Tag: 1Malaysia

  • Are We Falling In To Religious Fundamentalism?

    Are We Falling In To Religious Fundamentalism?

    “Muslim fundamentalism is an ideology which stands against choice, hope, change, and humanity. Islamism is a danger for the Muslim population. It is a danger for us.”

    So what is Islamism and Muslim fundamentalism? These two terms are often interchangeable and most times mean the same thing. We see it being used a lot, but what does it really mean?

    Marieme Hélie-Lucas, Algerian sociologist and founder of Women Living Under Muslim Laws, described fundamentalisms generally as “political movements of the extreme right which in a context of globalisation… manipulate religion… in order to achieve political aims.”

    Now that we have established the meaning of fundamentalism, it is important to now understand that Islamist movements are primarily political, not spiritual. So if you think that their aim is to guide you to the “right path”, think again.

    Islamism is a type of Islam that uses religion as an ideology to create a totalitarian political platform, which means creating a centralised government that does not tolerate parties of differing opinion. This kind of rule exercises dictatorial control over many aspects of life, including the will or thought of the people of its nation.

    To fundamentalists, their social model is the only one that can exist, it is the “absolute truth”.

    The most common line you’d hear from a fundamentalist would be, “This is Islam, and you cannot question it!”

    They deny the possibility of interpretation and reinterpretation, even though their adherents have been a part of it for centuries. I mean, how else could you explain the emergence of the different schools of thought?

    Fundamentalists embrace absolutism and refuse to accept questioning, insisting on a monolithic system of Islam based on their beliefs, and prosecuting you for thinking against their conventional thoughts.

    Islamists denounce secularists, often painting those who support secularism as anti-religion. They are against an ideology that promotes religious harmony because they wish to govern the state under their own rules, in this case, “Islamic rules”.

    In a Muslim-majority country, what easier way to make people succumb to you than by using religion as a tool to garner support?

    Fundamentalists aim to bring political religion into all spheres of life. They will police, judge and change anyone that is Muslim into their monolithic system. Sometimes even going overboard and demanding non-Muslims to conform.

    A lot of times, they aim sharply at women’s rights, policing and restricting our clothes, speech, and career, but this is usually bolstered with the soothing language of respect and protection. No doubt, there are women fundamentalists who advocate for these movements, but usually they don’t realise that they do so at the expense of other women as well.

    Most people associate Islamism and Muslim fundamentalism with violence, advances that are physical. But there is one type of fundamentalism that is just as deadly, and that fundamentalism is given the term “diffused fundamentalism.” This kind of fundamentalism is naturalised into your daily lives, and most times we don’t even realise it.

    They are absorbed and then spread through Twitter, Facebook, YouTube, the internet, television, radio, sermons and word of mouth.

    A lot of times, they are being spread as forms of entertainment. Shows on who is a good Muslim or who is not, talk shows in which you can enquire about what kind of sex you can have with your spouse and still “be a good Muslim”, pronouncements (with a little bit of humour added in) on how to talk, walk, dress, eat, sleep and all the little things you do in your daily lives.

    This fundamentalism is invisible in its pervasiveness and that’s what makes it so dangerous. Once absorbed and socially accepted, they become hard to combat and overturned. Diffused fundamentalism has essentially taken the beautiful and aesthetic religion that I grew up with, and turned it into a series of bodily functions.

    Diffused Muslim fundamentalism is dangerous because it is the seed that supports the growth of a society that condones violence and discrimination. It is the seed that sprouts the mentality that excuses the actions of Islamist groups such as ISIS, the Taliban, Al-Qaeda and Boko Haram. It is the seed where it all begins.

    Any kind of fundamentalism creates an oppressive environment. That, we all know. It’s not rocket science. After everything that we have seen so far, in the news and media, are we falling into religious fundamentalism?

    You be the judge.

    Just always remember: Go into politics with Islamic values, but never politicise Islam.

    * This is the personal opinion of the columnist.

     

    Source: www.themalaymailonline.com

     

     

  • Four Take PAS’ Hudud To Court

    Four Take PAS’ Hudud To Court

    Four individuals are seeking to stop PAS president Datuk Seri Abdul Hadi Awang and Parliament from tabling a Bill to amend the Syariah Courts (Criminal Jurisdiction) Act 1965 at any Parliament sitting.

    Mansoor Saat, Azira Aziz, Hasbeemaputra Abu Bakar and Hazwany Jamaluddin want the defendants to retract their plan or be prevented from continuing the discussions over the proposed amendments at any of its sessions.

    The injunction application, filed last Thursday, is fixed for case management at a High Court here on June 12, said their lawyer Siti Kasim.

    Hadi, Dewan Rakyat Speaker Tan Sri Pandikar Amin Mulia, his deputies Datuk Ismail Mohamed Said and Datuk Ronald Kiandee and secretary Datuk Roosme Hamzah have been named defendants.

    The plaintiffs also filed a main suit on June 4 naming the same parties as defendants.

    In the main lawsuit, they are seeking for a declaration that if the amendments were approved then it would be unlawful, invalid and in contradiction with various Articles of the Federal Constitution, which among others guarantee on liberty of the person, equality and protection against retrospective criminal laws.

    Among others, they want to get a declaration that the tabling of the amendment by Hadi at any Parliament sittings would be a breach of the terms of Pakatan Rakyat’s common policy framework Buku Jingga agreed on Dec 19, 2010.

    They are also applying to get any related relief from the court.

    In an affidavit-in-support of their main suit, their representative Mansoor, 61, said that Hadi had on March 18 given a letter to the Dewan Rakyat secretary to table a private members bill over the
    proposed amendment to the said Act at a Parliament sitting.

    Mansoor said he believed that the attempts to amend the Act was unconstitutional.

    He said any approval by the Dewan Rakyat speaker and his deputies for the Bill to be discussed by parliamentarians and subsequent approval of the proposed law would violate their rights.

    He said they would have to face different punishment from other non-Muslim Malaysians under the proposed amendments, reflecting that they will not enjoy equal rights like others.

    Besides that, he said that it will have a tendency to effect on the jurisdiction of the high court (superior courts) and syariah court (inferior courts).

    He said that certain new provisions were wrong in law, confusing and may be used to upgrade the jurisdiction of the syariah court.

    He said he believed that Hadi’s action was a breach of promise made to his voters.

    Asked by reporters here, Siti said that the main suit has been fixed for case management at a High Court here on June 18.

     

    Source: www.thestar.com.my

  • Malaysia’s 2nd Finance Minister: Resolve 1MDB Debt, Otherwise Malaysians Suffer

    Malaysia’s 2nd Finance Minister: Resolve 1MDB Debt, Otherwise Malaysians Suffer

    KUALA LUMPUR, June 3 — Malaysia must resolve 1Malaysia Development’s (1MDB) debt issue or risk a negative chain of events, including a possible downgrade to the country’s credit outlook or a plunge in value of the ringgit, Datuk Seri Ahmad Husni Hanadzlah warned today.

    Explaining this, the second finance minister said if Putrajaya is forced to shoulder the 1MDB debt of RM42 billion on top of its development expenditure of RM52 billion for next year, it would cause the government to fail to meet its targeted Budget 2015 deficit of 3.2 per cent and revert to over 4 per cent instead, he said.

    “What will happen? Our ratings will drop, when our ratings drop, our companies borrow from abroad, our currency value will drop like in 1998 then, when our ringgit at one point was over RM4, how to pay debts?

    “In our context, the main thing is we must solve the issue of debt so the people do not have to worry,” he said in a live interview broadcasted by national television channel TV1.

    During the 1997-1998 Asian financial crisis, the Malaysian currency dipped in value and at one point went over the RM4 mark in exchange rates against the US dollar.

    In March, Putrajaya said it is accountable for a US$3 billion (RM11.1 billion) loan secured by a 1MDB subsidiary using a letter of support from the Malaysian government.

    Last month, Moody’s Investors Services said government support of 1MDB could jeopardise Malaysia’s sovereign credit rating.

    Today, Husni also insisted that the rationalisation of 1MDB’s assets is not meant to “save” it or the government, but is instead a “restructuring” exercise with the aim of paring down its debt.

    He also said his key concern was Malaysians, citing the chain of negative effects that would happen if 1MDB’s debt had to be passed on to the government.

    But Husni also stressed in the same interview that no money has yet been lost by 1MDB, pointing out that the banking sector would otherwise be the first to chase the firm for the money it borrowed in a bid to avoid a high level of non-performing loans.

    “If the financial sector is quiet until now, that means the issue of money lost is not there,” he said.

    When speaking on the passing of 1MDB accounts from audit firm KPMG to Deloitte, he said many firms will review if they should continue using an auditor’s services after three years.

    Husni noted that 1MDB had decided to follow international standards in switching from a Big Four audit firm to the world’s top audit firm.

    On the alleged involvement of billionaire businessman Low Taek Jho in 1MDB’s deals, Husni dismissed the claims, saying the issue does not even arise.

    In March, Prime Minister Datuk Seri Najib Razak ordered the Auditor General and Public Accounts Committee to investigate 1MDB.

    1MDB was incorporated in 2009, after the prime minister announced the decision to turn the Terengganu Investment Authority (TIA) state fund into a federal agency.

    Since then, 1MDB has been dogged by negative publicity over its finances and debt, and most recently cash flow problems that saw it struggle to meet a RM2 billion loan payment.

     

    Source: www.themalaymailonline.com

  • Negligence Suit Over Missing MH370 Settled Out Of Court

    Negligence Suit Over Missing MH370 Settled Out Of Court

    A negligence suit filed by two children of a passenger on board Malaysia Airlines (MAS) flight MH370 which disappeared on March 8 last year has been settled out of court.

    The young plaintiffs, who filed the action through their mother, Ng Pearl Ming, had withdrawn the lawsuit, said Senior Federal Counsel Shahrin Saiful Nizam.

    “The suit was struck out following a notice of discontinuance filed by the plaintiff’s lawyer,” he told reporters after emerging from the chambers of High Court judge Rosnaini Saub.

    Shahrin said the family would not be allowed a file fresh suit, and that the judge had not ordered any costs.

    Meanwhile, lawyer Dr Arunan Selvaraj, who represented the boys, said the matter had come an amicable settlement after the judge spoke with the mother, Ng.

    “Having considered her rights and legal position, she has decided to accept the court compensation and move on with her life,” he said.

    The terms of settlement are confidential.

    The plaintiffs are the next-of-kin of passenger Jee Jing Hang. They filed the suit through legal firm Messrs Rusmah Arunan & Associates on November 1 at the Kuala Lumpur High Court registry.

    MAS, the Department of Civil Aviation (DCA), the Immigration Department and the Royal Malaysian Air Force were named as defendants in the suit for negligence, and in the case of MAS, breach of contract.

    In their statement of claim, the boys said their father, who was 41, had entered into an agreement with MAS for safe passage to Beijing when he paid the airfare.

    They said MAS breached the agreement when the plane, which departed from Kuala Lumpur, failed to land safely in Beijing on March 8.

    The Boeing-777 left the Kuala Lumpur International Airport at 12.41am on March 8 and disappeared from civilian radar about an hour later while over the South China Sea.

    But the plane was declared lost in an accident on January 29 by DCA director-general Datuk Azharuddin Abdul Rahman, and the 239 passengers and crew on board deemed dead.

    Lawyers well-versed in aviation law said then that Putrajaya’s declaration was an admission of liability and the airline had no defence, should suits be filed against it.

    Press reports said the MAS management had offered to pay US$50,000 (RM180,000), which would be deducted from the final compensation.

    According to the Montreal Convention – a multilateral treaty that governs international transportation of passengers and cargo – a maximum of US$175,000 can be offered in compensation by airlines.

    Of the total number of passengers, 152 were Chinese citizens, including a group of 19 artists with six family members and four staff returning from a calligraphy exhibition of their work in Kuala Lumpur.

    Thirty-eight passengers were Malaysians while the rest were from 13 other countries.

    The aircraft has yet to be found, even after an extensive search in the southern Indian Ocean where it was believed to have gone down after veering off course. – June 2, 2015.

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com

  • Malaysian Police Arrest 12 Linked To ISIS, Foils Attempt To Attack Government Buildings

    Malaysian Police Arrest 12 Linked To ISIS, Foils Attempt To Attack Government Buildings

    Police have foiled an attempt to attack government buildings in the Klang Valley after 12 people linked to the militant Islamic State (Isis) group were arrested, said Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar.

    Khalid said police also seized explosive materials and items likely to be used in bomb-making.

    “The 12 were arrested in the Hulu Langat area, in Cheras in Kuala Lumpur, and in Selangor yesterday and today, ” Khalid said in a statement.

    He said the group was planning attacks on several strategic locations in the Klang Valley, in a bid to avenge police clampdown on Isis sympathisers.

    The youngest among them was a 17-year-old. The others included a school dropout, a university student, a businessman and a wireman.

    The arrests, under anti-terrorism provisions in the Penal Code, were made yesterday and today by the counter-terrorism unit of the police’s Special Branch.

    The targets, according to police intelligence, were “strategic and important” government buildings, Khalid said.

    An Isis flag among bomb-making items which the police say it seized from the 12 suspects. – PDRM pic, April 26, 2015.An Isis flag among bomb-making items which the police say it seized from the 12 suspects. – PDRM pic, April 26, 2015.Among the explosive materials seized were 20kg of a powder suspected to be ammonium nitrate, 20kg of potassium nitrate, two litres of kerosene, two remote controls, batteries, digital weighing machines and other items believed to be “ingredients” and tools in bomb-making.

    Khalid said the planned attacks were in response to a call by a senior Isis leader in Syria to the group’s members and sympathisers to launch attacks against the interests of “secular Islamic countries” which the group deems as its enemies.

    The planned attacks were also meant as retaliation against the Malaysian police for the arrests of suspected Isis members and sympathisers, and those detained on suspicion of terrorism, he added.

    Khalid’s statement this evening follows his announcement on Twitter earlier today on the arrests and seizure of explosives.

    “12 people in Ulu Langat/KL were planning to create chaos in the country. Explosives were seized,” he had tweeted.

    To date, more than 90 people have been detained by Malaysian police for alleged ties to Isis.

    Earlier this month, 17 people were arrested for suspected involvement in the planning of terrorism activities in Kuala Lumpur.

    Khalid had said then that the April 5 arrests included two people who had just returned from Syria.

     

    Source: www.themalaysinsider.com