Tag: cost of living

  • SingFirst’s $6 Billion Social Safety Net Will Not Bankrupt Singapore

    SingFirst’s $6 Billion Social Safety Net Will Not Bankrupt Singapore

    SingFirst’s social safety net package is not prepared overnight but is the outcome of several years of research and discussion. It started with the S$60 billion economic plan outlined in the 2011 essay “Creating Jobs and Enterprise in a New Singapore economy – Ideas for Change” by Tan Jee Say, our Secretary-General.

    Our proposal has now been updated following discussions in the last few years with international experts in Finland, Norway, Berlin, Oxford and Harvard. It has also been discussed and debated internally over several months. We took into consideration what the Minister of Finance told Parliament about the use of returns on investment of Singapore’s national assets.

    To help our readers understand our approach, we have decided to use simple illustrations and graphics, rather than post a long article. We believe these simple messages will help to communicate our proposal more effectively and clearly.

    1. The ISSUE – Rising Social Inequality

    Economic growth in Singapore has created a large gap between the rich and poor, leaving a big segment of society behind. Inflation and technology has widened the income gap. Singaporeans have also become the most stressed, unhappiest and least emotional people in the world.

    According to an article in The Economist on 7 March 2014, Singapore is presently the most expensive city in the world as housing, education, healthcare and transport costs are rising day by day.

    ” It has been a long time coming, but Singapore, a tiny city-state of about 5m people, has finally made it: to being the most expensive city in the world. According to the Economist Intelligence Unit (EIU), a sister organisation of The Economist, after a decade of steadily climbing up the table from 18th place, Singapore now occupies the position usually reserved for the Japanese capital, Tokyo. Paris is now the second-most expensive, ahead of Oslo in Norway”.

    – The Economist (article here)

    Singapore has the biggest income gap among developed countries, as indicated by the Gini co-efficient, an international standard of measure of income inequality. The higher the Gini, the greater the inequality.

    gini1

    Singapore’s economic inequality is highest because its public spending as a percentage of GDP is the lowest among the developed countries.

    gini2

    2. Our PROPOSAL – Social Spending and Social Investment

    SingFirst wants to increase social spending and reduce social inequalities with

    a. Social Safety Net   (S$6 billion per annum)

    b. Social Investment  (S$8 billion per annum)

    This will be funded by the returns on our investment of national assets

    • GIC, MAS, Temasek Holdings etc generate huge investment returns
    • These huge investment returns are more than SingFirst’s proposed social spending amount
    • Principal sum (capital) of national assets WILL NOT be touched.

    2.1 The Government’s existing framework on NIR (Net Investment Return)

    • Returns on investments (R)     : from GIC & MAS
    • Investment income (I)              : from Temasek Holdings
    • R + I = Net Investment Return (NIR)
    • average annual NIR is about S$16 billion

    2.2  The Government’s existing framework on NIRC (Net Investment Return Contribution)

    • ½ R + ½ I = Net Investment Return Contribution (NIRC)
    • In last few years, NIRC has been estimated as S$8 billion
    • Balance ( NIR minus NIRC) = S$8 billion
    • Currently, this balance is RE-INVESTED into GIC & Temasek Holdings

    nirc 2

    To emphasize the above illustration, investment return contribution from GIC and MAS assets is STABLE, is based on expected long term real rate of return and is NOT AFFECTED by year to year fluctuations in actual returns (similar formula used by Norway and Yale University).

    That means the total NIR of S$16 billion is a stable amount year after year.

    In last few years (see illustration below), annual NIR is estimated at S$16 billion. NIRC is estimated at S$8 billion. So the balance for re-investment is S$8 billion on the average.

    nirc

    In the past 4 years, NIRC hovered around S$8 billion per year. So SingFirst proposes to use the NIRC for funding our S$6 billion social safety net package.

    As we are only using S$6 billion per year (75% of NIRC), this is SUSTAINABLE.

    There is a healthy surplus of S$2 billion per year (25% of NIRC) that is not used.

    3. PROPOSAL 1 – Social Spending

    The table below illustrates our social spending to defray the current high cost of living for all Singaporeans.

    safety net

    3.1 Monthly Benefits for Singaporeans

    A simple illustration below of how our social spending will benefit a family with 2 elderly parents, 2 parents and 2 young children on the monthly basis.

    family

    3.2 Tax Restructuring – to phase out GST

    1

    2

    3

    4

     4. PROPOSAL 2 – Social Investment

    Presently, the Ministry of Finance has re-invested approximately half of the net investment returns back into Temasek and GIC which are then used for Portfolio Investment. SingFirst proposes to broaden re-investment to include social investment (eg hospitals, schools). NOT only back into Temasek or GIC.

     

    5

    6

    7

     4.1 Our Proposed Initiatives

    9

     

    4.2 Reserves are not RAIDED by our proposals

    4.3  Pro-growth Social Package

    Our package is not wasteful consumption but will give a strong boost to the local domestic economy. We will create a strong, stable and diversified economy that benefit local businessmen and families.

    • Social safety net                          $ 6 billion
    • Social investment                        $ 8 billion
    • Healthcare (from defence)         $ 5 billion     (over 5 years)
    • Consumer (from GST)                $ 9.5 billion  (over 5 years)
    • Re-investment per year over 5 years   $14 – 28.5 billion

    4.3  Fair Society, Strong Families and Esteemed People

    With this package, SingFirst will deliver

    11

    In Conclusion: Our difference from the PAP

    At the Forbes Global CEO Conference on 28 October 2014, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said that he wanted Singaporeans to always be paranoid about someone else stealing their lunch.

    05slide1

    “Looking forward beyond the 50th anniversary, I think that is what Singapore needs to do – to be aware, to be paranoid so you always know that somebody can take your lunch away…”

    While PM Lee wants Singaporeans to be paranoid (“kiasu”), SingFirst prefers to put esteem into Singaporeans. Do you want to feel inferior and be “kiasu” or do you want to stand tall and be esteemed?

    You have a choice. Choose wisely.

    Stand tall. Vote SingFirst.

    SF_LOGO

     

    Source: http://singfirst.org

     

     

  • Retirement Adequacy, Healthcare And Cost Of Living Are Top Concerns For Singaporeans

    Retirement Adequacy, Healthcare And Cost Of Living Are Top Concerns For Singaporeans

    Retirement adequacy, healthcare and cost of living are top concerns of Singaporeans, a pre-Budget 2015 feedback exercise by REACH showed. These topics accounted for about a third of feedback gathered the Government feedback portal said in a news release on Monday (Feb 16).

    The exercise, jointly organised by REACH and the Ministry of Finance, collected feedback from online platforms, email, booths known as Listening Points, and a pre-Budget dialogue between late November last year and end-January.

    RETIREMENT ADEQUACY

    The exercise showed that Singaporeans are concerned about having enough funds after retirement to cope with daily expenses and rising cost of living – particularly for those who have not fully paid up their housing loans.

    There was “anticipation” among some Singaporeans that the Silver Support Scheme would help them, REACH said. “Nevertheless, there were also views that individuals need to take responsibility by not overextending themselves when buying their homes, and preparing for their retirement,” REACH added.

    Notably, the feedback had been collected before the recommendations of a Central Provident Fund (CPF) Advisory Panel were announced earlier this month, and respondents in the feedback exercise had asked for greater withdrawal flexibility from their CPF accounts upon retirement, which the panel had recommended.

    Some were worried that the CPF Minimum Sum “might be increasingly be out of reach for lower-income and vulnerable Singaporeans”, REACH said.

    Regarding the CPF Minimum Sum Topping-Up Scheme, some contributors suggested the Government match top-ups dollar-for-dollar to encourage more to contribute to the retirement accounts of their family members. However, some said this might only benefit the well-to-do who are cash-rich.

    HEALTHCARE

    Several were concerned that medical and hospitalisation costs may become increasingly unmanageable “especially for patients with chronic and life-threatening conditions”, REACH found. This is despite the introduction of the MediShield Life scheme which will be implemented in end-2015.

    Many contributors said the Government should look into shortening waiting time for treatment at hospitals, increasing manpower and providing more hospital beds to meet rising healthcare demands.

    They also recommended providing healthcare workers with more training on customer relations, and having translators in hospitals to overcome language barriers.

    COST OF LIVING

    The exercise saw many Singaporeans calling for more financial assistance to subsidise “everyday goods and services”. Some felt the Government should distribute cash handouts, grocery vouchers, and regulate the prices of goods to keep them affordable.

    Many felt that their salaries had not kept pace with rising inflation, and there were comments that the Government should not just focus on helping the lower-income as the middle-income were also feeling the pinch, REACH said.

    “Singaporeans continue to worry about rising cost of living which the Government seeks to address through various measures,” said REACH chairman and Senior Minister of State for Health, Dr Amy Khor. “But a key way to help Singaporeans cope with the cost of living must be to enable and equip them with the relevant skills so that they can have better jobs and better pay.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Why I Left For Malaysia…

    Why I Left For Malaysia…

    In 2013, I packed my bags, quit my job , withdrew my entire savings from the bank and left for Kuala Lumpur (KL) with my husband. To me, leaving Singapore was one of the most difficult decision I had made in my life. It was not a surprise that none of my family members or close friends could not understand my decision.

    I spent a year thinking deeply before I finally came to a decision.  But when I excitedly announced my plans to people around me, I have received no positive responses. None of the people around me were supportive. Instead, many have asked me why I have chosen to relocate to Malaysia when most Singaporeans are leaving for countries with a higher standard of living like Australia, Canada or USA.

    So, why am I leaving Singapore when plenty of Malaysians are trying to get into my country? Even my Malaysians colleagues are very surprised when they learnt that I am actually a Singaporean. I was even told by several of them that a lot of their Malaysian friends have actually renounced their Malaysian citizenship to become Singaporeans. No Singaporeans would want leave Singapore for Malaysia. Why I have not follow the norm?

    Well, it all began with my Malaysian husband who desperately wanted to be back home permanently. Of course, we fought several times because of this issue. We could be in a long distance relationship which I thunk I can never accept. However, we never have the intention to break up. We simply could not because we just love each other too much.

    So, we were left with only two options – Continue to live our life in Singapore or get married and settle down in KL.

    After giving much thoughts to this matter, you would know that I have chosen to get married and relocate to KL with my husband. This is seriously the most difficult decision for me to make in the entire 22 years of my life. In this blog post, I shall be documenting my reasons that eventually led me into making my final decision.

    Pros of Living in Malaysia

    1. Transport system

    Certainly, KL does not have the best transport system in the world. But at least, it is definitely efficient enough to transport me to most of the places in KL without frequent breakdown or delays. In fact, I always find the trains in KL to be more efficient than the ones in Singapore. Similarly, trains are relatively crowded during peak hours too. But definitely, not as crowded as in Singapore. I found it very stressful and mentally draining to commute in extremely overcrowded trains everyday when I was still in Singapore. It was even worst when trains started to breakdown more frequently than before as I have to spend more time on commuting everyday.

    However, buses in KL tend not to arrive on time as traffic congestion can be pretty bad during the peak hours. So, waiting for buses in KL can be rather frustrating at times. I will try to avoid commuting by bus in KL as much as I could.

    The bus services in Singapore are still far from being reliable or punctual either. Just like the trains, delays are common nowadays. Even when the buses managed to arrive on time, they are usually packed like sardine.

    Singapore used to have one of the best transport system in the world. However, in recent years, I started to feel very disappointed with our transport system. I actually find commuting to work in Singapore to be more stressful than the work itself.

    Now, I feel really glad that I have made the right decision to relocate to KL. Certainly, I would never want to experience the stress of commuting to work ever in life again.

    In Malaysia, a country where public transportation is still lacking, living without a car is difficult and inconvenient. But luckily, cars are available at pretty affordable price in Malaysia, but not really cheap if you are considering the fact that the country actually manufacture its own cars. Unlike in Singapore, I am really glad that I do not need to pay a hefty price to bid for a piece of paper in order buy a new car in Malaysia. All I would need to pay for is only the price of the vehicle itself. Of course, not taking into the account of bank loan interest, road tax and insurance.

    Car Ownership

    KL is often well-known for its terrible traffic congestion, no matter the time of the day. So, be prepared to find yourself caught in a jam for at least an hour if you are driving your way to work.

    Parking

    Most of the time, you probably do not need to pay a fee to park your car unless you are driving into major shopping malls, business buildings or city areas. If not, you could just park in any empty space which you could find around the vicinity. However, in certain areas, you would need to look out for any traffic police who may appear any time to issue you a summon for illegal parking.

    Living with car in Malaysia has gave me plenty of freedom and convenience to travel around and explore the rest of the country. I find this so much better than having to squeeze into a crowded train or bus just to get to any shopping mall in Singapore.

    3. Public holidays

    Malaysia has one of the highest number of public holidays in the world, currently ranking number seven in the top ten countries after Thailand, Indonesia, India and Hong kong. Just in KL alone, I would be enjoying at least 18 days off from work a year for free. Undeniably, this is the most awesome part about working in KL!

    Now, I believe many of you might start to question whether Malaysians do ever work. Of course they do. In fact, working overtime is quite common, but for me, I usually get to knock off from work on time at 5.30pm. The latest would be 6pm for me. Most of the colleagues, including my boss would probably leave the office by 7 pm.

    Working in KL enables me to maintain a healthy work-life balance. Other than working in the office, I am happy that I actually have plenty of time for my family and personal life as well. I enjoy the slower pace of life in KL very much. Now, I am glad to have escape from the hectic Singapore lifestyle for good.

    4. Compulsory CPF contribution

    Put aside the conversion rate, the salary package is really not that bad in KL. Currently, I am earning so much more as compared to the times when I was still working in Singapore. Furthermore, it is not a mandatory for me to contribute to CPF (known as EPF) in Malaysia. Certainly, I do not mind even if it is a must for me to make a contribution to EPF too. Unlike Singapore, EPF can be fully withdraw after reaching the age of 55. It will become part of my retirement fund.

    CPF vs EPF contribution & interest rates

    In addition, I did a quick comparison between Singapore CPF and Malaysia EPF contribution and interest rates.

    EPF Vs CPF 1

    In Singapore, employed Singaporean citizen up to the age of 50 are obligated to contribute 20% of their wages into their respective CPF accounts every month. The employer, on the other hand, are required to contribute an additional amount equivalent 16% of the employee’s monthly wage.

    Whereas, in Malaysia, employed Malaysian citizen up to the age of 60, earning less than RM 5000 per month, are obligated to contribute 11% of  their wages into their respective EPF accounts. Correspondingly, the employer are required to contribute an additional amount equivalent 13% of the employee’s monthly wage.

    However for employee who earns more than RM 5000 per month or above, the employer are only required to contribute an additional amount equivalent 12% of the employee’s monthly wage to their EPF account. For employees aged 60 and above, they may opt to continue to contribute to their EPF account at a reduced 50% rate,

    I would prefer the EPF system, where I would have more spare cash to spend. Perhaps I could do some long-term investment if I wish to. There may be a chance that I mismanage my finances and left me with little savings for retirement. But who can be sure of that? I would prefer to plan my retirement myself while enjoying my life. Undoubtedly, deducting 20% from my monthly wages is definitely going to result me missing a lot of things in life. The even bad news is that CPF cannot be fully withdraw even when employees have reached their retirement age.

    EPF Vs CPF 2

    Furthermore, CPF have been paying a fixed interest rates to its contributors, which has remained unchanged over the years. CPF interest rate for its Ordinary Account is fixed at 2.5% annually. As for its Special, Medisave and Retirement Accounts, the interest rate is fixed at 4% per year.

    EPF has a guarantee a minimum dividend rate of 2.5% annually, but usually, it is much more higher. A 6.35% dividend rate is declared in 2013, the highest ever payout in over a decade.

    Which is the better system? I shall leave it for you guys to judge.

    5. Cost of living

    When compared to the cost of living in Singapore, KL is still an affordable city to live in. Although the cost of eating out in KL is higher than in Singapore, the price of housing, healthcare and public transportation remain at affordable levels. It is relatively cheap to rent a room in KL. With RM 600 per month, you could probably rent an entire 3 rooms apartment that is located outside of the city area. There are plently of rooms for rent in a semi-detached house for as low as RM 250 per month too.

    A condominum that is located outside of the KL city would probably cost about RM 600k. Apparently, this is how much a 4-room HDB flat would cost in Singapore. If I have an option, I would definitely choose to live in a condominum.

    The ridiculous high cost associated with raising a child in Singapore scares me very much too. How am I going to raise a child when I am struggling to feed myself?

    6. Obsessed with paper qualification

    Singapore is an extremely competitive society obsessed with paper qualifications. A thing which I always hate because it give rise to elitism in our society.

    I am always not a very ambitious person. All I wanted in life is to have a job that will give me a decent and stable income. I once thought that completing university will help me to make enough income to lead a comfortable life. Unfortunately, I was wrong.

    Having an university qualification in Singapore is no big deal, especially for those that are obtained from a private institution. In fact, based on my personal experience, private diplomas and degrees are often not recognized by the government sectors.

    Between work experiences and paper qualifications, I believe most employers in Singapore would prefer to hire the better educated candidate rather than the one who only have plenty of work experiences.

    A local degree holder would naturally fetch a higher pay than a private degree holder. To me, this is absolutely frustrating because I seriously think that private university are no way inferior to the local university. Throughout my three years in private university, I spent two of the years working full time in the day and attending part-time classes at night. I gained experiences which are never taught in books. But that does not help me to start anywhere higher than those who actually graduated from a local university. I got even more frustrated to know that even a foreigner who holds a foreign degree from some unrecognized university is offered a better pay package than me.

    Furthermore, being overly obsessed with chasing paper qualifications actually makes Singaporeans apathetic to changes around them. Singapore is an emotionless society filled with not really ‘nice’ people. I do not mean that Singaporeans are not nice and friendly. But rather, our niceties does not seem to go beyond the surface level. Most of time we are just too obsessed with striving for excellence that we forget about caring for others.

    To put it in other words, Singapore education system is rigid and very result-orientated, which does not encourage innovative and creative individuals. I believe this is also the reason why Singapore has not been very successful in producing as much entrepreneurs as Malaysia.

    I have never encountered such problem while I was seeking for employment in KL. Paper qualification is important too, but without relevant experiences, chances of you securing an employment will be lower. Most Malaysians I have met are very friendly people who I could easily start a conversation with.

    7. Flexibility

    In Singapore, everyone simply just follow what the higher authorities say we should do. Although we often question the golden rule set by these people, eventually, we will still do whatever we are told to do. In fact, we have become extremely reliant on the rules set by higher authorities that we started to lose our own ability to solve problems.

    The society lacks the flexibility to handle new challenges. Singaporeans are generally ‘trained’ to follow rules. I must say that we really did a good job on that. But sometimes, I really feel that our society is just too structured and rigid, which does not really encourage creativity.

    I would not deny that Singapore is indeed a very fast and efficient country. But it comes with a price. A higher quality of life will naturally leads to a higher cost of living. Did I asked for that? Not really. I just wanted a simple and not so stressful life.

    Cons of Living in Malaysia

    I believe every city has it good and bad side. KL is definitely is not exception as well. Having listed all the good aspects of living in KL, let us look at some of the bad aspects of this city now.

    1. Ringgit – the weaker currency

    Undeniably, the weakening currency is always the bad thing about working in Malaysia. To be frank, I was actually surprised by the price of goods in Malaysia. All of a sudden, I realized that I could no longer buy as much products as before. Yes, it is certainly very frustrating, especially for those who just love shopping very much. But at least, I have learnt to spend my money more wisely now.

    My Singaporean friends often told me that the cost of living in Malaysia is very low, thus I would have nothing much to worry about. I always thought so too. But I would probably ask them to stop comparing apples to oranges now. Cost of living in Malaysia is low, but not as cheap as we assumed it to be. Without the high exchange rates between SGD and MYR, Malaysia, or particularly KL, can quite an expensive country to live in. Locals who are earning their income in Malaysia are struggling to make ends meet every month due to the high cost of living. Eating out is expensive where a plate of chicken rice will easily cost you RM 5. Then I will see people starting to convert the RM 5 into SGD and thought that is really cheap.

    However, if you gave it a deeper thought, if you are earning SGD, I believe you will be spending your income in Singapore too. Thus, it is not very right to convert and compare the price of goods in Malaysia with those in Singapore.

    The weaker Ringgit also makes travelling seems almost impossible most of the time. For Southeast Asia countries, except for Singapore, it is still fine. However, if you wish to visit Europe, I believe you would need to have at least RM 15k in hand.

    2. Language barriers

    In Malaysia, where unlike Singapore, Bahasa Malaysia is the national language. Thus, it is relatively important for one to be conversant in Bahasa Malaysia, especially when you plan to set up a business in Malaysia.

    Communicating with the Malaysian Chinese living in KL is not a problem as most of them can either speak Mandarin or Cantonese. However, I find it difficult to engage in a conversation with the Malay population, who usually communicate in Behasa Malaysia. Even so, I am glad that there is actually quite a number of them who are rather fluent in English language. But still, it is important and good for me to master some basic Behasa Malaysia if I have decided to stay in KL on a long-term basis.

    3. Higher crime rates

    Crimes are pretty rampant in Malaysia nowadays, especially theft, pickpocketing and rapes. In Malaysia, I have to stay alert and be very careful with all my personal belongings at all times. I could no longer enjoy the kind of safe environment like I used to while I was still in Singapore.

    4. Lesser career advancement & opportunities

    Comparing to Singaporeans, Malaysians are less ambitious. Most of them are easily satisfied with a decent and stable job, thus job hopping is actually less common. As a result, there are actually lesser career advancement opportunities available in the workforce. Companies in Malaysia seldom send its employees for trainings too. Most of them would not see the need to.

    To an extent, this is not an absolutely bad thing. At least I would not feel the pressure and stress to constantly upgrade myself to survive in the competitive society.

    Conclusion

    Do I see myself moving back to Singapore someday? Well, probably, but chances are not high. Currently, I feel really satisfied with my life in KL. But for certain, I do not have the intention to give up my Singapore citizenship. After all, Singapore is still my homeland.

    I used to love my little red dot very much and feel very proud to be a Singaporean. However, life has become so stressful and tough in Singapore in the past decade. The Singapore which I have knew is changed. Will I be able to earn enough to even feed myself? I am not very confident with that. Even if I could, I am not satisfied with just living with the bare minimum, struggling every month to make ends meet. I also hate to share our limited spaces with all the foreigners who Singapore welcomed in with open arms.

    We could have postponed our plans where we continue to work in Singapore and only relocate to KL once we have enough savings to provide us a comfortable life. But how old we would be when that time finally comes? It is better that we start everything anew when we are still young.

    If I were to become rich someday, I might fell in love with this city once again. But now, I am satisified with my life in KL. Apart from that, I also enjoy exploring the rural side of Malaysia very much.

    Elin Chow

    *Article first appeared on http://elinchow.blogspot.sg/

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • Positive Outlook For Singapore Economy In Immediate Future

    Positive Outlook For Singapore Economy In Immediate Future

    With a strong pipeline of investments, the overall outlook for Singapore looks positive in the immediate future, said Minister for Trade and Industry Lim Hng Kiang.

    However, he also cautioned that Singapore faces some challenges in the immediate one to two years – these include an ageing population and the task of matching Singaporeans’ aspirations.

    Mr Lim was speaking during a visit to the Braddell Heights ward on Sunday (Feb 1) – his first visit in 20 years. During a dialogue with residents of the ward, he was asked for his take on Singapore’s future economy and population.

    Citing a 2011 World Bank study of 101 middle-income countries, Mr Lim noted that Singapore was one of just 13 countries that managed to move from middle- to high-income, over a period of 50 years.

    But he stressed that Singapore still has to be cautious: “What it means for us as we celebrate 50 years is – number one, it is not very easy to become a high income country; and number two, it is also not very easy to stay there.

    “There is a lot of competition and if you mismanage like some countries – for example Greece – you can drop very quickly and the drop need not be gradual, it can be a very severe drop over a period of five years. As we look after Singapore and we look to our future, let us be careful and reinforce those things which make us successful. Let us also be careful not to fall down the slippery slope and end up with such problems.”

    With investments coming into Singapore and local companies investing overseas, Mr Lim said he is confident that the country will be able to maintain steady growth of between two and four per cent. This is because of Singapore’s strong pipeline of investments, the Economic Development Board still being able to attract investments to Singapore, and Singapore companies investing overseas – which allow them to generate good jobs with their headquarters in Singapore to look after their overseas subsidiaries.

    However, he cautioned that there may be some ups and downs. One challenge is the slowdown in Europe, China and Japan’s economic engines.

    “We have to find new opportunities for our companies. But overall, we are still optimistic that we can generate the jobs and the big challenge now is how to match Singaporeans with these jobs,” said Mr Lim.

    “HUMAN RESOURCE IS THE BEST AND ONLY RESOURCE WE HAVE”

    Thus the need for Singapore’s focus on education and training. “Human resource is the best and only resource that we have. Other resources, like land and energy, will face greater constraints. If you look at what we’ve achieved in the last 50 years and look ahead to the next 50 years, there’s optimism we can do more,” said Mr Lim.

    He cited how in 1966, only half of Singaporeans continued education past the primary six level. This is reflected in a high percentage of the current workforce having primary and secondary level qualifications.

    But Mr Lim noted that this demographic has changed – more than 50 per cent of those who are under 30 and entering the workforce are now graduates. Another 30 per cent are polytechnic graduates, with less than 15 to 20 per cent having primary or secondary school qualifications.

    He said that while an increasingly educated workforce is welcomed, this poses challenges as well and the economy has to adapt: “If your restaurants depend currently on the older workers with less education to be serving them – 10 to 15 years from now, these people will not be in the workforce. Your new workforce are polytechnic diploma holders and graduates. Therefore, you have to restructure your service industry to cater for this new profile of workers.

    “In MTI and MOM, we are very concerned and we study all these statistics very carefully… The objective given to us is to make sure we are able to restructure the economy, make sure we can generate good jobs that satisfy and meet the aspirations of our new workers.”

    About 280 people attended the dialogue, which lasted for over an hour. Questions ranged from Singapore’s education system, to changing consumer habits and the Central Provident Fund. One participant also asked what the role of SMEs looks like in Singapore’s future. Mr Lim said that moving forward, it will be key to have a strong pipeline of startups and SMEs, and to facilitate local SME tie-ups with big companies and foreign SMEs.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Singapore Is Most Liveabe City In Asia For Expatriates

    Singapore Is Most Liveabe City In Asia For Expatriates

    Singapore remains the most liveable city in Asia and the world for expatriates while Hong Kong slips to the 33rd place from 17th in the global ranking of expatriate living conditions published by ECA International.

    In Asia, Kuala Lumpur and George Town both ranked 16th in Asia and 118th in the world, while Johor Baharu 21st in Asia and 126th in the world.

    In 2014, Kuala Lumpur was 16th, George Town (17th) and Johor Baharu (21st) in Asia.

    ECA International regional director – Asia Lee Quane said: “Good air quality, solid infrastructure, decent medical facilities, low crime and health risks have contributed to Singapore maintaining its position at the top of the global ranking for quality of living for Asian assignees.

    “The fact that Singapore comes out top time and time again does make it a very attractive proposition for companies looking to set up in offices the region, particularly when conditions in Hong Kong (Singapore’s archival for the past few years) have deteriorated a little.”

    Updated annually, ECA assesses 450 locations worldwide on the quality of living based on climate; availability of health services; housing and utilities; isolation; access to a social network and leisure facilities; infrastructure; personal safety; political tensions, and air quality.

    Singapore is followed by Sydney and Adelaide in the ranking for Asian assignees.

    In mainland China, Shanghai, ranked 110th globally, is China’s most liveable city followed by Beijing (122nd).

    Scores have remained steady across most Chinese locations but Chongqing and Shenzhen saw the highest improvement over the year.

    In India, Bangalore, ranked 171st globally scores most favourably followed by Mumbai and Chennai. New Delhi (204th) is the least liveable.

    Along with Beijing, Delhi has the worst score for air quality not just in Asia but globally.

    In Thailand, the declaration of martial law has led to a worsening in socio-political scores for locations there, plummeting Bangkok and Chang Mai both to the 112th spot, down from last year’s 108th.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com