Category: Politik

  • US Appoints Gay Diplomat Randy Berry As Special Envoy For Rights Of LGBT People In Foreign Countries

    US Appoints Gay Diplomat Randy Berry As Special Envoy For Rights Of LGBT People In Foreign Countries

    The U.S. Department of State has announced that career diplomat Randy Berry will serve as the first special envoy for the rights of LGBT people in foreign countries, calling him a “voice of clarity and conviction on human rights.”

    Berry, who is openly gay, has served as the consul general at the U.S. Embassy in the Netherlands since 2012 and before that was posted to Nepal, New Zealand, Bangladesh, Egypt and Uganda since joining the State Department in 1993.

    “Defending and promoting the human rights of LGBT persons is at the core of our commitment to advancing human rights globally — the heart and conscience of our diplomacy,” Secretary of State John Kerry said in a news release.

    In the new role, Berry will strive to protect gay, lesbian, bisexual and transgender people from violence and abuse and will try to work with foreign governments to overturn laws in more than 75 countries that criminalize same-sex relationships.

    “Too often, in too many countries, LGBT persons are threatened, jailed and prosecuted because of who they are or who they love. Too many governments have proposed or enacted laws that aim to curb freedom of expression, association, religion and peaceful protest,” Kerry said.

    Gay rights groups praised the announcement, citing the need to stop discrimination and abuse of LGBT people globally. “At a moment when many LGBT people around the world are facing persecution and daily violence, this unprecedented appointment shows a historic commitment to the principle that LGBT rights are human rights,”Chad Griffin, president of the Washington-based LGBT rights group Human Rights Campaign, said in a news release. “This new appointment sends a message that the United States will remain on the forefront of protecting the human rights of LGBT people around the world.”

    According to Human Rights Campaign, same-sex conduct is punishable by death in 10 countries, including Iran and Saudi Arabia, and is criminalized in 76 countries.

    In 2014 there were at least 200 documented murders of transgender people in 28 countries, according to the TVT Project, an international transgender rights and research group that has been tracking homicides in the transgender community.

    Berry’s appointment is part of an Obama administration push to promote LGBT rights internationally and make them a foreign policy priority. The State Department in 2011 launched the Global Equality Fund, which supports LGBT human rights through partnerships with foreign governments and the private sector.

    With Reuters

     

    Source: http://america.aljazeera.com

  • Elections Department: Registers Of Electors Revised, Open For Public Inspection

    Elections Department: Registers Of Electors Revised, Open For Public Inspection

    The registers of electors have been revised and will be open for public inspection from Feb 24, 2015 to Mar 9, 2015, the Elections Department said in a press release on Monday (Feb 23).

    The revised registers contain the names of all qualified electors and may be checked through four channels:

    • Online at the Elections Department website
    • At community centres or clubs
    • At Singapore overseas missions that serve as overseas registration centres
    • At the Elections Department, located at 11 Prinsep Link, Singapore 187949

    The latter three methods will require the individual’s NRIC or passport.

    INCLUSION AND REMOVAL OF NAMES FROM REGISTERS

    During the inspection period, a person may submit a claim or objection to include or remove his name from the revised registers of electors.

    A claim to update one’s particulars can also be submitted during this period.

    These changes can be made via the four methods stated above. Claims and objections submitted online must be done via SingPass.

    RESTORATION OF NAMES AND REGISTRATION AS OVERSEAS ELECTOR

    Singaporeans whose names were removed from the registers of electors for failing to vote at a previous election may apply to restore their names to the registers.

    Overseas Singaporeans, whose names are listed in the registers and who have resided in Singapore for at least 30 days between Feb 1, 2012 and Jan 31, 2015 may register as overseas electors.

    Following the revision of the registers, overseas Singaporeans who have been registered earlier as overseas electors will also have to re-register to vote at any one of the designated overseas polling stations.

    The registrations can be done through the abovementioned channels. Applications will close with the issuance of the Writ of Election.

    OVERSEAS POLLING STATION IN DUBAI

    The Consulate-General of the Republic of Singapore in the United Arab Emirates (Dubai) has been designated as an overseas polling station for future elections. This is in addition to the nine overseas polling stations at Singapore’s overseas missions in New York, Washington DC, San Francisco, London, Shanghai, Beijing, Hong Kong, Tokyo and Canberra.

    The Elections Department said the overseas polling station in Dubai will facilitate overseas voting and registration for overseas Singaporeans in the Middle East region.

    More information about the addresses of registration centres can be found at www.eld.gov.sg.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Temasek’s Expected Earnings To Be Added To Government Revenue

    Temasek’s Expected Earnings To Be Added To Government Revenue

    With spending expected to be racked up on several fronts, including in healthcare and public transport, Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam said the Government must take steps now to strengthen future revenue, with one of the first moves being to include the projected earnings of Temasek Holdings in the Net Investment Returns (NIR) framework.

    The inclusion of Temasek’s total expected returns — including realised and unrealised capital gains, and not only actual dividends paid to the Government — in its spending budget will “bolster our fiscal resources at a time when we have to fund long-term critical infrastructure and develop the human talent and capabilities to secure our future”, said Mr Tharman.

    While the Government will seek to control costs, spending will “inevitably rise”.

    “We project overall spending to reach about 19 per cent to 19.5 per cent of gross domestic product on average over the next five years. This is about 1 per cent of GDP higher than the revenues we have today,” added Mr Tharman. “It is, therefore, necessary that we take steps now to strengthen future revenues, to put Singapore on a firm fiscal footing for the rest of this decade.”

    Economists say the change will give a significant boost to government coffers — to the tune of at least S$3 billion per year — although at least one said it might lead to Temasek altering its investment approach to a more conservative one.

    Before this change, the Government was allowed to spend up to half of the expected long-term real returns on net assets managed by the investment entities of the Monetary Authority of Singapore (MAS) and GIC.

    The inclusion of Temasek’s expected returns in the NIR framework was deferred in 2008 because there were no established methodologies for projecting the sum, given its investment approach of taking concentrated stakes and making direct investments. Temasek’s investment strategy was also still evolving then — it began to invest in more geographies and sectors since 2002, said Mr Tharman.

    But he said yesterday that the Government is now ready to do so, despite the volatility of Temasek’s equity-only portfolio. He added that it has developed an approach to project its expected long-term returns.

    The change to the NIR framework, in addition to the raising of personal income taxes he also announced yesterday, will yield additional revenue equal to about 1 per cent of GDP annually for the Budget over the next five years, said Mr Tharman. Of that, changes to personal income tax rates are expected to raise S$400 million a year.

    He added that the higher government spending over the coming years is in three main areas: Expanding healthcare infrastructure and subsidies for MediShield Life premiums; improving public transport (another S$26 billion has been committed over the next five years); and the development of Changi Airport Terminal 5.

    On top of these expenditures, there will be other essential spending, such as on enhanced domestic security and the rejuvenation of neighbourhoods, said Mr Tharman.

    Commenting on the move, Barclays economist Leong Wai Ho estimated that the inclusion of Temasek’s expected returns would yield at least S$3 billion, in addition to the roughly S$8 billion of investment income the Government is currently netting from the MAS and GIC per year.

    DBS economist Irvin Seah said the change will increase the Government’s fiscal sustainability, “especially when social spending is set to rise as the population ages”. But he felt the long-term projection of Temasek’s earnings will not be easy, given the entity’s portfolio, which could encourage it to take a more conservative investment approach in return for greater stability.

    Mr Leong noted that Temasek’s average returns over the past five years have been 11 per cent, falling to 9 per cent over the past 10 years and 6 per cent over the past 20. Its portfolio value, he observed, has risen to S$223 billion as of March last year, compared with S$133 billion 10 years ago.

    “It is probably not as volatile as people think, because of its diversified basket of investments, both geographically and sectorally,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Singapore Budget 2015: 7 Reasons Why Robin Hood Budget Matters

    Singapore Budget 2015: 7 Reasons Why Robin Hood Budget Matters

    I tried frantically to keep up with noting down the giveaways as Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam reeled them off as he announced the Budget 2015.

    A new SkillsFuture Credit account for all Singaporean workers aged 25 and above. Top ups to the accounts of children, secondary school students and post-secondary school students. Higher GST vouchers across the board, with a special bonus for seniors.

    There were too many to list. I gave up and just listened.

    And minutes after Mr Tharman finished the Budget 2015 statement, the first SMS came, from a former colleague.

    A Robin Hood Budget, she said.

    Here are seven noteworthy things about this year’s Budget.

    1. Robin Hood qualities

    It takes from the very rich to give to those who are poorer. Without little fanfare but every determination, the Government raised the top marginal tax rate for personal income taxes from 20 to 22 per cent. It will raise $400 million in extra revenue when it kicks in the Year of Assesssment 2017.

    It gives a lot to the poor, especially seniors from lower-income jobs in the past, under a new Silver Support bonus that aims to give up to about $750 a quarter a person to the elderly.

    2. The 1 per cent gap

    Mr Tharman flagged this gap. No, I’m not talking about the much-touted gap between the top 1 per cent earners and the rest, which has gotten so much flak worldwide for fostering inequality.

    I’m talking about the 1 percentage point projected gap between long-term revenues and long-term spending. The latter is tipped to go up to 19 to 19.5 per cent of GDP from now, as Singapore opens its coffers to spend on health care, retirees, and on infrastructure and investment in education. The former hovers around 18 to 18.5 per cent of GDP.

    How to make up the shortfall of about 1 per cent of GDP?

    This is a structural issue that will have resonance beyond this Budget.

    3. New spending rule

    Mr Tharman has a way to close that 1 per cent gap: Use projected long-term returns from Temasek Holdings.

    The Net Investment Return formula framework was implemented in 2009. He said: “Under the framework, the Government is allowed to spend up to 50 per cent of the expected long term real returns on its net assets managed by MAS and GIC.”

    Temasek was left out as it was undergoing a major change in investment strategy. Mr Tharman said it was a good time to add Temsek to the mix.

    So this Budget is important for signalling the long-term gap in revenue and spending.

    It is also significant for using a new framework that allows Singapore to tap a wider pool of money from expected investment returns on its reserves into the future.

    “The move will bolster our fiscal resources at a time when we have to fund long-term critical infrastructure and develop the human talent and capabilities to secure our future.”

    4. More help for middle-income

    Actually, I should qualify the Robin Hood bit. This Budget takes from the rich, to give a lot more to the middle-income, not just the poor.

    A 50 per cent personal income tax rebate, capped at $1,000, will benefit mid-income earners most.

    The concessionary maid levy is halved to $60. Exam fees are waived for most school students. Child-care subsidies will be improved. Most parents with kids will get fairly large top-ups to the child’s education account, of about $500 per child, regardless of whether the child is in preschool, secondary school or tertiary education.

    5. New way of targeting subsidies

    A new method to figure out who gets more subsidies and government assistance will be introduced for the Silver Support bonus for retirees. It goes beyond the traditional use of housing type. The Silver Support will still use housing type as a proxy for wealth, giving those in smaller flat types more in the Silver Support bonus. But even those in larger flats, up to five-roomers, will get it.

    But it will also take into account past working income of the retiree. It will also look at their household income to gauge what level of support these retirees have.

    As the Silver Support kicks in only from the first quarter of 2016 – in just over a year’s time – it isn’t clear how this new system will work out.

    But it is a novel, and potentially very useful, way of targeting subsidies. It will also be automatic, using presumably income data from Iras and CPF, and household type data from HDB.

    With Singapore going well-down the path of more middle-class welfare subsidies, expect this to be the start of a more refined way of figuring out who deserves what grants and subsidies.

    6. Meritocracy of skills, not hierarchy of grades

    Mr Tharman and other government ministers have been saying for several years now that Singapore has to go beyond a system where people are valued for their academic credentials, to one where every worker is motivated to excel at what he or she does, and rewarded accordingly.

    This Budget puts substance to that dream, with a new SkillsFuture Credit account for every Singaporean aged 25 and above. The Government will give $500 into this account in 2016.

    There will be a concerted push to get Singaporean workers and employers to change our culture to one which values people for skills, not their paper qualifications.

    A range of new SkillsFuture Awards and Fellowships will be introduced. Think of these as the skills-equivalent of the Public Service Commission’s scholarships for academically bright students.

    7. Productivity 2.0

    The first round of measures yielded some good results.

    Mr Tharman said: “Productivity today is 13 per cent higher than at the start of our restructuring journey in 2009. This is an average growth rate of 2.5 per cent per year. All of this gain was achieved in 2010 (11.6 per cent) and 2011 (2.3 per cent) as we recovered from the recession, and growth has been negligible in the three years since then.”

    Next: consolidating measures to focus on innovation and internationalisation. More grants for innovation. Tax breaks for mergers and acquisitions go up to encourage companies to merge and consolidate. The National Research Fund gets a $1 billion boost.

    All in, it can be said to be a sensible yet generous Budget, albeit at the expense of the very high-income. It may disappoint those who wanted a big SG50 Bonus to celebrate the nation’s Jubilee. But it does give out a mass hongbao to all Singaporeans, via top-ups to education funds for children and students, and via the new $500 SkillsFuture Credit for workers.

    More importantly, it sets Singapore on a clear trajectory – Mr Tharman would call it the path of progressivity – but basically the writing’s on the wall: higher taxes on the rather rich, to give to the poor and the middle-income.

     

    Chua Mui Hoong, Opinion Editor

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Driving Licences – Penalising Singaporeans

    Driving Licences – Penalising Singaporeans

    I had always wanted to pen this for I had worked as a driving instructor with one of the BIG 3 centres in Singapore. And yes, there are only the 3 who monopolise the industry and of course a handful of old-timers who are private instructors. No new licence is given to private instructors. Hence, after the passing of the old timers, there will never be private classes anymore which are by all means cheaper and the best option for those hard-pressed financially.

    Now, if you are a foreigner, it’s a walk in the park. Let’s say you come from India with an Indian licence. All you need to do is to pass your Basic Theory – and lo and behold – you have the much coveted prize – a Singapore Licence. Our licence is much respected the world over. For example, we are the only country from Asia which is recognised for conversion without taking a test in Australia. So they too know how tough it is to get a driving licence in Singapore. And for example countries like India, getting a licence is like going to a coffee shop. The more you are willing to give kopi money, the faster you can get your licence. (This is from the horse’s mouth for I have spoken to them before.)

    When I was an instructor, there were different types of learners who sought to get a licence. Among them were those who used them to “cari makan” [Ed: seek a living]. They had to go through rigorous training spending thousands of dollars while their counterparts from overseas didn’t need to do that. So why the discrepancy? Why must we make it so hard for Singaporeans to get a licence when it’s so easy for the rest?

    And all of those who had gone through testing in Singapore would know how you are treated by the testers. They are the kings. I have personally seen the trauma, the anguish, the emotional pain and suffering first hand among those who learn to take a licence. I have seen grown man cry because they failed the test. Why must we allow this to happen? Furthermore, what about those who had driven army vehicles during their NS? Are they given a full conversion? No, unless you clock a certain mileage. Isn’t this discriminating against Singaporeans when you allow foreigners to have it easy?

    My point is, we are always talking about PMET’s. But we always forget about the average Joe. To be honest, the average Joe doesn’t have a voice for they are working hard to earn a living. But one thing smart about them is they, for one, have for the longest time voted for opposition unlike our PMET’s who had been retrenched. In good times it’s the man in white and in bad times they pick and choose their colour, unlike the Joe’s.

    So can the opposition parties please make this a case for Singaporeans!!!!

    Majullah Singapura!

    Uncle Santosh

    Submitted by TRE reader.

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com