Tag: bisexual

  • Munah, Hirzi, ShiGGa Shay, Inch Chua And Daren Tan Among Acts Lined Up For Pink Dot Concert 2015

    Munah, Hirzi, ShiGGa Shay, Inch Chua And Daren Tan Among Acts Lined Up For Pink Dot Concert 2015

    Held in conjunction with the annual Pink Dot rally, the Pink Dot Concert 2015 is set to bring Hong Lim Park to life with an exhilarating line-up of some of Singapore’s hottest local talents.

    Performers include YouTube sensations Munah and Hirzi, Project Superstar winner Daren Tan, singer-songwriters Inch Chua and Gentle Bones, hip-hop artist ShiGGa Shay as well as dance group Plus Point.

    IMG_20150529_074108

    Starting at 6:30pm on Saturday13th June, the Pink Dot Concert 2015 will conclude as participants come together in a sea of shimmering pink lights to form the iconic Pink Dot; a symbol of support for the freedom to love. Please remember to wear pink-coloured clothing!

    According to regulations governing Speakers’ Corner, only Singaporeans and Permanent Residents may participate in events held at Hong Lim Park. However, foreigners are most welcome to watch and observe the concert as well as the formation of Pink Dot 2015.

    Support the #FreedomToLove with Pink Dot SG: YouTubeFacebook | Instagram & Twitter: @PinkDotSg | Website | Social Media Campaign

    Hashtags: #PinkDotSg #FreedomToLove #WhereLoveLivesSg

     

    Source: http://popspoken.com

  • The Gay Revival

    The Gay Revival

    I’m going to address some very controversial topics today. If you have trouble with God moving outside your comfort zone, you may not want to read this article. I’m serious: be careful! This may push your buttons.

    We’re going to talk about homosexual Christians, LGBT [Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Transgender] Christians.

    The Bible is clear, Old Testament and New: homosexual behavior is sinful behavior. Since we’re talking about Christians, we could go on about how there are loads of sins that we overlook in the church, while we call out certain others, but that hypocrisy is another topic for another day.

    One day, years ago, I was with a small group, praying for some folks we knew that were stuck in homosexuality. It was one of those prayer gatherings where you just know that God is hearing your prayers, even as he’s helping to shape them and encourage us in them.

    In the midst of that, I had a vision: tens of thousands of people in the homosexual community were encountering Jesus. It was a huge movement, and God was in their midst. They were worshiping powerfully, and God was delighting in their praise. There were signs and wonders. Many were in tears, some because of His love, some because of their sin, but it wasn’t always the sin I had my own eyes on that they were convicted of. It was a genuine revival.

    I began to praise God for that revival, for the many sons and daughters that were coming back to their Father, and as I did, the vision became even more real: I was in their midst as they were worshiping God.

    And then I realized: they weren’t – most of them weren’t – leaving their culture. Nearly all of them stayed in the homosexual community, and a very large number of them didn’t appear to repent of their homosexual ways.

    I began to react to that: That’s not right, I said in my mind. Father began to gently instruct me in this vision:

    1)         When he calls people to himself, he does not call them to leave their culture. American Church Culture is not our goal. Relationship with Jesus is the goal. Hmm. OK. That’s true enough.

    2)         When he finally got ahold of my life (after a longer fight than it should have been), I was not sin-free. There were several sins that he took decades to put his finger on. In fact, He said, There are some things I haven’t pointed out to you even yet. Yikes.

    But it’s true. If he didn’t point out– and by pointing out, give me grace to deal with – some of my sins for decades, why should I expect him to be less patient with other sons and daughters?

    3)         And son, he said so very gently: these are my children, not yours. I am their Father, you are not. I am capable of raising My own children without your getting in their way.

    Since that experience, I’ve received a few reports that it’s beginning to happen, that substantial numbers of people inside the LGBT community are discovering the Lover of their Souls!

    I have received credible testimony from different people in different streams that tell me about the revival that is going on among the homosexual population. (At their request, and for their safety, I will not be releasing their identities. Some people do not respond well when God moves outside their box.)

    These people have been among gatherings of gay believers – we might call them church meetings or conferences – where the worship is powerful, where the Holy Spirit is present, where signs and wonders are in abundance, where Jesus is lifted up high. They have recognized God’s favor on the gatherings, and experienced His delight in them.

    I have met believers who are homosexuals. Some appear to be your basic, timid churchgoers, some flaming transsexuals proclaiming the gospel to their community. Some are content with their homosexuality; some want out but don’t know how; some are proud of their status, though these seem to be the ones who’ve taken the brunt of the church’s accusations.

    I’ve said all this to arrive at this conclusion: God is moving powerfully in ways that we never expected. And hold on to your hats, because he has more than this that he’s going to do.

    So how shall we respond to homosexuals that call themselves Christians? That’s simple: we love them. Just like we’re called to love self-righteous people who call themselves Christians.

    We surely have no right to challenge the faith of either group, and nearly always, we lack the right to challenge either their behavior or their culture. But we have the right to love them.

    Let’s love one another, as Jesus commanded us, shall we? And let’s trust our good Father to raise His children well.

     

    Source: www.pilgrimgram.com

  • Kirsten Han: Time To Make Singapore A More Inclusive Space

    Kirsten Han: Time To Make Singapore A More Inclusive Space

    Ireland – a largely Catholic country which only decriminalised homosexuality in 1993 and divorce in 1995 – voted resoundingly to amend their constitution and approve same-sex marriage last weekend. They have become the first country in the world to approve gay marriage by popular vote, and at a count of 62 per cent to 38 per cent, no less.

    This piece of news stood in stark contrast to another development circulating on social media in Singapore: that the Media Development Authority (MDA) had apparently banned from radio and TV a song and music video by Jolin Tsai, presumably because its pro-gay message would encourage a push for same-sex marriage here.

    It feels a bit as if the MDA has jumped the gun; there *is* no push for same-sex marriage in Singapore, mostly because everyone is still wondering how to shift the supposedly-not-enforced-but-somehow-still-important-to-keep Section 377A, which criminalises sex between men. On top of that, many in the LGBT community find themselves struggling against the fact that some Singaporeans don’t even recognise that discrimination exists.

    That conservatives exist in every country is beyond doubt; I’m sure there were some fundies praying for the Lord to chuck rain down on gay people in Ireland too.

    But while we’re riding high on the inspiration generated by Ireland’s stellar example, it’s time to think of how our own country could be so much better for everyone living in it. To not just dwell on hate and fear, but on love.

    The repeal of 377A would have little to impact on the lives of heterosexual – or even religious – people. It would, however, mean a lot for LGBT people in Singapore, all of whom have parents, siblings, relatives and friends who would in turn be affected. It would be a strong signal that Singapore’s government will no longer be in the vanguard of discrimination against LGBT people, that it will no longer support the symbolic legislation that validates countless forms of bullying, dehumanising language and prejudice.

    It would be a step towards telling young LGBT persons that they *are* accepted in Singaporean society; that they don’t have to be ashamed of who they are and that they can have a future without stigma and fear in Singapore. It would tell the parents of these LGBT persons that they are not alone, that they don’t have to worry about their children being branded as deviants and criminals. Conservatives aren’t the only ones who care about family; gay people have families too. Love, even familial love, is not exclusive to heterosexuals.

    The court has rejected the constitutional challenge to 377A, essentially pushing the responsibility back to the legislators. Yet legislators have often pointed to Singapore’s conservatism as a reason for maintaining the status quo. As we see from the MDA’s move, the state is not only unwilling to change, but actively restricting the conversation.

    Ireland has done something wonderful and historic in this past weekend. Let us Singaporeans not be caught on the wrong side of history; let us not wait for court cases or politicians to bring us the equality that we should have.

    Make it to Hong Lim Park for Pink Dot. Write to your MP about LGBT rights and the need for anti-discrimination legislation. Talk to your friends about acceptance and diversity. Reach out to LGBT people around you who might need support. Do what you can to create a safe space for them to be who they are and say what they need to say.

    377A continues to loom over us all – a symbol of prejudice and discrimination. Yet we cannot simply wait for it to disappear; we as Singaporeans can do our part to start making Singapore a more inclusive place. Today.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Diana Abdul Rahim: Not A Case Of Secular Fundamentalism

    Diana Abdul Rahim: Not A Case Of Secular Fundamentalism

    I refer to Mr Walid Jumblatt’s letter, “Don’t let secular fundamentalism be the norm” (May 15), which was a reply to Mr Hairol Salim’s letter, “Efforts of Pink Dot ambassadors should be lauded, not condemned” (May 13).

    Secular fundamentalism connotes scorn of religion and its adherents, and is usually accompanied by attempts to exclude and limit religious expressions in public. The burqa ban in France is an example.

    Secular fundamentalism seeks to trivialise the persecution faced by adherents of a certain religion who are confronted by structural disempowerment. This is, however, not the case in this debate.

    Mr Hairol’s point about “religious-driven emotions” was addressed to a particular group of “activists and individuals from certain religious communities”. It was not a sweeping statement against the legitimacy of religious voices.

    Indeed, he stated that “views of all faiths and belief systems should be given fair consideration”, which echoes Mr Walid’s sentiments.

    It is illogical to construe this willingness to provide fair consideration for all perspectives, religious or otherwise, as an expression of secular fundamentalism.

    If we are serious about being inclusive, then Mr Hairol’s appraisal of those who voice the concerns of the LGBT (lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender) community should hold no controversy.

    Claims of respecting the democracy of dialogue have no legitimacy if we are unwilling to allow the people we disagree with the space to speak on their own terms.

    To me, there is much common ground between both writers. For dialogue to work in a reasonable, respectful and empathetic manner, however, interlocutors should be charitable and avoid misrepresenting the positions of their counterpart.

     

    *Article written by Diana Abdul Rahim was published in Voices, Today, on 22 May 2015

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • The Life Of A Male Prostitute

    The Life Of A Male Prostitute

    When Daniel, 33, decided to explore the gay world in 2000, he never thought he would eventually enter the oldest profession of mankind – prostitution.

    The medium-built and sun-tanned young man from Anhui province asked to be identified only by his first name and declined any photos, but he spoke candidly about his life as a sex worker, offering a rare glimpse into a common subculture that is being overlooked in modern society.

    Daniel claimed he was not sensitive to his sexual orientation when he was a boy. Driven by curiosity, he sought out gay photos online back in 1998, back when Internet access was still new to him. Soon he found some friends with similar taste. After about two years of nine-to-five office work in Shanghai, Daniel was bored. He decided to try a more exciting life. He uploaded his photograph to a compensated-dating website.

    His first customer soon appeared. It wasn’t very glamorous.

    He was paid 1,000 yuan (S$199), a fair amount at that time. In 2006, Daniel arrived in Hong Kong seeking to ply his trade. He had already chatted with some potential customers on instant messaging services before setting out. Daniel arrives periodically on a 7-day permit. He attends up to five clients charging HK$600-800 each time. Daniel is pleased that he can earn a living in Hong Kong without a working visa. He works from hotel rooms. Sometimes he takes his customers to his hostel, where he pays HK$150 a day.

    Daniel now spends about three quarters a year in Hong Kong, Singapore and Malaysia. He earns as much as 30,000 yuan in a month in Singapore. Risks are higher too. Daniel was charged with breaching the condition of his stay, when he was caught working on his tourist visa. He appealed and continued to come to Hong Kong while his appeal was underway. He continued working as a prostitute during his visits. He lost his appeal and was banned from Hong Kong for the next two years.

    Most male sex workers (MSWs), like Daniel, have chosen their vocation voluntarily. “I think men turn to prostitution for many reasons. But as far as I know, no one has done this against their will or owing to their financial backgrounds,” Daniel said. “Some of them do it because they want to make more money, though.”

    “I do not have a moral problem with having sex for money, as long as it’s safe. That is the bottom line. However, I have always been concerned about how this (being a sex worker) may affect my family,” Daniel said frankly. His family is relatively well-off. His parents are teachers and living comfortably in his home town. “My parents don’t know about my work, or anything else about my sex life but they suspected that I was gay.”

    Contrary to common belief, the MSWs, who are usually labeled as “money boys”, serve mainly males rather than females. “More than 90 percent of my customers are males,” Daniel said. “Female customers may just need someone to talk to, not necessarily sex.” On rare occasions, females come to him for threesomes with their boyfriends.

    The entrenched Chinese morality and psychological pressures prohibit women from seeking sex partners, said Leo Yiu, chief executive for Midnight Blue, a local support network for MSWs. “People believe men take advantage of women when having sex regardless whether they’re forced to do so or they initiate it. Worse still, women do it at risk of getting pregnant,” Yiu commented. “It’s a great challenge for them to expose themselves to strangers in a strange environment.”

    Nonetheless, an odd phenomenon is emerging nowadays that married couples visit male prostitutes to spice up their sexual lives. “Husbands bring their wives along to go whoring due to the fact that it’s exciting or husbands realize they cannot fulfill their wives’ sexual needs so they hire MSWs to do the job,” said a local sex worker named Wai. He is gay and boasts dozens of customers.

    Daniel is now self-employed. He met all his customers online. No one takes a cut from his earnings. “I love the free time that the job allows me. I cannot get back to typical office work. Plus, I get to know many people, some of them are rich and smart, through this job. And I have learned a lot from them.”

    At present, MSWs usually seek their customers in three ways. First, there are individual online encounters; second, online agents and third, saunas and massage establishments. “Not every money boy is a masseuse, but they ought to learn this skill if they look for more opportunities,” said Wai. “A small number of them set up one-man brothels.”

    Midnight Blue, set up in 2005, aims to promote safe sex among gays and provide legal support for MSWs. At times, staff at Midnight Blue launch outreaching visits to night clubs and saunas to advocate a safer environment for MSWs. Their motto is, “Whoring to a Better Future, Paying for a More Sensuous Life”. The organization has published a book, Sex Without Boundaries, about the ups and downs of eight young people working as MSWs.

    It is estimated that there are around 2,000 MSWs in the city. Some of them are locals and the others come from the mainland and South East Asian countries. Yiu believes the import of these MSWs is helping develop the sex industry. “When the pie gets bigger, people get to know where to look for suitable people when they feel like it and the sex workers, either males or females, will have a bigger market,” he said.

    According to a Chinese adage, ma si luo di xing, meaning you need to walk if your horse dies. Gloomy economy had spawned prostitution. Daniel witnessed a boom of MSWs in Singapore during the economic downturn. The candidates were previously drivers or chefs or other occupations.

    Daniel considers himself fortunate that he seldom comes across problem customers. He says most customers come to him to be soothed. “I think that being a sex worker might be like being a therapist. Many gay people are introvert, they have no one to talk to and they cannot come out of the closet. Only by talking to us can they reveal their true selves,” Daniel explained.

    It is understandable that MSWs are commonly gays, or preferably so, for the sake of their jobs. Straight men may find it gross or need to tackle a great psychological barrier in making love to men.

    Ever since he took to prostitution, Daniel was prepared to sacrifice his childhood friends. “We have nothing in common. They talk about families and kids, all this has nothing to do with me,” he said.

    Daniel understands the limitations of prostitution – age. “I will retire from this business, but I know people who work well past 40. That said, the older we get, the less we will work, and eventually we will have to retire,” he admitted. He expects he saves up enough money to establish his own business within a year.

    Looking back, he regrets nothing for choosing this path. “If I had my life ahead of me, I would still choose to do the same thing,” he said. “Prostitution is a harmless vocation. We don’t destroy but complement.”

    Daniel doesn’t rule out the possibility of getting married one day, with a girl. “I can accept a girl as my family member but if you talk about sex, I still prefer a man.”

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com