Category: Singapuraku

  • Activist Han Hui Hui Calls For S$10,000 Donation To Pay For Legal Fees

    Activist Han Hui Hui Calls For S$10,000 Donation To Pay For Legal Fees

    On 5 June 2015, an email was received by Han Hui Hui informing her that she has to pay $6,000 to the Attorney General’s Chambers as her application OS67 has been withdrawn while she was overseas on 27 May 2015.

    OS67 is an Originating Summons seeking declarations that Singaporeans should be given the rights to freedom of assembly and freedom of speech at Hong Lim Park to demand for transparency and accountability.

    On 6 June 2015, $500 was paid to seek legal advice as OS67 is important to the #ReturnOurCPF case for both the illegal demonstration and public nuisance charges.

    On 7 June 2015, summons, affidavit and other legal documents were prepared.

    On 8 June 2015, a further $256.90 was being paid to the Supreme Court as filing fees.

    On 9 June 2015, the court has granted Han Hui Hui the right to represent herself in court as Mr M Ravi was suspended and there is no other legal counsel available.

    We are looking for 10,000 Singaporeans who care to give $1 each so as to continue this fight.

    This amount is for the court, filing and legal fees to continue the cases of Singaporeans being charged for the CPF Protest at Speakers’ Corner on 27 Sep.

    Send your $1 via Internet Banking, ATM or cheque to POSB savings account no. 279-12328-0.
    (This account belongs to Han Hui Hui and has the sole purpose of organising events as well as fighting lawsuits against us)

    Please help to share this meaningful activity with your friends.

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • High Court: No Queen’s Counsel For Roy Ngerng In Defamation Suit By Lee Hsien Loong

    High Court: No Queen’s Counsel For Roy Ngerng In Defamation Suit By Lee Hsien Loong

    The High Court today dismissed an application by blogger Roy Ngerng’s for a Queen’s Counsel (QC) to represent him in a hearing on damages he must pay for defaming Singapore’s Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong.

    High Court judge Steven Chong also ordered Ngerng to pay S$6,000 in costs, inclusive of disbursements.

    Ngerng was found guilty of defaming PM Lee in a blog post he made last year that suggested PM Lee misappropriated pension funds in a similar way to how the City Harvest Church was accused of misusing church funds.

    The City Harvest Church is currently still before the courts with no verdict yet to be made.

    Ngerng’s lawyer George Hwang had filed the bid on 28 May, and had subsequently cited the precedence of the case as grounds for a QC.

    This is the first time a blogger is being sued by the Prime Minister in Singapore.

    However, Justice Chong said that “novelty is not to be confused with complexity”, as QCs can only be admitted to argue cases in the Singapore courts if they have special qualifications or experience for the purpose of the case.

    He also said that while Ngerng’s choice of QC was well-respected in the field of defamation in the United Kingdom, the subject matter of this case is “local-centric”.

    Another factor for considering a QC was whether local senior counsel was available to take the case, and whether there is a need to engage the services of a foreign legal counsel.

    In response, Justice Chong called Ngerng’s attempts to seek members of the local bar who are not senior counsels to argue his case “disappointing”.

    “If Mr Ravi was suitable at the more complex stage, I fail to see why local non-senior counsels would not be suitable at this less complex stage,” Justice Chong was reported by media as saying.

    Human rights lawyer M Ravi had been representing Ngerng until his license to practice has been suspended on medical grounds. Ravi is currently seeking to have his license reinstated.

    Adapted from media reports.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • LTA: Stiffer Penalties For Repeat Offenders Who Stick Illegal Ads On Lamposts And Pillars

    LTA: Stiffer Penalties For Repeat Offenders Who Stick Illegal Ads On Lamposts And Pillars

    Tougher penalties will be meted out to those caught for putting up illegal advertisements on road infrastructure, such as lamp posts and pillars at sheltered walkways and bus stops.

    From June, the fines for repeat offenders will be increased from $400 to $500, the Land Transport Authority (LTA) said on Wednesday, in an update on its fight to rid the streets of unsightly ads.

    LTA said that the use of anti-stick paint on street infrastructure, which started in 2010, has helped to reduce the number of illegal advertisements and maintain the overall cleanliness of public streets but it did not give figures on the reduction in the number of illegal ads.

    The special paint makes it difficult for ads to be pasted on and also helps to reduce the labour time and cost needed to remove them. It has been applied to more than 16,900 street light poles and road-related facilities at about 600 locations.

    LTA added that since 2011, it has also been providing low-cost advertisement boards near selected MRT stations with high pedestrian traffic. There are now a total of 52 such advertisement boards at 45 locations.

    LTA said it will continue to monitor if the anti-stick paint should be used at more locations, and if more advertisement boards should be set up.

    “Illegal advertisements on our street infrastructure have been a sticky issue, as it is both unsightly, and requires additional manpower and resources to remove,” said Dr Chin Kian Keong, group director for transportation and road operations, LTA.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Ismail Kassim: A Malay Triology – Politics

    Ismail Kassim: A Malay Triology – Politics

    Part III: Why Malays can’t put their act together?

    We are Malays and we must uphold our Malay heritage above all. All my life I have considered myself a Malay and a Muslim; not Sunni, not Syiah.

    I honour our Prophet, PBUH, whom I consider a perfect gentleman; peerless and fearless. I try to imbue myself with the values he espoused and accept much of his teachings on how life should be lived in this world.

    We should not get involved with the Semitic people, their perennial quarrels and their penchant for mutual slaughter.

    Neither side is right; both are equally murderous, and both want power, not to build a progressive and equal society based on fear of God, but to oppress the other side for not belonging to their sect.

    To these people, their strongest affiliation is to their religious sect and to their tribe; the sense of nation hardly exists. They have never learnt to compromise and work together for the larger interest of the nation.

    True, in the early years, Islam liberated their minds and they became a progressive people but over the centuries they have slide backwards; today, they are among the most backward of societies.

    For example, just take a look at the Land of the Pharoahs and you see another Mubarak in the making, made possible by the so-called liberals of their society. The military, which lost all their battles against the Israelis, is only good for oppressing their own people.

    The trouble there is that the Muslim Brotherhood wants to force their Islamic agenda down the throat of the liberals, the latter wants to do the same to the Muslims, while the military wants to usurp power mainly to further their own ends.

    As for the keepers of our holy places, look at them trying to imitate the Israelis, bombing Yemen and killing innocent civilians, to further their dubious self-serving goals.

    If you look around the globe, the Chinese are fast on their way to becoming a respected nation, the Indians too have jumped on the same path and picking up momentum.

    Alas the Arabs are still locked in their ancient enmities and the Malays seem to want to follow them on their path of self-destruction.

    Just compare how the Australians behave towards Singapore and towards Indonesia when their citizens are about to be executed for drug offences. You can tell which country commands more respect from the Aussies and you know the reason why.

    Across the Causeway, we see the spectacle of UMNO and PAS at each other’s throat, almost like a pantomime imitation of the Sunni-Syiah conflict in the Middle-East.

    They forget the lesson of history. With 5000 British troops, the British ruled over 500 million Indians for 500 years.

    A feat made possible only with the help of hundreds of thousands of collaborators because of disunity and jealousy among Indians, who hate each other more than they hate the white men. If the Malays are not careful, history can repeat itself in Tanah Melayu.

    When I stopped reporting on Malaysian politics in Oct 1995, I felt then that the country was sliding down the hill. Two decades later, my opinion remains unchanged; the slide continues inexorably.

    Politics is in a mess. The Malays are divided as they have never been, and the non-Malays disenchanted and demoralised, and race-relations never very good even in the best of times, has taken another tumble downwards.

    Corruption in high places and in the Malay-dominated bureaucracy has become more rampant.

    As for the rakyat, the bigots and the obnoxious among them have made themselves heard at frequent intervals, no doubt instigated by Nationalist elements, religious fanatics and politicians in furtherance of their own narrow and selfish goals.

    Even before it lost Chinese support, UMNO have for years been pampering the Malay electorate on two fronts; closing its eyes to mismanagement of its pro-bumiputra policies and appeasing their insatiable demands for more and more Islam in public and private life.

    The result is increasing greed within sections of the community for the material comforts of this world and at the same time for the divine blessings of the next world.

    I do not see switching from the UMNO-led Front to the opposition Pakatan Rakyat as a viable long-term solution. A narrow win for the Pakatan will only trigger endless rounds of instability a la Thailand.

    Malaysia is not ready yet for a two-party system, not now and not in the next few decades. A split within the dominant Malay community does not benefit any group, not the Malays and not the minorities.

    Likewise, in Singapore, it is foolish of the Malays here to entertain any ideas that they could profit by playing one Chinese side against the other.

    Only a united, dominant community will have the confidence and the ability to offer meaningful concessions to its respective minority.

    In a democratic one man one vote system, UMNO are now in a dilemma. After losing the support of the Chinese and the more progressive elements from the Malay community, it cannot afford to alienate whatever little communal support it has left.

    Without any concession to the Chinese, they won’t come back. If too much, it might lose its conservative Malay base. The result is stalemate.

    The best way out for Malaysia is for the Malays to unite, for PAS and UMNO to get together minus their extremist fringe, and forge a common platform to build up the nation, develop the Malays and other indigenous groups into a respected community and to be fair to their minorities, who are assets to the nation.

    Malay leaders should swallow their pride. Come to Singapore and see how the PAP have done it. Learn how to protect the interests of the dominant community while giving a fair deal to the minorities.

    The selective discrimination against Malays in the security and military services is balanced by other benign policies so that overall things square up for the community.

    It is not an impossible act for Malaysia to follow, but you need a strong leader to pull it off. At the moment, there is none in sight.

     

    Source: Ismail Kassim

  • CNB Investigating SMS Drug Peddling

    CNB Investigating SMS Drug Peddling

    Drug-pushing has been taken to a new level in Singapore: Dealers are now touting through mass-SMS, raising concerns, in particular, of youths being sucked into abusing.

    One such text message seen by TODAY, sent from a number the receiver is not acquainted with, read: “Dealing with Ecstasy, LSD, heroin, cocaine, crack, magic mushrooms, amphetamines, Cannabis, Methylphenidate (Ritalin), Pholcodine, Ketamine. Call or Whatsapp.”

    The Central Narcotics Bureau (CNB) told TODAY it was recently alerted to such a practice among drug dealers.

    “CNB is aware of the Short Message Service claiming supply of drugs and is looking into the matter,” said its spokesperson.

    Such “brazen” peddling calls for concern, said youth counsellors, especially as drug abuse among youths is on the rise.

    Figures released by the CNB in January show that while the overall number of drug abusers has fallen, more young people are getting hooked on drugs.

    Two-thirds of the 1,058 new abusers arrested last year were below the age of 30. Five years ago, this group made up only about 29 per cent of the number of new abusers.

    Mr Viknesan SB, senior counsellor at the National Addictions Management Service, said such easy accessibility can tempt youths to try drugs out of curiosity.

    Dr Carol Balhetchet, senior director of youth services at the Singapore Children’s Society, said she is “deeply concerned” because children and youths-at-risk spend a lot of time on their phones and social media.

    “It is quite natural that peddlers are getting more creative … I will not be surprised if they use the same approach to get youths to join neighbourhood gangs, be involved in unlicensed money lending, and so on,” she said.

    Since it is impossible to prevent youths from being exposed to such peddling methods, Dr Balhetchet said “the only right approach is education … to teach youths not to answer to such peddlers”.

    Mr Low Kar Leong, a social worker at Care Corner Singapore, said while the dealers’ latest tactic makes it easier for those who want to get drugs, it does not mean more youths will jump on the bandwagon.

    “Their first point of contact is usually their friends,” he said.

    Asked about how easy it would be to take these drug dealers to task — given that even pre-paid SIM cards now have to be registered — lawyers were divided in their opinion.

    Citing how “trafficking” is defined in the Misuse of Drugs Act, criminal lawyer Josephus Tan said anyone who makes an offer to sell, give, administer, transport, send, deliver or distribute drugs can be convicted.

    Lawyer Raj Mannar, however, said whether money and goods changed hands is another element in proving criminal liability.

    Although law enforcement officers can easily trace who owns the mobile phone numbers, he pointed out that fraudulently registered prepaid cards have been used to perpetuate crimes.

    “So I don’t think you can charge someone based solely on the text message. It will just be part of the evidence,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu