Category: Sosial

  • Goh Meng Seng: Is Singapore Government In Panic Mode About Economy?

    Goh Meng Seng: Is Singapore Government In Panic Mode About Economy?

    PM Lee is basically trying to tell us, don’t panic ok, this is not a crisis yet!

    However, MAS has, for the very first time in my memory, giving out subtle but CRITICAL warning to Singaporeans not to over spend and try to save for rainy days 。。。。

    It defies Keynesian economics logic actually. When time is going to be bad, consumption needs to boost up, not down. If MAS is making such call, it means that time is REALLY REALLY REALLY going to be EXTREMELY BAD! And believe me, this is THE CRISIS mode already!

    Oh Not to forget, PAP government is so Kan Cheong that it now puts up a law, I guess this is ONE OF ITS KIND of LAW in this world, that puts mandatory requirement on company to report to Government if they are retrenching 5 or more workers within 6 months! Alamek… This is the REAL PANIC MODE!

     

    Source: Goh Meng Seng

  • No Influx Of Chinese Nationals In Johor

    No Influx Of Chinese Nationals In Johor

    JOHOR BARU • Investments from China into Johor are part of a global trend and it does not make sense to say that there will soon be 700,000 Chinese nationals living in the southern state, said Johor Menteri Besar Mohamed Khaled Nordin.

    He made the remarks to rebut a claim by former prime minister Mahathir Mohamad that housing projects in Johor such as Forest City township will result in an influx of Chinese nationals into the state.

    Datuk Seri Khaled said China has become an economic powerhouse with a large middle class that has a strong appetite for property all over the globe, the Malay Mail Online news website quoted him as saying on Thursday.

    And Dr Mahathir, who was prime minister for 22 years, should understand the importance of foreign investments as he had flown all over the world to ask investors to put money in the country.

    “This is a global phenomenon and it behoves all parties, particularly the private sector, to attract investment from China and, specifically, to Johor. More so when Johor is just next to Singapore,” Mr Khaled said in a statement.

    “But it is wildly inaccurate to state that property… is only for the Chinese. What more when developers in Johor do not target only Chinese as their prospects.”

    Dr Mahathir, who now leads an opposition party, claimed in a speech late last month that a “gigantic city” being built in Johor would be peopled by Chinese nationals.

    He further claimed that he had heard that they would be given Malaysian identity cards to vote for Prime Minister Najib Razak’s ruling coalition.

    “This is the frightening story I heard, that there is an attempt to issue ICs to foreigners to support Najib in the next general election,” he said in a speech at an opposition rally last week, as quoted by the Malaysian Digest news site.

    “Johoreans, Malays or even local Chinese and Indians can’t fill up this gigantic city that can hold 700,000 people. Foreigners will be imported to fill these houses being funded by Chinese developers, to settle them into our community,” Dr Mahathir said.

    Rebutting the claim, Mr Khaled said the 1,386ha Forest City project, which is being built on four man-made islands, is a project lasting 30 years.

    “Marketing for residential properties in Forest City is not concentrated only in China but also in Australia, Middle East and other countries, and it is only offering 10,000 units,” he said, as quoted by Bernama news agency.

    “After 30 years, maybe there will be 700,000 foreigners in Johor but it is unlikely all of them will be Chinese nationals.”

    He added: “We, in Johor, do not want to be the backyard of Singapore. We want to develop on our own efforts, our capability, strength and on the position of Johor itself.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Chee Soon Juan: Lee Hsien Loong’s Unstatesman-Like Behaviour Ruining Relations With China

    Chee Soon Juan: Lee Hsien Loong’s Unstatesman-Like Behaviour Ruining Relations With China

    It is clear that Singapore’s relations with China has deteriorated in recent years and LHL’s utterances have not helped. The couple of wisecracks he made – saying that all the Chinese people need to do was to turn on the tap if they wanted pork soup after pig carcasses were found in the rivers or get free smokes simply by opening windows because of the smog – were, to put it mildly, eyebrow-raising.

    Such humour, while one might expect from a stand-up comic, has to be off limits to a head of government. Does this even need to be pointed out?

    To make matters worse, Lee made these injudicious remarks in front of an American audience, a country that China sees as its intense rival, and drew much laughter. How do you think we would react if another country’s leader made some jokes about Singapore?

    And when matters came to a head regarding the South China Sea, Lee presumed to lecture China on the rule of law, forgetting his own abuse of the rule of law in Singapore. And when frustrated over the demise of the TPP, he lashed out that China was no more the middle kingdom. The tone-deafness defied belief.

    Would not such views have been better expressed behind the scenes? Did the jokes contribute to an already aggravated atmosphere?

    No one determines who we trade and build alliances with. Singaporeans will not be dictated to by any foreign power and we will meet any such challenge with united resoluteness.

    But when our prime minister deprecates other countries, he must be called out. To remain silent or, worse, call for unintelligent loyalty to him on such occasions is to endanger our country’s interests and jeopardise our people’s well-being.

    As PM, Lee must realise that what he says on the international stage impacts greatly on ordinary Singaporeans. Unstatesman-like remarks that harm our country’s international relations must stop.

     

    Source: Chee Soon Juan 徐顺全

  • Singapore Entrepreneur Asad Jumabhoy: Singaporeans Should Stop Complaining And Start Competing

    Singapore Entrepreneur Asad Jumabhoy: Singaporeans Should Stop Complaining And Start Competing

    Entrepreneur Asad Jumabhoy is a member of the once-powerful Jumabhoy family whose name is synonymous with Scotts Holdings, one of Singapore’s pioneer property giants. Years of family feuds including one between Asad’s brothers weakened the family business and by the late 1990s, Asad decided to go his own way.

    One of the first things he started as CEO of his Scotts Group was Asia Tax Free Shopping, a GST tax refund platform. Over the years, he’s been able to adapt and zero in on opportunities.

    His latest project is UTU, a cross-border loyalty and reward points platform for consumers – a project he is working on with his son.

    He goes “On the Record” with Bharati Jagdish about this, about staying competitive, and how he feels about the problems that plagued the Jumabhoy family business. But first, whether he felt a sense of apprehension in stepping out of his family business to go his own way.

     

     

    STOP COMPLAINING ABOUT FOREIGNERS AND COMPETE 

    Jumabhoy: I think it has to do with education and skills level. If you turn around and say, “I’m as good as the foreigner that comes in. I’m probably better-educated. I’m happy to compete.” it’s fine.

    It’s a question of getting our local men and women to say the same thing. You’re good enough to compete, so compete. Stop complaining. Let anybody come. You want to work or you don’t want to work? You want to work hard or you don’t want to work hard? You want to get somewhere in this world or you don’t? It’s up to you.

    Don’t come and tell me foreign guys came in and took my job. Improve your skills. I see so many kids today come from every kind of background, well-of backgrounds and not well-off backgrounds. They’re knocking themselves out learning. It’s really a question on how much you’re willing to put out and how hard you’re willing to work.

    Bharati: Of course some might say no matter how hard I work, I’ll never really be able to compete because the foreigner doesn’t have to deal with the high cost of living that I do and therefore is willing to accept a lower salary than me, so he becomes a more attractive employee.

    Jumabhoy: That’s market practice. Every time you interfere with market pricing, you end up in a mess. It’s not just Singapore, every country. If you put currency controls for example, you’ll get a problem somewhere else. All these things are interconnected. It’s been proven and it’s very painful to prove, but the market economy is a good allocator of resources.

    If you have a feeling that your talent is worth more than what you’re being paid, go do something else. Go start your own business. If the market is saying, “Asad, I’m not willing to pay you so much for this job.” then I have two choices: either I change my job and change my focus or I stick with this and accept my position.

     

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Father Refused Bail For Repeat-Offender-Son, Netizens Applaud

    Father Refused Bail For Repeat-Offender-Son, Netizens Applaud

    PETALING JAYA: The tough love shown by a father who made the difficult choice not to post bail for his repeat offender son received strong support from the public.

    Many took to social media to voice their opinions on the decision by V. Mariadass to teach his 26-year-old son M. Herry Dass a lesson.

    The distraught father opted not to continue with the RM3,000 bail after the son claimed trial to gang robbery.

    The response was overwhelmingly in agreement with Mariadass as an online poll by The Star Online yesterday found 95% of more than 1,000 respondents approving his decision to turn his back on his remorseless son.

    Only 5% responded that as the fa­­ther, Mariadass, 55, should take some responsibility for his son’s up­­bringing.

    The case attracted a great deal of interest with numerous Facebook users uploading their comments and showing a similar level of support for the father.

    “Tough love. But the dad did the right thing in my opinion. Hope this guy repents and makes good of his precious life,” said Jai Gaanesh, adding that he hoped that the story would serve as a lesson to others.

    Firdaus Khalid pointed out that Herry Dass had the look that suited the entertainment industry, suggesting that he could have found a role in a television drama.

    “Think about it man, you should be the one helping your dad in his old days, not making him suffer.

    “Your dad did the right thing – it’s time you learn from this lesson, be a man and get a job to help your family,” said Firdaus.

    Louisz Chin said: “The father made the right decision although it may look and sound like he was very cruel.

    “No parent would want their children to go to jail but it has come to the extent that the parent has to allow his child to face reality.”

    Raveendran Subramaniam said it must have been a difficult choice and quoted the idiom “spare the rod and spoil the child”.

    However, not all the comments were positive.

    Eddie See said that Mariadass should also be blamed as he was involved in the upbringing of his son.

    “I believe that parents should be held accountable for their children’s wrongdoing,” said See, in response to criticisms of his comments.

    KL Chong also focused on how Herry Dass might have been raised, saying that “it all starts with childhood”.

    “Teach your kid accountability and he will be careful and honest.

    “Defend the kid and blame others even when he is wrong, he will grow up never taking responsibility and always counting on dad to bail him out,” he said.

    “Prison life won’t change him!” was Daniel Raj’s remark, in contrast to comments that hoped Herry Dass would emerge a better man.

    Raj said that once Herry Dass was behind bars, he would find himself indebted to gangs and would likely not be able to escape from them.

    Herry Dass was granted bail by the court after he claimed trial under Section 395 of the Penal Code, which carries a maximum 20-year jail sentence.

    His father decided not to post his bail, saying that it was his son’s third or fourth run with the law within 10 years.

    Mariadass claimed he had borrowed as much as RM20,000 to pay the fines since.

    Several teenagers, interviewed by The Star, said Herry Dass should be brave enough to face the consequences.

    Student Lucas Ng, 16, said one must take full responsibility for their actions, saying that the decision of Herry Dass’ father was justified.

    Ng said spending time in prison could be a good lesson for Herry Dass to change for the better.

    Ruba Abinaya Raja Morgan, 14, concurred, saying “by not bailing him out, the father is teaching his son a valuable lesson in life”.

    Christina Liew, 16, said “using the rod” would serve as a reminder that one must face the outcome.

    V. Latashah, 17, said Herry Dass’ father only wanted the best for his son.

    “When a child, regardless of age, makes a mistake, he or she needs to face the consequences. You should never protect your child when they break the law,” she said.

     

    Source: www.thestar.com.my

deneme bonusu