Category: Politik

  • Ten Uncomfortable Statements Made By Lee Hsien Loong At National Day Rally

    Ten Uncomfortable Statements Made By Lee Hsien Loong At National Day Rally

    Ten uncomfortable statements made by our Prime Minister at last night National Day rally:-

    1. Earn less than $1000 can buy HDB flat – to compound the misery of low wage Singaporean workers, our PM states that if you earn $1000 and below you can now buy  2-room HDB flat. The previous low was $1000 and they may throw in the paint for you as well.

    This kind of wild baseless electioneering is the stab to the morale of many of our low wage workers who sometimes could not even buy food for themselves let alone purchase a brand new HDB flat with a salary of $1000 and below.

    We need a comprehensive minimum wage system so our poor can live in dignity while working hard.

    2. Protection for Singaporean workers – PM talks alot about protecting the Singaporean core but on the ground we saw companies replacing us like changing cheap underwear with foreign labour.

    Young people who recently graduate continue to face difficulties at the job front and matured PMETs turn to cab driving in order to survive.

    This kind of senseless rhetoria may probably hurt him and his party at the polls badly.

    3. Recognition of a EM 3 student making it through SUT – though PM tries to deliver due recognition to a EM 3 student working his way up through SUT, there is still much to be done to deter fake degree fraudsters from entering our shore as foreign talents.

    Singaporeans are shocked that degrees from dubious third world universities from our foreign talents for the past decades are not properly verified and their skills autheticated.

    This is more worrying for positions like doctors, civil engineers, nurses and accountants.

    Can we trust our foreign-trained doctors now with their diagnosis and worse operating skills?

    Its also a slap to the faces of our professionals who work their way up to acquire degrees from our first world universities only to be beaten at the door by a fake certificate when they go for job interview.

    4. Pioneer generation package – the government will spend $9 billion on the pioneer generation package but much of it is done through the medical subsidy at clinics and the hospital using a CHAS card.

    There is nothing much to celebrate about as so far no cash has pass through to our seniors of whom many still need to toil under the sun to haul cardboards for a living.

    At best, its a propaganda scheme meant to entrap 150,000 senior citizens for their valuable votes.

    5. Paternity leave and baby bonus enhanced – paternity leave for fathers will be enhanced from one to two weeks and baby bonus will be given to all married mothers with no limit on the number of baby born. There is still zero benefit for babies born out of wedlock.

    Its unsure how many dads could claim this benefit even though the government will pay for the extra one week of paternity leave as many are feeling insecure about their jobs in a very lopsided job market.

    What if their employers are unhappy that the caring father takes two weeks off to care for his new-born baby and decide to find a replacement for him?

    Civil servants will in all likelihood be able to claim this fringe benefit so fathers can do more at home during a very difficult period at home but those sloughing in the private job environment are unlikely to encash their entitlement for fear they may lose their jobs.

    PM has all along warn us about taking care of our lunch as many on the outside are looking to eat it if we are not careful.

    6. Income ceilings for buyers of new Build-to-Order flats will be raised from S$10,000 to S$12,000 – this is good news for newly-wed who have a high combined income and still qualify for our subsidized BTO flats.

    It will benefit those who belong to the middle income earners and want to be conservative in their first home purchase.

    Many new citizens who work their way up here must be happy that such a ruling is in effect now as they can claim their citizenship benefit with a higher income ceiling for BTO flats.

    7. Re-employment age raised to 67 – another useless scheme as many of our matured PMETs could not get ready employment once they cross the 50-year-old mark.

    Many professionals turn to cab driving when they could not find any viable employment in order to survive. We probably have the most educated cabby force in the world next to US and Australia.

    This re-employment age enhancement probably benefits those at the civil service which harbours a more balanced work-place environment.

    It seems that the civil service will implement most of the PM’s suggestions but during his speech he cautions against burdening employers at the private sector which hires almost 70% of our workforce.

    Why the double standards?

    8. Racial and religious segregation – PM spent quite alot of time trying to instill fear into the population by highlighting the racial tensions since independence and the recent racial outbreak in KL.

    By doing that, he is not doing much to integrate the society into one united country as race and religion divides us if we keep on emphasizing its differences and dangers.

    We indeed have come a long way from a fragmented small country to one that imports foreigners by the million to enhance our economy.

    Right now, we probably have harbour 200,000 PRC Chinese, 250,000 Filipinos, 200,000 Indians, 300,000 Malaysians, 50,000 Indonesians and 50,000 Vietnamese among others.

    Its a sizeable foreign legion which is capable of upsetting any racial harmony we have all along try to protect.

    The Chinese bus strike and Little India riot were two classic examples of a foreign-dominated economy that went very wrong if we don’t try to help these people integrate with our way of life.

    9. Emphasis on infrastructure and economic developments – many Singaporeans by now are used to such rhetoria in every PM national day rally speeches.

    One can simply download last year’s speech and there is not much difference in both contents and substance.

    We all know about the world’s best airport, busy highway and highest-GDP – its already being ingrained in us for the past few decades.

    We hope to hear more visionary speeches like those from his father – bringing the nation together despite the wide wage gap between the have’s and the have-not.

    We want to hear how he could empathsize with those who have lost their jobs to a incoming foreigner because of his economy-driven open-door policy – that he knew their pain their sufferings and their sacrifices so we can have a better Singapore.

    We want to hear more of his software than the hardware stuff which frankly doesn’t benefit the downtrodden who struggle from hand to mouth every month due to the lack of a minimum wage system.

    Moreover, we don’t need a leader who always give us empty promises but seldom deliver when the time arrives.

    10. “No corruption, no dishonesty!” such words echoed through my mind throughout the night after hearing the PM’s speech.

    I was troubled as its like a statement made without much substantiation when the facts spoke otherwise.

    I also asked myself: “What will his father do in such a situation?”

    Years of cushioned rule by the PM has rendered our civil service of it’s efficiency and pride.

    Many serve the country because they do it for their rice bowl rather than serving the people whole-heartedly.

    The lack of a proper system of accountability also gives way for some to manipulate the public funds for personal use.

    The AGO audit flagged out alot of our ministerial financial lapses and they were subsequently covered up later on without much transparency and openness.

    The ruling party hopes Singaporeans will forget about the matter before going to the polls – suspected to be next month.

    With the help of social media, such serious lapses will be played up over and over again so Singaporeans will know what kind of government they are putting up with for the next five years!

    Written by: Gilbert Goh

     

    Source: www.transitioning.org

  • Oh Generals, Generals Wherefore Art Thou?

    Oh Generals, Generals Wherefore Art Thou?

    Dear Singaporeans,

    When was the last time a SAF general turned PAP politicians fought in a Single Member Constituency? Has this happened before?

    I think not. From George Yeo, to Teo Chee Hean, to Lui Tuck Yew and the more recent entrants of Chan Chun Sing and Tan Chuan Jin, our SAF warriors have been parachuted straight into GRC and swiftly swept into parliament.

    Ng Chee Meng, the latest military man to trade in his soldier uniform for the white-on-white is no exception. Ng will be contesting in Pasir Ris-Punggol GRC under the tutelage of DPM Teo Chee Hean; and like his other soldiers turned politican colleagues, he will, in time to come, lead a GRC.

    But how can we say a politician is competent if he has not won his own battles? In fact, how is a general victorious if he has never fought his own battle?

    Let’s not be mistaken, I am not against the PAP promoting their own to political stardom and some generals are actually effective and inspiring leaders. But to truly earn the respects of citizens, maybe they should start fighting their own wars and not hide behind someone’s back.

    Freddy Tan

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • SPP: National Growth Should Not Be At Expense Of Singaporeans

    SPP: National Growth Should Not Be At Expense Of Singaporeans

    National growth should not be done at the expense of jobs for Singaporeans and ailing infrastructure, said Singapore People’s Party chairman and Non-Constituency Member of Parliament Lina Chiam, who has issued a response to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s National Day Rally last evening.

    Citing issues with low birth rates, public transport woes, population growth and Singapore’s place in international economics, Mrs Chiam, who will be re-contesting in Potong Pasir SMC for GE2015, indicated that the government needs to first take care of the interest of citizens.

    “While we must ensure a sustainable immigration policy, we continue to ensure our low birth rate does not erode our base of work force,” she said. “As an opposition NCMP, I am fully aware that Singaporeans want better jobs. I also want to put Singaporeans first in policies. We do want to sustain a favorable business environment. But we must also try to improve the skill sets of Singaporeans, and improve the productivity of our local workforce.”

    She agreed with the PM about having sight on global challenges, particularly in a weakening region where Singapore has a stronger role to play, and she is not focused on local issues like transport to the exclusion of these issues, but hopes instead to “work with the next group of leaders, PAP or otherwise, to tackle long term issues”.

    Mrs Chiam is also confident that SPP has the talent within the party to contribute to policy-making and challenge the ruling People’s Action Party on core national issues.

    SPP has thus far announced Jeannette Chong-Aruldoss and Ravi Philemon as candidates for the coming General Election. Both Chong and Philemon have been instrumental in handling policy proposals during their time at the National Solidarity Party.

    Mrs Chiam’s response to PM Lee’s National Day Rally speech is appended in full below.


    SPPResponse to National Day Rally speech 2015

    There were many issues raised by the Prime Minister in his national day rally speech. He was also campaigning for his party in his speech, dishing out more goodies to Singaporeans. In a way, it seems to be an election speech.

    By far, the most important topic was the tradeoff between economic growth and our need for foreign workers. This seems to be a permanent feature in every rally. While we must ensure a sustainable immigration policy, we continue to ensure our low birth rate does not erode our base of work force. As an opposition NCMP, I am fully aware that Singaporeans want better jobs. I also want to put Singaporeans first in policies. We do want to sustain a favorable business environment. But we must also try to improve the skill sets of Singaporeans, and improve the productivity of our local workforce. Singaporean employees want less foreign competition, but Singaporean firms have been asking for relaxation of foreign worker quota. As a politician, my aim is to balance two sides of the equation, for the benefit of both sides.

    There are two ways to combat the economic challenges of low birth rate. We either maintain a more open immigration policy or we increase the working life of our work force. In the latter, I support the PM’s call to increase working life to 67. I also think we need a better balance between the two methods.

    Our population policy and low birth rate will continue to be an issue for Singapore. In a bid to increase our economic competitiveness, the government increased the population planning parameters. Downstream, our transport capacity was stretched. The role of the Transport Minister is now critical for Singapore. I suggest the PM or the DPM themselves assume the role of Transport Minister, to take charge of this vital portfolio.

    I also agree with the PM that we need to look beyond Singapore. We have destabilizing forces around the region. Malaysia is weakening as a nation. For Singapore to grow, we need our region to be strong as well. After all, they act as our hinterland and are strong trading partners to Singapore. A country like Indonesia can afford to close their doors because of their size. Further north, China is competing with Singapore for our core financial businesses. Yes, I get it that MRT breakdowns are frustrating. But I hope we can work with the next group of leaders, PAP or otherwise, to tackle long term issues.

    At the SPP, we focus on building a strong pipeline of talent. Unlike other parties, it is not our interest to push these talented individuals put prematurely. We want to contribute to policy and we think we have the talent to compete with the PAP on core issues.

    Mrs Lina Chiam, NCMP
    Chairman, Singapore People’s Party

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Dear NSP Ignore The People’s Voices And See It Backfire In Your Face

    Dear NSP Ignore The People’s Voices And See It Backfire In Your Face

    With all respect Steve Chia and NSP CEC, you and your CEC have taken the narrow and disregarded the wide.

    The narrow refers to your interests in your own party … and to an extent, your followers. The wide refers to the current political situation that Singapore and Singaporeans find themselves in today.

    While every political party is looking toward correcting the wider imbalance of one party dominance, and seeking ways to correct that by weighted and considered compromises … your party is taking the opposite path to protect the narrow.

    All I can say is that this will most likely backfire and set your party back to a stage where it might not be recoverable.

    Please reconsider and tell us that you do feel the pulse of Singaporeans at large, and not only those of your supporters.

     

    You do realise that in the news reported this morning, your party comes across as having the same mentality as that of the PAP.

    You are only interested in serving your party supporters and has no qualm to disregard the voices of others who may not have yet supported you.

    You still have time to correct your stance and to win back the confidence of Singaporeans and not just that of your supporters.

    You do see that the 43% of voters who voted for the NSP in GE 2011 were Opposition supporters more than they were NSP supporters.

    When push comes to shove, the party with the better parliamentary experience and trustworthiness will be preferred to take the PAP to task.

    The 3 cornered fight will do NSP no good because the outcome is foreseeable …. you may not get half of your previous 43%. Why damage the good repute because of this?

    Please reconsider for the larger cause and larger good of Singapore.

    Thank you.

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Jeanette Chong-Aruldoss: Give Me A Fair Chance To Win Your Votes

    Jeanette Chong-Aruldoss: Give Me A Fair Chance To Win Your Votes

    ENCOUNTER WITH A GRASSROOT LEADER

    (Yesterday morning, 22 Aug at Blk 17 Old Airport Road Food Centre)

    Smiling broadly and holding up my J4M flyer, I approached a man aged about 40 sitting alone.

    He glared at me and motioned that he did not wish me to approach him.

    Thinking he might not be local, I asked in English “Are you a Singaporean?”

    Staring at me for a couple of seconds (to the point that I thought he might indeed be a non-Singaporean), he then answered in a stern tone, “Yes, I am a Singaporean and I have already decided who to vote for.”

    Astounded, I said “But how can you have decided when elections have not even began yet?”

    Him (with hostility): “I am a grassroot leader.”

    Me (thinking that grassroot leaders are community-minded): “Oh may I know your name?”

    Him: “No.”

    Me (realising that my thinking could be wrong): “Why would being a grassroot leader mean that you already decided who to vote? Does it mean that all grassroot leaders are …..”

    Him (sensing where I was going, cut me off in mid sentence): “I know who you are. You are a lawyer and so am I. You are engaging me the wrong way. I am here to have my breakfast. You are engaging me the wrong way.” He clearly wanted me to go away, so I went away.

    I am really puzzled by the man’s response. Many Singaporeans join the grassroots to serve the community, and not to serve politicians or the political ambitions of the ruling party. This grassroot leader had made up his mind who to give his vote to. He was not interested to meet me or to even hear me out. He made it very clear to me that I have zero chance to win his support.

    Well, can’t say I didn’t try. If you’re reading this, I want you to know, no hard feelings. To everyone else who is reading this, I’m going to keep trying to work for your support, regardless of affiliation.

    All I ask is for you to judge me on my merits and give me a fair chance to win your support.

     

    Source: Jeanette For Mounbatten

deneme bonusu