Tag: extremists

  • When Children Become Targets Of Terrorists

    When Children Become Targets Of Terrorists

    Last week, Taleban terrorists stormed an army-run school in Peshawar, Pakistan, killing at least 132 children and committing one of the deadliest attacks against children in recent years.

    The incident adds to a decade of terrorist activities which are becoming more cold-blooded and wanton than ever before and are particularly targeted at children, say historians and criminology experts.

    These innocent lives, they say, are regarded by every culture as worth protecting, which makes them the prime targets of modern-era terrorists who are out to make the most impact possible with their acts of violence.

    “Terrorists are looking for something of value that they can strike… targeting children is something that really hurts,” said Professor Emerita of History Anna Geifman of Boston University, who is also senior researcher at the political studies department at Bar Ilan University in Israel.

    “Terrorists want to show that they are willing to do anything so… we should take them seriously,” added Professor Laura Dugan from the Department of Criminology and Criminal Justice at the University of Maryland.

    Previously, terrorists “had their own code of how to behave”, said criminal justice administration professor Gus Martin of California State University.

    American terrorists, he said, would plant bombs and dial ahead so buildings could be evacuated, or Pakistani hijackers would free captives before blowing up the plane.

    But that morality began to shift in the 1990s, especially with the appearance of groups like Al-Qaeda; and on Sept 11, “a new era had dawned”, said Prof Martin.

    “Now the moral compass has completely changed – many of these groups have no hesitation in killing as many as possible.”

    Prof Geifman, who has written a book on terrorism called Death Orders, added that after the 9/11 attacks, terrorists had to look for the next “sensational and impressive” act of violence, and that was when they turned to children.

    One of the most notorious acts of terrorism targeted at children was the school attack and hostage-taking in Beslan, Russia in 2004.

    Rebels took over the school for three days and held 1,200 students, teachers and parents hostage in the school gym. They turned it into a death camp, denying children food and water.

    Many died when a bomb was detonated in the building, while others were shot by the rebels as they tried to escape.

    According to reports, more than 700 were wounded and more than 300 died – 186 of them children.

    Prof Dugan said attacks on educational institutions “started increasing dramatically” that year. And in the years after, it “becomes clear that schools that are targeted have young children attending them”.

    The proliferation of child victims could also have to do with terrorist groups copying each other, said experts. Prof Dugan said such trends have emerged before: “Suicide attacks have spread across groups since the early 1980s… another example is airline hijacking in the late 1960s and early 1970s.”

    In the case of Boko Haram, the terrorist group that kidnapped nearly 300 girls in Nigeria in April – and another batch of at least 185 a week ago – the attacks are a statement against Western education and the education of women. It believes that women should be at home raising children and looking after their husbands instead of getting educated.

    Some of these women are “kidnapped and sold into slavery”, said Prof Martin.

    Another explanation for targeting children is to make a “counterculture” statement, said Prof Geifman.

    “Whatever is precious in the other culture, they will try to negate and destroy.”

    She said that many terrorist groups, including the Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS) and Al-Qaeda, have a culture of revering death, whereas society in general “chooses life”.

    When they kill children, “they destroy the most precious symbol of life because there is nothing more alive than a child”.

    Many of these groups also believe killing these children is done with the blessing of their god.

    Said Prof Martin: “They feel if they do god’s work they will be clean and god favours this type of behaviour.”

    While governments work to stop these acts of terror, the man in the street also has a responsibility to stand up to such acts, said experts. Prof Geifman believes that while children are the immediate targets, ultimately the terrorist group is signalling to the public at large that the group should be feared.

    “We are the real targets,” said Prof Geifman. “The terrorists are talking to us.”

    But instead of avoiding school or work after an attack, life should go on, she urged.

    “They want to see every one of us act as a hostage… We should do the opposite and not succumb to fear.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Islamophobia Driving Expectation On The Need For Muslims To Openly Deplore Terrorist Acts?

    Islamophobia Driving Expectation On The Need For Muslims To Openly Deplore Terrorist Acts?

    There’s a certain ritual that each and every one of the world’s billion-plus Muslims, especially those living in Western countries, is expected to go through immediately following any incident of violence involving a Muslim perpetrator. It’s a ritual that is continuing now with the Sydney hostage crisis, in which a deranged self-styled sheikh named Man Haron Monis took several people hostage in a downtown café.

    Here is what Muslims and Muslim organizations are expected to say: “As a Muslim, I condemn this attack and terrorism in any form.”

    This expectation we place on Muslims, to be absolutely clear, is Islamophobic and bigoted. The denunciation is a form of apology: an apology for Islam and for Muslims. The implication is that every Muslim is under suspicion of being sympathetic to terrorism unless he or she explicitly says otherwise.

    The implication is also that any crime committed by a Muslim is the responsibility of all Muslims simply by virtue of their shared religion. This sort of thinking — blaming an entire group for the actions of a few individuals, assuming the worst about a person just because of their identity — is the very definition of bigotry.

    It is time for that ritual to end: non-Muslims in all countries, and today especially those in Australia, should finally take on the correct assumption that Muslims hate terrorism just as much as they do, and cease expecting Muslims to prove their innocence just because of their faith.

    Bigoted assumptions are the only plausible reason for this ritual to exist, which means that maintaining the ritual is maintaining bigotry. Otherwise, we wouldn’t expect Muslims to condemn Haron Monis — who is clearly a crazy person who has no affiliations with formal religious groups — any more than we would expect Christians to condemn Timothy McVeigh. Similarly, if someone blames all Jews for the act of, say, extremist Israeli settlers in the West Bank, we immediately and correctly reject that position as prejudiced. We understand that such an accusation is hateful and wrong — but not when it is applied to Muslims.

    This is, quite literally, a different set of standards that we apply only to Muslims. Hend Amry, who is Libyan-American, brilliantly satirized this expectation with this tweet, highlighting the arbitrary expectations about what Muslims are and are not expected to condemn:

    This ritual began shortly after September 2001. American Muslims, as well as Muslims in other Western countries, feared that they could be victims to a public backlash against people of their religion. President George W. Bush feared this as well and gave a speech imploring Americans to embrace Muslim-Americans as fellow citizens. But while the short-term need to guard against a backlash was real, that moment has passed, and the ritual’s persistence is perpetuating Islamophobia rather than reducing it, by constantly reminding us of our assumption that Muslims are guilty until proven innocent.

    The media has played a significant role in maintaining this ritual and thus the prejudiced ideas behind it. Yes, that includes openly Islamophobic cable news hosts like those in the US. But it also includes even well-intentioned media outlets and reporters who broadcast Muslims’ and Muslim organizations’ condemnation of acts of extremist violence, like the hostage crisis in Sydney.

    There is no question that this coverage is explicitly and earnestly designed to combat Islamophobia and promote equal treatment of Muslims. No question. All the same, this coverage ends up cementing the ritual condemnation as a necessary act, and thus cementing as well the racist implications of that ritual. By treating it as news every time, the media is reminding its readers and viewers that Muslims are held to a different standard; it is implicitly if unintentionally reiterating the idea that they are guilty until proven innocent, that maybe there is something to the idea of collective Muslim responsibility for lone criminals who happen to share their religion.

    Instead, we should treat the assumptions that compel this ritual — that Muslims bear collective responsibility, that they are presumed terrorist-sympathizers until proven otherwise — as flatly bigoted ideas with no place in our society. There is no legitimate reason for Muslim groups to need to condemn Haron Monis, nor is there any legitimate reason to treat those condemnations as news. So we should stop.

    We should treat people Haron Monis as what he is: a deranged lunatic. And we should treat Muslims as what they: normal people who of course reject terrorism, rather than as a lesser form of humanity that is expected to reject violence every time it happens.

     

    Source: www.vox.com

  • Sydney Siege Gunman Identified As Self-Styled Islamic State Preacher Sheik Haron Monis

    Sydney Siege Gunman Identified As Self-Styled Islamic State Preacher Sheik Haron Monis

    He is Sheik Man Haron Monis, who is a self-styled preacher of Islamic State on bail for accessory to murder.

    Monis, 50, died at the end of a 16-hour siege at the cafe early this morning, but was no stranger to Australian authorities.

    He first came to public notice in 2010 when he faced charges for sending offensive letters to the families of two Australian soldiers who died in Afghanistan – and the family of a trade official, Craig Senger, who died in the 2009 Jakarta bombing.

    As a result, he was convicted of 12 counts of using a postal service to cause offence, ordered to perform 300 hours of community service and placed on a two-year good behaviour bond.

    Monis was banned from sending similar letters to the relatives of British soldiers, but claimed in court at the time the condition was a breach of his freedom of speech.

    Monis’ former lawyer Manny Conditsis describes him as a “damaged goods individual” with an ideology that clouds his common sense.

    Monis was also accused of being an accessory to his ex-wife’s murder and faced charges on 40 offences relating to the indecent and sexual assault of several women in 2002.

    He was granted bail and was set to reappear in court in February 2015.

     

    Source: www.sbs.com.au

  • Troubling Trend Of Civil Servants Supporting IS’ Cause In Malaysia

    Troubling Trend Of Civil Servants Supporting IS’ Cause In Malaysia

    PETALING JAYA, Dec 3 — Two more civil servants who were channeling funds to the Islamic State (IS) have been arrested as police express worry over militant sympathisers in the civil service.

    Police are working to establish the extent of IS influence among civil servants as so far six government officers had joined, planned or had sent money to the extremist outfit which controls chunks of territories in both Iraq and Syria.

    A police source said in six months, four civil servants were arrested in the Klang Valley and Kedah, and there is a possibility of others in the service being involved.

    “We are now investigating the extent of involvement of civil servants in IS activities in the country and abroad,” the source said.

    “There is a possibility those detained had influenced others, including their colleagues, to join their cause and this is a worrying trend.”

    Investigators are establishing if these suspects had recruited others from their departments.

    The source said intelligence and operations personnel are working to determine the seriousness of the matter.

    The latest arrest came when the Bukit Aman’s Counter-Terrorism Unit conducted an operation in Kuala Lumpur and Kedah on Nov 27 and 28.

    Inspector-General of Police Tan Sri Khalid Abu Bakar said police picked up three men in separate locations.

    “Two of them, aged 23 and 28, work at a government agency in Kuala Lumpur. They are suspected to have channeled funds to new recruits who are planning to travel to Syria to fight alongside IS.”

    Investigations revealed the third suspect, aged 36, joined IS last year and had spent four months in Syria before returning to Malaysia on April 8.

    He said the trio were being detained under the Security Offences (Special Measures) Act (Sosma).

    In October, police made a major breakthrough following the arrest of three men who played a key role in the recruitment of more than 20 Malaysians.

    One of the recruiters was an assistant director attached to the Energy, Green Technology and Water Ministry.

    The 37-year-old civil servant was responsible for recruiting and making travel arrangements for those wanting to go to Syria. He was also the contact person for Malaysian fighters in Syria.

    The other recruiter fought alongside rebels in Syria last December and returned to Malaysia in April while the third was an expert in recruiting people via Facebook.

    The three recruiters are believed to have been trained by Dr Mahmud Ahmad, 36, an Islamic studies lecturer with Universiti Malaya.

    The trio’s arrest led to the arrest of 11 other supporters from various backgrounds — a 14-year-old student, a housewife, a graphic designer, a university student, factory workers and odd-job workers.

    Police had then expressed shock that the suspects came from all walks of life, suggesting that the recruitment drive was intense. Police said the recruiters would scout for targets via Facebook and brainwash them to fight coalition forces in Iraq and Syria.

    Once coaxed, the recruits would meet a 34-year-old suspect who fought in Syria.

    The trio also had connections with 36-year-old stationery shop operator Mohd Najib Hussein and Muhammad Joraimee Awang Raimee, 39, who was attached to the Selayang Municipal Council.

    Mahmud, Najib and Joraimee were previously IS recruiters but later fled the country and joined Abu Sayyaf in Southern Philippines.

     

    Source: www.themalaymailonline.com

  • Two Civil Servants Among Three Arrested In Malaysia For Suspected Links to IS

    Two Civil Servants Among Three Arrested In Malaysia For Suspected Links to IS

    KUALA LUMPUR — Malaysian police said today (Dec 2) that they have detained three men, including two civil servants, suspected of being linked to the militant Islamic State group.

    The detentions bring the number of people held for suspected militant links to 43 this year.

    National police chief Khalid Abu Bakar said the three were detained Nov 27 and 28 in operations in Kuala Lumpur and in northern Kedah state.

    Mr Khalid said in a statement that a 36-year-old suspect had joined militant groups in Syria since Dec 28 last year and returned to Malaysia on April 8.

    Another two, both civil servants in their 20s, were believed to have been channelling funds to several Malaysians who want to go to Syria to join the Islamic State terror group, he said.

    The spread of the Islamic state ideology has worried Prime Minister Najib Razak, who recently warned that it can cause chaos and conflict in the country. He said the government would introduce a new anti-terrorism law next year to combat the security threat.

    No details have been given on the new law, but officials said it may include preventive measures such as detention without trial. Critics have urged the government not to revive the Internal Security Act, which allowed indefinite detention without trial. It was abolished in 2012 as part of political reforms.

    The government said they have identified 39 Malaysians fighting in Syria and Iraq, including five who had died. AP

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

deneme bonusu