Category: Singapuraku

  • A DBSS Ceiling For Khaw Boon Wan To Explain

    A DBSS Ceiling For Khaw Boon Wan To Explain

    As The Online Citizen (TOC) reported on Sunday, the Minister of National Development will be questioned about the poor quality of recent flats, especially those under the Design, Build and Sell Scheme (DBSS), and also those under the Build-To-Order (BTO) programme. (See here.)

    The minister in charge, Khaw Boon Wan, has said little about the many complaints which homeowners have raised so far.

    Besides the by now infamously narrow corridors at Pasir Ris ONE, for example, buyers were also unhappy over an entire slew of defects found in their flats – including leaking pipes, badly located water heaters, hollow tiles in their bathroom walls, scratched tiles, tiles with different shades of colours, windows which are nor properly installed, and so on.

    At Pasir Ris ONE, one of the most obvious and conspicuous anomaly seems to be the ceiling at the ground floors.

    The “gas vent” runs through the ceiling along the corridors, together with what looked like gas pipes, all seemingly put together in haste, and left exposed.

    The “gas vent” looks like an after-thought thing. The developer seems to have forgotten about the gas vent, and then just plonk it up there, hold it up with a few screws and that’s it.

    It is a wonder that such designs have been approved by the Building and Construction Authority (BCA) or the Housing and Development Board (HDB).

    TOC visited the DBSS development about a week ago and took a short clip of it.

    Perhaps Mr Khaw will explain why such a design is allowed by the authorities.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Poor People In A Rich Country

    Poor People In A Rich Country

    Cardboard collectors

    Growing up in Singapore through the 1970s and 1980s, the karung guni man was a common feature.  They collected newspapers and cardboard boxes.  Over time, the karanguni men that collected old stuff became more interested in electrical items.  There is a garbage collection/recycling industry out there that is lucrative.  As usual, it is lucrative for those higher up the economic food chain.

    At the lower end of this food chain are those that wheel around a trolley looking for discarded cardboard boxes at rubbish disposal areas behind shophouses and business premises.  Many of us are too busy rushing back and forth from work and we hardly come across these people.  However, I am sure that a growing number of Singaporeans have been noticing a trend of elderly individuals collecting cardboards or tin cans.  When my office was in the Bugis area, I used to come across a regular tin-can collecting uncle probably in his 70s or in his late 60s at the very least.  He would hang around the coffee shops to pick empty cans from tables.  There is an old lady with bent back that can be seen struggling to pull an old trolley loaded with flattened cardboard boxes.  With my office now located near Chinatown, I do come across more such old people in the back alleys of Chinatown.

    These are hardworking men and women. They are around the age of my mother and father or even older.  These are the men and women that have been working hard all their lives.  They struggle but they soldier on.  When I look at these elderly people, the thought that crosses my mind is: ‘Why? Why do they still need to work at this age?’  I know that the answer to this question cannot be unidimensional.  Cardboard collectors don’t make a fantastic amount of money.  I understand that a daily average can be anywhere from $2 to $5.

    Are these elderly people living on their own?  Do they not have children?  Do their children not provide for them?  Is it that their children cannot afford to take care of them?  Do these elderly people want to have their sense of dignity and fend for themselves?  Do they want to keep themselves occupied in their old age by doing the one job that they know?

    The State perspective

    One of the most disturbing aspects of the Singapore government’s official position on poverty has been its non-acknowledgement.  From statements to the effect that there are no homeless persons in Singapore to a refusal to define a poverty line, the state has systematically tried to keep the problem of poverty under wraps.  However, it cannot be denied that the government has rolled out initiatives to assist low-income families.  I remember attending a closed door seminar where Minister Shanmugam characterised the Singapore government as being socialist but giving the appearance of being capitalist.  From what he said on that occasion, I understand that the PAP leaders probably see themselves as being in a position where they need to appear to be very pro-business to keep investment in whilst at the same time quietly carrying out welfare measures.  Perhaps, this could be the reason for often sounding very pro-business and appearing to ignore the existence of a social underclass.  Perhaps, appearing to ignore but not really ignoring.

    That would be a kinder way of looking at how our leaders perceive the masses.  I’m not so sure if that is true.  I truly wonder if our leaders and decision makers are living too much in an ivory tower to fully appreciate what is going on at the ground level.

    Today I noticed some funny comments on facebook about elderly people exercising by collecting cardboard boxes in the hot sun.  I traced those comments to the origin and it turns out that Minister Tan Chuan Jin has posted on his facebook about elderly people collecting cardboard boxes.  To be fair, he appears to acknowledge that there are different reasons why the elderly engage in this work.  However, what is disturbing is that the post is intended to build on the narrative that old people want to have a sense of dignity and they derive that through work and also for the elderly people work is a way of keeping themselves occupied or even getting some exercise.

    I reproduce the Minister’s post in full here as I don’t want to take him out of context:

    “While I often chat with them when I meet them, I haven’t gone so far up the value chain to know the middle man and the whole set-up. I was most happy to join a group of young Singaporeans from Youth Corp on a project they initiated – to get first hand insight into the lives of elderly cardboard collectors: what motivated them to do what they do; and the challenges they face. The youngsters devoted their weekends over a 2-month period to befriend the cardboard aunties and uncles on the streets in the Jalan Besar area, and spent time talking to them to understand what they are going through in life.

    They shared with me that they were surprised by their own findings! The normal perception that all cardboard collectors are people who are unable to take care of themselves financially is not really true. There will be some who do this as their main source of income. Some do so to supplement what they have. Some prefer to earn extra monies, treat it as a form of exercise and activity rather than being cooped up at home. They do this to remain independent, so that they can have dignity and not have to ask their families for help.

    For members of the public, the simplest thing that one can do for these people is to talk to them to understand them. More often than not, people make judgements without finding out the facts of the matter, in this instance, the stigma surrounding cardboard collectors. But of course, for those who genuinely need financial help because they are unable to find other jobs to supplement their income from cardboard collecting, the government will do what it can to help these people. If you know of individuals who need help, do let us know.

    I’d like to thank Zaihan Mohamed Yusof who started it all with his articlehttp://www.tnp.sg/news/when-cardboard-gold in The New Paper. The youngsters picked up on the idea and followed up. Cheers to Koh Cheng Jun (Tm Lead) and Muhammad Syazwan Bin Mohamed Suhri who were with me on the ground, and thanks to the team who shared their thoughts with me…Goh Pei Yi Valerie, Janarthanan Ahalya, Khoo Lay Keat Bryan, Lee Jun Xian, Serena Mok Jia Xin.

    Inspired by you guys for taking that extra step. We all can too!”

    The truth is that there are bound to be some elderly people working for those reasons pointed out as there will be those that work because they have no other choice. I have nothing against looking at cardboard collecting elderly people from a nuanced perspective by considering all the varieties of reasons for which they collect cardboard boxes. However, I do object to highlighting a particular perspective that assists in bolstering the state narrative that there is no poverty in Singapore.

    I know many of my fellow Singaporeans (especially professionals) have no idea that there is poverty in Singapore. I have engaged in social work with residents in rental flats and some of these in localities such as Chai Chee where the flats house the elderly. Many of these residents are surviving on a mixture of government grants and charitable donations of food and groceries from social workers. (As an aside, the great redeeming feature of our rat-race driven country is the existence of a decent number of charitable, socially conscious and responsible citizens. There is still hope for our society.) The plight of the underprivileged in our society is unpardonable considering that we are a 1st world country. Clearly more can be done by average Singaporeans as well as by the state. It really doesn’t help to build a narrative that eventually makes it acceptable for our pioneer generation to work till the day they die. If they are to work as an MP till the day they die without having to turn up in Parliament or carry out active constituency duties, I don’t think anyone would object to that kind of work for the elderly. If you expect someone in his/her 80s to work as a cardboard collector with no safety net, then somewhere along the way, the system has failed these people.

    One problem with my parents’ generation is that many of them had no retirement planning. That was their background. It is not possible to blame them. To many, their kids would have been the retirement safety net. My parents have been fortunate to be able to retire. I know that this is not the case for many elderly people. Some elderly people have to resort to working because they don’t want to burden their children. They see their sons and daughters struggling to maintain their families. Wages for many have not increased to keep up with inflation and many low-income families find it virtually impossible to fully support their parents. It is true that if you asked some of the working elderly they would reply that they work to have dignity and not to have to ask their families for help. The sub-text in that reply is that their children are not in a position to properly support them.cardboard-collector

    This year we celebrate 50 years of our nationhood. We have progressed economically and many have benefited but many have also been left behind. Let’s not forget the back breaking work of a generation of Singaporeans that continue to work in the shadows of our skyscrapers. There is no point in constructing myths about how the PAP turned a fishing village into a modern metropolis when the people that were responsible for the rapid growth of the 1970s are now left to toil till the day would die.

    Let’s acknowledge the existence of a problem. Let’s see what can be done to solve it.

    (P.S. To be fair to Tan Chuan Jin, he does mention in his post to let the government know if we know of individuals that need help.)

     

    Subra

    * The author blogs at article14blog.wordpress.com primarily about the law & politics in Singapore, occassionally veering off into socio-economic issues. Article 14 of the Singapore Constitution protects the Freedom of Speech, Expression, Peaceful Assembly and Association. But, there are excessive restrictions on these Freedoms. He hopes that he can, in his own small way, contribute to the gradual realisation of these Freedoms in this land.

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • Lee Hsien Loong: Electoral Boundaries Committe Formed Two Months Ago

    Lee Hsien Loong: Electoral Boundaries Committe Formed Two Months Ago

    The committee that reviews electoral boundaries was formed two months ago, a sign that the general election is round the corner.

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong announced the formation of the Electoral Boundaries Review Committee on Monday, in response to questions in Parliament.

    The forming of the committee, which redraws constituency boundaries ahead of a general election, is the first formal step towards calling a GE.

    Leading up to the polls in 2006 and 2011, the committee had taken four months to do its work before issuing its report.

    While there is no fixed date for the election to be called after the report is submitted, it has taken as short as one day and as long as one month and 26 days in the past.

    Mr Lee told the House that he had asked the Committee in its review to consider the population shifts and housing developments since the last boundary delineation exercise.

    He also asked them to consider having smaller group representation constituencies, so as to reduce the average size of such constituencies to below five members, and have at least 12 single member constituencies. There are currently 15 group representation constituencies and 12 single-seat constituencies.

    “As per past practice, the Committee is chaired by the Secretary to Prime Minister. It is now in the midst of its deliberations and will make its recommendations to me when it is ready,” said Mr Lee.

    He was responding to questions from People’s Action Party MP Arthur Fong (West Coast GRC) and Non-Constituency MP Yee Jenn Jong of the Workers’ Party on whether the committee has been formed.

    Mr Lee added that he could not promise a minimum period between the publication of the report and the calling of a general election, which Mr Yee had asked for.

    The reason is that “it depends very much on the exigencies of the situation, and … on when elections become necessary,” said the Prime Minister.

    The committee’s work is to split or shrink group representation constituencies, and absorb or create more single-member constituencies, based largely on population shifts.

    It is appointed by the Prime Minister and is usually made up of five civil servants.

    Mr Yee had asked if the committee’s members can be drawn from various political parties as well, as it was done before Singapore became independent.

    Mr Lee said the committee has, for many years, comprised civil servants with experience and domain knowledge.

    This allows them to make considered decisions on how to divide up the constituencies, taking into account population shifts and housing developments in Singapore, and prevents “complete upheaval” each time the boundaries are redrawn, he added.

    “As for bringing political parties in, I’m not sure that’s an entirely good idea,” he said, adding that this is the practice in the United States.

    In America, members of the House of Representatives decide on the demarcation of electoral boundaries, said Mr Lee, and “what happens is they carve it up among themselves”.

    “It’s a political deal. I think that’s not a good arrangement. I think it’s best we leave this to the civil servants to work at,” he added.

    Furthermore, Mr Lee said that he would leave the committee to decide whether it would open its meeting minutes to the public, as Mr Yee had requested.

    But he added: “I don’t believe that it is helpful to have every twist and turn in the minutes reported and published. I think the committee’s report is the final word.”

    After the committee’s report is released, Parliament is dissolved and the writ of election issued. Nomination Day – which must take place no earlier than five days and no later than one month after the writ is issued – then signals the start of the campaign period, leading up to Polling Day.

    This process took between two and seven months in the past GEs.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Former HDB CEO: Singapore Must Plan For 10 Million Population

    Former HDB CEO: Singapore Must Plan For 10 Million Population

    Singapore must start planning for a population that could possibly hit 10 million, Liu Thai Ker, the man often credited as the architect of modern Singapore, told CNBC.

    The bold number suggested by Liu, who served as the chief executive of the Housing Board from 1979-1989 and then as CEO and chief planner of the Urban Development Authority from 1989-1992, is nearly double the current 5.3 million population and significantly higher than the 6.9 million figure proposed by the Singapore government in its 2013 Population White Paper.

    In the white paper, the government described its vision of raising the country’s population by as much as 30 percent in the next two decades to ensure the economy remains dynamic. However, the move sparked strong objections amid rising discontent in the land-scarce nation over soaring housing costs and an influx of immigrants.

    But Liu stands by his theory, saying that population growth is pivotal to Singapore’s future.

    “One fundamental thing about urban planning is, don’t try to stop or control or curb population growth,” Liu, who is now chairman at the Centre for Liveable Cities and senior director at RSP Architects Planners and Engineering, said.

    Read MoreHow Singapore can stay relevant after 50th

    “We should allow Singapore to grow and plan for a much bigger population… like 10 million people. We should ask ourselves: How long do we want Singapore to remain as a sovereign country? Even at 10 million people and assuming a population growth rate of 1 percent, we will only last slightly over 100 years and that’s not a long time,” he added.

    The country, which is battling worrying demographic changes, also needs immigrants to keep its economic engines running. With a fertility rate of only 1.2, far below the replacement rate of 2.1 and one of the lowest in the world, an ageing population would lead to profound problems for Singapore, the country’s Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said at a conference earlier this month.

    Liu agrees: “Being such a tiny place, there is a propensity toward homogeneity of ideas and concepts. For us to nurture a creative society, we need people from outside. In fact, one of the reasons why Singapore could succeed was because we were a heterogeneous society at the beginning, with people from all over the world.”

    But even as population numbers accelerate, Singapore’s achievements in urban development and innovation must be maintained.

    “We must continue to keep the city green and attractive for businesses, as well as good talent to come,” Liu told CNBC.

    Lessons from Singapore

    Apart from being well-known as a ‘garden city’ where flora and fauna is weaved into the urban fabric, the stability and efficiency of Singapore’s urban infrastructure serves as a role model for many developing nations.

    To emulate the success of the Southeast Asian city-state, governments in these developing countries will need to take the lead, according to 77-year-old Liu.

    “It may not sound democratic in a Western sense but in Asia or even Africa, the government must play a big role when there’s a great need for development. Because if you leave it to the businesses or private sector, they will inevitably focus more on the business side of things.”

    For that reason, it is imperative that government leaders educate themselves on urban development, the architect-planner added.

    “Leaders must be humble enough to learn what makes a good city. Mr Lee understood what made a good city from his days in Cambridge, but he spent all his life learning from urban success stories,” said Liu, referring to Singapore’s founding father Lee Kuan Yew.

    Singapore ‘needs entrepreneurs’ in the post-LKY era

    “Leaders must also be ruthlessly rational… and I often explain to foreign dignitaries that the highest authority in Singapore is something called the truth. The Prime Minister and President will listen [even if it was] a lowly civil servant who said the truth. That, to me, is an important aspect of Singapore’s success story.”

    Liu retold the story of Lee ‘s decision to construct low-cost flats in high-rise buildings – known as HDBs – even though such high-density housing was condemned by experts in the 1960s. Towering skyscrapers have since become a symbol of the nation’s successful public housing strategy and urban landscape.

    “We must subscribe to ‘clarity equals courage.’ It is not good enough to have courage and charge ahead blindly. it is also not good enough to just follow the world. You need to think what your city needs and have the courage to move ahead even [if it is] against the world’s trends,” he added.

    Lee Kuan Yew was Singapore’s first and longest-serving prime minister, who oversaw Singapore’s transformation from a sleepy British colonial outpost into a global metropolis within a single generation. He died on March 23 at the age of 91.

     

    Source: www.cnbc.com

  • Some Hospitals Seeing Increase In Baby Deliveries In 2015

    Some Hospitals Seeing Increase In Baby Deliveries In 2015

    With about a month to go to the nation’s 50th birthday, some hospitals are already seeing an increase in the number of babies delivered this year, compared to last year.

    NATIONAL DAY BABIES

    Couple Fiona and Xavier Yang got married in early-2014 and were eager to start a family. They were keen to have a child born in 2015, as they felt it would be special to have a SG50 baby, and they soon found out they were expecting a girl on Aug 24.

    But due to her baby’s size, Mrs Yang was medically advised to have a C-section earlier, which falls on Aug 9.

    “We feel very excited and are looking forward to this day, because we are going to celebrate the nation’s birthday with the newborn,” she said. “It marks a new chapter of our life. By giving birth on National Day, it marks a memorable day for her.”

    The delivery suite at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital. (Photo: Sara Grosse)

    Similarly, Dr Sim Wen Shan, who works in a delivery suite at KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital (KKH), will also be having her own SG50 baby, with her estimated date of delivery on Aug 9.

    “Of course we were very excited about it,” she said. “However, we do understand that we may not be able to deliver on National Day itself. We look forward to the progress of events in August, and hopefully it will just happen on National Day.”

    RISE IN 2015 BABIES

    As National Day approaches, some hospitals Channel NewsAsia spoke with, say they have already seen a rise in deliveries in the first half of this year, compared to the previous years.

    They speculate it could be due to more parents wanting to have their babies born in the SG50 year. But regardless of whether there will be a spike of deliveries in August, hospitals say they are well-equipped to manage the patient load.

    The National University Hospital (NUH) says it has delivered more than 1,800 babies from January to June 2015, a 7.6 per cent increase, compared to the same period in 2014. NUH added that about 86 women are due to deliver in the first two weeks of August, of which 7 women have their projected due dates falling on Aug 9.

    KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital commemorative coin and plush toy for the first 50 babies born on Aug 9. (Photo: Sara Grosse)

    Meanwhile, KKH has seen a slight bump in deliveries for the first six months of this year. It estimates an increase in deliveries of 5 per cent by the end of the year and says they are well prepared to manage patient load, especially in August.

    “In expectation of this bumper crop this year, we have increased the number of doctors who are on duty, as well as the number of nurses and midwives on duty in the labour ward,” said Associate Professor Tan Thiam Chye, Head of Inpatient Service at the Division of Obstetrics and Gynaecology at KKH.

    COMPARABLE TO THE PREVIOUS YEAR

    On the other hand, there are hospitals who say the number of deliveries they have had this year so far is comparable to the previous year. Raffles Hospital says it sees an average of 1,000 to 1,100 deliveries each year.

    “We don’t see a rise at this point,” said Director of Inpatient Operations at Raffles Hospital Lilian Yew. “In terms of the surge in the month of August, and in terms of managing these patients, we will be able to handle them. We will increase our manpower in terms of managing them.”

    Raffles Hospital says so far, they have two patients who are due to deliver on Aug 9, and an average of 30 patients who are due within the first two weeks of August this year. This is the same compared to previous years.

    Gleneagles Hospital also says its numbers are comparable to last year, and expects to close the year with close to 3,000 deliveries. So far, the hospital has close to 100 patients who are due to give birth in August.

    A suite at Gleneagles Hospital. (Photo: Sara Grosse)

    Said Gleneagles Hospital CEO, Dr Vincent Chia: “Currently looking at the picture, there doesn’t seem to be a sharp climb or sharp increase, but we are keeping close watch. We have staff on standby and they will be recalled back to help out with the current operations or the present operations if needed.

    “Moreover, if our labour ward rooms are full, then our post-natal wards can be converted to actual labour wards to be used as well.”

    GOODIES

    Nonetheless, hospitals are giving out additional goodies to parents who have a baby on National Day.

    KK Women’s and Children’s Hospital commemorative coin for the first 50 babies born on Aug 9. (Photo: Sara Grosse)

    For Gleneagles Hospital, this includes a free upgrade to a suite, a gift hamper, a fresh bouquet of flowers and a celebratory meal, while Raffles Hospital is offering a hamper and celebratory meal, as well as a suite upgrade.

    To mark SG50, KKH is giving a special coin and a plush toy to the first 50 babies born on Aug 9.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

deneme bonusu