Category: Politik

  • Humanising Kenneth Jeyaretnam

    Humanising Kenneth Jeyaretnam

    With a strong political pedigree as the eldest son of the late opposition figurehead, JB Jeyaretnam, one would expect Kenneth Jeyaretnam to be voted into parliament by now. Why hasn’t it happen?

    From the initial excitement when Kenneth first stepped up to takeover the Reform Party to the series of missteps he had made since GE2011, people’s perception of  Kenneth changed from a rising star to some kind of joker politician.

    I wrote a humanising piece about the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP)’s Dr Chee Soon Juan and thePeople’s Action Party (PAP)’s Chan Chun Sing earlier. Here’s the third in the series. Don’t judge a person too quickly.

    Kenneth is not an engaging public speaker, but if you follow his questionings of the PAP government’s economic policies on his blog, he would make a good MP in parliament to ask all the hard stuff. After all, he is a highly educated, experienced economist with a double first class honours from Cambridge to match Lee Hsien Loong.

    In Singapore, Kenneth attended St Andrew’s School, followed by the United World College of South East Asia. He attended Charterhouse School in England from 1975-77. From 1978-80 he returned to Singapore to serve his National Service. From 1980-83, he attended Queens’ College, the University of Cambridge, where he read economics and graduated with Double First Class Honours. Kenneth is also an alumnus of the Amsterdam Institute of Finance.

    Credentials wise, he is rock solid.

    Kenneth’s entrance into Singapore politics started with the passing of the late JB Jeyaretnam in 2008. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong sent a cryptic condolence letter to his two sons, Kenneth and Philip Jeyaretnam. Thereafter, the elder son went on to shoulder his father’s unfinished work in the fight to give Singaporeans an alternative voice in parliament.

    Do you remember names like Nicole Seah, Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss, Tony Tan and Hazel Poa? Do you know all of them first entered politics by joining the Reform Party when Kenneth stepped up?

    It was the catalyst for all the political awakening that followed, leading up to the watershed GE2011.

    In fact, Kenneth was a sought-after star catch then. Both the Workers’ Party (WP) and Chiam See Tong’s Singapore People’s Party (SPP) courted Kenneth to join them in contesting GE2011. If he did, he would probably be in parliament by now.

    Yes, there were pitfalls. Maybe Kenneth is not a strong leader; many of the strong members in the Reform Party walked out to join the National Solidarity Party (NSP) and other political parties.

    The Reform Party still managed to muster enough resources to contest in 6-members Ang Mo Kio GRC and 5-members West Coast GRC in GE2011. Not bad for a new political party. The Ang Mo Kio team was a motley crue, assembled last minute, but credits to Kenneth for at least putting up a fight there versus a walkover.

    The party lost in both GRCs, polling 33.34% of valid votes in West Coast and 30.67% in Ang Mo Kio. For GE2015, the Reform Party is back to contest in the two GRCs plus Radin Mas SMC.

    Kenneth tends to take things too seriously. We all know the phrase “don’t feed the trolls”. Not Kenneth Jeyaretnam. He was baited into a silly quarrel with Singapore’s top online troll, SMRT Ltd (Feedback), getting ridiculed as “jeyababy” among other names.

    It stemmed from Kenneth making police reports over alleged threats made to his family members after he entered politics. Other opposition politicians like Chiam See Tong had such encounters too, but chose to laugh it off or kept it out of the public’s eyes.

    Kenneth is also always quick to speak for those who are the most marginalised, like Roy Ngerng and Amos Yee. It is almost political suicide for any politicians to get themselves associated with these guys. Nonetheless, we do need someone on the far-left of the political spectrum who dare speak when others keep quiet. Imagine one day if you get wrongly arrested under the ISA; you can count on someone like Kenneth to speak for you. Probaby not WP nor the PAP.

    In the eyes of many Singaporeans, these are stupid actions, but it also tells you Kenneth sticks to his values on democracy and freedom of expression, just like his late father. Even if it means losing votes.

    The dumbest thing he did was to contest the by-election in Punggol East SMC in 2013. Kenneth obtained only 1.2% of the valid votes in a rare 4-cornered fight. The victory went to Lee Li Lian of the WP. This greatly damaged the reputation of the Reform Party as a credible opposition party which can pull votes.

    Some stuff he did right – his scrutiny on the minute details of policies, particularly in the field of economics. His favourite targets include the CPF, the GIC and Temasek. Kenneth was the one who flagged the technicality involving a US$4 billion IMF loan commitment from our government, challenging it all the way to court. He is a policy hack.

    One of his biggest folly is probably to allow all sorts of people to contest under the Reform Party. Voters view candidates as a team. If your team mates keep scoring own goals and make weird faux pas, you get dragged in the mud.

    Maybe he should have went for a SMC first before gunning for a GRC. After all, his father won his first election in the single seat of Anson which has now disappeared from the electoral map.

    Kenneth Jeyaretnam may not be the most engaging of speakers, but go listen to him, read his blog and find out more about him before writing him and the Reform Party off as a political lightweight.

     

    Source: http://alvinology.com

     

  • WP’s Faisal Manap And Fairoz Shariff Put Religion First, Potential Minister-In-Charge Of Muslim Affairs

    WP’s Faisal Manap And Fairoz Shariff Put Religion First, Potential Minister-In-Charge Of Muslim Affairs

    Bro,

    I nampak photo of WP Malay candidates performing prayers before rally dah go viral. I’m actually very proud and impressed of what they do. As a Kaki Bukit resident and a Muslim, it is good for me to see that there’s people like the WP candidates who represent us.

    WP Candidates Praying Before Rally

    They show that even they are in Chinese party, they never forget their religious duties. They also very good people with very good heart.

    What I know is Cik Faisal Manap and Cik Fairoz Shariff is very strict on religion. Religion is number one, is the priority for them. Islam is guide for what they do.

    Faisal Manap

    Fairoz Shariff WP

    What I feel is Muslim MPs should put religion first, like Cik Faisal and Cik Fairoz.

    Cik Faisal I know is Wear White supporter which is pro-family and anti LGBT. As Muslim this is not even a question for us. LGBT is forbidden. I respect Cik Faisal for standing up for what he believes in. He dont care about what the party stand. He support because he is a Muslim.

    Wear White

    I support the movement because it’s my responsibility to show concern for my fellow Muslims, asking them to do some introspection on whether what they’re doing is in accordance with Islamic values. That’s the campaign’s main calling.” – Faisal Manap

    I and my family wil pray they will be successful next week. Who knows maybe they can become Muslim Minister one day inshaallah?

    Hamzah

    [Reader Contribution]

    *Editor’s Note: The original article was amended to correct a phrasing error. We apologise to Mr Hamzah.

  • 18 Assembly Centres For Candidates, Supporters, To Gather

    18 Assembly Centres For Candidates, Supporters, To Gather

    After polls close at 8pm on Sep 11, and until 30 minutes after the announcement of the last result, electoral candidates, their supporters and members of the public may gather at 18 designated assembly centres to await the announcement of the results, the police said on Monday (Sep 7).

    Permit applications for the assembly centres must be made in person by a candidate or his election agent at the Police Elections Permit Office (PEPO) between 8.30am and 2.30pm on Sep 9 to 10. No fees will be levied by police for the permit. Application forms for the permit can be obtained from the PEPO office and may also be downloaded from the police website at www.spf.gov.sg/elections.

    Police have grouped the electoral divisions into three zones. The assembly centre sites available in each zone are:

    Contesting parties and independent candidates can only apply for one assembly centre site in each zone that it is contesting in. Where there is more than one applicant for a particular assembly centre site, a ballot will be conducted, police said.

    Contesting parties and independent candidates can also apply for a permit to use an indoor site as an assembly centre. The indoor site has to be within the zone that they are contesting in.

    The list of assembly centres allocated to contesting parties and independent candidates will be announced on Sep 10, after the close of permit applications.

    The Police Elections Permits Office (PEPO) will conduct a briefing on the application procedures for Assembly Centres on Tuesday (Sep 8) at 9am, at Police Cantonment Complex (2nd Level), 391 New Bridge Road, Singapore 088762. Candidates or their Election Agents are invited to attend the briefing, police said.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • PPP’s Goh Meng Seng Says Lee Kuan Yew’s Death Part Of Reason For Forming Party

    PPP’s Goh Meng Seng Says Lee Kuan Yew’s Death Part Of Reason For Forming Party

    The People’s Power Party (PPP) is a newcomer for the General Election, but the man behind its inception is no stranger to politics in Singapore.

    Founder and secretary-general Goh Meng Seng has 15 years of political experience and contested in the last two general elections under two different parties.

    On Sept 11, Mr Goh will lead a PPP team to contest Choa Chu Kang GRC. His rival will be Health Minister Gan Kim Yong’s People’s Action Party (PAP) team.

    Yesterday, Mr Goh, 45, the managing director of a group of market research and linguistics companies, told The New Paper in a phone interview that he does not see the switching of parties as a weakness.

    “I’ve learnt a lot during my time in Workers’ Party (WP), which I joined in 2001, and helped contribute in the rebranding for the 2006 GE,” he said.

    Mr Goh was a member of the WP’s Central Executive Council and the party’s “A” Team, which stood and lost in Aljunied GRC in 2006, with 43.9 per cent of votes.

    Saying “my job was done”, he left the party later that year and joined the National Solidarity Party (NSP) in 2007. He said he used his knowledge to build NSP up for the 2011 GE.

    “We helped increase the profile of NSP after four years. But I felt that we needed more opposition to give rise to more political discourse,” he said.

    In July this year, the PPP was officially registered, with Mr Goh as its secretary-general.

    Mr Goh said the death of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew this year was another reason behind the setting up of the new party.

    “The current system, where there is a strong concentration of power, is only viable when you have a strong philosopher behind it.

    “Now that Mr Lee is gone, there’s no one else who has such a strong political morality who can control everyone. Things can go wrong.

    “The only way to provide sustainability is when power is separated into different parties that can act as checks and balances,” he said.


    PROFILE

    WHO:
    Goh Meng Seng

    WHAT:
    Managing director of a group of market research and linguistics companies

    FAMILY:
    Married with a daughter

    POLITICAL CAREER SO FAR:
    2001: Joined Workers’ Party (WP)
    May 2006: Contested Aljunied GRC with WP
    November 2006: Quit WP
    March 2007: Joined National Solidarity Party (NSP)
    May 2011: Contested Tampines GRC with NSP
    November 2011: Quit NSP
    July 2015: Registered People’s Power Party (PPP)

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Chee Soon Juan – Behind The Man

    Chee Soon Juan – Behind The Man

    We wonder why Dr Chee is so desperate for Singaporeans to forget his past. What does the man have to hide? This is the strange journey of Chee Soon Juan’s rise to the top of SDP.

    March 1993
    “Varsity sacks SDP’s Dr Chee from his teaching position”
    Straits Times 31 March 1993
    Fired by NUS for misappropriation of funds and misconduct
    “The university accused Chee of using Singapore $226 (US$137) from its research grant to send his wife’s academic papers by courier service to a U.S. university.”
    –  Reuters News, 31 March 1993Maintained no wrong-doing and was fully justified in the use of funds
    “He maintained yesterday that he had done no wrong. “I do not accept and will counter whatever reason the university may have for my termination,” he said.
    –  Business Times, 31 March 1993 
    April 1993
    “SDP voices support for sacked lecturer Dr Chee”
    Straits Times, 2 April 1993 “Chee Soon Juan to go on hunger strike to protest sacking”
    Straits Times, 2 April 1993

    “Sacked Singapore lecturer sued for defamation.”
    – Reuters News, 24 April 1993

    SDP party Secretary-General Chiam See Tong signed off on a statement defending Chee“Calling for Dr Chee’s reinstatement, the SDP said it had complete confidence in his integrity and rejected allegations that his conduct was less than honest or that there was any deception on his part.”
    South China Morning Post, 3 April 1993

     Chee caught taping conversation and denying it
    “The NUS Head of Department of Social Work and Psychology disclosed that during a meeting on Dec 7 last year, the sacked neuropsychology lecturer secretly recorded their conversation.

    And he had lied when he denied doing so after Dr Vasoo noticed the tape-recorder and confronted him about it.”
    Straits Times, 3 April 1993

     Chee admits to taping conversation

    “When contacted last night, Dr Chee admitted that he had tried taping the Dec 7 conversation. He did it to protect himself against possible future action to throw him out of his job, he said.”
    Straits Times, 3 April 1993

    Staged a hunger strike to protest situation

    “Chee Soon Juan last night said he was going on a hunger strike from 6am today to protest against his dismissal from the National University of Singapore.”
     – Straits Times, 5 April 1993

     Call by public for Chee to take legal action against NUS

    “There is a big question mark over why Dr Chee refuses to challenge the university’s action in court. Does he not have faith in the system in which he wants to be a player?”
    Straits Times, 7 April 1993

    “If he feels so strongly that he was wrongfully dismissed, why can’t he take legal action against his employer? He should show the public some facts.”
    Straits Times, 8 April 1993

    Chee will not take legal action against NUS

    “”I will not go to the courts and that is as far as I can say.”
    Straits Times, 5 April 1993

     Chiam See Tong called for Chee to stop hunger strike
    “SDP secretary general Chiam See Tong said on Monday night that the party fully supported Chee in what had been a personal decision, but believed his point had been made.”
    Reuters News, 6 April 1993

     Chee drinks glucose water while on hunger strike
    “He had said he would take only plain water when he began his protest on Monday. He began taking water with glucose yesterday, but denied emphatically that it meant that he was taking a source of food with his drinks.”
    Straits Times, 7 April 1993

     Chee faces defamation lawsuits

    “Chee Soon Juan, 30, assistant secretary general of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), said he had received a letter from lawyers for S Vasoo, his former department head at the National University of Singapore (NUS), claiming defamation and seeking a public apology and damages.”
    Reuters News, 24 April 1993

    May 1993
    Chiam to represent Chee in suit“LAWYER and Singapore Democratic Party leader Chiam See Tong will represent his party colleague, Dr Chee Soon Juan, in a defamation suit.”
    Straits Times, 2 May 1993
    June 1993
    “Chiam quit after CEC vetoed censure move”
    – Straits Times, 19 June 1993
    Chee took over Chiam to become Secretary-General of SDP“The statement came a day after Mr Chiam had revealed that the CEC had blocked him on many issues and that the differences had remained unresolved for some time now.

    He resigned as the party’s leader during a CEC meeting on May 17, when he was out-voted on a motion by him to censure Dr Chee for going on a hunger strike.”
    Straits Times, 28 June 1993

     Chiam seeks to be discharged from being Chee’s lawyer

    MR CHIAM See Tong no longer wants to represent fellow party member Dr Chee Soon Juan in the two defamation suits filed against the sacked university lecturer.”
    Straits Times, 30 June 1993

    July 1993
    “Chiam criticises Dr Chee for use of research funds for wife’s thesis”– Straits Times, 17 July 1993
    Chiam criticises Chee“MR CHIAM See Tong has accused Dr Chee Soon Juan of usurping his post in the party and challenged him to resign if he really had not sought to lead it.”
    Straits Times, 3 July 1993

     Chiam cricitises Chee for decisions on research funds and hunger strike

    “MR CHIAM See Tong, in a reversal of his earlier position, yesterday criticised his former party deputy, Dr Chee Soon Juan, for using his university research funds to send his wife’s PhD thesis to an American university.

    He said that if he were Dr Chee, he would have checked with the university first before using the money.”
    Straits Times, 17 July 1993

    “Mr Chiam slammed the hunger strike as something that should not have been carried out, as hunger strikes had little place in modern Singapore. Many members of the public had approached him to criticise Dr Chee’s move as “stupid” and “childish”, he added.”
    Straits Times, 17 July 1993

     Chee no longer assistant to Chiam
    “DR CHEE Soon Juan is no longer serving Mr Chiam See Tong as his parliamentary legislative assistant (LA).

    A Parliament spokesman yesterday confirmed that this took effect on July 1.

    It is not known whether the Potong Pasir MP, Mr Chiam, terminated Dr Chee’s services or whether Dr Chee tendered his resignation.” – Straits Times, 23 July 1993

    August 1993
    “SDP wants Chiam stripped of ‘unofficial leader’ title” – Straits Times, 3 August 1993
    Chee leads SDP to take disciplinary action against Chiam
    “THE Singapore Democratic Party’s collective leadership has asked Parliament to consider stripping its former chief Chiam See Tong of the title “unofficial leader of the opposition”.”
    Straits Times, 3 August 1993“The CEC is also planning to take disciplinary action against Mr Chiam, acting secretary-general Chee Soon Juan confirmed yesterday.”
    Straits Times, 3 August 1993

     

    SDP holds disciplinary inquiry
    “Following the disciplinary action, the CEC can either decide to demote, suspend or sack Mr Chiam.

    Under the party’s constitution, if Mr Chiam is sacked from the party, he loses his parliamentary seat of Potong Pasir.”
    Straits Times, 7 August 1993

     

    SDP sacks Chiam
    “Singapore’s longest-serving opposition member of parliament, Chiam See Tong, has been expelled from the party he founded for breaching discipline and refusing to accept collective leadership, party officials said on Saturday.

    Officials of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) said its Central Executive Council (CEC) had expelled Chiam, the party’s former secretary-general, on Friday.”
    Reuters News, 21 August 1993

     

    Chiam does not accept sacking decision
    “”The CEC has no legal authority to sack me from the party while the authority of the leadership is being questioned by the cadres,” said Mr Chiam, who resigned as party chief in May after a squabble with CEC members, and has since criticised the leaders in public.”
    Business Times, 21 August 1993

     

    Chiam wins court order to keep seat in parliament for now
    “CHIAM SEE TONG yesterday successfully obtained a court order against the Singapore Democratic Party’s central executive committee (CEC), in effect freezing the party sacking he received last Friday and thereby keeping his seat in Parliament.”
    Business Times, 26 August 1993

     

    27 cadre members elect Chiam as head of new ‘CEC’

    “TWENTY-SEVEN cadre members of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) members voted last night at a special meeting to dissolve the party’s “collective leadership” and to elect a new CEC with Mr Chiam See Tong as its chairman.

    In a dramatic turn of events, they also passed a unanimous resolution to “retract” Mr Chiam’s expulsion from the party.”
    Straits Times, 29 August 1993

    September 1993
    “COURT ORDER AGAINST CHIAM.”
    – Business Times, 1 September 1993
    “Chiam’s SDP suit to be heard in November”
    – Straits Times, 9 September 1993
    Chee leads court order against ChiamSINGAPORE Democratic Party Acting Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan said yesterday the party had obtained a temporary court order restraining Chiam See Tong, Sin Kek Tong and nine other persons from “pretending” to be the SDP chairman, secretary-general and central executive committee members.”
    Business Times, 1 September 1993

    Chiam challenges explusion from SDP
    “THE High Court has set aside five days, from Nov 15, to hear Mr Chiam See Tong’s legal suit challenging his expulsion from the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).”
    Straits Times, 9 September 1993

    December 1993
    “Singapore opposition MP’s expulsion illegal – court.”
    – Reuters News, 10 December 1993
    Chiam keeps parlimentary seat
    “SINGAPORE, Dec 10 (Reuters) – The High Court ruled on Friday that the                 expulsion of Singapore’s longest-serving opposition member of parliament, Chiam See Tong, from his own party in August was illegal and invalid.The ruling allows Chiam to keep his parliamentary seat.”
    – Reuters News, 10 December 1993
    January 1994
    “SDP told by landlord to quit premises”Straits Times 20 January 1994
    Despite rental arrears, Chee Soon Juan claims eviction is a political matter“Asked if he knew of the rental arrears, Dr Chee said no, but added: “In the confusion of what has been happening in the party lately, the administration has been a bit confused.”

    He also said that the move to evict the party did not come as a surprise to him as the landlord had previously expressed reservations about renting the premises to an opposition party.
    –  Straits Times, 20 January 1994

    February 1994
    “SDP politicising eviction issue, says landlord”
    –  Straits Times, 3 February 1994 “Chee abandons his defence in defamation suit”
    –  Straits Times, 18 February 1994

    SDP told to pay Chiam $33,948, or 1/3 of costs”
    –  Straits Times, 23 February 1994

    Landlord claims Chee is policising eviction issue“I do not agree with and dislike the SDP for ‘politicising’ the whole matter when the simple truth of the matter is that they had failed to pay rent for two months. I feel that SDP is using the matter and me to elicit whatever little political sympathy…”
    –  Straits Times, 3 February 1994

    Chee drops defence in defamation suit

    “OPPOSITION politician Chee Soon Juan has abandoned his defence in a                 defamation suit brought against him by his former boss and an MP for                 Tanjong Pagar GRC, Dr S. Vasoo.

    His decision to do so is, in effect, an admission that he has defamed Dr Vasoo.”
    –  Straits Times, 18 February 1994

    SDP to pay costs to Chiam
    “THE High Court yesterday fixed the costs in Mr Chiam See Tong’s recent   successful suit against the Singapore Democratic Party at $101,845,                 including disbursements.”
    –  Straits Times, 23 February 1994

    April 1994
    “Singapore opposition politician fined for libel.”– Reuters News, 15 April 1994
    Chee to pay fines for defamation “THE High Court yesterday awarded Dr S. Vasoo $210,000 in damages in                 his defamation suit against Dr Chee Soon Juan over remarks made by the latter after Parliament had debated his sacking by the National University of Singapore last year.”
    – Straits Times, 16 April 1994

     

    Do you trust him enough to empower him to be your voice in parliament?

     

    Source: https://thoughtsofrealsingaporeans.wordpress.com

     

deneme bonusu