Tag: FT

  • Court: Headless Woman Killed By Husband

    Court: Headless Woman Killed By Husband

    Upset that his wife was making a long-distance call to a mystery party, he reportedly punched her in a fight and left her lying on the bed.

    It was only later, he told a friend, that he realised that she was not unconscious, but dead. That was when he decided to get rid of the body.

    A coroner’s court found yesterday that Indian national Jasvinder Kaur, 33, had been murdered by her husband, Harvinder Singh, 35, on Dec 11, 2013.

    Ms Kaur’s headless body was discovered floating in Whampoa River on the morning of Dec 12. Her corpse was wrapped in black trash bags, with the legs exposed and hands severed at the wrists.

    Harvinder, a senior logistics coordinator, remains on the run. His friend, fellow Indian national Gursharan Singh, 27, was jailed for 30 months in April for helping to get rid of Ms Kaur’s body.

    Gursharan, a forklift driver, had helped Harvinder carry a luggage bag from the latter’s residence at 228A Balestier Road to the canal near McNair Road.

    When Gursharan grew suspicious at how heavy the bag was, he demanded to know what was in it. Harvinder then explained that he had fought that morning with Ms Kaur and punched her once on the neck.

    He said she had fallen onto the bed and he had left her there. When he found her in the same position later, he realised she was dead and decided to dispose of her body.

    Although Gursharan was then aware that the luggage contained a corpse, he helped Harvinder carry it to the canal. Harvinder then told him to walk away. As Gursharan left, he heard a splash.

    Ms Kaur’s employer told investigators that after the deceased failed to turn up for work as a beautician on Dec 11, Harvinder called to say she was returning to India.

    Harvinder fled the next morning to Malaysia, and then to India, where the authorities were unable to trace him. He is now on Interpol’s wanted list.

    The exact cause of Ms Kaur’s death remains unknown as her head and hands were never found.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Judge Increases Jail Sentence To 3 Months For Foreigner Who Attacked Cabby

    Judge Increases Jail Sentence To 3 Months For Foreigner Who Attacked Cabby

    Just two weeks after he was sentenced to a three weeks’ jail for assaulting a taxi driver, 34-year old Dutchman Dino Petrus Johannes van Deijzen saw his sentence increased to three months.

    The deputy public prosecutor had appealed the original sentence, saying the judge in that case, District Judge Imran Abdul Hamid, seemed to have been convinced by van Deijzen’s portrayal of himself as a victim.

    The Dutchman, a design executive, had claimed that the taxi driver, Me Ee Kah Ling, had also hit him, resulting in the former losing consciousness.

    Justice Imran was reported to have “noted that the victim had also engaged in a scuffle with van Deijzen and traded blows, which would have explained the blunt force trauma suffered by the accused.”

    However, justice Tay rejected this.

    He said Mr van Deijzen’s claims were “convenient excuses to downplay his use of inexcusable violence” against Mr Ee, 42.

    Further, justice Tay noted that Mr van Deijzen was not remorseful and that there were neither an offer of compensation to Mr Ee noran apology from the Dutchman.

    Mr van Deijzen and his girlfriend were reportedly intoxicated when they hailed and boarded Mr Ee’s cab at Dunlop Street at almost 1am on 21 October.

    They asked to be ferried to blk 538 in Ang Mo Kio.

    When the taxi reached the destination, Mr van Deijzen’s girlfriend vomited in the taxi.

    Mr Ee then asked the couple to leave the car and asked for the fare.

    The couple, however, ignored him and walked away without paying.

    At this point, Mr Ee threatened to call the police, and was retrieving his phone from his taxi when Mr van Deijzen pounced on him, slammed the door and punched Mr Ee.

    Me Ee tried to escape and ran away, but Mr van Deijzen gave chase and pushed him to the ground, and continued to punch and kick Mr Ee.

    The heinous act was caught by the in-vehicle CCTV of Mr Ee’s taxi.

    Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)
    Soosay (Photo: Straits Times)

    Also in June, National University of Singapore (NUS) law professor, Sundram Peter Soosay, 43, has been found guilty of assaulting a taxi driver while drunk.

    Mr Soosay, who is a Singapore permanent resident and has been working at NUS since 2008, was lambasted by District Judge Victor Yeo in court.

    Judge Yeo said Mr Soosay’s testimony was “riddled with hindsight reasoning, convenient conjecture and hypothesis”.

    Judge Yeo then sentenced the law professor to four months jail and ordered him to compensate the taxi driver, 71-year old Sun Chun Hua. (See here.)

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • Singaporean Forced To Leave Company Staffed With 90% Foreigners, Face Legal Action For Breach Of Contract

    Singaporean Forced To Leave Company Staffed With 90% Foreigners, Face Legal Action For Breach Of Contract

    Dear Mr Goh,

    My name is Johnny.

    I’m having a dispute at the moment with my employer regarding my training bond agreement which I have to pay when I breached the contract. Mr Chandra, my neighbour has recommended me to you.

    I recently made the decision to leave because I was forced to.

    It all started when I had a Italian manager from England. He had so many problems with us and the team can’t take it.

    As I was there on my assignment, I reached out to my ops manager and ops executive for advice.

    After hearing me out, they asked me to write a letter and get people who agree to sign and then submit it to the management. In the end, I’m punished for doing that and my ops manager has since return to England.

    90% of my head office are all foreigners.

    They work together as a “team” and are trying to break our rice bowl. I was eventually given an option to leave if I felt that the company is not suitable for me or stay and prove that I can deliver.

    This was delivered to me by my Taiwanese ops manager.

    After considering for a month, I decided to take my leave but I won’t pay a single cent for my bond.

    The level of stress and depression they have given me because of this is not worth it. Till today, they still say that I have to answer to my wrong doing.

    But I was advised wrongly – by a management member – should I be punished for it?

    Now I understand that they want to take legal action against me. I will need to seek legal advice too.

    Please help and advice me.

    Yours sincerely,

    Johnny

    Editor’s note: we have forwarded the mail to our legal advisor. Note also that the middle management jobs all go to foreigners. If you do not want your children to work under foreign imports, you know what to do during the next election.

     

    Source: www.transitioning.org

  • New Citizen From PRC Went AWOL To Pursue Medical Studies At Cambridge

    New Citizen From PRC Went AWOL To Pursue Medical Studies At Cambridge

    He went absent without official leave (AWOL) for more than five years to pursue his studies in Britain.

    Wang Yinchu, then a 22-year-old full-time national serviceman, was one month away from completing his national service when he left Singapore on Oct 8, 2008 to pursue his pre-clinical medical studies at the University of Cambridge.

    After he returned on July 2 last year, he pleaded guilty to being AWOL and was sentenced to three weeks’ detention.

    But the chief military prosecutor appealed against this sentence in the military court of appeal on May 29 and urged a stiffer sentence.

    He was then given 18 months’ detention.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Reasons Why Foreigners Get Jobs Over Singaporeans

    Reasons Why Foreigners Get Jobs Over Singaporeans

    Another new initiative to help Singaporean workers?

    According to the Channel NewsAsia news report “New portal to prepare students for future jobs” (Apr 7) – “The one-stop portal for education, training and career information, is a key plank of the SkillsFuture initiative that seeks to help Singaporeans take ownership of their job search.”

    What do employers want?

    All these new initiatives to help Singaporeans find jobs and career development may not work because we do not think through what is it that most employers want?

    Employers want …

    • workers who are experienced, highly skilled,  highly educated and intelligent

    When you allow the whole world to come to Singapore as tourists to look for jobs – you don’t need to be a genius to figure out that the odds will continue to be stacked against Singaporeans – when you are competing with the best (or the worse who fake their credentials) in the world

    • workers who cost less

    Foreigners don’t have to contribute CPF. So, employers save up to 20 per cent on wages. And of course, foreigners may be willing to work for lesser pay than Singaporeans

    • workers who do not have turnover problems

    Since most foreigners are on 2-year contracts – they are mostly stuck with the same employer for at least 2 years

    • less work disruption

    Foreigners on work permits cannot get pregnant. So, no “4 months’ maternity leave” problems. Those on employment pass also typically come to Singapore as “singles” and so are less likely to have maternity leave

    Male foreigners do not have National Service reservist training “disruptions” to work

    • workers who can do very long hours of shift work

    Foreigners have no choice and are more willing to accept jobs which are 12 hours or longer a day for 6 days a week

    Make yourself valuable to employers?  

    As to the article “Make yourself valuable, even after getting your degree: Indranee Rajah” (CNA, Apr 7), which said ”The forum focused on whether a degree still matters when it comes to employment, and saw some students sharing their views on pursuing a job that is not relevant to their degree.

    Ms Indranee said having skills to adapt to the changing job market will be important and it is one of the objectives of the Government’s SkillsFuture initiative.

    Odds stacked against Singaporeans?

    She added that the Government is hoping to change mind sets by getting people to find out what they really want to do and to get the relevant qualifications”

    • how do Singaporeans make themselves more valuable to employers, when the odds are so stacked against them in favour of foreigner?

    Real pay increase?

    So, is it any wonder that the real starting pay of graduates has hardly increased in the last 8 years or so, and real basic, gross and total wages (excluding employer CPF contribution) have also hardly increased in the last 15 years or so?

    Employ Singaporeans first?

    Finally, the most telling “wayang” is perhaps that the national jobs portal under the Fair Consideration Framework to employ Singaporeans First, cannot give any statistics at all as to how many of the jobs actually went to Singaporeans!

    Win battles lose war
    * Submitted by TRE reader

    Half the workforce not “true-blue” Singaporeans?

    P.S. I went to a bank, hospital and food basement of a shopping mall one day, and almost every worker was not a Singaporean!

    Source: www.tremeritus.com