

    In a changing environment, Mr Lee said, tripartism remained the right formula to take Singapore into the next phase of its development.

    He urged each of the tripartite partners to update their approach. The government will develop new economic policies, and employers have to both ensure that companies remain viable and continue to seize new business opportunities.

    On their part, the unions have to stay relevant to a new generation of members in a new economy, and encourage workers to continually improve themselves.

    Separately, with the NTUC ready to elect a new 21-member central committee via secret ballot on Thursday, the third and final day of its national delegates conference, Mr Lee urged the unions to give a strong mandate to their new leadership to take the labour movement forward.

    Chan Chun Sing became the new NTUC secretary-general in May this year, taking over from Lim Swee Say. Among those stepping down is NTUC president Diana Chia, who is moving on after nearly four years in that position.

    About 800 union delegates and observers – who represent the 60 NTUC-affiliated unions and one association – are taking part in this week’s conference, which is held once every four years.

     

    Source: www.businesstimes.com.sg

  • Mohamed Jufrie: Failure Of Opposition To Let Voters Have Their Cake And Eat It Let To Their Dismal Showing At The Polls

    Mohamed Jufrie: Failure Of Opposition To Let Voters Have Their Cake And Eat It Let To Their Dismal Showing At The Polls

    Much has been said about the last GE, or rather its result. A combination of factors – from LKY’s passing to newly minted citizens, right down to the bookies who predicted PAP’s loss in many constituencies which alarmed many voters.One important factor which many failed to mention was the failure of the opposition to give voters what they wanted ie to have their cake and eat it.

    Singaporeans are very smart indeed. What is the use of having the cake and not getting to eat it?

    Simply speaking the voters wanted the PAP to still be the governing party and at the same time they want a strong opposition presence. The alternative parties were just not ready. When they heard minister Khaw Boon Wan’s threat that the PAP might not be able to form the government they panicked and decided to play it safe. They went for the cake even if they end up not getting to eat it.

    Had the opposition been smart enough they would have executed the By Election Effect Strategy (BEES as we described it some years ago) to let the PAP form the government on Nomination Day by contesting less than 50% of the seats. Just like we did in 1991 when the opposition won an unprecedented 4 seats – 3 SDP and Low Thia Khiang for the WP.

    Had we repeated the BEES voters would not have been threatened and would have voted for the more credible candidates without fear. The credible opposition candidates could then prove themselves worthy of the peoples’ support and gone on to prepare themselves for future elections to win more seats and by then would be on their way to ready themselves for government in subsequent elections.

    Voters now get the cake but cannot get to eat it because the PAP would not let them. Just watch.

     

    Source: Mohamed Jufrie Bin Mahmood

deneme bonusu