Category: Politik

  • Yaacob Ibrahim: No Such Thing As Freedom Of Expression Without Limits

    Yaacob Ibrahim: No Such Thing As Freedom Of Expression Without Limits

    Communications and Information Minister Yaacob Ibrahim said he appreciates a decision by a local printer of The Economist not to reproduce a page with the latest cover of the Charlie Hebdo magazine depicting the Prophet Mohammed.

    “We have no doubt that there’s no such thing as freedom of expression without limits. As I have said before, the right to speak freely and responsibly must come together,” Dr Yaacob said to the media on the sidelines of the JFDI.Asia Demo Day on Friday (Jan 16),

    Dr Yaacob, who is also Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs said the circulation of the cartoons will not be allowed in Singapore. He later posted on Facebook that “there are longstanding laws against causing offence to our races and religions” in Singapore.

    The page in the Singapore edition of The Economist was replaced with a statement informing readers that the magazine’s “Singapore printers” declined to print it. The magazine hit local newsstands on Friday.

    “I think Singaporeans understand the sensitivities and we must continue to protect our racial, religious harmony. So I appreciate the sensitivities shown by the printer and I commend them for the decision,” said Dr Yaacob.

    “All in all, it’s been a good outcome for us, because people understand that we must continue to work together to preserve the racial and religious harmony in Singapore,” he added.

    Dr Yaacob said the Malay/Muslim community is “by and large offended” by the latest Charlie Hebdo cover. “But I think they also understood that we need to act rationally and I am quite impressed at how the community has come together to respond to this particular episode,” he said.

    “But at the same time, we recognise that this may not be the last time that it will happen and we have continued to build up our resilience. And on our part we should also continue to try and spread the message of peace and tolerance across all communities here in Singapore.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Lee Hsien Loong Hints That General Elections Is Some Time Away

    Lee Hsien Loong Hints That General Elections Is Some Time Away

    Hinting that the next General Election could be some time away, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said the Government has not had time to think about setting up the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee – often seen as one of the final steps in the run-up to polls.

    The next GE must be held by January 2017. Speaking to the Chinese media in an interview on Thursday, Mr Lee said the Government is preoccupied with the SG50 celebrations this year and hence, has had no time to think about when to set up the committee. “When it’s set up, everyone will know,” he added.

    Mr Lee was also coy on whether his successor has been identified from among the current batch of Cabinet ministers. Saying it was very likely that the person is already in Cabinet, he nevertheless added that he is not entirely certain because he is looking to bring in some candidates with potential to lead the country for the next election.

    But, he said, the search for his successor should be complete after the polls.

    When it was pointed out by reporters that the possible successor would have little time to work with his Cabinet colleagues if he were to come from the next cohort of Members of Parliament, Mr Lee said: “But it might not be an unfamiliar face.” So could it be someone whom the public is already familiar with? “There is the possibility, certainly” he replied.

    Referring to United States President Barack Obama and British Prime Minister David Cameron – both of whom had no prior experience running a government department or ministry before emerging as their respective countries’ top leader – Mr Lee said the Government might have no choice but to accept such a model.

    Mr Lee also said that in the next election, voters should be prepared for the possibility of junior office-holders – such as Ministers of State and Senior Parliamentary Secretaries, and not necessarily Ministers – leading the People’s Action Party teams in Group Representation Constituencies.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Chee Soon Juan: PAP Should Not Stigmatise Failure

    Chee Soon Juan: PAP Should Not Stigmatise Failure

    Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) chief Chee Soon Juan has criticised Social and Family Development Minister Chan Chun Sing’s decision to make scathing remarks about him on Thursday, adding in his response laced with sarcasm that Singaporeans “detest” the politics of mud-slinging.

    Referring to Mr Chan’s description of him as a “political failure”, Dr Chee said unlike the “accomplished” minister who had risen quickly through the ranks of the army and assumed political office, he had chosen a different path that does not lead to “power, privilege and a high salary”.

    “In this respect, Mr Chan is right — I have not succeeded. I have instead undertaken (the task) to speak up for the people of Singapore in what was, to put it mildly, a very difficult political terrain,” said Dr Chee.

    “Nevertheless, I am proud of my achievements … But I want to sound him a note of caution: When we attain our goals in life, we should not look down on and criticise others who have yet to achieve theirs.”

    The minister wrote to The Huffington Post on Thursday about their decision to publish two of Dr Chee’s articles — Without Freedom There Is No Free Trade and Free The Singapore Media And Let The People Go, printed on Nov 13 and Dec 11 last year, in which he criticised the Government for violating human rights through its trade processes and for its control over the media.

    In the letter, Mr Chan also detailed Dr Chee’s lacklustre electoral performance against that of Mr Chiam See Tong — founder of the SDP who had been forced out by Dr Chee — and his dismissal from his lecturer post at the National University of Singapore for misappropriating research funds and other misconduct.

    “It is because of these and other failings that Dr Chee is a political failure — not because he was persecuted, as he likes to pretend (to be),” the minister said.

    Taking issue with Mr Chan’s sharply worded letter, Dr Chee yesterday said the ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) “outdated practice of stigmatising failure” troubles him.

    He also hit out at the PAP’s “habit of engaging in the politics of name-calling and personal destruction”. “It is disappointing that the younger generation of ministers like Mr Chan has not set a new direction for the conduct of politics in Singapore, instead relying on that of a bygone era. How does calling me a failure help to solve the problems that Singaporeans face?” said Dr Chee.

    “For the sake of Singaporeans, let us go beyond such an unconstructive form of politics that Singaporeans detest and graduate to a more mature level of contestation of ideas that the people deserve.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Chan Chun Sing In No Position To Criticise Chee Soon Juan

    Chan Chun Sing In No Position To Criticise Chee Soon Juan

    Yesterday, Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing wrote a scathing letter to the Huffington Post about Chee Soon Juan claiming that he was a nobody in Politics in Singapore.

    Chan had taken issue with the fact that the Huffington post, which is a media not censored and controlled by the Singapore government unlike our mainstream media, had published two of Dr Chee’s letters which were critical of Singapore and he tried to make them understand that they shouldn’t continue publishing Dr Chee’s letters.

    In doing so, he highlighted all of Dr Chee’s “failures” including all the instances where he had been ‘fixed’ by the government to discredit him personally and professionally.

    See his full letter here: Chan Chin Sing: Chee Soon Juan is a Nobody

    In another separate letter to Straits Times, Chan Chun Sing, has gone even further to attack Dr Chee.

    He said that Dr Chee was a failure and he rebut Dr Chee’s other articles where he criticised the fact that Singaporeans cannot live on $1000 a month.

    Mr Chan insisted that Singaporeans who earn $1000 a month can afford a flat and benefit from many aid schemes including getting subsidies on healthcare, transport, education and utilities.

    Chan Chun Sing also attacked Dr Chee saying he had failed to win any elections and kicked out the former leader of his party Mr Chiam See Tong.

    It is interesting that Chan Chun Sing attacks Dr Chee for failing to win any elections as he himself also never won any elections.

    Chan Chun Sing was parachuted into parliament iin the walkover GRC of Tanjong Pagar on the coattails of Lee Kuan Yew.

    Mr Chan never won a single vote but Dr Chee had won many, just not enough to get into parliament. This is despite the mainstream media in Singapore continuously painting him as a madman and a criminal.

    For Mr Chan to bring up the “kicking out” of Chiam See Tong from the SDP as a character flaw in Chee Soon Juan, perhaps he should be looking at his own party and fellow MP in Tanjong Pagar.

    Back in the 1960s, Lee Kuan Yew also “kicked out” the main charismatic character in the PAP, Lim Chin Siong, by taking over the party. When Lim Chin Siong left the PAP and formed his own party like Chiam See Tong from the SDP, Lee Kuan Yew then him in jail accusing him of being a communist despite declassified British documents indicating that this was not the case at all.

    What do you think?

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • Chan Chun Sing Criticises Chee Soon Juan In Reply To The Huffington Post

    Chan Chun Sing Criticises Chee Soon Juan In Reply To The Huffington Post

    SINGAPORE — Two articles by opposition politician Chee Soon Juan published in The Huffington Post have drawn a sharply worded response from Minister for Social and Family Development Chan Chun Sing, calling out the American news website for giving the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) secretary-general “considerable but undeserved attention and space”.

    The two opinion pieces, Without Freedom There Is No Free Trade and Free The Singapore Media And Let The People Go, were published on Nov 13 and Dec 11 last year, respectively.

    The articles criticised the Singapore Government for violating human rights through its trade processes and for its control over the media, which Dr Chee said “have put reason and
    intellectualism to sleep”.

    In the letter addressed to the site, Mr Chan did not address the opinions expressed by Dr Chee, but took issue with the website’s decision to publish the articles. “You perhaps believe he is a weighty political figure in Singapore. He is nothing of the kind,” said Mr Chan.

    Describing Dr Chee as a “political failure” who had stood for and lost three elections, Mr Chan said: “The party he now leads, the Singapore Democratic Party, was once the leading opposition party in the country. But that was when it was led by Mr Chiam See Tong, a man everyone in Singapore — political friend and foe alike — regards as honourable.”

    While it was Mr Chiam who brought Dr Chee into the SDP fold in 1992, Dr Chee later forced him out of the party. “Since then, the SDP hasn’t won a single seat in Parliament, although Mr Chiam went on to win elections repeatedly,” Mr Chan said.

    He also pointed out that while Dr Chee “likes to trumpet in foreign media”, the SDP secretary-general had been sued by ruling-party politicians and did not mention that he had been sued by Mr Chiam “because it is embarrassing”.

    Dr Chee’s dismissal from the National University of Singapore — where he was a psychology lecturer — in 1993 for misappropriating research funds and other misconduct, including secretly recording conversations with university staff, as well as his 1996 conviction of perjury by Parliament for submitting false statements all point to his failure as a politician, the minister said.

    “It is because of these and other failings that Dr Chee is a political failure — not because he was persecuted, as he likes to pretend (to be),” said Mr Chan.

    “His party is now one of the weakest political parties in Singapore principally because voters do not regard its leader as an honourable man.”

    Mr Chan noted that Dr Chee, who was disqualified from contesting the past two General Elections because he was declared a bankrupt in 2006 for failing to pay damages for libel to
    former Prime Ministers Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong, has been campaigning to redeem himself in the public eye.

    “As he has done in the past, he has looked to the foreign media for redemption, chiefly because foreign journalists don’t know him as well as Singaporeans and he believes he can beguile them into believing he is the Aung San Suu Kyi of Singapore politics,” Mr Chan said.

    While Dr Chee has claimed that he has been forced to publish in foreign media as he has been silenced in local channels, Mr Chan noted that several sociopolitical websites in Singapore had run several articles by Dr Chee, while some of his letters had been published in the local press.

    “Dr Chee’s problem is not that he has not been heard by Singaporeans; his problem is that they have,” said the minister.

    The SDP was unable to respond as of press time.

    MR CHAN’S LETTER TO THE HUFFINGTON POST IN FULL:

    Your website has given Dr Chee Soon Juan considerable but undeserved attention and space. You perhaps believe that he is a weighty political figure in Singapore. He is nothing of the kind.

    Dr Chee has stood for elections thrice – and lost badly all three times, once receiving just 20% of the vote.

    The party he now leads, the Singapore Democratic Party, was once the leading opposition party in the country. But that was when it was led by Mr Chiam See Tong, a man everyone in Singapore, political friend and foe alike, regards as an honourable man.

    Indeed, it was Mr Chiam who brought Dr Chee into the SDP in 1992. He mentored the younger man and promoted him. Dr Chee then proceeded to betray Mr Chiam, isolate him and force him out of the SDP, a party that he had founded in 1980 and had nurtured over 14 years. Since then the SDP hasn’t won a single seat in Parliament, though Mr Chiam himself went on to win elections repeatedly.

    In 1993, Dr Chee was dismissed from the National University of Singapore for misappropriating research funds and for other serious misconduct, including surreptitiously recording conversations with university staff.

    He has been sued for defamation not only by ruling party politicians, a fact that he likes to trumpet in the foreign media, but also by the doyen of the opposition in Singapore, Mr Chiam, a fact that he doesn’t mention because it is embarrassing.

    And in 1996, Dr Chee and three of his associates were convicted of perjury by Parliament tor submitting false statements to a Special Parliamentary Committee. This is the equivalent of Congress convicting someone of perjury, a most serious offence.

    It is because of these and other failings that Dr Chee is a political failure — not because he was persecuted, as he likes to pretend.  His party is now one of the weakest political parties in Singapore principally because voters do not regard its leader as an honourable man.

    Dr Chee was disqualified from contesting the last two General Elections because he was declared a bankrupt in 2006 for failing to pay damages for libel to former Prime Ministers Lee Kuan Yew and Goh Chok Tong. He was discharged from bankruptcy in 2012 after the former Prime Ministers agreed to accept a reduced sum in damages. Since then Dr Chee has been campaigning to redeem himself in the public eye in preparation for the next General Election.

    As he has done in the past, he has looked to the foreign media for redemption, chiefly because foreign journalists don’t know him as well as Singaporeans and he believes he can beguile them into believing he is the Aung San Suu Kyi of Singapore politics.  Dr Chee, however, claims he is forced to publish in the foreign media because he has been silenced in the Singapore media.

    But this is false. There are several socio-political websites in Singapore, some with as wide a reach among Singaporeans as the Huffington Post has among Americans. They have run several articles by Dr Chee. The local press also has carried several of Dr Chee’s letters.

    Dr Chee’s problem is not that he has not been heard by Singaporeans. His problem is that they have.

    Sincerely,

    Chan Chun Sing

    Minister for Social and Family Development, Singapore

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com