Category: Sosial

  • More Diversity In Voices Need To Be Heard On Racism In Singapore

    More Diversity In Voices Need To Be Heard On Racism In Singapore

    This article, “Racism in Singapore: Stop telling us minorities how to react to it“. has been shared widely, and I definitely think it is an important voice. I see a growing number of articles/conversations about racism, and a wider range of people speaking up, which I think are encouraging signs that there is more awareness and willingness to talk about race in Singapore.

    I hope the conversation doesn’t fixate on or stagnate at individualised, interpersonal instances of microaggressions, exclusion or privilege. Of course, these experiences aren’t separate from systemic racism, and are in fact deeply linked to them, but the connection often isn’t made as strongly as it could be.

    People switching to Chinese in conversations, friends telling racist jokes, etc are definitely significant and we should keep talking about these things and how they affect us, as well as how we can respond to them. We’ve all had these experiences and can feel solidarity around them.

    But I’m also interested in conversations that I don’t hear as much – about how Malay and Tamil people are overrepresented in prisons, whether they’re more likely to be profiled/picked up for certain crimes than Chinese people are, how Malay students are grossly underrepresented in universities, and what the barriers racial minorities face in accessing education, housing and jobs are.

    I’m interested in critiquing more closely, how our cultures and people are portrayed as backward, lazy, violent, uncivilised and parasitic in national narratives, and whether we can organise to push for anti-discrimination laws, for greater political representation and more in-depth analysis on how the media perpetuates harmful stereotypes about race.

    How many of the 1 in 10 families that live in poverty in Singapore are Malay or Tamil, and how much harder is it for racial minorities to experience intergenerational social mobility? The narrative continues to be that minorities need to work harder to catch up, and some minority groups are held up as “model minorities” and pitted against others. The recent study on Singaporeans’ receptivity to a president of a different race showed that both Indian and Malay respondents would prefer a Chinese candidate over each other. Is this what the success of a divide and rule approach looks like? Solidarity amongst racial minorities is low, and there’s plenty of racism to be explored there too.

    Social problems like unplanned teenage pregnancy, drug abuse and gang culture are ghettoised, stigmatised and pinned to the cultural deficit of minority communities rather than to structural discrimination, alienation and poverty. They’re also not given the same centrality in social policy as problems like gambling, that are more common in Chinese communities, are (as Alfian Sa’at’s play ‘GRC’ points out so well).

    Race needs to be a lens we apply to every social phenomenon we study, and we need more race disaggregated data about everything. The government, certain think tanks and the media are quick to look at race when it is to pin an issue as an “Indian problem” or “Malay problem”, but not to pinpoint racial discrimination.

    To take one example, there’s been a lot of discussion about bullying in Singapore schools – if studies on this also looked at whether racial minorities face more abuse/different types of abuse in school (I’m sure it’s true), anecdotes of interpersonal racism that appear in articles like this would have more context and meaning, and we would be able to offer deeper analysis and make stronger arguments for change. It doesn’t just stop at “my friends needs to be more sensitive” but allows us to demand that MOE, schools and educators take a proactive stance in addressing racial discrimination on a nationwide, school-wide or at least classroom-wide level.

    But maybe there is a different point to be made here too. While there is more interest in discussing race, while there are more voices addressing this now than before, are they diverse enough? Many of these voices, including mine, are middle-class voices. And I believe there are more important voices to listen to, when it comes to racism. The same way that middle-class feminism can silence working class women’s struggles, race consciousness that is not informed by class struggle can be a hazard. I am excited to explore possibilities for organising, for collective action, and to not allow individualised identity politics (or the “cult of individualism”) to become self-limiting or deteriorate into navel gazing.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

     

  • SDP: Elected Presidency Reforms A Distraction From Real Democratic Reforms

    SDP: Elected Presidency Reforms A Distraction From Real Democratic Reforms

    In 1993 when the government introduced the Elected Presidency (EP) bill, it gave a grand vision of how system was evolving into a more democratic one where there would be greater checks and balance.

    Then prime minister Goh Chok Tong even said that “In introducing this Bill, the present Government, is in fact, clipping its own wings. Once the constitutional amendment is effected, this Government will have some of its powers checked.”

    The truth was not quite as noble. Instead, many saw the move as Mr Lee Kuan Yew ensuring that Mr Goh, as the new prime minister, would not run off with the horse, so to speak. Following the introduction of the scheme, the late Ong Teng Cheong then became Singapore’s president from 1993-1999.

    Mr Ong actually believed Mr Goh that the EP was formulated to clip the Government’s wings. During his tenure, President Ong famously asked for the state’s accounts to be made known to him, to which he was told that the information would take 52 man-years to compile. Towards the end of his term, Mr Ong publicly complained of his “long list of problems” with the Government. He also announced that he would not seek a second term.

    Which was just as well because PM Goh revealed that although Mr Ong had sought a second term, the Government could not support his bid. Mr S R Nathan was chosen instead.

    Before he left office, however, Mr Ong told the public that some cabinet ministers and civil servants had treated his office as a “nuisance” and that the government had indicated that it did not need his approval in using the reserves to fight the Asian financial crisis that occurred in 1997.

    The very public spat prompted Mr Lee Kuan Yew to step in, upbraiding everyone for harbouring illusions about the powers of the presidency. He slapped down Mr Goh’s statement about the government clipping its own wings: “No, if you’ve to clip the wings, then you are in for trouble, you cannot govern…I cannot remember it but I would not have used that phrase because the executive powers of the Government should not be clipped.”

    Then in 2004, Mr Lee Hsien Loong introduced legislation to bypass the president when it came to the transfer of reserves to GLCs and statutory boards (see here), making the EP even more meaningless.

    The government is in the midst of reviewing the Constitution to pave the way for a president from the minority race. Only the very naive will fail to see the move for what it is – to ensure that the PAP’s candidate ascends to the office. The EP scheme degenerates into a deeper and bigger political farce.

    It is clear that the PAP has absolutely no intention of allowing its powers to be scrutinised and checked by anyone. Together with schemes like the Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) and the Non-constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP), the Elected Presidency serves only to create the illusion of democracy in Singapore.

    What we need is a genuine democratic system where all political parties can openly and fairly contest for seats in elections overseen by an independent elections commission, where the mass media is not monopolised by the PAP, and where the civil liberties of the people are not curtailed.

    Only then can we hope to check the government and truly protect our reserves.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Saudi Arabia Grand Mufti: Iranians Are Not Muslims

    Saudi Arabia Grand Mufti: Iranians Are Not Muslims

    Saudi Arabia’s top cleric has declared that Iran’s leaders are not Muslims and regard Sunni Muslims as their enemy.

    Grand Mufti Sheikh Abdul-Aziz ibn Abdullah Al ash-Sheikh was responding to Iran’s supreme leader, who denounced Saudi Arabia’s handling of the annual Hajj pilgrimage to Mecca.

    The Grand Mufti said the claims of the Iranian Ayatollah were “not surprising” and accused Iran’s leaders of being Zoroastrians, an ancient pre-Islamic Iranian religion.

    Saudi Arabia’s population is nearly 90 per cent Sunni and has long been at odds with the 95 per cent Shia Iran – two denominations that have been in conflict since the 7th century.

    In remarks published on Wednesday, Sheikh Abdul-Aziz Al ash-Sheikh said: “We must understand these are not Muslims.

    “They are the son of the Magi and their hostility towards Muslims is an old one, especially with the People of the Tradition [Sunnis].”

    Iran’s Ayatollah Ali Khamenei accused the Saudis on Monday of “murdering” pilgrims caught up in the stampede during last year’s Hajj.

    At least 2,426 people, including 464 Iranians, were killed in the stampede. According to Saudi authorities, only 769 were killed.

    Without providing evidence, the Ayatollah said: “The heartless and murderous Saudis locked up the injured with the dead in containers.

    “Instead of providing medical treatment and helping them or at least quenching their thirst. They murdered them.”

     

    Source: www.independent.co.uk

  • Genting Bus Crash Victims: Our Valuables Went Missing

    Genting Bus Crash Victims: Our Valuables Went Missing

    Blood flowed from his head as passers-by pulled him from the tour bus after it crashed and flipped on its side near Genting Highlands in Malaysia.

    Mr William Wee, 52, was drifting in and out of consciousness, but all he thought about was his wife.

    He was soon reunited with his wife, who was also pulled out of the bus. She, too, was badly injured.

    As they lay on the ground near the wreck, Mr Wee realised that his wife was no longer wearing her jewellery.

    Then he remembered that his Galaxy Note 5 and Sony Xperia smartphones, and his wife’s Samsung, were still on the bus. But when he went back into the bus to look for them, they were missing.

    The security manager told The New Paper yesterday: “I don’t know where everything had gone, but when my wife was dragged out, her gold necklace and bracelet were missing.”

    He also tried looking for his luggage, where he had kept his wallet containing $350 and RM1,500 (S$500), but it was nowhere in sight.

    “We never found our luggage or phones,” said Mr Wee, who later reported the loss to Malaysian police.

    He had kept his and his wife’s passports in his sling pack.

    Mr Wee said he was confused after the crash, but noticed about a dozen people entering the bus to help pull injured passengers out of the wreck.

    He also saw them standing around in the accident area, but they had vanished by the time the authorities arrived. He suspected that one or more of the bystanders could have stolen his valuables.

    Mr Wee received 18 stitches to his head at Bentong Hospital. His wife had multiple fractures to her shoulder, ribs and right wrist.

    They were later transferred to the National University Hospital (NUH) in Singapore. He is expected to be discharged today.

    The couple were on the Grassland Express And Tours bus that crashed into a road divider at the Karak Highway last Wednesday at about 3.45pm while heading to Kuala Lumpur from Genting Highland.

    Nine Singaporeans on board were injured. One of them, Mr Lim Sia Thian, 62, died from his injuries on Sunday.

    Another couple on the bus have also reported the loss of their valuables to Malaysian police.

    LOST

    Mr Phillip Wee, 65, who is semi-retired, said in the report that his wife, who was injured in the accident, had lost her $6,500 Rolex watch as she was being pulled out.

    His iPhone 6S, worth $1,200, and his wife’s Samsung 6S Edge smartphone, worth about $1,000, which were on them, had also gone missing.

    They also couldn’t find their luggage, which included their shopping of handbags, shoes, clothing and mooncakes worth a total of $1,400, and a carry-on bag containing a $1,000 iPad Air 3 and RM1,000 in cash.

    “All we got back from the police were our passports,” he told TNP yesterday.

    “When I asked them where the rest of our belongings were, they said they did not know.”

    He said in the report that many people had entered the bus after the accident and while they seemed to be there to help, he believed they had stolen from the victims.

    He said a representative of Grassland has contacted him and his wife to discuss compensation for their missing belongings.

    Recalling the accident, Mr William Wee said the road was clear at the time of the accident, and he was not sure what caused the bus to crash.

    “There was no car in front of the bus when it swerved suddenly,” he said.

    “When I saw that it was going to hit the divider, I shouted. Then my head hit something and I blacked out.”

    When he came to a few minutes later, he was being dragged out of the bus by strangers.

    “I heard people shouting ‘tarik, tarik’ (Malay for pull), and someone pulled me out of the bus and left me on the road,” he said.

    “I sat up, and my head was bleeding like a tap, but I knew I had to find my wife.”

    His wife was later taken out of the bus by the passers-by.

    Mr Wee said he was seated at the front of the top deck next to the late Mr Lim. He did not know Mr Lim, but was sad to learn of his death.

    “It’s really sad that this has happened,” he said.

    “Like most of the passengers, Mr Lim was sleeping when the accident happened.”

    Malaysian police said a blood sample had been taken from the bus driver and sent to be tested for drugs and alcohol.

    Inspector Mohd Shaifuddin, the investigating officer, told TNP yesterday that the results have not been released. He added that no one has been arrested and that investigations are still ongoing.

    Despite the loss of their belongings, the couples were grateful to be alive.

    Mr William Wee said: “Money can be earned. We may have lost all our belongings, but we are lucky that we at least get to keep our lives.”

     

    Source: The New Paper

  • What Happened To Entry Fee For Singapore Vehicles? Johor Residents Ask

    What Happened To Entry Fee For Singapore Vehicles? Johor Residents Ask

    Malaysia’s government must explain repeated delays to the introduction of the Vehicle Entry Permit (VEP) and if it still intends to implement the charge, said Johor residents. The New Straits Times quoted several of them as saying that there have been no updates on the system, leading them to suspect the move has been secretly scrapped.

    “I wonder what seems to be taking the government years to decide on this entry fee charge.

    “I hope this is not just talk and no action as I recall this VEP plan was mooted a couple of years ago,” 44 year-old Tiew Hui Ping told the newspaper.

    Ms Tiew said the collection from the VEP could be used to fund projects and fix the roads in Johor.

    Another Johor resident, Saravanan Batumalai, said he hoped the government will resolve the issue quickly.

    “The VEP charge should also be imposed on Singaporean motorcyclists entering as right now, Malaysian motorcyclists have to pay up to S$4 (RM12.05) everytime they cross over to Singapore,” the 24 year-old said.

    Ms Salimah Muhari from Kangkar Pulai said the government should have started implementing the VEP charge when the Singaporean government revised their toll rates at the checkpoints and increased its VEP fees to S$35 per day.

    “The RM20 fee proposed for the VEP charge is reasonable and I don’t think it will burden the Singaporeans,” the 24 year-old said.

    Back in July, Transport Minister Liow Tiong Lai said that the government has no plan to scrap the implementation of the VEP and said it will be resumed once the system is ready to go.

    The VEP, which was first proposed back in 2006, was supposed to start with a charge of RM20 for foreign vehicles entering Johor on July 16, but was postponed for the fourth time.

     

    Source: TODAY Online

deneme bonusu