Category: Sosial

  • Pergas Wrote Letter To Lee Hsien Loong, Expressed Concerns On Israeli-Palestine Conflict

    Pergas Wrote Letter To Lee Hsien Loong, Expressed Concerns On Israeli-Palestine Conflict

    The Singapore Islamic Scholars and Teachers Association (Pergas) has written to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to highlight the Muslim community’s concerns about the “situation in Palestine”, saying the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict is “regrettable and worrying”.

    The letter, written in Malay and dated 17 February, expressed Pergas’ hopes that Lee would bring up the matter during the two-day official visit to Singapore by Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, on Monday and Tuesday (20-21 February).

    In the letter, the President of Pergas, Ustaz Hasbi Hassan, said, “Israel’s occupation has lowered the value of human lives. It has caused the lives of children, women and the elderly.

    Pergas has expressed our concern and the Singapore Muslim aspiration to the Singapore government on the Palestine situation. Alhamdulillah, our concern has been conveyed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to the Israeli’s Prime Minister during his two-day Singapore visit earlier this week.

    “The blockage and control of Gaza has ravished the basic human rights for protection, housing, health, education and more. The upholding of these rights has been agreed upon by the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which urge Israel to stop illegal housing on Palestinian land,” he said in the letter.

    Ustaz Hasbi stressed that as Muslims and citizens of Singapore, Pergas stands by the values of harmony and justice and, like any other community, rejects any form of tyranny, invasion and repression.

    “Violence will only beget violence, and peace could never be achieved as long as discrimination, tyranny and repression still exist,” he said.

    Pergas understands the Singapore government’s policy on such matters, which has been affirmed by the appointment of former Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Hawazi Daipi, as Singapore’s new non-resident representative to the Palestinian Territories. Hawazi assumed the position in November last year.

    “We support the government’s policy and hope that Israel and Palestine can work together towards peace and harmony. We also hope that all forms of repression and violence will cease with justice prevailing for both parties,” Ustaz Hasbi said.

    Prime Minister Lee’s reply to Pergas

    In a letter addressed to Ustaz Hasbi dated Tuesday (21 February), Lee thanked Pergas for expressing its concerns about the situation in Palestine and the Israeli-Palestinian issue.

    Lee said he fully understands these concerns. Singapore is friends with both Israel and the Palestinian National Authority, and many Arab countries, he added.

    “While the situation is complex and progress is difficult, Singapore has always urged Israel and Palestine to resume direct negotiations and work towards a just and durable solution to this longstanding conflict,” Lee said in the letter.

    Lee also reiterated Singapore’s position in the letter, saying that the Republic is convinced that “a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, however hard to achieve, is the only way to bring peace and security to both peoples.”

    The prime minister has stated Singapore’s position and concerns to Netanyahu during his visit here and last year. In the letter, Lee said he has explained to the Israelis that the Middle East matters to Singapore.

    “People all over the world are seized with the Israeli-Palestinian issue, and with the plight of the civilians caught up in the conflict. For Muslim communities particularly, it is an emotional matter.

    “Singapore is in Southeast Asia, surrounded by Muslim-majority countries. And we ourselves have a substantial Muslim population, who are an important part of our harmonious multi-ethnic population,” Lee said.

    He added that “Singapore fervently hopes for peace between Israel and the Palestinians”, which will contribute to a more stable Middle East and a safer world.

    “I thank you for supporting Singapore’s position, which reflects the interests of our nation,” Lee concluded in the letter.

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • This Muslimah Wears A Hijab, She Is A Scholar

    This Muslimah Wears A Hijab, She Is A Scholar

    As the child of a prison officer, Ms Siti Madinah Mohamed Salim grew up in prison staff quarters, close to where inmates who had committed various crimes were incarcerated.

    “This made me wonder how they got into prison, how it would change them and how their families were coping while they were inside,” says the 32-year-old social worker.

    She encountered more people with troubled lives during an internship at the Syariah Court when she was pursuing a diploma in Islamic law at Ibnu Sina Institute of Technology in Malaysia. “I observed couples with different needs and issues applying for divorce. There were many emotional moments when the divorces were finalised and I often wondered if more could have been done to save their marriages,” she says.

    In for the long haul
    These experiences led Ms Madinah to think about a career in social work. When a friend told her about the Social Service Scholarship offered by the National Council of Social Service (NCSS) during the final year of her degree course in Islamic law at the Al-Azhar University in Egypt, her interest was piqued.

    After she completed her studies and returned to Singapore at the end of 2009, she applied successfully for the scholarship.

    A temporary stint at a Malay Muslim organisation after her return cemented her decision to join the social service sector. “Again, I observed a lot of families in need and from there I felt that I could do this as a profession,” she says.

    On the scholarship, she studied at the Social Service Institute for a bachelor’s degree in social work awarded by Australia’s Monash University. This programme is no longer offered at the institute.

    Upon graduation in 2013, she started work at Ang Mo Kio Family Service Centres Community Services. The scholarship required her to serve a four-year bond in a social service organisation.

    During that period, she was also accepted into the Sun Ray scheme following a career dialogue with NCSS. “In this scheme, I am given the opportunity to go for leadership training, mentoring and coaching, and as a result, it allows me to network with various leaders and community partners to broaden my perspectives,” she says.

    Gaining experience
    In February, she was seconded to SPD, formerly known as the Society for the Physically Disabled, where she is currently working as a social worker in the Early Intervention Programme for Infants and Children (EIPIC).

    At the two places she has worked since graduating, she has gained experience in different areas.

    She says: “At the family service centre, I handled cases dealing with a wide range of issues, such as financial, behavioural, marital and family violence. Currently, in EIPIC, I am more focused on working with parents and caregivers of children with special needs such as autism, global developmental delay and speech delay.

    “Each journey with a client is different and meaningful. I feel that I learn and gain as much as the client as we work together to build resilience and overcome challenges. I feel a deep sense of satisfaction when my clients are able to achieve their goals.”

    She remembers, in particular, a case involving an elderly woman and her daughter who was in university at that time. They lived in a rented room and had limited money for food and daily expenses.

    “After a few years journeying with them, it was satisfying for me to hear from the daughter that they were doing fine and did not need further assistance. The daughter had secured a job as a primary school teacher and her pay was sufficient to support her mother and herself. I am happy that, in some small way, I have made a positive contribution towards someone’s life,” she says.

    Another aspect of the job that Ms Madinah enjoys is being part of a team focused on one main goal — “the well-being of the client”.

    She elaborates: “We have all heard about the many helping hands approach, which means there are other resources available that clients can tap for further assistance. As a social worker, I tap these resources as well so that I have other professionals working with me towards the best outcome for the client.

    “This common purpose makes for a good working environment and a great source of motivation during challenging periods.”

    She hopes to have a long and productive career in this sector. She is also mindful of the need to give back, having enjoyed the privilege of a scholarship. “Accepting a scholarship means that there is a responsibility for you to do as well as you can and contribute as much as you can back to the community,” she says.

     

    Source: http://sphclass.com.sg

  • Mengapa Masih Wujud Fahaman Sempit Terhadap Kaum Wanita?

    Mengapa Masih Wujud Fahaman Sempit Terhadap Kaum Wanita?

    Peranan kaum Hawa sering kali tidak diberikan pengiktirafan dan penghargaan yang sewajarnya. Ini meskipun bilangan wanita yang menyandang jawatan berprofil tinggi semakin meningkat. Mengapa pemikiran dan tanggapan yang mempersoalkan keupayaan dan kewibawaan kaum Hawa terus membelenggu minda masyarakat? Muhammed Shahril Shaik Abdullah, Pustakawan Bersekutu di Lembaga Perpustakaan Negara yang juga anggota The Reading Group mengongsi beberapa sebab yang mungkin menyebabkan pemikiran sedemikian menyempitkan persepsi terhadap kaum Hawa.

    Jika dibandingkan zaman sekarang dengan zaman dahulu, boleh dikatakan kaum wanita pada zaman sekarang ini menikmati taraf kehidupan yang lebih tinggi. Ini dapat dilihat dari jumlah wanita yang kian ramai memegang jawatan-jawatan yang suatu ketika hanya dikhaskan buat kaum lelaki, baik di bidang pekerjaan mahupun di arena politik.

    Namun, sejauh manakah perubahan sosial sedemikian mencerminkan arus perubahan yang sehaluan dari segi sikap serta tanggapan sesebuah masyarakat terhadap kaum wanita? Walaupun peluang pekerjaan serta pendidikan buat kaum wanita pada masa kini jauh lebih luas berbanding beberapa dekad yang lalu, tanggapan terhadap wanita masih lagi berdasarkan fahaman sempit yang nyata menghambat kemajuan ke arah masyarakat yang bersifat adil.

    Barangkali ramai di antara kaum suami dan bapa dalam masyarakat kita yang bersifat penyayang terhadap keluarga masing-masing. Kita tidak berada di dalam sebuah masyarakat yang sadis di mana kaum lelaki sewenang-wenang memukul bantai isteri dan anak-anak.

    Namun di sebalik sifat penyayang tersebut, tersembunyi satu ketidaksadaran (subconsciousness) yang terpendam kian dalam di lubuk hati dan sanubari si penyayang. Ketidaksadaran tersebut, yang dibentuk dan didorong oleh pengaruh luaran seperti struktur serta kondisi sosial, lingkungan hidup dan juga penyebaran pengetahuan dalam segala bentuk informasi dari pelbagai sumber termasuk akhbar, filem serta media sosial, tidak akan dapat dikesan di tingkatan sadar (conscious level) dari segi perbualan mahupun perbuatan. Malah, apa yang diucap dan diperlakukan di tingkatan sadar seringkali bertentangan dengan apa yang terpendam di peringkat tidak sedar (subconscious level).

    Sebagai contoh, sebuah negara yang dikuasai oleh pemerintahan yang berasaskan prinsip patriarki akan membentuk serta menjalankan dasar-dasar negara yang mendiskriminasi dan menindas kaum wanita. Dasar-dasar tersebut, jika tidak dipersoalkan, pada gilirannya akan meresapi akar pemikiran masyarakat lantas membuahkan warga-warga negara yang berfikiran patriarkis, meskipun hadir di tingkatan tidaksadar. Barangsiapa yang menentang atau mempersoalkan fahaman tersebut akan dianggap pengkhianat atau pemberontak lantas disingkir sebagai seorang yang tidak sehaluan dengan masyarakat.

    Apabila norma sosial sesebuah masyarakat berlandaskan pemahaman yang tidak mempedulikan kesucian kehidupan malah cenderung terhadap kebinasaan, akibatnya akan ada pengorbanan jiwa-jiwa yang tidak bersalah. Di dalam buku beliau The Great Theft, Khaled Abou El Fadl menceritakan tentang kejadian di Arab Saudi, yang berlaku pada pertengahan bulan Mac 2002, di mana sekumpulan murid perempuan di sebuah sekolah awam terbunuh sewaktu terperangkap di dalam bangunan sekolah yang sedang dijilat api kebakaran.

    Apa yang lebih menyedihkan ialah, menurut Abou El Fadl, pintu-pintu sekolah tersebut telah dikunci dari luar oleh sekumpulan polis agama Saudi yang menghalang dengan kekerasan segala upaya untuk menyelamatkan murid-murid berkenaan. Penjelasan yang diberi atas perbuatan mereka ialah disebabkan murid-murid perempuan tersebut tidak menutup aurat – bermaksud mereka tidak mengenakan hijab serta niqab mereka pada waktu itu – dan juga buat mengelakkan sentuhan fizikal di antara pasukan penyelamat dengan murid-murid perempuan terlibat.

    Dari peristiwa di atas, kita dapat melihat masalah yang timbul, malah yang menjurus kepada pembunuhan, apabila manusia bertindak atas dasar dan pengaruh fahaman yang parokial. Di dalam benak pasukan polis agama Saudi tersebut, hanya satu kekhuatiran yang harus difikirkan, iaitu muka dan rambut murid-murid perempuan terlibat – yang terperangkap di dalam bangunan yang sedang dijilat api – tidak seharusnya kelihatan di tempat awam. Pada mereka, penutupan aurat itu lebih penting dari menyelamatkan nyawa yang sedang dalam bahaya. Demikian akibatnya apabila fikiran dikuasai oleh ketidaksadaran yang sentiasa berlegar di lubuk hati.

    Pengaruh luaran seperti media sosial juga memainkan peranan yang amat penting dalam membentuk ketidaksadaran sedemikian, selain membentuk minda serta pemikiran seseorang malahan sebuah masyarakat. Tidak boleh dinafikan pentingnya peranan media dalam menyampaikan berita serta informasi buat membina pengetahuan terhadap segala perihal di sekeliling kita. Namun, ini tidak bererti segala apa yang dilapor atau dikongsi harus diterima secara membabi-buta tanpa kritikal.

    Sikap yang kritikal akan membolehkan kita mengesan ideologi di sebalik penulisan yang bersifat cauvinis mahupun patriarkis. Jika disoal, kemungkinan besar si penulis tidak akan bersetuju malah akan menafikan dirinya sebagai seorang yang cauvinis. Malah tidak akan ada seorang lelaki yang akan mengaku dirinya sedemikian. Ramai yang akan mengatakan kaum wanita harus dihormati, disanjungi dan disayangi.

    Namun pernyataan-pernyataan tersebut barangkali hanya hadir di tingkatan sadar. Pada tingkatan tidaksadar, masih ramai yang menganggap serta mempercirikan kaum wanita sebagai satu kaum yang lemah dan serba kekurangan, yang harus patuh dan tunduk pada supremasi kaum lelaki. Amat sukar untuk seseorang yang didorong oleh ketidaksadaran sedemikian mengakui serta menganggap kaum wanita sebagai kaum yang mampu berdikari.

    Seorang isteri harus disayangi, dibelai, dihormati – pada masa yang sama beliau juga wajib patuh dan taat pada suami. Bahkan apa yang diajarkan di merata kelas-kelas agama, di setiap ceramah dan syarahan, dan juga di kaca televisyen melalui drama dan filem, ialah syurga isteri itu terletak di kaki suami. Maka apabila isteri menderhakai suami, beliau tidak akan dapat mencium pun bau syurga.

    Ajaran dan pesanan yang bermasalah sebegini jarang dipersoalkan, oleh kerana kepercayaan mutlak terhadap yang berbicara sebagai pakar dalam bidang yang dibicarakan. Di sini juga kita dapat melihat peranan asatizah serta penulis dan penerbit media dalam membentuk dan mempengaruhi pemikiran masyarakat.

    Sebagai contoh, di dalam filem Suami Aku Ustaz yang ditayangkan pada tahun 2015, kita akan dapat mengesan idea-idea yang amat bermasalah apabila ditontoni dari lensa yang kritikal. Misalnya, ibu bapa yang melihat anak perempuan mereka sebagai sebuah objek yang boleh diperlakukan sekehendak hati tanpa menghiraukan hak si anak sebagai seorang manusia; pendewaan guru-guru agama yang menjurus kepada ketaksuban serta perhambaan diri pada golongan tersebut hingga sanggup melepaskan diri dari tanggungjawab dengan berserah dan mengikut membabi-buta segala apa yang diajarkan sang ustaz, walaupun bercanggah dengan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan; pandangan hidup patriarkis yang menetapkan kaum lelaki sebagai golongan yang dianugerahi Tuhan darjat yang lebih tinggi justeru lebih layak menentukan apa yang baik dan buruk buat kaum wanita.

    Dari filem ini, kita dapat melihat bagaimana industri budaya yang dikuasai golongan inteligensia yang tidak berfungsi, akan mencipta karya-karya yang sarat dengan idea-idea yang bermasalah, yang berasaskan pemikiran feudal dan cauvinis, lantas meluas dan menyerap masuk ke minda masyarakat.

    Kenyataan yang dibuat penerbit filem tersebut sewaktu diwawancara, bahawa cinta serta kepatuhan isteri kepada suami merupakan nilai yang penting dalam rumah tangga, menjadi bukti kepada pemikiran patriarkis beliau. Rumahtangga yang penuh dengan kasih dan sayang bermula dari perasaan saling hormat menghormati serta faham memahami, bukan berasaskan kepatuhan yang bersifat perhambaan dan pengabdian. Tidak akan wujud sifat kasih dan sayang, bahkan tidak akan ada rasa cinta, apabila seseorang menuntut supaya dipatuhi dan ditaati oleh pihak yang lain.

    Lebih bermasalah lagi apabila agama dijadikan sandaran bagi pendirian yang patriarkis. Misalnya menggunakan hadis-hadis daif yang menuntut agar wanita harus patuh dan tunduk pada supremasi kaum lelaki. Nabi telah diutuskan Tuhan untuk membebaskan masyarakat di kota Makkah dari segala bentuk penindasan dan ketidakadilan dengan membasmikan segala praktik jahiliyah Arab yang tidak berperikemanusiaan, seperti menanam hidup-hidup bayi perempuan yang baru dilahirkan.

    Perbuatan jahil sedemikian tiada bezanya dengan pemikiran jahil yang sedang tersebar luas pada hari ini melalui agensi-agensi luaran yang telah disebutkan di atas. Nabi telah berhasil membasmi praktik jahiliyah pembunuhan bayi perempuan. Oleh itu amat penting untuk kita memastikan supaya kita pula tidak terjebak dengan pembunuhan jiwa kaum wanita serta anak-anak dalam masyarakat kita.

    Sebagai permulaan, kita perlu mendidik dan menanamkan dalam diri anak-anak kita sikap adil serta sifat saling hormat-menghormati di antara lelaki dan perempuan, dengan menghindari sebarang perkataan atau perbualan yang bersifat patriarkis. Misalnya, usahlah kita berkata kepada mereka “Jangan nangis seperti perempuan” atau “Kalau nak jadi lelaki, mesti kuat. Tidak boleh lemah seperti perempuan.” dan sebagainya.

    Pendidikan awal akan menentukan cara pemikiran serta pemahaman yang akan mereka terap apabila dewasa kelak. Maka perlunya kita membantu mereka dalam proses tersebut dengan harapan membasmi ideologi-ideologi yang merosak seperti patriarkalisme.

    MENGENAI PENGARANG:
    Muhammed Shahril Shaik Abdullah ialah Pustakawan Bersekutu di Lembaga Perpustakaan Negara

  • Donald Trump: I Like 2 State Solution But I’ll Leave It Up To Israel And Palestinians

    Donald Trump: I Like 2 State Solution But I’ll Leave It Up To Israel And Palestinians

    WASHINGTON – U.S. President Donald Trump said on Thursday he likes the concept of a two-state solution to the Israel-Palestinian conflict, expressing his preference on the issue for the first time since sparking international criticism for appearing to back away from the longstanding bedrock of Middle East policy.

    But in an interview with Reuters, Trump stopped short of reasserting a U.S. commitment to eventual Palestinian statehood and instead said again that he would be “satisfied with whatever makes both parties happy.”

    Trump’s comments put a new twist on a statement he made at a Feb. 15 joint news conference with Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu suggesting that his administration would no longer insist on the creation of an independent Palestinian state as part of any future peace accord.

    It could also send a signal to both sides, as well as the international community, that the principle that has long underpinned U.S.-led peace diplomacy will not be discarded if the Trump administration moves forward, as he has promised, with an initiative to restart long-stalled peace efforts.

    “No, I like the two-state solution,” Trump said when asked whether he had backed away from the concept during his joint White House appearance with the right-wing Israeli leader. “But I ultimately like what the both parties like.”

    “People have been talking about it for so many years now. It so far hasn’t worked,” he added. But he then repeated his revised position, saying: “I like this two-state solution, but I am satisfied with whatever both parties agree with.”

    Trump’s comments provided nuance to his earlier comments.

    “I’m looking at two states and one state, and I like the one both parties like,” he said at last week’s news conference. “I can live with either one.”

    Those words were welcomed at the time by the Israeli right but denounced by Palestinians, who seek a state of their own.

    A one-state solution would be deeply problematic for both sides. One concept would be two systems for two peoples, which many Palestinians would see as apartheid and endless occupation. A second version would mean equal rights for all, including for Palestinians in an annexed West Bank, but that would compromise Israel’s Jewish character.

    United Nations Secretary-General Antonio Guterres cautioned against abandoning the idea of a two-state solution, saying there was “no alternative,” and Egyptian and Jordanian leaders also renewed their commitment to that goal.

    Trump’s revised language could soften such criticism, but still fails to meet demands that he explicitly re-commit to seeking a two-state solution.

    At the news conference, Trump pledged to work toward a peace deal but said it would require compromise on both sides. He also surprised Netanyahu by urging him to “hold back on settlements for a little bit,” a vague appeal to curb construction of Jewish settlements in the occupied West Bank captured in the 1967 Arab-Israeli war.

    But at the news conference he offered no new prescription for achieving an accord that has eluded so many of his predecessors, and Palestinian anger over his strongly pro-Israel stance could make it difficult to draw them back to the negotiating table.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Gay Community Expressed Mixed Feelings About Prominent Activist Charged For Drug Crime

    Gay Community Expressed Mixed Feelings About Prominent Activist Charged For Drug Crime

    A prominent gay activist, Dr Stuart Koe, was hauled to court yesterday for six drug-related charges (including one of trafficking) and the gay community have expressed disappointment that the incident will cause the public to have poor view of it.

    Dr Koe was one of the 3 petitioners who appealed to parliament to repeal Section 377A in 2007. He is also the managing director of a local pharmaceutical company, ICM Pharma and the founder of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) news and social networking site Fridae.com.

    The 44-year-old allegedly sold a packet of crystalline substance which contained 0.17g of methamphetamine, to another man for $240, at a Spottiswoode Park Road apartment on 25 Aug last year.

    Reverend Miak Siew, the pastor of the gay-friendly Free Community Church, said that the community should not kid itself about the harms of drugs. “I know far too many lives destroyed by meth (ice),” he said.

    And added: “Addiction is a disease that takes over a person and it is dangerous and irresponsible to say “a little bit” is ok.”

    Nic Lim the founder of the Facebook page ‘GLBT Voices Singapore’ said that he had been repeatedly attacked in the past by people in the gay community for posting honest entries about drug use in his page dedicated to gay confessions. They accused him of painting a bad image of the community and of disgracing them.

    “So long a huge swath of our community prefers to pretend that we don’t have a drug problem (and we definitely do), then we will lose more and more of our gay brothers and sisters to it, and see more of them in the news,” he said.

    Otto Fong, a former Raffles Institution teacher whose coming out in 2007 caused a stir, said:

    “But let’s be rational here and look at the real problem. It isn’t Koe who blocked all positive portrayals of gay people in the media. This is a concerted effort by others to erase all the good stuff gay people have been doing – like charity for orphans, creating families in spite of the odds, researches, shaping policies, being great healers and teachers. Just erase our contributions, and make sure the public only reads only the bad things. How can individuals like Koe fight against a tide of people coached weekly to complain, to repeat lies and to hate us with irrational fervor?
    I can only hope the younger generation of gay people and straight allies find a better solution. Instead of aiming our hopes and frustrations at Koe, we can do far better to reflect on ourselves and what we can and need to do.”

    Another prominent gay activist, Kelvin Wong, said that the conversation on drug use needs more clarity.

    “I think we need more clarity when talking about drug use. There is drug use for medical purposes, drug use for recreational purpose, drug abuse and drug addiction. There are growing cases that not all drugs have the same level of harm and addiction level. It is those whose addiction level is high and/or harmful that we need rigourous awareness. There are drugs that have shown to help medical conditions. So we cannot lump drug use or people’s attitudes to drugs the same boat. Furthermore, the law on drugs is historically politically driven and has little relevance to science and facts as the law treats all drugs the same. We could well say the same about alcohol, but because is not against the law and socially accepted people are getting drunk nightly in pubs and dead pissed or dying of liver related failures but nobody cares as much.”


    Comments are found in this Facebook post: http://bit.ly/2lyqU2t.

     

    Source: www.theindependent.sg

deneme bonusu