Tag: Chee Soon Juan

  • Chee Soon Juan: Singapore Is Ailing, PAP Serving Her Poison

    Chee Soon Juan: Singapore Is Ailing, PAP Serving Her Poison

    Dr Chee Soon Juan, the Secretary-General of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), wrote an article on the condition of the country stating that Singapore economy is living on borrowed time and innovation is the only antidote.

    “It is what we desperately need for economic regeneration. Welcoming the unknown, taking risks, making mistakes, embracing failure, encouraging derring-do – isn’t this what being innovative is all about?” he said.

    Pointing that countries around the world are changing so drastically politically while Singapore continues to follow its old ways, being “disastrously out-of-sync with rapidly changing times.”. Cocooned in its comfort zone, unaware that Singapore is sinking deeper into dysfunction and mediocrity and passed by societies ready and willing to change.

    This is what he wrote in full :

    THE WORLD is in upheaval. South Koreans throng the streets demanding the removal of their president; Malaysians clash as they profess their love or loathing (depending on whether you don red or yellow apparel) for their prime minister; pro- and anti-Beijing Hong Kongers do battle over whether two young lawmakers should be disqualified from parliament; Pinoys and Pinays elected a Pope-cussing-Obama-hating-gun-happy politician as their national leader; the Brits up-ended order of every conceivable kind when they voted to leave the European Union; and now, half of Americans elected as their president someone whom the other half cannot find enough expletives to hurl at.

    All this is enough to make Singaporeans want to quicken the search for another habitable planet to fly to.

    Cue PM Lee: “In Singapore, we watch all this with concern and we have to ask ourselves how we can prevent ourselves from going in that direction. For 50 years we’ve been very lucky. We are still united, still proud of the country, still moving forward…So be aware that the risks are there, and you have seen what can go wrong in other countries.”

    Translation: Singaporeans are lucky to have the PAP. So shun disruption, stick with the familiar. We may not be able to change the government but that is a good thing because citizens cannot be trusted to make the right decisions – just look at the other countries. The PAP will decide for us and protect us from the world’s madness.

    This is what Singaporeans hear and have been hearing for half-a-century. The thinking has been baked into our national DNA.

    It is also one that will ensure our country’s demise. It is this fear of the unfamiliar, fear of getting things wrong, fear of taking chances that will be Singapore’s undoing. For nothing in such an outlook fosters an innovative culture.

    Welcoming the unknown, taking risks, making mistakes, embracing failure, encouraging derring-do – isn’t this what being innovative is all about?

    The truth is that our economy is living on borrowed time. The dependence on multinationals to transfer skills and know-how, a hard-working and cheap labour force ready to work even harder and cheaper, and a bewildering bevy of government companies controlled by the Prime Minister’s wife is a model that may have worked in the past but is disastrously out-of-sync with rapidly changing times.

    As it is, our economy, teetering on the brink of a recession, has been ailing for the last couple of years – this taking place despite the absence of a major world crisis. The danger is that it may signal the beginning of something protracted.

    Innovation is the anti-dote. It is what we desperately need for economic regeneration. For this, change – including political change, especially political change – is necessary.

    I can do no better than quote Steve Wozniak, Apple’s co-founder, who pointed out that a company like Apple could not have emerged from a place like Singapore: “Look at structured societies like Singapore, where are the creative people?…All the creative elements seem to disappear.”

    It is a tragedy that Singaporeans are unable to see that Americans, Hong Kongers, or Britons are unafraid to take political chances, stand up to injustice – perceived or otherwise, and be their nation’s boss. So what if Brexit fails or China cracks down on Hong Kong or Donald Trump’s tenure turns out to be a disaster? They’ll learn, course-correct and improve their political systems in the long run.

    What about us? We continue to be afraid of change because the PAP breeds and feeds the fear of change. We are cocooned in our comfort zone, unaware that we are sinking deeper into dysfunction and mediocrity and passed by societies ready and willing to change.

    It has become a cliche, but still no less true, that this island on which we inhabit has precious little natural resources; nothing to mine for, drill at or grow on. This is why it is so troubling that those in power are strangulating the very thing that will ensure our survival and progress – the minds of our people.

    What fertiliser does for crops, political freedom does for innovation. The messiness and seeming chaos that accompanies democracy must not be seen as societal threats to be bleached from our system. In our desire for peace and security, let us not inadvertently celebrate the peace of the cemetery and the security of the serf.

    Political disruption (unfortunately, to many Singaporeans, this includes the simple act of electing a few more opposition MPs) is needed to energise the human spirit and provide that impetus for positive change.

    May wisdom and courage prevail.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Online Gambling Just Another Revenue Generating Avenue For Government

    Online Gambling Just Another Revenue Generating Avenue For Government

    The SDP had opposed the PAP’s move to allow the construction of casinos in Singapore in 2005. The government’s rationale then was that there was money to be made off the gambling scene in Asia.

    Not every business venture should be pursued just because it makes money. There are moral and ethical considerations too.

    Gambling is a vice and its social ills are widely documented. Lives and families are destroyed because of addiction to gambling. Gambling also brings along other criminal activities such as money laundering, organised crime and sex trafficking.

    Just this year, for example, two people were engaged in gambling related crimes. A Singaporean was caught laundering nearly one million dollars in Australia in order to gamble. In a separate case, a UOB officer stole a total of $95,000 from the bank to pay for his gambling habit in Macau.

    For these complex and intertwining reasons, gambling – especially one facilitated by the state – should not be encouraged.

    Minister for Social and Family Development Tan Chuan-jin disingenuously argues that the PAP, by allowing state organisations such as Singapore Pools and the Singapore Turf Club to conduct online betting, is not encouraging gambling.

    He says that the move will, instead, allow that government to monitor the “very real dangers” of virtual gambling. However, he doesn’t spell out how the authorities will overcome these dangers by legitimising gambling over the Internet.

    The truth is that with or without the state’s entry into the online world of gambling, those who seek to indulge in the gaming habit will find ways on the Internet to satisfy their desires. Providing additional and state-sanctioned gaming sites adds to, not minimises, the problem.

    One factor that is prompting the government to enter into the online gambling business is that it sees its revenue falling due to poor economic circumstances. By getting into the act, the government opens up another avenue for revenue collection.

    The problem is that gambling exploits the dreams and hopes of the poor who are most vulnerable to and who can least afford such activity.

    There are many ways to develop a sound and mature economy without resorting to this kind of exploitation. Instead of making money from Singaporeans placing online bets, the PAP should free up the political system and encourage innovation and entrepreneurship. This will generate a productive economy and drive sound economic growth without adversely affecting our families.

    This latest measure is another step in a slow but certain descent into turning Singapore into a city without any values, and one ruled by a government with no ideas beyond exploiting the people.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Chee Soon Juan: Deadly Mishaps A Poor Reflection Of Government

    Chee Soon Juan: Deadly Mishaps A Poor Reflection Of Government

    The recent past has seen several deadly mishaps that leads one to question the quality of our workforce and, more importantly, its leadership.

    Just this morning, we learnt of an SMRT bus driver taking the bus over an empty field when he thought no one was looking and got it stuck in the mud.

    Other incidents involving bus drivers were not so amusing. A 29-year-old woman was killed when she was struck by an SBS Transit bus in Toh Tuck Avenue. An elderly pedestrian died after a bus ran him over at Toa Payoh. A visitor from Britain was fatally hit by a bus while he was crossing the road at Upper Cross Street. An SMRT bus driver ran over and killed a 60-year-old woman at Yishun.

    Then, a slab of concrete installed as a sunshade collapsed in Tampines. It was a stroke of good fortune that it did not topple and kill anyone.

    Two shelter walkways were hit by crane-lorries in Bukit Batok, one of them toppled over with the base-plates of the shelter ripped from the ground. Luckily, no one was injured.

    Several lift breakdowns resulted in severe injuries to passengers and even caused the death of an elderly man.

    Two young MRT maintenance workers were killed at the Pasir Ris station when safety procedures broke down.

     

    Source: Chee Soon Juan 徐顺全

  • SDP: Elected Presidency Reforms A Distraction From Real Democratic Reforms

    SDP: Elected Presidency Reforms A Distraction From Real Democratic Reforms

    In 1993 when the government introduced the Elected Presidency (EP) bill, it gave a grand vision of how system was evolving into a more democratic one where there would be greater checks and balance.

    Then prime minister Goh Chok Tong even said that “In introducing this Bill, the present Government, is in fact, clipping its own wings. Once the constitutional amendment is effected, this Government will have some of its powers checked.”

    The truth was not quite as noble. Instead, many saw the move as Mr Lee Kuan Yew ensuring that Mr Goh, as the new prime minister, would not run off with the horse, so to speak. Following the introduction of the scheme, the late Ong Teng Cheong then became Singapore’s president from 1993-1999.

    Mr Ong actually believed Mr Goh that the EP was formulated to clip the Government’s wings. During his tenure, President Ong famously asked for the state’s accounts to be made known to him, to which he was told that the information would take 52 man-years to compile. Towards the end of his term, Mr Ong publicly complained of his “long list of problems” with the Government. He also announced that he would not seek a second term.

    Which was just as well because PM Goh revealed that although Mr Ong had sought a second term, the Government could not support his bid. Mr S R Nathan was chosen instead.

    Before he left office, however, Mr Ong told the public that some cabinet ministers and civil servants had treated his office as a “nuisance” and that the government had indicated that it did not need his approval in using the reserves to fight the Asian financial crisis that occurred in 1997.

    The very public spat prompted Mr Lee Kuan Yew to step in, upbraiding everyone for harbouring illusions about the powers of the presidency. He slapped down Mr Goh’s statement about the government clipping its own wings: “No, if you’ve to clip the wings, then you are in for trouble, you cannot govern…I cannot remember it but I would not have used that phrase because the executive powers of the Government should not be clipped.”

    Then in 2004, Mr Lee Hsien Loong introduced legislation to bypass the president when it came to the transfer of reserves to GLCs and statutory boards (see here), making the EP even more meaningless.

    The government is in the midst of reviewing the Constitution to pave the way for a president from the minority race. Only the very naive will fail to see the move for what it is – to ensure that the PAP’s candidate ascends to the office. The EP scheme degenerates into a deeper and bigger political farce.

    It is clear that the PAP has absolutely no intention of allowing its powers to be scrutinised and checked by anyone. Together with schemes like the Nominated Member of Parliament (NMP) and the Non-constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP), the Elected Presidency serves only to create the illusion of democracy in Singapore.

    What we need is a genuine democratic system where all political parties can openly and fairly contest for seats in elections overseen by an independent elections commission, where the mass media is not monopolised by the PAP, and where the civil liberties of the people are not curtailed.

    Only then can we hope to check the government and truly protect our reserves.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Chee Soon Juan: PAP Running Scared, Doesn’t Want Genuine Political Contest

    Chee Soon Juan: PAP Running Scared, Doesn’t Want Genuine Political Contest

    I have often pointed out that the PAP is never sincere in ensuring that there is genuine political contestation, it always raises the bar just when its opponents come close to beating it at its own game (think GRC, Cooling-off Day, Public Order Act, etc).

    The most recent example is the tweaking of the EP. Ostensibly, it is to ensure minority representation in the presidency. The reality is that alarm bells went off when Dr Tony Tan won by just 0.34%-point over Dr Tan Cheng Bock.

    As usual, the government goes through the exercise of conducting a “study” of the issue. “Expert” views are then sought to substantiate the recommendations in the study. http://www.todayonline.com/…/mixed-race-teams-presidential-…

    The process goes like this. Step 1: Frame the issue, set the parameters. Step 2: Gin up debate in the local media and through various panels (within prescribed parameters, of course). Step 3: Legislate it.

    Much time, effort and money is expended to legitimise a course of action on which the PAP has already decided. Remember the discussions about whether to have 9 or 12 NCMP seats or 3- or 6-member GRCs or which race Singaporeans prefer their presidents?

    As Noam Chomsky points out: “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum.”

    What is troubling in this instance is that at a time when our country faces complex and enormous challenges – challenges where open and intelligent debate is so desperately needed – the PAP devices yet another scheme to further control the political process.

    There is a price, a steep one, to pay for all this.

     

    Source: Chee Soon Juan 徐顺全