Category: Singapuraku

  • Chee Soon Juan: Deadly Mishaps A Poor Reflection Of Government

    Chee Soon Juan: Deadly Mishaps A Poor Reflection Of Government

    The recent past has seen several deadly mishaps that leads one to question the quality of our workforce and, more importantly, its leadership.

    Just this morning, we learnt of an SMRT bus driver taking the bus over an empty field when he thought no one was looking and got it stuck in the mud.

    Other incidents involving bus drivers were not so amusing. A 29-year-old woman was killed when she was struck by an SBS Transit bus in Toh Tuck Avenue. An elderly pedestrian died after a bus ran him over at Toa Payoh. A visitor from Britain was fatally hit by a bus while he was crossing the road at Upper Cross Street. An SMRT bus driver ran over and killed a 60-year-old woman at Yishun.

    Then, a slab of concrete installed as a sunshade collapsed in Tampines. It was a stroke of good fortune that it did not topple and kill anyone.

    Two shelter walkways were hit by crane-lorries in Bukit Batok, one of them toppled over with the base-plates of the shelter ripped from the ground. Luckily, no one was injured.

    Several lift breakdowns resulted in severe injuries to passengers and even caused the death of an elderly man.

    Two young MRT maintenance workers were killed at the Pasir Ris station when safety procedures broke down.

     

    Source: Chee Soon Juan 徐顺全

  • What A Minister’s Reluctance To Be PM Says About Race In Singapore

    What A Minister’s Reluctance To Be PM Says About Race In Singapore

    The move on Wednesday by Singapore’s popular deputy premier to emphatically quash suggestions he wants to take over from Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong exposes the conservative ethnic consensus in the country’s leadership, despite a public clamour for greater political openness, observers say.

    Public speculation about Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s fit as Lee’s successor has been swirling in recent years, and resurfaced on Monday after an independent survey showed nearly 69 per cent of Singaporeans would support the 59-year-old ethnic Tamil as the country’s next leader.

    “Just to be absolutely clear, because I know there’s this talk going around… I’m not the man for PM, I say that categorically. It’s not me,” Tharman told local media late on Wednesday.

    Tharman said the top job was not his ambition.

    He is one of two deputy prime ministers and oversees financial and social issues. The former central bank chief took the job in 2011, having entered politics in 2001. He was finance minister from 2007 to 2015, and an education minister before that.

    “I’m good at policymaking, good at advising my younger colleagues and supporting the PM, not being the PM,” he was quoted as saying.

    Political observers told This Week in Asia Tharman’s comments revealed his tacit acceptance of the long-ruling People’s Action Party’s (PAP) belief that the Chinese-majority country was not yet ready for an ethnic minority leader.

    “It may be that he genuinely does not want the job but it is also possible that the results of that survey have exposed the gulf between popular thinking and many of Tharman’s senior PAP colleagues on ethnicity and politics,” said Garry Rodan, professor of Southeast Asian politics at Australia’s Murdoch University.

    “The PAP orthodoxy…emphasises that most Singaporeans are reluctant to support candidates from outside their own ethnic group for top leadership posts,” Rodan said.

    Singapore’s resident population of 3.9 million is made up of 74.3 per cent Chinese, 13.3 per cent Malays and 9.1 per cent Indians, with others making up the remaining 3.2 per cent.

    Alex Au, a prominent political blogger, said Tharman was “being a very loyal colleague”.

    T

    “He does not wish pressure to build on his cabinet colleagues to choose certain options when it comes to leadership succession,” he said.

    Singaporean leaders – including current premier Lee and his father, the late founding prime minister Lee Kuan Yew – have said the country’s conservative majority Chinese electorate had some time to go before it would accept a non-Chinese leader.

    But the survey of 897 Singaporeans, commissioned by Yahoo Singapore and conducted by independent polling firm Blackbox Research, showed 73 per cent of people disagreeing that the race of the premier is an important factor.

    “The poll results confirm data from other Blackbox surveys that race is not the primary criterion as a basis for choosing a preferred candidate among the Singapore public,” the polling firm said in the report.

    Long-time Singapore political observer Bridget Welsh said Tharman’s popularity “stems from his support of spending for social welfare and services, and management of the economy, as well as his ability to bridge groups as a more liberal and open leader compared to his peers”.

    But “as an elite-orientated party, the PAP categorically rejects selection by popular opinion,” said Welsh, a Southeast Asian politics expert at the National Taiwan University.

    “Tharman is too liberal, too popular, and an ethnic minority – all features that do not fit with today’s hardline PAP,” she added.

    Tharman, who concurrently served as the chief of the International Monetary Fund’s powerful policy-steering body from 2011 to 2015 while in government, grabbed the limelight at last year’s general election as he used his avuncular speaking style to take apart the opposition’s economic policies and explain the government’s position.

    Video clips of his speeches at the hustings went viral on social media, spurring the hashtag “#TharmanforPM”.

    Tharman led a team of legislators to sweep the five-seat Jurong district with 79 per cent of the vote in the country’s unique system of bloc voting. It was the highest winning margin in the country. The PAP won the election with 69.9 per cent of the popular vote.

    But the economics-trained Tharman, with degrees from the London School of Economics, Cambridge University and Harvard University, has repeatedly denied having designs on the top job. In July last year he used a sporting analogy to describe his aversion to being premier.

    “I was always, in sports, a centre-half rather than centre forward. I enjoy playing half-back and making the long passes, but I am not the striker,” Tharman told CNN anchor Fareed Zakaria in a forum.

    “Unless I am forced to be, and I don’t think I will be forced to it, because I think we have got choices,” he was quoted as saying.

    Au, the blogger, said Tharman’s popularity signalled that the “public is hungry for a different style of governance”.

    There is a perception that he is more “approachable and intellectually flexible than some of the ministers in cabinet who perhaps because of their military background come across as rigid or inarticulate,” Au said.

    Former army chief Chan Chun Sing, the current PAP whip and leader of the powerful National Trades Union Congress, is seen as one of the ruling party’s preferred candidates to be the next prime minister.

    Finance Minister Heng Swee Keat, who returned to work in August after suffering a stroke earlier this year, is also seen as a contender.

    In the Yahoo poll, Chan scored 24 per cent support to be a prime ministerial candidate, while Heng got 25 per cent.

    Au said the current public debate on leadership succession is “a function of the moment”.

    In past leadership changeovers, prime ministers’ successors were named early and had lengthy understudy.

    “As the saying goes, nature hates a vacuum,” Au said. “This is causing public speculation to circulate but the window will close soon when the successor is anointed.”

     

    Source: www.scmp.com

  • REACH Cancels Public Forum, Wrongly Informs That Dr Tan Cheng Bock Did Not Register

    REACH Cancels Public Forum, Wrongly Informs That Dr Tan Cheng Bock Did Not Register

    Government agency, REACH, was to organise an public forum on the Presidential Election. Presidential hopeful, Dr Tan Cheng Bock, successfully registered to participate in the forum.

    I was looking forward to attending a REACH public forum on the Presidential Election set for today. Minister Shanmugam was due to speak and I wanted to hear what he had to say. I registered my attendance last week and was happy to receive a confirmation for my attendance. I was planning to attend with a few friends and family.

    So Dr Tan was understandably disappointed when the forum was eventually cancelled. REACH explained that the cancellation was due to poor response. The agency also indicated that there was no registration under the name of Dr Tan Cheng Bock.

    reach-explanation

    But why would someone of Dr Tan Cheng Bock’s stature lie online about registering for the event?

    Turns out, he Dr Tan wasn’t. He had in fact registered under the alias ‘Adrian Tan’, which is recorded in his NRIC. He also provided all his personal details during the registration.

    In response to REACH that I did not register?

    I did register under my alias Adrian Tan which is in my NRIC, the registration also asked for my NRIC number, mobile, address, and occupation which I supplied. My acceptance letter is attached, as well as my alias in my NRIC.

    reach-confirmation

    So what really was the reason for the cancellation of the forum? Your guess is as good as mine.

     

    Dr Who

    [Reader Contribution]

  • Amos Yee Gets 6 Weeks’ Jail For Wounding Religious Feelings

    Amos Yee Gets 6 Weeks’ Jail For Wounding Religious Feelings

    Teenage blogger Amos Yee was sentenced to six weeks’ jail on Thursday (Sep 29), after he pleaded guilty to six charges for wounding the religious feelings of Christians and Muslims.

    The 17-year-old was also ordered to pay a fine of S$2,000 for defying two notices to turn up at a police station to give his statement.

    “(Yee) is not lacking in his mental capacity to make rational choices in the way he conducts himself,” Principal District Judge Ong Hian Sun said, adding that he “deliberately elected to do harm by using offensive and insulting words and profane gestures to hurt the feelings of Christians and Muslims”.

    The blogger’s “contemptuous and irreverent remarks” undermines the religious harmony in Singapore, and his conduct “should not be condoned or tolerated”, the judge said.

    Judge Ong also said he hoped the punishment, while not overly harsh, would be enough to deter Yee from re-offending. “Hopefully we will not have (Yee) appearing again in this court for the same offence in the future,” the judge said, referring to Yee’s previous conviction.

    Yee was sentenced in July 2015 to four weeks’ jail for the same offence. In total, he spent more than a month – about 50 days – in prison, after repeatedly breaching bail conditions.

    For intending to wound religious feelings, Yee could have been jailed for up to three years, fined for each charge or both. For failing to show up at a police station, Yee could have been jailed for one month, fined up to S$1,500 per charge or both.

     

    Source: ChannelNewAsia

  • Sembawang Hostage Situation Was Over A Lovers’ Tiff

    Sembawang Hostage Situation Was Over A Lovers’ Tiff

    It started as a lovers’ tiff and escalated into a 17-hour stand-off with the police after a man locked himself in a Sembawang flat with his girlfriend’s two-year-old son on Tuesday evening.

    The stand-off ended at around noon yesterday when the police stormed into the fifth-storey unit and apprehended the 39-year-old man. The boy was rescued unharmed.

    The man was arrested for wrongful confinement, possession of a scheduled weapon and drug-related offences.

    His girlfriend, a widow in her 30s with four young children, was also arrested at the scene for drug-related offences.

    The 17-hour stand-off is believed to be one of the longest in which the police’s Crisis Negotiation Unit (CNU) has been involved.

    This is how the drama unfolded:

    THE SPARK

    After the couple moved into the one-room rental flat about a year ago, neighbours often heard them quarrelling, mostly over money and his accusations of her infidelity. (See report, far right.)

    She, on the other hand, was upset over his possessiveness and attempts to control her every move.

    On Tuesday afternoon, he asked her to run an errand, and she left her two-year-old son alone at home with him.

    She took the opportunity to complain to her mother about her problems with him.

    Mother and daughter returned to the flat at Block 462, Sembawang Drive, where the mother confronted the man.

    They had a tearful and furious argument, which sparked the situation that turned into the 17-hour stand-off.

    The man refused to open the door and challenged them to call the police.

    A 36-year-old housewife told The New Paper that her 57-year-old mother, who lives a few doors away from the couple, witnessed the incident.

    The woman, who wanted to be known only as Ms Rosli, said: “My mum heard a row between the man and the two women at about 5pm. The women were outside the flat, and he was shouting at them to go away.

    “My mother heard one of the women shouting at the man to let the boy go because ‘he’s not yours’.”

    THE PHONE CALL

    Mr Iskandar Mariano, 32, an event coordinator who lives down the corridor, heard the couple quarrelling and a child screaming at around 5pm.

    A woman, whom he recognised as the widow, came over, looking distressed, and asked to use his home phone.

    “She looked like she was under a lot of pressure and in need of help,” he told TNP.

    “She looked blank and confused, as if she was in a dilemma about who to call. She even forgot the number she wanted to call.”

    Not wanting to intrude, Mr Iskandar walked away and did not overhear her phone conversation.

    “Afterwards, she went back to (stand outside) her unit, and continued to quarrel with the man.”

    The police received a call about the incident at 6.44pm.

    When officers from Ang Mo Kio Police Division arrived, the man refused to open the metal gate to let them in.

    Mr Iskandar said: “I heard the man was taking drugs with the door open when the police arrived.”

    THE STAND-OFF

    The CNU was activated to negotiate the safe release of the boy, and the Special Operations Command (SOC) team was deployed in case there was a need for forced entry.

    TNP observed the man, dressed in a white shirt, pacing around the flat as the night went on.

    He appeared calm and was not armed.

    Several SOC officers were seen standing outside the flat at about 10pm as the negotiations continued.

    The Singapore Civil Defence Force (SCDF) sent a fire engine, a Red Rhino, two fire bikes, an ambulance and three support vehicles.

    As a precaution, a safety life air pack was deployed at the foot of the block and the Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team was on standby.

    TNP understands that more than 100 officers from SCDF and the police were deployed.

    At 4.15am, the man appeared at the gate and spoke to negotiators for about five minutes.

    The child was unharmed and had access to food and water while he was confined in the flat, said Dr Lim Wee Kiak, the MP for Sembawang, yesterday morning.

    Around noon yesterday, the police saw an opportunity to take action.

    THE RESCUE

    SOC officers broke into the flat through the windows to rescue the boy, while the front gate was cut for other officers to enter and arrest the man, said the police in a statement yesterday.

    During the operation, the sound of breaking glass could be heard and sparks could be seen as the gate’s lock was cut.

    The man was taken out in handcuffs, with a blanket draped over his shoulders, and put inside a police car.

    The boy was later assessed by para­medics, but was not taken to hospital.

    He was physically unharmed throughout the operation, and the police are working with the Ministry of Social and Family Development on his well-being.

    Police investigations are ongoing.

    Assistant Commissioner of Police Lian Ghim Hua, who was in charge of the operation, said: “It was a challenging operation as the safety of a two-year-old child was involved, and the negotiations were also protracted, running to some 17 hours.

    “Securing the safe release of the child was my top priority. I am glad the operation turned out well with the child safely secured through a coordinated operation involving officers from various police units and SCDF.”

    THE AFTERMATH

    The media were later allowed to gather outside the unit where the hostage situation took place.

    The metal gate was burned where the police had cut through the lock, and there was debris on the floor. Glass shards from shattered window panels were scattered all over the corridor. The one-room flat was furnished simply with a queen size bed, television and fan.

    Five of the woman’s relatives were seen entering the flat. They declined to speak to the media.

    A resident on the sixth storey, who wanted to be known only as Madam Aliyah, 55, said she felt relieved.

    “I couldn’t sleep the whole night, I even called my boss to tell him I couldn’t come to work today,” she said.

    “I was praying for the boy the whole night. I was so relieved when they rescued him.”


    Neighbours: Couple frequently argued

    The couple moved into a one-room rental flat on the fifth storey of Block 462, Sembawang Drive, about a year ago.

    The woman is a widow with four young children. The 2-year-old boy in the centre of the drama is her youngest.

    Her other children were with their grandmother in Woodlands when the incident happened, said Sembawang GRC MP Lim Wee Kiak.

    Neighbours in the rental block said they often overheard the couple arguing over money and infidelity.

    The quarrels got violent sometimes, with the neighbours hearing glass breaking, doors slamming and furniture being dragged around.

    A neighbour, who lives on the third storey and wanted to be known only as Ms Ana, said she saw the couple arguing at the void deck two weeks ago.

    “They quarrel every day, sometimes into the wee hours. I often hear the baby crying and the television turned on loudly,” she said.

    POLICE

    Ms Ana, 38, who is self-employed, added that the police were called to the unit after one argument two months ago.

    Another neighbour, Madam Masdia Gea, 33, who lives on the same floor, said: “I told my children to ignore their quarrelling.

    “They always slam the doors, and they have been fighting ever since they moved in a year ago.”

    But the housewife added that the couple were friendly, and did not cause any trouble to their neighbours.

    “They would usually just say ‘hi’ and ‘bye’ and smile when we meet in the corridor,” she said.

     

    Source: The New Paper

deneme bonusu