Tag: average

  • Why Singaporeans Expecting The “Average Starting Salary” Probably Don’t Deserve It

    Why Singaporeans Expecting The “Average Starting Salary” Probably Don’t Deserve It

    It’s tough to be a graduating Singapore student these days. With the unemployment rate at its highest since 2010, graduating students are likely to find getting their dream job more challenging, with many MNCs cutting entry-level openings meant for graduates looking to kick-start their career in an area of interest.

    We wrote an article last week on how the banking sector has been one of the hardest hit in terms of job cuts, and how many of these jobs lost are unlikely to ever return.

    These are ominous signs that the job market for young Singaporeans may not be as rosy and straightforward as it once was. Gone are the days when people graduate and go into the MNCs or SMEs of their choice, and have their first employer teach them all they need to know about the industry, while earning a decent starting salary at the same time.

    The Problem With Expectations

    Earlier this month, we wrote about the expectations that Singapore workers have when it comes to pay increment and bonuses. These are expectations that are created not through individuals carefully analysing what’s happening in today’s employment market, but rather, by what’s generalised and reported in the media, or by what Singapore workers have come to take for granted based on what they experienced in the past.

    For example, we may expect a 5% annual increment from our employers simply based on what the media reports, which in turn may be based on some observations or survey done by a recruitment company. This may or may not be an accurate reflection of what’s actually happening on the ground.

    But it doesn’t matter for most people.

    The expectations have been set, never mind if the media report wasn’t that accurate to begin with, or if there were other reports that may contradict the report they read.

    The other way expectations are set is based on what people are used to. For example, if I were used to enjoying a 10% increment each year during my first 3 years at work, I would expect a 10% increment in my fourth year as well, even if the economy weren’t doing well, or if the Singapore economy is experiencing deflation for 24 straight months.

    Forming Expectations From What We Read

    How do undergraduates who have yet to enter the workforce get their job expectations from?

    The first way is based on what they read. For example, the media may report that the median salary in Singapore is $3,375 (before employer’s CPF contribution) as of 2015 based on information provided by the Ministry of Manpower.

    Other news report may be based on statistics provided by non-government agencies. For example, the Straits Times reported earlier this year that median salary for university graduates is $3,300, with 9 in 10 graduates finding employment within 6 months of their final examinations. This is based on a Graduate Employment Survey jointly conducted by NUS, NTU and SMU. Not to be outdone, SIM also did its own survey noting that 73% of its graduates found full-time job within 6 months with an average starting salary of $2,766.

    It’s easy to see why these seemingly innocuous reports can lead to expectations being formed. Undergraduates, who may otherwise have no idea about what’s happening in the working world and hence, no expectations about how much they should earn, suddenly find themselves have a salary range in mind when it comes to landing their first job after graduation, never mind if they have zero experiences to begin with, or don’t even know what the heck they want to do.

    Forming Expectations From What We Learn

    The other way expectations are created is based on what graduates are taught in school.

    Due to the importance of attracting young Singaporeans to enrol with them, universities, both public and private, always like to paint a rosy picture of what their graduates can expect. They tend to be a little over optimistic, featuring ex-graduates of theirs who are now working in “successful roles” such as investment banking, private equity and hedge funds.

    No universities would be caught telling their students the harsh truth that their degree is worthless, if they don’t have the relevant internship experience or the right network to get into the career of their choice. Neither do they want to tell you that the banks themselves are cutting headcounts across the board.

    The (Big) Problem With Graduates Who Expect The “Average Starting Salary”

    Many graduates spend way too much time trying to find out what is the “average starting salary” for university graduates. The problem however is that this “average starting salary” really doesn’t matter for you, the job seeker, especially if you want a rich and fulfilling career.

    You see, the graduate who knows what he or she aspires to do is finding ways via internships, networking and self-education to work towards that role. Such a graduate isn’t interested in knowing what the “average starting salary is for year 2016 students.” They already know what they want to do, whether the sector they are looking at is hiring people, and how much they are worth. They also know how useful (or not useful) they really are to hiring companies as a fresh graduate.

    On the other hand, graduates who expect the “average starting salary” because of what others are saying are usually just giving out a signal that they have no idea how else to determine the value of themselves, or what they can offer – which unfortunately usually isn’t very much since they don’t even know what they want to do.

    These are the graduates who are familiar with how much the “average starting salary” is in Singapore, but have no idea what is it that they want to do, even after 3 to 4 years in university.

    Nobody Thinks They Are Worst Than The Average

    Back in secondary school, our maths teacher taught us that median represent the value right in the middle of the data group.

    When it comes to salary matters, it means that 50% of people earn more than the median while another 50% earn less than the median. Hence, earning less than the median is perfectly normal, especially if you know the industry you are in doesn’t pay that much.

    People who know what they want to do wouldn’t be bother about the median. A graduate who intends to go into journalism would know that his or her starting salary is likely to be less than $3,000 due to the nature of the sector.

    For graduates who are not sure about what they want to do, the median becomes a really important figure to take reference from, since they can’t rely on other metrics. A job is only good if it offers at least the median salary. Negotiation is based largely on what the salary package offers, because the person doesn’t really know what else to base it on.

    Put yourself in the employer’s shoes for a moment. We think it’s fair to say that a company would prefer hiring people who knows what they want to do, and who really wants to join and stay with them. Why then would they want to pay the median salary for a person who is simply applying for the job because it sounds doable and pays the “average starting salary”?

    Have The Right Expectations For The Right Reasons

    This article isn’t meant to say that graduate shouldn’t have any pay expectations. It’s always good to know what’s available out there and what these jobs are paying. But you must also know how these jobs fit to your interest and career ambitions.

    As a fresh graduate, your job is to have an understanding of what is it that you are interested in, and what are the skills sets and experience that your currently lack to get to the role that you aspire for.

    It also only by knowing these things that you can set expectations on what you want out from your first job, rather than aimlessly applying for jobs with an expectation based on what you read online.

     

    Source: https://sg.finance.yahoo.com

  • Ismail Kassim: Grading Your Leaders

    Ismail Kassim: Grading Your Leaders

    Lately I have been thinking about the nature of political leadership.
    What is the difference, I ask myself, between good leaders and great leaders and between the former and those regarded as average, ‘’Ok, can-do or so-so’’ leaders?
    I think we can all agree that good leaders are good managers. They are relatively hard-working, efficient, and to some extent, able to deliver the promised material goods to the people.
    Great leaders, on the other hand, need not necessarily be good at managing, but they have a grand vision and the ability to inspire their people towards a common goal.
    They are leaders who are ready to sacrifice their lives for a cause they believe in. They become great only after emerging victorious after a struggle against great odds.
    History is replete with such great leaders: Mao, Nehru, Uncle Ho, Thatcher, Reagan, Mandela, Deng Xiaoping and our very own LKY. I will also put Mahathir and Putin, despite their shortcomings, in the same category.
    In short, the underlying common factor is struggle. It is only through a tough battle that a leader can stamp his authority and forge group cohesion and solidarity around him.
    There is no other way. Camaraderie cannot arise in the absence of a battle against deadly opponents and certainly not through devious means to achieve victory without fighting.
    How about good leaders who lived in stable, post-revolutionary times? Is there any hope of them becoming great?
    Of course – lots of hopes. One way is to create your own challenges through manipulating the internal or external landscape.
    Abe, I think, is on the way to greatness if his efforts to remould the Japanese mind after the traumas of WW11 succeed.
    Duterte and Modi too have a chance if they could last the distance in their valiant goal to reshape their nations.
    So good leaders can become great, but if they are not careful they can also be downgraded one rung down to the level of the ‘’so-so’’ leaders.
    Badawi is a fine example of a leader considered good initially but later downgraded. He had great dreams and goals, but he could not control the greedy warlords and also the religious misogynists in and out of his party. Under their combined onslaught, his vision evaporated into thin air.
    Cameron, after winning a second term, was on the road to greatness, but then he stumbled badly over the Brexit issue. After his defeat in the referendum and subsequent resignation, history will put him under the ‘’so-so’’ category.
    Other leaders who are currently classified as good will also meet the same fate as Cameron if they mishandle or spurn the challenges facing them.
    Actually, leaders who have to face tough but winnable challenges during their rule should consider themselves lucky. They do not have to manufacture a crisis. All they need is to brace themselves and rally their good-minded people to battle.
    But if they take the soft or easy option, shifting the goalpost and disqualifying their opponents through dubious constitutional manoeuvres, then they risk slipping from good to the ‘’so-so’’ category.
    Such ‘’so-so’’ leaders, of course, can still console themselves. At least they are one rung above the bottom group of rotten leaders; the corrupt who steal their people’s money to feed their family frenzied overseas shopping sprees and bribe or buy political support from friends and foes alike.
    There are so many of these rotten apples, near and far, that I don’t think it is necessary for me to mention any by name.
    Readers should not have any problems in identifying at least some of them. What, if in the process of dodging a fight, a good leader makes a monumental blunder, an error of judgement, with grave consequences for his people in the coming years?
    Will he just be demoted to ‘’so-so’’ or kick down two rungs to join the rotten lot? I will let history make that call.
    spurns greatness
    falls from good to rotten
    ah! what a fate
  • How Much Do You Need To Be Above Singapore’s ‘Average’?

    How Much Do You Need To Be Above Singapore’s ‘Average’?

    Forbes has named Singapore as the third richest country in the world. This wealth is measured using the Gross Domestic Product (GDP) per capita. Simplistically, it adds up everyone’s income for the year – to obtain GDP – before dividing it by the country’s population.

    So how much should the “average” Singaporean be making based on this calculation?

    Read More: Singapore, world’s richest. At what cost?

    The golden number is $5,943!

    At end-2014, Singapore’s GDP was recorded at SGD390.1 billion with population size of 5.47 million (Singapore residents + foreign talents).

    Table 1: National Accounts and Population in Singapore

    FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014
    GDP(SGD mils) SGD 346,354 SGD 362,333 SGD 378,200 SGD 390,089
    Population (mils) 5.18 5.31 5.40 5.47
    GDP per Person SGD 66,816 SGD 68,205 SGD 70,048 SGD 71,318
    Income per month SGD 5,568 SGD 5,684 SGD 5,837 SGD 5,943

    Source: Singapore Department of Statistics 

    Is $5,943 the correct number as the average wage?

    As mentioned, GDP per capita is a simple method to define how rich a country is by understanding how much everyone in the population earns per annum.

    However, using the entire population is not a good gauge, as children, students and retirees are not working, and hence should be excluded from the calculation.

    Table 2: National Accounts and Labour Force in Singapore

    FY2011 FY2012 FY2013 FY2014
    GDP (SGD mils) SGD 346,354 SGD 362,333 SGD 378,200 SGD 390,089
    Labour Force (mils) 3.24 3.36 3.44 3.53
    GDP per Worker SGD 106,995 SGD 107,779 SGD 109,824 SGD 110,482
    Income per month SGD 8,916 SGD 8,982 SGD 9,152 SGD 9,207

    Note: The labour force comprise of people who are working or seeking work Source: Comprehensive Labour Force Survey, Ministry of Manpower

    Using labour force instead of total population will be more accurate since we are basing our calculation only on those who are working. In this case, average wages inclusive of CPF contribution would be SGD9,207 per month per person.

    Additional Clarifications: You should be adding any additional income received aside from your salary into this figure. 

    So what are your numbers telling me? 

    If you are like us, then this number may appear exceedingly high to you, perhaps even unattainable. Do not worry, you’re not alone.

    The median salary in Singapore is SGD3,770. That means the majority of us  are not earning the average, unless we have other source of income. This is normal, as income are usually skewed towards the higher income earners and thus medium hardly ever equates to mean.

    What you should make out of this number is that there is potential to increase your wages in Singapore. Unlike poorer countries, where your future growth in earnings would be easily capped by the low potential in the country, we do not lack this in Singapore. There is money to be made, somewhere and somehow, in Singapore.

     

    DollarsAndSense.sg is a website that aims to provide interesting, bite-sized financial articles which is relevant to the average Singaporean.

    Image from Benjamin Lim. 

    Additional clarifications:

    Some readers have commented that measuring a person’s income using GDP is not correct. They are right. There are two ways to calculate GDP. One is via an expenditure approach and the other is via an income approach. For this article, we have used the income approach.

    Typically, national income can be measured by adding up wages + rental + interest + business profit. This is a ballpark alternative to measuring GDP. As seen from the formula, wages is only one part of the equation for income. Most of the super rich (i.e. the top 5%) will make the bulk of their income from rental (rent of real estate), interest (returns from investments such as stocks and bonds and from business profits (dividends) and not their monthly wages. 

    Other income an individual received should also be included when considering total income. This includes any government subsidy. 

    Regardless of how balanced or lopsided the distribution of wealth is in a country, GDP per capita will always be higher than “average” income. That is because there are additional factors such as corporate tax (i.e. money paid to the government) and retained earning that will not go to the individual. 

    Lastly, this article is not meant to say that we should all aimed to earn about SGD 9207 per working adult. Obviously, that is not possible. Rather the point is to show that as a country, we are by no means poor, and in fact, could be seen as generating about SGD 9207 of economic value per person, on average. Whether the medium salary of SGD 3770 is right or not can be of the opinion of the individual readers. 

     

    Source: http://dollarsandsense.sg