Category: Sosial

  • Body Of 50 Year Old Found In Rochor Canal

    Body Of 50 Year Old Found In Rochor Canal

    The body of a 50-year-old man was pulled from the Rochor Canal on Saturday.

    When The Striats Times visited the scene at about 1pm, the body was covered by a blue police tent near the Immigration and Checkpoints Authority of Singapore building in Lavender.

    Officers later carried a black body bag onto a police van parked in Crawford Street.

    It is understood that the dead man is an Indian Singaporean. The body was discovered at a quieter part of the canal.

    Police said they received a request for assistance at 10.20am.

    “Upon police arrival, it was established that a body of a man was found floating in the canal,” a spokesman said.

    “The body was subsequently retrieved from the river and the man was pronounced dead by paramedics at the scene.”

    Police are investigating the case as an unnatural death.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Law Professor Withdraws Offer To Compensate Cabby Victim

    Law Professor Withdraws Offer To Compensate Cabby Victim

    The assistant law professor had initially offered to pay compensation to a cabby for assaulting him.

    But he withdrew the offer yesterday after he was berated by a judge.

    National University of Singapore law professor Sundram Peter Soosay, 43, was eventually sentenced yesterday to four months’ jail and ordered to pay $1,500 compensation to the cabby.

    Soosay had been found guilty last month of assaulting Mr Sun Chun Hua, 70, in the wee hours of Christmas Day in 2013.

    Earlier during yesterday’s hearing, Soosay had indicated he was willing to offer Mr Sun compensation.

    But when District Judge Victor Yeo chided him and his lawyer for not settling the issue earlier so Mr Sun could consent to the compensation, Soosay withdrew his offer.

    During sentencing, Judge Yeo said that violence against transport workers cannot be tolerated because while they provide an essential service to the public, they deserve to work in a safe and secure environment.

    He highlighted that Soosay had attacked Mr Sun at about 5am, when there was little foot traffic and the taxi driver would be at his most vulnerable.

    “I did not sense any remorse (in you), and you have a lackadaisical attitude towards compensation,” the judge said.

    The court had earlier heard that an intoxicated Soosay boarded Mr Sun’s taxi after a party.

    He vomited in Mr Sun’s taxi and got off the cab near King Albert Park in Clementi Road, where he walked away without paying.

    When the cabby chased him, Soosay handed him $50.

    But after the cabby turned his back and headed towards his taxi to retrieve change, Soosay attacked Mr Sun from behind.

    VIOLENT

    He jumped on the older man’s back, knocked him to the ground and hit him several times in the face and head.

    Soosay stopped only when a passer-by went to the cabby’s assistance.

    Calling Mr Sun a victim of gratuitous violence, Judge Yeo noted that the cabby could not work for 17 days.

    Referring to the cabby’s testimony, Judge Yeo said the cabby had never seen anything like that in his 20 years as a driver, and that he has stopped picking up drunk passengers.

    Soosay offered no mitigation before sentencing. He will be appealing his sentence and has been released on $20,000 bail.

    The $1,500 compensation will still have to be paid to Mr Sun by July 15.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • MUIS To Disburse $1.74 Million To Poor And Needy In Ramadan

    MUIS To Disburse $1.74 Million To Poor And Needy In Ramadan

    The Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS) will disburse about S$1.74 million to the poor and needy this Ramadan. The sum is a 20 per cent increase compared to last year, MUIS announced on Friday (Jun 26).

    A total of S$1.28 million will be disbursed to 12,624 recipients, and S$448,600 for programmes in Ramadan for zakat-receiving families as well as gift hampers for Hari Raya celebrations.

    MUIS said it has been able to offer the Ramadan bonus to more recipients as there is an increase in families and individuals who qualify for financial assistance from the revision of the 2014 Per Capita Income qualification criteria review.

    Chief Executive of MUIS Hj Abdul Razak Maricar said that each recipient will receive between S$100 and S$200, depending on family size.

    “MUIS also extends the Ramadan bonus to Muslim residents of 27 children homes and homes for the aged. This Ramadan disbursement is also used to fund mosque support programmes for the poor and needy throughout this month.”

    This year’s Ramadan bonus will be paid out from Jul 7.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Customer Service Star: Sahur Punya Pasal, McDeliver With Taxi!

    Customer Service Star: Sahur Punya Pasal, McDeliver With Taxi!

    We order our food at 3am plus.. they deliver so called late .. cause we have to eat before we fast in islam we call it “sahur” meaning to fill up ur stomach before the fasting day start..

    we were loitering around outside in a group of 30 worker and.. arnd 4am plus came a taxi.. someone crack a joke.. says that our mac came by taxi.. so we just laugh..

    when the taxi stop.. it was really the mac delivery..

    Taxi McDelivery 1

     

    so we laugh out loud.. we ask wat happend to ur bike.. they say.. order too much so they have to travel by cab..

    so kuddos to the outlet who make the fast decision for us who wanna “sahur” ..

    even though a bit late bt the effort counts…

     

    Casper

    [Reader Contribution]

  • Employer Jailed 15 Months For Abuse Of Myanmar Maid

    Employer Jailed 15 Months For Abuse Of Myanmar Maid

    For “cruel and inhumane” acts including scalding her domestic helper with a red-hot ladle because the curry cooked was not up to her standard, a 33-year-old minimart owner was sentenced to 15 months’ jail and ordered to compensate her victim S$4,900 today (June 25) by the State Courts.

    District Judge Christopher Goh ordered Jayaraman Suganthi to compensate Ms Naw Mu Den Paw for the time the latter could not work due to ongoing investigations.

    Suganthi’s offences were deliberate and malicious, and showed a profound lack of respect for the victim’s welfare, said DJ Goh, who noted that cases of maid abuse warrant a deterrent and retributive sentence. “You treated the victim more as chattel than a fellow human being,” he told Suganthi.

    Suganthi’s offences were particularly aggravated by her “carelessness and lack of sympathy” in not taking Ms Naw for medical treatment, added the judge.

    The abuse took place over four months between July and October 2013, and ended only after the victim ran away on Oct 3, he noted.

    Suganthi pleaded guilty last month to three counts of voluntarily causing hurt, and had three similar charges taken into consideration for sentencing. The prosecution had pressed for a jail term of 12 to 16 months for her.

    Besides placing the hot ladle on Ms Naw’s back and calf, Suganthi used a metal pestle on another occasion to hit the 24-year-old Myanmar national. This was because Ms Naw was not frying an Indian snack called vadai “fast enough”.

    On a third occasion, Suganthi punched and bruised her victim’s left eye for failing to wake up at 6.30am to send her daughter to school — even though the maid had only completed her chores at 4am that day.

    Despite the victim’s serious injuries, which included heavy bleeding from her head on one occasion, she was not given any medical help and was even told to wear long pants to cover up the injuries.

    Suganthi also used household items such as a broom handle and kitchen scissors to assault Ms Naw on various occasions, the court heard.

    Ms Naw lived in constant fear during the period of abuse and did not dare to inspect her wounds as Suganthi would scold her for it.

    A medical examination revealed that she had suffered visible burns and injuries on her back, head, eyes and the back of her ears.

    DJ Goh reiterated the gravity of foreign-worker abuse in sentencing Suganthi.

    “There is no legitimate reason why an employer should inflict any injury on any of (his or her) employees, let alone workers who are at a disadvantage because they are working in a foreign country,” he said. “It will be a sad reflection of our society if we allow such acts to go unpunished.”

    Suganthi, whose mother, husband and other relatives were present in court, sobbed loudly throughout the hearing today. She could have been jailed up to 10-and-a-half years and fined for causing hurt with a heated substance. She could have been jailed up to three years and fined up to S$7,500 for voluntarily causing hurt to her domestic helper.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu