Tag: employment

  • More Non-Residents Retrenched Amid Restructuring

    More Non-Residents Retrenched Amid Restructuring

    Amid ongoing business restructuring, last year saw a 40 per cent jump in the number of non-resident workers retrenched, figures from the Ministry of Manpower show.

    A total of 12,930 workers received the pink slip in 2014, 12 per cent higher than in the year before. This represented 6.3 lay-offs per 1,000 employees, up from 5.8 in 2013.

    Last year’s higher redundancy numbers were caused by more non-resident workers being let go — 5,690 versus 4,050 in 2013. In comparison, the number of residents made redundant fell from 7,520 to 7,240.

    These led to resident workers making up 56 per cent of retrenchments, the lowest since 1998 and the first dip in three years. In 2013, the proportion of resident redundancies was 65 per cent.

    Resident workers laid off also found new jobs more quickly, with half of them finding new bosses within one month. The percentage of residents who re-entered the workforce within six months of redundancy also rose for the third straight quarter to 59 per cent in December last year.

    The services sector — mainly wholesale trade, financial services, legal, accounting and management services, and retail trade — accounted for most of the retrenchments (56 per cent). Manufacturing as a whole made up 31 per cent of the lay-offs, while construction was responsible for the remaining 13 per cent. The increase in construction lay-offs was caused by a decline in private sector construction output.

    Despite forming the majority of those retrenched, PMETs comprised a smaller share of the lay-offs last year (51 per cent) compared to 2013 (56 per cent).

    The top reason cited for lay-offs was “restructuring of business processes for greater efficiency” (32 per cent), followed by “reorganisation of businesses” (24 per cent) and “poor business or business failure not due to recession” (22 per cent).

    Commenting on the statistics, analysts said the higher number of retrenchments was caused by a combination of modest economic growth last year, tightened foreign labour supply and economic restructuring.

    The higher Dependency Ratio Ceiling — the maximum ratio of foreign employees permitted — in the services and construction sectors led to increased redundancies, said DBS economist Irvin Seah. “The services sector finds it difficult to find more local workers to support that additional one foreign worker. As a result, companies have to downsize operations, trim their headcount and increase productivity,” he said.

    Higher foreign-worker levies could have caused a shift in preference towards retaining resident workers, said UOB economist Francis Tan.

    OCBC economist Selena Ling said the higher redundancies are “not too alarming for now”. “As restructuring continues, and as companies and industries try to adapt to the new normal — improving productivity and making do with less manpower — you could still get a fair bit of churn,” she said.

    Noting the low unemployment rate and high re-entry rate for resident workers, she added: “If overall unemployment rate is still fairly low, then a certain amount of churn is not a bad thing because it means there is labour mobility, which is what you need for a fairly efficient, market driven economy.”

    Experts said they foresee redundancies rising further in the near-term. The services and construction sectors will continue to be vulnerable this year due to weak productivity, which could affect firms’ overall business performance, said Mr Tan. “If a company in a particular sector is not seeing growth, then naturally they may shut down. Then, there will be increased redundancies,” he added.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • The Hottest Jobs And Highest Paying Sectors In Singapore

    The Hottest Jobs And Highest Paying Sectors In Singapore

    The five highest-paying sectors in Singapore are banking and finance; oil, gas and petrochemicals; pharmaceuticals; semiconductors; and, information technology, according to a new report by staffing firm Kelly Services.

    Its 2015 Singapore Salary Guide also highlighted several jobs as particularly high-paying. Network and systems engineers can make up to $4,000 to $7,000, while application development consultants can earn up to $5,000 to $7,000 and financial accountants can earn up to $4,500 to $9,500. Supply chain managers can earn up to $5,000 to $14,000 and compliance managers can make up to $10,000 to $12,500. These figures apply to experienced professionals.

    Four other things Kelly Services says about the Singapore jobs market:

    1. Industries that are expected to grow in 2015 are banking & finance, life sciences, supply chain, procurement and logistics and advanced manufacturing.

    2. In banking and finance: Changes in financial regulations have raised demand for staff managing compliance and risk management. Compliance managers can expect to earn $10,000 to $12,500 monthly, while risk managers can look forward to salaries of $12,500 to $14,000.

    The entry of new players into the banking scene has also increased demand for relationship managers. They can expect to earn $7,500 to $18,000 per month.

    3. In healthcare: With eight of the top 10 pharmaceutical and medical technology firms basing their headquarters in Singapore, there is growing demand for those with expertise in the laboratory, technical sales and regulatory affairs.

    4. In information technology: Growing demand for mid-level IT professionals, with businesses increasingly concerned with cyber-security.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • ITE Graduate Looked Down By Interviewer Because Of Poor Qualifications

    ITE Graduate Looked Down By Interviewer Because Of Poor Qualifications

    Dear All Singapore Stuff,

    I’m going to share my thoughts regarding an interview with a certain company for the position of Test Technician and after the interview, I left feeling horrible, depressed and really upset. The interviewer was rude and unprofessional. I found this job opening through jobstreet.

    First of all, I waited for almost an hour before the interview commenced because the HR recruitment specialist had an appointment and forgot about the interview. How convenient. That is unprofessional and they should have told me beforehand. The interviewer didn’t introduce his name, what his position was or which department here was from. So we’ll call him Mr Nice guy.

    So Mr Nice guy asked me regarding my last drawn salary, from two previous companies. He asked “why is your salary low?”. I explained that I worked only for a few days during the course of the employment and probably that’s the reason why it’s not that high. Mr Nice guy wasn’t satisfied with my answer and raised his voice and said “NO NO YOU’RE NOT ANSWERING MY QUESTION”. At this point of time, I felt that this interview had gone sideways. Mr Nice guy critiqued how could I possibly work with the company if I couldn’t answer a simple question.

    In the first place, is this question even relevant? You employ someone based on merit and skills, not on previous pay and I did give an answer. I’m sorry if you are not satisfied with my answer.

    Mr Nice guy proceeded with the interview and I answered as best as I could, in a polite manner even though I felt like walking out the door. He was rude throughout the interview and asked me questions that are not related to the job scope. All the while he behaved in a condescending manner and constantly undermined my credibility. Mr Nice Guy kept hinting that the company is looking for “highly educated people” He seem to have a prejudice against ITE graduates like me.

    The ad that they posted is misleading to future applicants on what are the required qualifications. I have met the necessary requirements. I have a Nitec in the relevant course and I have the relevant experience. The interviewer looked down on me just because I was an ITE graduate. He also continously undermined my capabilities throughout the interview and he was hinting that ITE graduates have no place in the company.

    Education is very important in Singapore. But it is wrong to stereotype someone just based on his/her qualifications. Even if you are from ITE, it doesn’t make you less of a person. What does it matter if you have a PhD but you’re an asshole. Is someone deemed highly educated just based on his qualifications? Everyone should be treated equally regardless of their education. There should be no prejudice against people who has less education than you. What’s important is the attitude of someone and I believe that is what you should look for in an employee.

    Mr Nice guy concluded the interview by bluntly saying that according to him, I had failed the interview because of my attitude and I wouldn’t ever get a good job in Singapore and that the way I answered his first question was unreasonable and unprofessional.

    I believe he was the one who was rude and treated me with no respect. If i wanted to be interrogated I would’ve just gone to a police station. Where did he learn his interviewing skills from? He was rude and inconsiderate from the start and he didn’t even know that he was rude. He spoiled my day with his attitude. I dont have any background in human resource but i doubt that that is a how an interview should be held.

    I have lodged a report with TAFEP and am currently awaiting a personal apology from the interviewer itself for being rude to me. I hope other people don’t go through what I have been through.

    PS: Interviewer is a foreigner. At first I didn’t want to mention it for fear of readers having clouded judgements but due to recent cases, i thought this factor should be taken into consideration.

    Disgruntled Applicant
    A.S.S. Contributor

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Reasons Why Foreigners Get Jobs Over Singaporeans

    Reasons Why Foreigners Get Jobs Over Singaporeans

    Another new initiative to help Singaporean workers?

    According to the Channel NewsAsia news report “New portal to prepare students for future jobs” (Apr 7) – “The one-stop portal for education, training and career information, is a key plank of the SkillsFuture initiative that seeks to help Singaporeans take ownership of their job search.”

    What do employers want?

    All these new initiatives to help Singaporeans find jobs and career development may not work because we do not think through what is it that most employers want?

    Employers want …

    • workers who are experienced, highly skilled,  highly educated and intelligent

    When you allow the whole world to come to Singapore as tourists to look for jobs – you don’t need to be a genius to figure out that the odds will continue to be stacked against Singaporeans – when you are competing with the best (or the worse who fake their credentials) in the world

    • workers who cost less

    Foreigners don’t have to contribute CPF. So, employers save up to 20 per cent on wages. And of course, foreigners may be willing to work for lesser pay than Singaporeans

    • workers who do not have turnover problems

    Since most foreigners are on 2-year contracts – they are mostly stuck with the same employer for at least 2 years

    • less work disruption

    Foreigners on work permits cannot get pregnant. So, no “4 months’ maternity leave” problems. Those on employment pass also typically come to Singapore as “singles” and so are less likely to have maternity leave

    Male foreigners do not have National Service reservist training “disruptions” to work

    • workers who can do very long hours of shift work

    Foreigners have no choice and are more willing to accept jobs which are 12 hours or longer a day for 6 days a week

    Make yourself valuable to employers?  

    As to the article “Make yourself valuable, even after getting your degree: Indranee Rajah” (CNA, Apr 7), which said ”The forum focused on whether a degree still matters when it comes to employment, and saw some students sharing their views on pursuing a job that is not relevant to their degree.

    Ms Indranee said having skills to adapt to the changing job market will be important and it is one of the objectives of the Government’s SkillsFuture initiative.

    Odds stacked against Singaporeans?

    She added that the Government is hoping to change mind sets by getting people to find out what they really want to do and to get the relevant qualifications”

    • how do Singaporeans make themselves more valuable to employers, when the odds are so stacked against them in favour of foreigner?

    Real pay increase?

    So, is it any wonder that the real starting pay of graduates has hardly increased in the last 8 years or so, and real basic, gross and total wages (excluding employer CPF contribution) have also hardly increased in the last 15 years or so?

    Employ Singaporeans first?

    Finally, the most telling “wayang” is perhaps that the national jobs portal under the Fair Consideration Framework to employ Singaporeans First, cannot give any statistics at all as to how many of the jobs actually went to Singaporeans!

    Win battles lose war
    * Submitted by TRE reader

    Half the workforce not “true-blue” Singaporeans?

    P.S. I went to a bank, hospital and food basement of a shopping mall one day, and almost every worker was not a Singaporean!

    Source: www.tremeritus.com

  • 97% Of Singaporeans Would Consider Leaving Singapore To Work Overseas

    97% Of Singaporeans Would Consider Leaving Singapore To Work Overseas

    Ninety-seven per cent of Singaporeans would consider leaving Singapore to work overseas — the biggest proportion in Asia, a poll by recruiting firm Hays showed.

    The poll, released on Monday (March 30), found that 85 per cent of respondents would leave for better job opportunities, career development or exposure.

    Twelve per cent would leave for a change in lifestyle.

    The poll was conducted among 2,553 job seekers in Singapore, Malaysia, Hong Kong, China and Japan.

    China had the second most globally-mobile workforce, with 96 per cent of job seekers willing to work overseas, with better job opportunities, career development or exposure being the key reasons.

    The figure for Hong Kong was 94 per cent and 93 per cent for Malaysia, with most job seekers citing better opportunities, career development or exposure as the factors that would nudge them to leave.

    Japan had a lower proportion of job seekers who indicated they were willing to work overseas — 88 per cent.

    However, it had the biggest proportion of job seekers citing lifestyle factors as a reason for leaving, at 23 per cent.

    Ms Christine Wright, managing director of Hays in Asia, said the opportunity to gain international experience is the top factor driving local talent overseas.

    Employers increasingly value local talent with “international experience and an international mindset”.

    “These candidates are even more highly valued than expatriates since they combine their Westernised way of thinking and experience of how business is done overseas with local cultural understanding,” she said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com