Tag: class

  • Security Guards Better To Be Seen Not Heard?

    Security Guards Better To Be Seen Not Heard?

    It was 7.45am when I reported for duty at the guardhouse of an upscale condominium in District 9, dressed in my uniform of white shirt and dark blue trousers.

    Mr Johari, a middle-aged guard who had been working there for two years, showed me the ropes and the first thing he said to me was: “Watch out for the cars.”

    He meant I would have to memorise some residents’ car registration numbers in a hurry if I was going to do the job right.

    Helpfully, he rattled off some critical numbers: 30, 166, 186, 2125. Those were the car numbers of residents who expected the guards to recognise them and lift the carpark barrier quickly when they approached.

    “They will complain if you are slow, like this one who is in the management committee,” he said, as a car drew up. I scribbled the numbers into a notebook.

    My supervisor, Mr Zaini, had another tip: “Make sure you smile.”

    He explained: “People staying here are all ‘somebodies’ and they want to be acknowledged. Don’t ask visitors their names or who they are visiting. They get offended.”

    It made me wonder why this condominium needed guards at all. Why not have a smiling robot of the sort being produced in Japan, that can recognise residents and car numbers? Or give residents remote controls to operate the barriers themselves?

    Mr Zaini said we guards play a role in providing security to the wealthy residents. “It gives them a sense of security to have uniformed guards around,” he said.

    The freehold condominium has only four-bedroom apartments and penthouses above 3,000 sq ft in size. The 100 units are spread out over four five-storey blocks in a sprawling compound about the size of a football field. Besides the swimming pool, gym and function room, it also has a yoga pavilion and lounge. All the apartments have private lifts.

    Over the past two years, some units changed hands for between $10.7 million and $27.5 million.

    Mr Johari told me about half the residents were Singaporeans and the rest were foreign tenants paying more than $15,000 a month in rent.

    The management council hired a private company to provide security guards. A 12-man guard team was assigned there, with six guards on duty on each 12-hour shift and shift changes at 8am and 8pm.

    Each 12-hour shift is further divided into one-hour blocks, with 11 hours of work and a one-hour meal break. The 11 one-hour blocks form a rotating roster, with five guards put on one of five tasks hourly: manning the main guard post, guarding the basement entrance of the clubhouse, operating the carpark barrier, watching CCTV cameras and patrolling the grounds.

    When it was time for my one-hour break at noon, Mr Johari led me to a small makeshift area in a corner of the basement carpark, next to a pump room and out of sight of residents. The stale smelling room was lit by a fluorescent tube. There were metal lockers, a wooden table with chipped corners and four plastic chairs, two of which were shaky. A desk fan provided some comfort.

    When I took my lunch break there, I could see Ferraris, Lamborghinis and a Bentley – some of the residents’ luxury cars – and we security guards had to make sure nobody sneaked pictures of them.

    The guards at this condominium are barred from using the common toilets in the clubhouse and swimming pool. They have their own, also in the basement carpark. It has one toilet bowl and a sink. During my two days there, it had no soap or toilet paper, and the tap was broken.

    Ms Amy, in her 50s, the only female guard in the team, said that she tries to avoid using the toilet and brings her own hand sanitiser.

    I was appalled, but my security guard colleagues did not seem to mind any of this. I brought my own toilet paper and wet wipes on Day 2.

    As a new guard, I was assigned unpopular tasks that kept me on my feet: operating the carpark barrier, guarding the clubhouse entrance and patrolling.

    What I liked least was having to spend an hour stuffing letterboxes with a notice about the swimming pool closure and checking at the start of the day that more than 500 light bulbs in the lift lobbies, walkways and carpark were working.

    For the effort, I was paid $70 a day. My fellow guards at the agency serving this condo are paid between $1,800 and $1,900 each month. My employer, who has an “A” grade from the annual police grading exercise, pays slightly above the going rate of about $1,700 a month.

    But Mr Johari felt the pay was still too low for the long hours put in. “At our level, we are only working for the money,” he said. “What job satisfaction is there?”

    His salary is well below the median monthly gross salary of $3,480 for Singapore citizens and just below the $1,900 monthly Workfare salary ceiling. And he works 12 hours a day, six days a week.

    In just two days there, I felt my self-esteem being nibbled away, not least because I learnt quickly that a security guard does his job best when he is invisible and doesn’t draw notice to himself. Just smile, do your job, don’t engage with residents, don’t give them any opportunity to complain.

    Over two days, only twice did people thank me.

    A Filipino maid was grateful when I held a door for her and the pram she was pushing, and a CityCab taxi driver said thanks when I pointed him to the guards’ toilet.

    From condo to worksite

    After two days at the upmarket condo, I asked the agency manager for a change and was redeployed to the worksite of a nearly completed private building in Little India.

    I presented myself at 7.45am dressed in the same uniform.

    I arrived to find a woman security guard, seated at a folding metal table, being scolded by a cleaning supervisor. The middle-aged woman had not even begun to eat her roti prata, but the supervisor was scolding her for “dirtying” the place. The truth, I learnt later, was that other workers could use that table for their meals, but not the guards.

    The building, with offices and shops, is not yet open to the public. The guards are there mainly to watch over the contractors putting the finishing touches to the building.

    Here I would be known as Security Officer Toh and I was not told to smile, apparently because I would come into contact mostly with workers and the building’s handful of full-time staff. Unlike at the condo, the guards here were free to use any of the toilets in the uncompleted building, at least for now.

    But there was no proper rest area or lockers, and guards could put their belongings anywhere, as long as they were out of sight. “Put your backpack below the table,” said my supervisor Krishnan, in his 60s.

    Here too, security guards typically work 12-hour shifts, but the duties were less structured and there was no roster of tasks.

    During my two days there, I spent five hours each day guarding the door to a room to make sure no one entered, as it had just been cleaned with chemicals.

    I told Mr Krishnan what the place needed was a lock, not a guard, but he ignored the idea. He snapped: “Why you talk so much? You are a new guard.”

    I was also assigned to patrol the perimeter of the premises. One of my colleagues, Mr Lim, in his 40s, asked if I smoked. “For smokers, going on patrol means you can find a corner to take a smoke,” he said with a smile.

    I do not smoke, but going on patrols allowed me to test the observation skills I had been taught.

    So when I spotted a white van parked illegally near a taxi stand for more than 20 minutes, I reported it to another supervisor, only to have him say: “Leave it to LTA, not our business.” The van’s presence was not entered into the guard room’s official record book, labelled “Occurrence Book”. All it said was: “10 to 11am: SO Toh conducted patrol. Everything normal.”

    Another time, the fire alarm went off. I could not contact my supervisor who was on his meal break, so I did what I had been trained to do.

    I checked the floor under my charge, evacuated a worker to a safe area and reported what I had done to the worksite’s fire control centre. I also made an entry in the record book, as I had been trained to do.

    It turned out to be a false alarm. While I did not expect a pat on my back, I certainly was unprepared for the dressing down that came from the burly security manager, a full-time employee of the building owner.

    Yelling at me for recording the incident, he shouted: “You are trying to be too smart!”

    That was when I learnt that guards were not allowed to write in the record book. They had to write on a piece of paper and show it to the security manager, who would then decide whether to put it in the book. Clearly, it was meant to show only what the security manager wanted to record.

    After the dressing down, I decided I had enough. I told the agency manager I would not be coming to work the next day.

    Mr Krishnan did not bat an eyelid when I said goodbye at the end of my shift. “Relief guards come and go. I am angry that the manager keeps sending inexperienced guards like you to me,” he vented.

    Ending my short stint as a security guard, I remembered Mr Zaini, the condominium supervisor who told me to smile while on the job. He has been a guard for 15 years and I’d asked him how he did it.

    “This is a thankless job,” he said. “Smiling makes it easier for me to get through the long day. And at the end of each day, I smile because it is over and I can get home to my family.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • 1,395 Ultra High Net Worth Individuals With Combined Net Worth of S$234 Billion in Singapore in 2014

    1,395 Ultra High Net Worth Individuals With Combined Net Worth of S$234 Billion in Singapore in 2014

    The ultra high net worth (UHNW) population in Singapore saw the addition of 40 individuals in 2014, according to a wealth report released on Wednesday (Nov 19).

    There are now a total of 1,395 UHNW individuals in Singapore – a record high. Their combined net worth is US$180 billion (S$234 billion), an increase of 12.5 per cent over the past year, according to the Wealth-X and UBS World Ultra Wealth Report.

    UHNW individuals are defined as those with US$30 million and above in net assets. The size of Singapore’s UHNW population ranks sixth among Asian countries and 19th globally, according to the report.

    This year, while Singapore’s UHNW population grew slower than both the global and Asian average, the combined wealth of its UHNW individuals has grown significantly faster.

    “Such strong growth is reflective of the city-state’s growing international appeal with regards to the strength of its financial sector, and the ease of both establishing and conducting business in the country, allowing for rapid wealth accumulation” the report stated.

    The report also found that:

    • Singapore’s UHNW population controls almost 17 per cent of the country’s total wealth of US$1.08 trillion.
    • More than 20 per cent of Singapore’s UHNW population is engaged in the finance, banking and investment industry
    • 60 per cent of Singapore’s UHNW population is fully self-made.
    • 25 per cent of Singapore’s UHNW population inherited their wealth and went on to grow their fortunes through businesses or other ventures
    • 15 per cent fully inherited their wealth
    • Singapore’s female UHNW population accounts for a much larger share of its total population than the global average. But the average net worth of female UHNW individuals in Singapore is 45 per cent lower than that of male UHNW individuals in the country.
  • Empathising Through Elitist Attitude:  A Demonstration By S-League CEO Lim Chin

    Empathising Through Elitist Attitude: A Demonstration By S-League CEO Lim Chin

    The chief executive officer of the S-League, Singapore’s domestic football league, has come under criticism for what he said to players of the Tanjong Pagar United football club recently.

    It was announced that the club would not be participating in the 2015 competition “due to money”, as reported by the Straits Times last week.

    “We were unable to find a sponsor for this year after Field Catering, who came in with a $100,000 sponsorship last season, pulled out before this season,” club chairman Edward Liu said then.

    It will be the second time that the jaguars, as the club is also known, will sit out the competition. It had also done so after the 2004 campaign, similarly citing financial reasons for the withdrawal then.

    The S-League has also been shrunk from 12 teams to 10, with Woodlands Wellington and Hougang United merging into one team.

    Tanjong Pagar United’s withdrawal this year from the professional league competition has caused anxiety among its players and staff, who are unsure what to do next.

    Some took to the online space to voice their unhappiness, questioning the leadership of Mr Liu and the league’s CEO, Lim Chin.

    In response, the two men held a meeting with the players and staff last week.

    A 85-minute recording of the meeting was later leaked online, and led to further criticism of Mr Lim’s response, particularly for the tone and the words he used at the meeting.

    Mr Lim was apparently defending Mr Liu when the latter came under fire from the players at the meeting.

    Mr Lim blasted the players:

    “The chairman of the club and the management committee (are) above all of you. You are players, nobody is bigger than the club. The chairman heads the club.

    “The management committee is not for you to judge… So I think you all need to know where you stand as a player, as a staff, as a coach.

    “Do not ever question the chairman on his role and responsibility.”

    He is also reported to have said:

    “Some of the reasons you may not accept well and good, I cannot force you to accept every answer that we give you, but we are giving you the truth. If you cannot accept the truth then we cannot help you in any way.”

    Mr Lim’s outburst was criticised by some for being insensitive to the players who had suddenly found themselves with an uncertain future with the club after the withdrawal from the S League was announced.

    The changes to the league and the withdrawal of Tanjong Pagar was announced a mere three months before the start of the next season.

    A posting on the My S-League Story Facebook page said that while there is merit to the S-League’s plans for consolidation, it was the sudden manner in which this was decided which has caused unhappiness.

    “It is the abrupt and arbitrary manner by which the reform has been conducted that irks me the most,” the posting said. “Players should have been given at least a season’s heads up. What should have been done in my opinion is for next season to continue with 12 teams but to have relegation, where the bottom 2 teams will sit out from 2016 onwards. This would make the league more exciting and give the players and playing staff enough time to make plans for the future.”

    Another posting on the “Ass League” blog also questioned the decision to reduce the size of the league next season.

    “[One] needs to remember that these people are football players with short careers and very wobbly rice bowls due to lack of job security. They are men with families to feed, and they are merely seeking clarification on the actions and decisions undertaken by the ones who may have a profound effect on their ability to feed their families. Mr. Lim claims to want to make the League stronger, but are these decisions doing the League any good when all it will do is serve to further convince Singaporeans that football is far from being a viable career in Singapore?”

    Warriors FC’s Hassan Sunny also expressed similar sentiments last week.

    “Players and coaches who lose their jobs as a result cannot be left alone just like that,” said Hassan, who was named the Player of the Year at an award ceremony last week.

    “Something must be done for them, as they have served the league well. The FAS can provide them with some subsidies to prepare for life after football, such as provide them some compensation to equip themselves with relevant skills to find jobs in the footballing industry and even outside of it,” he said.

    Mr Lim, who also attended the event, was booed when he appeared.

    A former colonel in the Army who had also served as Chief of Artillery, Mr Lim later told the press that on hindsight he “could have been more sympathetic” towards the players.

    “My tone was a bit loud but, certainly, I think we empathised with the players who were affected,” he said.

    Mr Lim explained that he was upset by the players’ criticism of Mr Liu.

    “It just hurt me to find that the players, in such a big forum and in front of everyone, were questioning Edward’s role and what he has done for the club,” Mr Lim said.

    “So, at that moment, I felt that I couldn’t sit down and let this continue.”

    The S-League has suffered from declining interest, including from sponsors, and the standard of Singapore football has seen a drop in FIFA’s world’s ranking.

    Singapore is now placed 161st in the world, a slump of 12 places from last year.

    President of the Football Association of Singapore, Zainuddin Nordin, believes however that the changes and consolidation of the league will bring more interests for the clubs.

    “Research commissioned by us has shown that the present local environment cannot support a 12-club S.League,” he said last week. “The consolidation of the S-League into a 10-club league next season would make the league stronger, more competitive and a more exciting product that will help to draw more fans to the stadiums, and attract potential sponsors.”

    Mr Zainuddin, who is also a Member of Parliament for Bishan-Toa Payoh GRC, has served three 2-year terms as FAS chief, but will be stepping down next year.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Relax Visa Rules to Attract More Tourists While Singaporeans Vie for Space

    Relax Visa Rules to Attract More Tourists While Singaporeans Vie for Space

    SINGAPORE: The tourism industry has been hit in recent months following events such as the disappearance of Malaysia Airlines flight MH370, but Singapore could attract up to half a million more visitors in two years’ time if it improves its visa procedures, said a report by the World Travel and Tourism Council (WTTC) and World Tourism Organization.

    Key markets that require a visa for Singapore include China, India and Russia. Visa facilitation could result in about 358,000 to 504,000 more visitors in 2016 than under current policies and an additional S$768 million to S$1.08 billion in tourism receipts, estimated the report, The Impact of Visa Facilitation in ASEAN Member States, published earlier this year.

    The report’s projection of 2016 figures, however, was based on the World Tourism Organization’s international arrivals figure of 11.9 million for Singapore last year – significantly below the 15.6 million visitor arrivals published by the Singapore Tourism Board (STB).

    On the discrepancy, WTTC head of communications Emma Coulthurst said the World Tourism Organization’s arrivals figures are generally seen as the most authoritative and consistent source across countries.

    “VISAS INHIBITING TOURISM”

    Differing statistics aside, Singapore should consider e-visa programmes and regional agreements for visa facilitation and maximise infocomm technology to improve visa procedures, among other possibilities, the WTTC told TODAY.

    Visas are inhibiting the growth of tourism in general and governments need to automate processes, produce more visas-on-arrival and, eventually, get rid of visas altogether, said WTTC president and chief executive officer David Scowsill.

    “The ability that airlines now have in supplying data to the government authorities really removes the need in the future for visas at all,” said Mr Scowsill, who was in town last week for the Asia Travel Leaders Summit and ITB Asia conference.

    The tourism industry here is also feeling the manpower crunch and foreign labour restrictions and Mr Scowsill encouraged more flexibility in labour permits for foreign workers in the service industry. “If you want to maintain the service standards in Singapore in this industry – attractions, hotels, airlines – you have to make sure those jobs are filled and they are filled with customer-orientated individuals,” he said.

    The tourism industry is good at forecasting growth and this would help in working with the authorities on future manpower needs, he added.

    REINVENTION KEY TO REPEAT VISITORS

    The STB’s latest tourism sector performance quarterly report, which was released last month, showed that visitor arrivals numbered 3.6 million from April to June, a drop of 6 per cent from the previous year and the steepest year-on-year decrease in five years. Tourism receipts fell by 3 per cent to S$5.6 billion.

    Still, Mr Scowsill gave the thumbs-up to Singapore’s efforts in drawing visitors, praising its constant reinvention, the introduction of new products every two to three years and its infrastructure. “When I travel around the world and talk to other governments about what they need to do to develop their tourism industry, I use Singapore as a good example of what needs to happen,” he said.

    Reinvention is key to drawing repeat visitors, “because you’re not interested in the one-shot visitor who comes once, spends three or four days running around doing everything and does not come back for 20 years.”

    In addition to continued innovation and investment in infrastructure, Singapore has to focus on China, said Mr Scowsill. About 100 million Chinese travelled abroad last year and this number is expected to hit 200 million by 2020. Singapore would do well to stimulate demand from Chinese tourists, given their propensity to spend, he said.

    And in the face of competition with other markets, “the trick for Singapore is to make sure you’re always (part of travellers’ itineraries), in terms of not only groups, but individual leisure consumers”, he added

     

    Source: channelnewsasia.com