Tag: football

  • Tampines Rovers Chairman Krishna Ramachandra Resigns

    Tampines Rovers Chairman Krishna Ramachandra Resigns

    He took the S.League by storm. Within months of helming Tampines Rovers, chairman Krishna Ramachandra put the S.League on the world map.

    Internationally recognised names Jermaine Pennant, Gerard Houllier and even Ronaldinho were associated with the five-time league champions.

    But it has not been plain sailing for the 45-year-old corporate lawyer, who is relinquishing his post as Tampines chairman after less than two years in the job.

    The New Paper understands that Krishna has recommended a successor, who will need to be approved by the authorities.

    Said Krishna in a statement: “I intend to step down as chairman of TRFC in the coming weeks… after TRFC’s 2016 accounts have been audited and finalised. I will be dealing with all outstanding queries relating to TRFC’s statement of accounts before stepping down.

    “The high demands of my professional career have overtaken my ability to keep volunteering at the level of intensity that is needed to fulfil the role of chairman of TRFC,” added Krishna, who said he will remain as a committee member to assist in the transition phase.

    Financial issues also cropped up at the club. These include late payment of salaries to Stags staff, which raised the attention of the Central Provident Fund Board.

    Despite the woes, Krishna said he has derived joy from his involvement with the club.

    “It has been an honour and privilege to serve this wonderful club. I have enjoyed many memorable moments with the fans, players, coaches and staff – all of whom have been just an absolute joy to work with,” he said.

    “I have absolutely no regrets on the footballing experience I have had in the last six over years and I will certainly continue to support Singapore football.”

    Krishna is hopeful of a better future for S.League clubs, though.

    “Hopefully, in the near future, S.League clubs will be allowed the option to be privatised, and those that can, may possibly install a viable model,” he said.

    “This will take time but more importantly will need the support of all stakeholders.”

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • No Refunds Despite Messi, Higuain Withdrawals From Singapore-Argentina Game

    No Refunds Despite Messi, Higuain Withdrawals From Singapore-Argentina Game

    Football fans who bought tickets to watch Lionel Messi and Gonzalo Higuain in action against Singapore on Tuesday night (June 13) will not be able to seek refunds now that the two football stars have withdrawn from the international friendly.

    In response to queries from TODAY, match promoters UNICESS Sports Group said that no refunds or forms of compensation will be provided, even though Messi and Higuain were the players that were heavily promoted as the star attractions of the game, which is selling tickets at S$40, S$78, S$138, S$188.

    UNICESS said that while the selection of the Argentina squad was out of its control, the Asia-based sports match tour promoter believes that “football fans will understand” because the world No 2-ranked side that will face the Lions at the National Stadium will still feature several other top stars.

    “While UNICESS and the Football Association of Singapore (FAS) share the disappointment of football fans at the absence of these players, there is not a requirement to refund tickets,” the company said.

    “Argentina have selected a…squad that continues to feature world-class players such as Angel Di Maria, Paulo Dybala and Sergio Romero and we look forward to what will still be a highly entertaining match.

    “We have no control over the squad that is brought to represent Argentina. This is the Argentine Football Association’s (AFA) role and the players that actually play in game is made official by the head coach only just before the game. We believe football fans will understand.”

    UNICESS also pinned the blame on the AFA, saying that it only confirmed the withdrawals of Messi, Higuain and Manchester City defender Nicolas Otamendi on Saturday evening (June 10), and added that it was the AFA who provided UNICESS with the images and videos of Messi to be used for marketing purposes.

    However, Argentina newspaper Clarin first broke the news last Thursday (June 8) that Messi and Otamendi would be leaving the Argentina squad after the team’s international friendly against Brazil in Melbourne on Friday (June 9).

    Argentina head coach Jorge Sampaoli then also said at a press conference in Melbourne last Thursday that “it was already planned” that Messi and Otamendi would leave after the Brazil game.

    While Messi did arrive in Singapore with the Argentina squad on Saturday, and took the team bus to the Fullerton Hotel, the Barcelona striker returned to Changi Airport a few hours later to take a flight out of the country.

    Significantly, after promoting the match together for the past few weeks, UNICESS issued the media statement on the players’ withdrawals at around 11pm on Saturday night alone, without the FAS.

    In response to queries from TODAY, the FAS, the official sanctioning body of the game, said it had discussed the issue of refunds with UNICESS in the wake of the player withdrawals. However, it said that the decision on whether to provide refunds would be taken solely by UNICESS.

    “As they are the match promoter, (the) commercial decisions are made by them,” an FAS spokesman said.

    “That said, we do understand the fans’ frustrations and the difficult situation UNICESS has been put in by the late withdrawals. It is not easy for them to find a satisfactory outcome as such matches are extremely expensive to put together.

    “When they (UNICESS) started promoting the match weeks ago, they sincerely believed that the players would be participating in the match.

    “Nonetheless, we hope that football fans are still excited to see one of the best teams in the world take on our boys in what is truly a once-in-a-lifetime experience.”

    Local football fan Nathaniel Lee, 35, however told TODAY that while he understood UNICESS may not be blamed for the withdrawal, he had hoped they would have at least provided some form of compensation for the fans.

    Said the operations manager: “It would have been nice if they could provide some form of compensation. After all, we were promised something and they ultimately did not deliver on their promise.

    “While I can empathise with them (UNICESS), they should also spare a thought for the fans who bought tickets thinking they were going to watch Messi, Higuain and even (Sergio) Aguero, who was in the promotional poster as well.”

    But some others were less forgiving on UNICESS’ Facebook page.

    Facebook user Mushroomhead Illo wrote: “Dear Unicess Sports Group, Messi has already left our little red dot.

    “Please offer no more excuses, take responsibility and do the honourable thing of giving the fans, who have put their trust in you and bought the tickets according to what you’ve advertised, their full refund. Thank you.”

    Aloysius Lin added: “Thought I can witness one of the greatest players in action, but turns out is the greatest con job in action.”

    Jas Singh wrote on TODAY Sports’ Facebook page: “This is a good wake-up call to never buy into the hype from end-of-season tours.”

    UNICESS told TODAY that over 20,000 tickets to the match has been sold so far, and that it remains confident that ticket sales will continue to increase over the next two days. The National Stadium’s capacity is 55,000.

    Said UNICESS: “Ticket sales have remained buoyant, and we expect ticket sales to steadily increase over the next two days.

    “We are confident that football fans in Singapore will still want to come and support the Lions as they go up against a truly world-class team in Argentina.”

     

    Source: http://www.todayonline.com

  • Bali United Score Praise For Goal Celebration Promoting Religious Harmony

    Bali United Score Praise For Goal Celebration Promoting Religious Harmony

    A photo posted on Facebook by Bali United FC on Monday (Jun 5) has netted widespread praise for its message of religious harmony.

    The photo, which has been shared close to 12,000 times, shows players Ngurah Nanak, Yabes Roni and Miftahul Hamdi in prayer positions of different faiths in celebration of Yabes’ goal.

    Defender Ngurah Nanak, who is Hindu, was pictured standing with his palms raised to his forehead, while Christian forward Yabes, who had just scored Bali United’s second goal against Borneo FC, kneels on the grass. Beside him, Muslim Miftahul is seen praying prostrate.

    The photo, shot by Miftahuddin Halim, was captioned: “Because differing beliefs will not stop us from achieving the same goal.”

    The post attracted hundreds of comments with people lauding Bali United for attempting to unite Indonesia. The country recently saw racial and religious tensions come to the fore after ex-Jakarta governor Ahok – a Chinese Christian, was sentenced to prison for blasphemy over comments on the Quran. Islamic fundamentalists had agitated for him to be punished, mobilising mass protests against him, though he had apologised.

    “FOOTBALL CAN UNITE A NATION”

    “It’s beautiful to see that differences have united us as one Indonesia. Save NKRI (Negara Kesatuan Republik Indonesia) … Best for Bali United, hope you become the Liga 1 champion,” said one Facebook user.

    Another said: “This is why I support Bali United. Even though they are of different faiths, they respect each other.”

    Yet another praised Bali, an Indonesian island popular with tourists: “This is the strength of Bali – tolerance which is key to Indonesia’s harmony.”

    Speaking to Kompas after the match on May 14, Yabes said the move was meant to promote unity within Indonesia, despite its citizens practising different faiths and cultures.

    “Protect our brotherhood and stay as one,” said the 22-year-old.

    His teammate Miftahul said he would be happy if the brief celebration was made an example.

    “Football can help unite a nation,” he said to Kompas.

     

    Source: http://www.channelnewsasia.com/

  • Tampines Rovers In A Money Muddle

    Tampines Rovers In A Money Muddle

    S.League club Tampines Rovers ran into cash-flow problems last April, and it appears that the club are facing another money muddle this year.

    The New Paper understands that the Central Provident Fund (CPF) Board is looking into the club, with former sponsor Komoco Motors recalling a $190,000 loan.

    Tampines are also facing a repayment of a $756,000 “sponsorship credit line” from Taiwanese tech company Nogle, starting next year.

    This comes after TNP reported in March that Tampines were late in paying player salaries in January and February, with other administrative issues seeing the club facing fines by local and regional football authorities.

    1) CASH-FLOW PROBLEMS

    Tampines general manager Desmund Khusnin told TNP that the club had faced cash-flow problems earlier in the year but, while he remained confident that the Stags will sort out their financial issues, he could not explain exactly how they will do so.

    “There was a delay (of CPF payments) in March – a three-week delay – but, after that, it’s all been sorted out. During that period, there was a cash-flow issue, but now I’m sure it will not happen again,” he said.

    TNP has seen letters sent by the CPF’s Recovery Department, asking for a meeting with at least five Tampines players and two of their non-playing staff members at its office next month. Desmund confirmed that he, too, had received a similar letter.

    “In March, there were a lot of payments due, including those for the AFC Cup,” he said, referring to Tampines’ involvement in the continental tournament.

    The club had to travel to Vietnam, Malaysia and the Philippines during the group stage, but their involvement in the tournament has ended with their failure to qualify for the knockout stage.

    “Those things (bills) were coming in, but now we’re stabilised without the AFC Cup. There’s only the S.League,” said Desmund.

    2) KOMOCO LOAN

    TNP understands that Tampines’ former sponsor Komoco has recalled a $190,000 loan made to the club, understood to be for last year’s AFC campaign.

    The loan recall came this month, when Stags chief Krishna Ramachandra was paying some players’ salaries with his own money.

    Desmund revealed that the money was used to pay eight players who needed their wages earlier, although the club have yet to repay Krishna.

    “Those (players) who needed (their salaries) urgently came forward and, because they needed it urgently, they were paid through the chairman’s personal account… but that is not a cash-flow issue,” Desmund said.

    “I think there were eight of them. We are in the process of paying him (Krishna) back in the coming months.

    “Once the club are stabilised, we can work out all this.”

    3) SPONSORSHIP CREDIT LINE

    Last July, The Straits Times reported that Tampines signed a $750,000 “sponsorship deal” with Taiwanese tech firm Nogle, but TNP has learnt that the deal is a “credit line” that requires the club to either return the money or convert the monies to shares in the club if they privatise.

    S.League clubs are registered societies – not private entities – that come under the umbrella of the league.

    “There’s some agreement, because it’s a sponsorship credit line, it’s like later on they will monetise, or make it into a sponsorship,” said Desmund.

    TNP understands that Tampines were initially required to repay Nogle $21,000 per month, starting January this year.

    When asked if Tampines need to repay Nogle, Desmund said: “Yes, in 2018.”

    4) REVENUE STREAMS

    Tampines have already given up their licence to run jackpot operations, with Krishna previously telling TNP that it was a decision made on moral grounds.

    But TNP understands that the club have re-applied for the licence.

    While the Police Licencing and Regulatory Department, which determines if an organisation receives approval to run such operations, declined to reveal if Tampines’ application has been approved, Desmund confirmed that the club have yet to receive the nod.

    But he asserted that the club are in good stead, although another of their revenue streams has fizzled out.

    Its partnership with the Ronaldinho academy is dead in the water. International Football Group (IFG) – the partner company in the deal – is run by Krishna’s brother Gane Ramachandra.

    The Today newspaper reported last week that IFG owes its employees up to eight months of unpaid salaries.

    Tampines bid and won the lease for a pitch at Dempsey for the academy, costing $18,888 per month, but have since given up the pitch.

    “The CSR (corporate social responsibility) project is almost there,” said Desmund, pointing to Tampines’ revenue stream that will replace the Ronaldinho academy and their jackpot operations.

    “The chairman and the committee have sorted it out. Details will come out in the future, but I’m confident that none of these (payment) delays will happen again.”

    5) BOARDROOM DEPARTURE

    Not all is well in the Tampines boardroom.

    As reflected on the club’s website, there are now only four members in the club’s management committee, following the resignation of vice-chairman Chris Wong.

    When contacted, Wong would only say: “I left the club at the end of April due to work commitments.”

    Desmund remained optimistic, but revealed that the club will not be splashing the cash in the next three years.

    He said: “The budget for the next three years will probably not be so big, but we will survive. (But there will be) no more of the 2016 kind of budget (that saw the entry of marquee players like Jermaine Pennant).”

    In response to TNP’s queries on the Tampines situation, the S.League’s director of operations Kok Wai Leong said: “We have heard concerns raised about this matter, and are looking into it.”

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Local Football Fan: FAS Please Save Our S-League,  Stop Farcical Banner-Size Limitation

    Local Football Fan: FAS Please Save Our S-League, Stop Farcical Banner-Size Limitation

    Warning: Long and sad post ahead, read at own peril

    Glad I made the impromptu decision to go down to Choa Chu Kang Stadium to watch Warriors FC take on Hougang United this evening. I have always been very envious of the unwavering and fervent support shown by the Hougang United fans (Hougang United FC Supporters’ Club, affectionately known as the “Hougang Hools”) towards their players, and even ex-players.

    Tonight was no different – from start to end, the singing, the chanting, the beating of the drums never stopped. “Satu hati, satu Hougang” was the cry – “One heart, One Hougang”, in Bahasa Melayu. “COME ON HOUGANG, COME ON HOUGANG!”

    I didn’t join in. After all, I am a Home United fan, and it would be weird to cheer Hougang on so enthusiastically and chant with the Hools.

    Look at the picture featured in this post. You will see a bunch of banners belonging to the Hougang Hools, who had made their way to the game a couple of hours before kick-off, and painstakingly hung them up by one by one. You will also notice that none of the posters are obstructing the view of the fans, given that they were hung over a ledge.

    So there the Hools were, chanting their lungs out, having a good time, especially after Fumiya Kogure had scrambled the ball home from a few metres out for a precious 1-0 lead against the much-fancied Warriors, who had ex-Dutch and Greek League player Joel Tshibamba in attack.

    Enter CCK Stadium security personnel. Two men came down and spoke to one of the Hougang Hools, telling him to remove the banners. They cited stadium rules and FAS regulations, and said that the maximum size of flags and banners allowed to be brought in was 1m x 1m. To say the Hougang supporters were annoyed is an understatement.

    They felt that there was no reasonable basis for such a rule, given that these banners had been brought all over Singapore to other S-League grounds, without incident. In fact, stadium personnel at Jalan Besar Stadium, right where the FAS Headquarters are located, had no similar objections to such banners. They also repeatedly asked security personnel whose view they were obstructing. The security personnel had no response to this rather valid question.

    Things were getting heated, so I decided to step in and break up what I perceived as increasing hostility between parties. I immediately told the security personnel that I was not a Hougang supporter, and that I was only trying to help. I asked them to show me where they got the rule of 1m x 1m from – they could not answer. So there was this farcical moment where all of us whipped out our mobile phones and tried to verify if this was indeed an FAS regulation.

    “You see the FAS website, it’s there.” It wasn’t. The FAS website is by no means a great source of current information, but that’s another complaint for another day.

    I told the security personnel I understood that their hands were tied, but asked if they could “close one eye” just for today, and then both parties could write in to clarify if the rule applied to banners from supporters’ clubs that did not obstruct anyone’s view. They said they would have to escalate it, but they understood the point I was trying to make.

    I returned to my seat and thought that was the end of it. 10 minutes later, a club official by the name of Eugene, came down and asked to talk to me. Eugene was exceedingly polite, and I think this situation could have been so much worse if Eugene had been more abrasive in his interactions with the Hougang supporters. Eugene explained to me and some of the Hougang Hools that rules are rules, and that this came from an FAS directive at the start of the season, which FAS came up with in consultation with the Singapore Police Force.

    After much debate and some angst, a compromise was reached – Eugene promised he would raise this issue in the post-match report, and seek clarification. For this match, since it was coming to an end, he wouldn’t ask for the banners to be removed. A happy ending of sorts.

    Given that I took on the role of a pseudo-mediator in this dispute, I had to try to maintain some neutrality when I was there. While I pushed for proof that such a rule existed, and asked for its rationale, I also ensured that I re-directed some of the angst away from the security personnel, because at the end of the day, they were just doing their jobs. In my mind, I felt they could have been more flexible, but they were not doing anything wrong. I didn’t want things to get ugly.

    Now that I am at home though, I would just like to say that I think this is farcical, and puts our league in a terrible light.

    1m x 1m. The maximum size of a flag or banner printed to support your team.

    To offer some perspective, that means if you were at a stadium to watch an international game between Singapore and say, Japan, in a crucial World Cup / Asian Cup qualifier, you would not be allowed to bring your Singapore flag along.

    Let that sink in for a bit.

    Now, look at the picture again. The banners were draped over a ledge. The supporters would be seated in the blue area you see in the picture. Exactly who is being blocked by the banners / flags? With respect, I cannot think of a reason for limiting the size of such banners. Perhaps, the original intention of the rule was to prevent fans from making huge banners and then lifting them up while in the stands, obstructing the view of others. If so, then perhaps some clarification from FAS, or some flexibility from security personnel, or club officials is necessary.

    This has been a very long post, so let me just end by saying this: I think it is sad, that in a dying domestic league suffering from a dwindling number of supporters, supporters (who are not paid for this, mind you) are not allowed to express themselves fully, and add to the colour of the league.

    I think it is sad, that in a dying domestic league suffering from a complete lack of atmosphere in certain games, you have a band of fans who are easily the most committed and the loudest in the league, and officials try to dampen their spirits.

    And I think it is incredibly sad, that when I assured the Hools that I would write in to FAS to seek clarification, and also to ask that such banners be allowed, some of them told me not to waste my time. Is that borne out of a lack of faith that even after the elections, nothing is going to change, and our league is gonna die a gradual death?

    I hope not, and I will do everything in my power to ensure it doesn’t happen. But I am only one man, so I urge everyone reading this (if you’re still reading this, haha) to come down and watch an S-League game sometime. Noone to go with? Just give me a shout and I’ll gladly accompany you if I have the time. Eddy not free? Just go down and make new friends!

    So, Football Association of Singapore, please do something. I have faith in the new administration. Come together with the supporters. Let’s save our S-League.

     

    Source: Eddy Hirono