Category: Politik

  • Parliament To Debate Lapses Highlighted in AGO’s Audit Of  WP’s AHPETC

    Parliament To Debate Lapses Highlighted in AGO’s Audit Of WP’s AHPETC

    Parliament will sit today, with the Auditor-General’s report on the audit of the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC), as well as the calculation of public transport fares on the agenda.

    A total of 45 questions were submitted by Members of Parliament for this sitting: Thirty-three questions for oral answer and 12 for written answer.

    Minister of National Development Khaw Boon Wan will move a motion on the Auditor-General’s report on the AHPETC, which flagged major lapses in “governance and compliance”.

    The Ministry of National Development will call for a stronger legislative framework for town councils, in order to hold those responsible for their good management to proper account, and will also call on all Town Councils to uphold high standards of accounting, reporting and corporate governance to safeguard residents’ interest.

    The Members of Parliament have also submitted questions on a wide range of topics, covering childcare centres, public transport fees, the Productivity and Innovation Credit scheme and the rental or sale of HDB flats, among others.

    The State Lands (Amendment) Bill and the Land Acquisition (Amendment) Bill will be introduced during this Parliament sitting. The second reading for the Deep Seabed Mining Bill will also be deliberated.

    The report by the Auditor-General following its audit of the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council (AHPETC) revealed that key individuals running the town council also have stakes in companies it hired to manage its estates.

    Experts have said that in cases where there are such conflicts of interests, a possible solution may be to have an independent body overseeing some of the town council’s management processes, such as when it calls for tenders.

    Lapses in the management of related party transactions were among the findings in the Auditor-General’s report that was released on Monday (Feb 9).

    The Auditor-General’s report found that AHPETC had hired two managing agents to carry out estate maintenance services. One of these was FM Solutions and Services Management (FMSS), which was first set up in May 2011.

    FMSS’ managing director, general manager and two deputy general managers are shareholders in the company. They are also on the management board of the AHPETC – holding the position of secretary, general manager and deputy general managers.

    AHPETC’s secretary also owns FM Solutions and Integrated Services (FMSI), a sole proprietorship. FMSI was engaged as a managing agent to manage precincts under the Hougang Town Council from April 2011 to June 2012.

    Among the lapses highlighted in the Auditor-General’s report, it was found that a fee of S$1.28 million paid to the two companies for services during the financial year of 2012 to 2013 was not recorded in its financial statements.

    Invoices made to the two companies were also issued and signed by the town council’s general manager and secretary, who were acting in their capacity as director of FMSS and owner of FMSI respectively.

    The report said the town councils did not adequately manage the conflicts of interests that arose.

    Associate Professor Mak Yuen Tee, who is with the National University of Singapore Business School, said: “The minimum is to declare and make people aware that you have those conflicts, to then not be involved on both sides of the transactions. In other words, you should not be verifying the payments and then approving the payments.

    “Ideally, you want a situation where you are not sitting on both sides – either you step off the town council or you do not get involved with the managing agent.”

    A possible alternative is to have an independent body overseeing some of the management processes like tenders for projects where there might be potential conflicts of interests.

    Assoc Prof Mak added: “If you need estate management services, one issue would be what are the available options out there. If you call a tender, are you able to get different organisations to participate in the tender?

    “I am involved in organisations where we call tenders and sometimes you do not have enough options and you end up selecting from a list of one. Ideally, you do not want that to happen but sometimes it will. If that happens and you end up in a related party situation, then that is where you need to take steps to mitigate that by involving people who are independent to review and to approve.”

    Another solution is to develop or adopt a framework that can help the town council improve its management processes and manage risks.

    Mr Sidney Lim, managing director of Protiviti Singapore, a company that deals with corporate governance, said: “The framework essentially looks at the three different risks that organisations face – the compliance risk, operational risk and reporting risk. And what is in the framework is a series of processes as well as components to help them manage and improve on corporate governance.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Buddhists Demonstrate In Myanmar To Protest Move To Grant Rohingya Muslims Citizenship

    Buddhists Demonstrate In Myanmar To Protest Move To Grant Rohingya Muslims Citizenship

    YANGON — Hundreds of people demonstrated in Yangon, Myanmar’s biggest city, today (Feb 11) to protest a government decision to allow people without full citizenship, including members of the Rohingya ethnic minority, to vote in an upcoming constitutional referendum.

    Most Muslim Rohingya are not citizens, and prejudice against them is high in the predominantly Buddhist nation.

    Parliament plans to debate several constitutional amendments. It recently approved a proposal by President Thein Sein to allow people with temporary identification cards, such as Rohingya, to vote in a referendum tentatively planned for May.

    Communal tensions have led to violence in recent years which left at least 280 people dead and 140,000 homeless, mostly Muslims confined to squalid camps in the western state of Rakhine.

    The temporary identification cards, popularly called “white cards”, were created by the former military regime for the 2010 elections in which it relinquished power to a nominally civilian government, though under heavy army influence. An army-backed political party won seats in areas with sizable numbers of white card holders.

    White card bearers are technically in the process of applying for citizenship. In addition to Rohingya, they include members of ethnic minorities such as the Kokang and Wa, and people of Chinese and Indian descent.

    Parliament originally voted against allowing white card holders to vote in the referendum, but reversed itself after an appeal from Mr Thein Sein. The government has been under pressure from Western nations and rights groups over its treatment of Rohingya, and Mr Thein Sein may have been trying to appease those critics.

    Domestically, however, the move has been sharply criticised.

    Most of those protesting today were Rakhine Buddhists, and the crowd of about 300 included at least 70 Buddhist monks.

    “White card holders are not citizens and those who are non-citizens don’t have the right to vote in other countries. This is just a ploy by politicians to win votes,” said Buddhist monk Shin Thumana.

    Lower house lawmaker Thein Nyunt said the government’s policy toward white card holders is inconsistent because they are banned from voting in general elections but allowed to vote in the referendum. White card holders are not allowed to join political parties.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • AGC Warns Public Comments On Case Of Three Singaporeans Arrested During Thaipusam Is Sub Judice

    AGC Warns Public Comments On Case Of Three Singaporeans Arrested During Thaipusam Is Sub Judice

    In the wake of the arrest of three Singaporeans for various offencesallegedly committed during a Thaipusam procession on Feb 3, the Attorney-General’s Chambers on Wednesday (Feb 11) issued a reminder warning against public comments, including on the Internet, as such statements may be sub judice contempt of court.

    The accused face various charges, ranging from disorderly conduct to voluntarily causing hurt to a police officer. The three – Ramachandra Chandramohan, 32, Jaya Kumar Krishnasamy, 28, and Gunasegaran Rajendran, 33 – are out on bail and will appear in court again on Mar 6.

    Said the AGC in a press release on Wednesday: “As criminal proceedings are currently before the Courts, we would like to remind the public that statements made may be sub judice contempt of court, if the statements are calculated to affect the judicial process and there is a real risk of prejudice being caused to the ongoing proceedings.”

    Under sub judice laws, commenting on a case being considered by the court may be considered interference with due process.

    “All parties are advised to refrain from making any public comments, or posting any statements on the Internet on these matters which may have that effect, pending final determination of the legal proceedings by the Courts,” the AGC added.

    “The Attorney-General’s Chambers takes a serious view of statements made which are calculated to interfere with the integrity of the administration of justice. Anyone who has information on the case should send it to the Police.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Anwar Ibrahim Lashes Out At Federal Court Decision

    Anwar Ibrahim Lashes Out At Federal Court Decision

    Malaysia’s highest court has upheld a sodomy conviction against opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim, sentencing him to five years’ jail amid angry scenes that will inflame political tensions across the country.

    Dr Anwar, 67, warned before the verdict was delivered that jailing him would backfire on Malaysia’s government. He lashed out at the judges after prosecutors argued his sentence be at least six years’ jail, saying they had “bowed to their political masters”.

    “You could have carved your names . . . but in bowing to the dictates of your political masters, you have become partners in the murder of the judiciary. You chose to remain on the dark side,” he said.

    When Dr Anwar refused to stop speaking, the judges left the court. “Allah is my witness. I will not be silent. I will never surrender,” he said.

    Lead prosecutor Muhammad Shafee Abdullah argued the original sentence of five years’ jail was “manifestly inadequate”.

    He said Dr Anwar had shown no remorse. “The higher the man, the higher the crime,” Mr Shafee said, referring to Dr Anwar’s government service.

    The conviction disqualifies Dr Anwar from political office and contesting the next election, which must be held by 2018.

    Repeated charges of sodomy brought against Dr Anwar over more than a decade have been seen as an attempt to end his threat to the government’s increasingly precarious 58-year reign.

    The conviction will renew criticism of the Malaysian government’s frequent use of courts to cripple its political opponents. Within minutes of the verdict being announced, the government issued a statement claiming that Malaysia has an independent judiciary.

    “In this case, exhaustive and comprehensive due process has been followed over many years,” a government spokesperson said. “We call on all parties involved to respect the legal process and the judgement.”

    The country’s colonial-era law, which criminalises consensual sexual acts between people of the same sex, has been condemned by the United Nations and many Western countries, including Australia.

    After Dr Anwar had been take to jail the Abbott government issued a statement expressing disappointment at the verdict.

    “We are deeply concerned by the severity of the sentence and we have made our concerns known to the Malaysian Government,” a spokesperson said.

    “As a friend of Malaysia, Australia encourages the Malaysian Government to consider the impact of recent decisions, including the Anwar verdict and the retention of the Sedition Act, on its international standing and its commitment to human rights.”

    David Wells, a forensic expert from the Victorian Institute of Forensic Medicine who gave evidence in Dr Anwar’s first trial, said the scientific evidence led by the prosecution was deeply flawed and was accepted as such by the presiding judge when he delivered a not guilty verdict, which was later overturned.

    “It is difficult to see how this position has changed in the absence of fresh evidence,” Professor Wells said.

    Hundreds of chanting opposition supporters rallied outside the Federal Court in Kuala Lumpur as Dr Anwar arrived with his wife Wan Azizah Ismail, family members and senior opposition figures to hear the verdict.

    Ms Wan Azizah said her husband was innocent and the judges must answer to God and their conscience. Dr Anwar hugged members of his weeping family after the verdict was read to a hushed and packed court.

    Human rights groups called the verdict a travesty of justice.

    “Prime Minister Najib Razak’s government has persisted in its politically motivated prosecution of opposition leader Anwar Ibrahim at the expense of democratic freedoms and the rights to non-discrimination and privacy for all Malaysians,” said Phil Robertson, deputy Asia director at Human Rights Watch. “Allowing this travesty of justice to stand will further undermine respect for rights and democracy in Malaysia.”

    A former deputy prime minister once seen as a rising star among Asia’s political leaders, Dr Anwar was accused of sodomising a male aide in 2008 but was acquitted by the High Court in 2012. However the Appeals Court overturned the acquittal in March last year and sentenced him to five years’ jail.

    Dr Anwar was previously imprisoned for six years after being ousted as deputy prime minister in 1998 on earlier charges of sodomy and abuse of power. He was freed in 2004 after Malaysia’s top court quashed that conviction.

    Dr Anwar has maintained all of the charges were trumped up to kill his political career after a falling-out with former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad.

    Tuesday’s verdict is seen as a turning point in Malaysia’s sharply divided political system, in which the coalition led by the United Malays National Organisation (UMNO) has held power in one form or another since 1955.

    Only a pro-rural gerrymander saved the coalition from defeat at bitterly contested elections in 2013, after Dr Anwar’s opposition alliance won the popular vote.

    As tensions have risen in the country ahead of the verdict, the government made a flurry of arrests and prosecutions using a draconian sedition law that Mr Najib had pledged to abolish in 2001.

    The quashing of dissent comes at a time Mr Najib is locked in a long-simmering battle with Dr Mahathir and other conservatives in UMNO.

    Dr Mahathir, 89, has criticised a state-owned strategic investment firm called 1Malaysia Development Berhad, headed by Mr Najib, that has been plagued by charges of mismanagement. The firm has missed three payments on a $US600 million loan but the government insists it remains solvent.

    Dr Mahathir, an abrasive and outspoken figure who remains a powerful influence in UMNO, has also blamed Mr Najib for the party’s poor poll result in 2013 and for plans to scale back a program that provides special privileges for the country’s Malay majority.

    Mr Najib has also been embarrassed by allegations swirling around the gruesome slaying of Mongolian socialite Altantuya Shaariibuu eight years ago that have re-emerged after two of his former bodyguards were sentenced to hang in January over the murder.

    The case has raised allegations of covert payments over Malaysia’s $US2 billion purchase of French submarines when Mr Najib was defence minister. Mr Najib and the government deny any wrongdoing.

    Australia has been drawn into the case after Sirul Azhar Umar, one of the bodyguards, was arrested in Queensland. He is being held in immigration detention at Sydney’s Villawood detention centre.

    Dr Anwar has been the unifying figure in the opposition Pakatan Rakyat (People’s Alliance), holding together three unlikely partners, the Islamic PAS (Pan-Malaysian Islamic Party), the secular and socialist DAP (Democratic Action Party) and Dr Anwar’s PKR (People’s Justice Party).

     

    Source: www.theage.com.au

  • Singapore And North Korea Discuss Bilateral Cooperation

    Singapore And North Korea Discuss Bilateral Cooperation

    Ministers from Singapore and North Korea on Tuesday (Feb 10) discussed bilateral cooperation and exchanged views on regional and international developments.

    North Korea’s Vice Minister for Foreign Affairs Ri Gil Song called on Singapore’s Senior Minister of State for Foreign Affairs Masagos Zulkifli at Singapore’s Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA). The issues they discussed included the importance of lowering tensions and maintaining peace and stability on the Korean peninsula.

    Mr Ri will be in Singapore from Feb 9 to 12, and he is set to meet senior officials from the MFA. The minister is on a regional visit to several Southeast Asian countries.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com