Tag: GE2015

  • PPP’s Goh Meng Seng Says Lee Kuan Yew’s Death Part Of Reason For Forming Party

    PPP’s Goh Meng Seng Says Lee Kuan Yew’s Death Part Of Reason For Forming Party

    The People’s Power Party (PPP) is a newcomer for the General Election, but the man behind its inception is no stranger to politics in Singapore.

    Founder and secretary-general Goh Meng Seng has 15 years of political experience and contested in the last two general elections under two different parties.

    On Sept 11, Mr Goh will lead a PPP team to contest Choa Chu Kang GRC. His rival will be Health Minister Gan Kim Yong’s People’s Action Party (PAP) team.

    Yesterday, Mr Goh, 45, the managing director of a group of market research and linguistics companies, told The New Paper in a phone interview that he does not see the switching of parties as a weakness.

    “I’ve learnt a lot during my time in Workers’ Party (WP), which I joined in 2001, and helped contribute in the rebranding for the 2006 GE,” he said.

    Mr Goh was a member of the WP’s Central Executive Council and the party’s “A” Team, which stood and lost in Aljunied GRC in 2006, with 43.9 per cent of votes.

    Saying “my job was done”, he left the party later that year and joined the National Solidarity Party (NSP) in 2007. He said he used his knowledge to build NSP up for the 2011 GE.

    “We helped increase the profile of NSP after four years. But I felt that we needed more opposition to give rise to more political discourse,” he said.

    In July this year, the PPP was officially registered, with Mr Goh as its secretary-general.

    Mr Goh said the death of founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew this year was another reason behind the setting up of the new party.

    “The current system, where there is a strong concentration of power, is only viable when you have a strong philosopher behind it.

    “Now that Mr Lee is gone, there’s no one else who has such a strong political morality who can control everyone. Things can go wrong.

    “The only way to provide sustainability is when power is separated into different parties that can act as checks and balances,” he said.


    PROFILE

    WHO:
    Goh Meng Seng

    WHAT:
    Managing director of a group of market research and linguistics companies

    FAMILY:
    Married with a daughter

    POLITICAL CAREER SO FAR:
    2001: Joined Workers’ Party (WP)
    May 2006: Contested Aljunied GRC with WP
    November 2006: Quit WP
    March 2007: Joined National Solidarity Party (NSP)
    May 2011: Contested Tampines GRC with NSP
    November 2011: Quit NSP
    July 2015: Registered People’s Power Party (PPP)

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Chee Soon Juan – Behind The Man

    Chee Soon Juan – Behind The Man

    We wonder why Dr Chee is so desperate for Singaporeans to forget his past. What does the man have to hide? This is the strange journey of Chee Soon Juan’s rise to the top of SDP.

    March 1993
    “Varsity sacks SDP’s Dr Chee from his teaching position”
    Straits Times 31 March 1993
    Fired by NUS for misappropriation of funds and misconduct
    “The university accused Chee of using Singapore $226 (US$137) from its research grant to send his wife’s academic papers by courier service to a U.S. university.”
    –  Reuters News, 31 March 1993Maintained no wrong-doing and was fully justified in the use of funds
    “He maintained yesterday that he had done no wrong. “I do not accept and will counter whatever reason the university may have for my termination,” he said.
    –  Business Times, 31 March 1993 
    April 1993
    “SDP voices support for sacked lecturer Dr Chee”
    Straits Times, 2 April 1993 “Chee Soon Juan to go on hunger strike to protest sacking”
    Straits Times, 2 April 1993

    “Sacked Singapore lecturer sued for defamation.”
    – Reuters News, 24 April 1993

    SDP party Secretary-General Chiam See Tong signed off on a statement defending Chee“Calling for Dr Chee’s reinstatement, the SDP said it had complete confidence in his integrity and rejected allegations that his conduct was less than honest or that there was any deception on his part.”
    South China Morning Post, 3 April 1993

     Chee caught taping conversation and denying it
    “The NUS Head of Department of Social Work and Psychology disclosed that during a meeting on Dec 7 last year, the sacked neuropsychology lecturer secretly recorded their conversation.

    And he had lied when he denied doing so after Dr Vasoo noticed the tape-recorder and confronted him about it.”
    Straits Times, 3 April 1993

     Chee admits to taping conversation

    “When contacted last night, Dr Chee admitted that he had tried taping the Dec 7 conversation. He did it to protect himself against possible future action to throw him out of his job, he said.”
    Straits Times, 3 April 1993

    Staged a hunger strike to protest situation

    “Chee Soon Juan last night said he was going on a hunger strike from 6am today to protest against his dismissal from the National University of Singapore.”
     – Straits Times, 5 April 1993

     Call by public for Chee to take legal action against NUS

    “There is a big question mark over why Dr Chee refuses to challenge the university’s action in court. Does he not have faith in the system in which he wants to be a player?”
    Straits Times, 7 April 1993

    “If he feels so strongly that he was wrongfully dismissed, why can’t he take legal action against his employer? He should show the public some facts.”
    Straits Times, 8 April 1993

    Chee will not take legal action against NUS

    “”I will not go to the courts and that is as far as I can say.”
    Straits Times, 5 April 1993

     Chiam See Tong called for Chee to stop hunger strike
    “SDP secretary general Chiam See Tong said on Monday night that the party fully supported Chee in what had been a personal decision, but believed his point had been made.”
    Reuters News, 6 April 1993

     Chee drinks glucose water while on hunger strike
    “He had said he would take only plain water when he began his protest on Monday. He began taking water with glucose yesterday, but denied emphatically that it meant that he was taking a source of food with his drinks.”
    Straits Times, 7 April 1993

     Chee faces defamation lawsuits

    “Chee Soon Juan, 30, assistant secretary general of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP), said he had received a letter from lawyers for S Vasoo, his former department head at the National University of Singapore (NUS), claiming defamation and seeking a public apology and damages.”
    Reuters News, 24 April 1993

    May 1993
    Chiam to represent Chee in suit“LAWYER and Singapore Democratic Party leader Chiam See Tong will represent his party colleague, Dr Chee Soon Juan, in a defamation suit.”
    Straits Times, 2 May 1993
    June 1993
    “Chiam quit after CEC vetoed censure move”
    – Straits Times, 19 June 1993
    Chee took over Chiam to become Secretary-General of SDP“The statement came a day after Mr Chiam had revealed that the CEC had blocked him on many issues and that the differences had remained unresolved for some time now.

    He resigned as the party’s leader during a CEC meeting on May 17, when he was out-voted on a motion by him to censure Dr Chee for going on a hunger strike.”
    Straits Times, 28 June 1993

     Chiam seeks to be discharged from being Chee’s lawyer

    MR CHIAM See Tong no longer wants to represent fellow party member Dr Chee Soon Juan in the two defamation suits filed against the sacked university lecturer.”
    Straits Times, 30 June 1993

    July 1993
    “Chiam criticises Dr Chee for use of research funds for wife’s thesis”– Straits Times, 17 July 1993
    Chiam criticises Chee“MR CHIAM See Tong has accused Dr Chee Soon Juan of usurping his post in the party and challenged him to resign if he really had not sought to lead it.”
    Straits Times, 3 July 1993

     Chiam cricitises Chee for decisions on research funds and hunger strike

    “MR CHIAM See Tong, in a reversal of his earlier position, yesterday criticised his former party deputy, Dr Chee Soon Juan, for using his university research funds to send his wife’s PhD thesis to an American university.

    He said that if he were Dr Chee, he would have checked with the university first before using the money.”
    Straits Times, 17 July 1993

    “Mr Chiam slammed the hunger strike as something that should not have been carried out, as hunger strikes had little place in modern Singapore. Many members of the public had approached him to criticise Dr Chee’s move as “stupid” and “childish”, he added.”
    Straits Times, 17 July 1993

     Chee no longer assistant to Chiam
    “DR CHEE Soon Juan is no longer serving Mr Chiam See Tong as his parliamentary legislative assistant (LA).

    A Parliament spokesman yesterday confirmed that this took effect on July 1.

    It is not known whether the Potong Pasir MP, Mr Chiam, terminated Dr Chee’s services or whether Dr Chee tendered his resignation.” – Straits Times, 23 July 1993

    August 1993
    “SDP wants Chiam stripped of ‘unofficial leader’ title” – Straits Times, 3 August 1993
    Chee leads SDP to take disciplinary action against Chiam
    “THE Singapore Democratic Party’s collective leadership has asked Parliament to consider stripping its former chief Chiam See Tong of the title “unofficial leader of the opposition”.”
    Straits Times, 3 August 1993“The CEC is also planning to take disciplinary action against Mr Chiam, acting secretary-general Chee Soon Juan confirmed yesterday.”
    Straits Times, 3 August 1993

     

    SDP holds disciplinary inquiry
    “Following the disciplinary action, the CEC can either decide to demote, suspend or sack Mr Chiam.

    Under the party’s constitution, if Mr Chiam is sacked from the party, he loses his parliamentary seat of Potong Pasir.”
    Straits Times, 7 August 1993

     

    SDP sacks Chiam
    “Singapore’s longest-serving opposition member of parliament, Chiam See Tong, has been expelled from the party he founded for breaching discipline and refusing to accept collective leadership, party officials said on Saturday.

    Officials of the opposition Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) said its Central Executive Council (CEC) had expelled Chiam, the party’s former secretary-general, on Friday.”
    Reuters News, 21 August 1993

     

    Chiam does not accept sacking decision
    “”The CEC has no legal authority to sack me from the party while the authority of the leadership is being questioned by the cadres,” said Mr Chiam, who resigned as party chief in May after a squabble with CEC members, and has since criticised the leaders in public.”
    Business Times, 21 August 1993

     

    Chiam wins court order to keep seat in parliament for now
    “CHIAM SEE TONG yesterday successfully obtained a court order against the Singapore Democratic Party’s central executive committee (CEC), in effect freezing the party sacking he received last Friday and thereby keeping his seat in Parliament.”
    Business Times, 26 August 1993

     

    27 cadre members elect Chiam as head of new ‘CEC’

    “TWENTY-SEVEN cadre members of the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP) members voted last night at a special meeting to dissolve the party’s “collective leadership” and to elect a new CEC with Mr Chiam See Tong as its chairman.

    In a dramatic turn of events, they also passed a unanimous resolution to “retract” Mr Chiam’s expulsion from the party.”
    Straits Times, 29 August 1993

    September 1993
    “COURT ORDER AGAINST CHIAM.”
    – Business Times, 1 September 1993
    “Chiam’s SDP suit to be heard in November”
    – Straits Times, 9 September 1993
    Chee leads court order against ChiamSINGAPORE Democratic Party Acting Secretary-General Chee Soon Juan said yesterday the party had obtained a temporary court order restraining Chiam See Tong, Sin Kek Tong and nine other persons from “pretending” to be the SDP chairman, secretary-general and central executive committee members.”
    Business Times, 1 September 1993

    Chiam challenges explusion from SDP
    “THE High Court has set aside five days, from Nov 15, to hear Mr Chiam See Tong’s legal suit challenging his expulsion from the Singapore Democratic Party (SDP).”
    Straits Times, 9 September 1993

    December 1993
    “Singapore opposition MP’s expulsion illegal – court.”
    – Reuters News, 10 December 1993
    Chiam keeps parlimentary seat
    “SINGAPORE, Dec 10 (Reuters) – The High Court ruled on Friday that the                 expulsion of Singapore’s longest-serving opposition member of parliament, Chiam See Tong, from his own party in August was illegal and invalid.The ruling allows Chiam to keep his parliamentary seat.”
    – Reuters News, 10 December 1993
    January 1994
    “SDP told by landlord to quit premises”Straits Times 20 January 1994
    Despite rental arrears, Chee Soon Juan claims eviction is a political matter“Asked if he knew of the rental arrears, Dr Chee said no, but added: “In the confusion of what has been happening in the party lately, the administration has been a bit confused.”

    He also said that the move to evict the party did not come as a surprise to him as the landlord had previously expressed reservations about renting the premises to an opposition party.
    –  Straits Times, 20 January 1994

    February 1994
    “SDP politicising eviction issue, says landlord”
    –  Straits Times, 3 February 1994 “Chee abandons his defence in defamation suit”
    –  Straits Times, 18 February 1994

    SDP told to pay Chiam $33,948, or 1/3 of costs”
    –  Straits Times, 23 February 1994

    Landlord claims Chee is policising eviction issue“I do not agree with and dislike the SDP for ‘politicising’ the whole matter when the simple truth of the matter is that they had failed to pay rent for two months. I feel that SDP is using the matter and me to elicit whatever little political sympathy…”
    –  Straits Times, 3 February 1994

    Chee drops defence in defamation suit

    “OPPOSITION politician Chee Soon Juan has abandoned his defence in a                 defamation suit brought against him by his former boss and an MP for                 Tanjong Pagar GRC, Dr S. Vasoo.

    His decision to do so is, in effect, an admission that he has defamed Dr Vasoo.”
    –  Straits Times, 18 February 1994

    SDP to pay costs to Chiam
    “THE High Court yesterday fixed the costs in Mr Chiam See Tong’s recent   successful suit against the Singapore Democratic Party at $101,845,                 including disbursements.”
    –  Straits Times, 23 February 1994

    April 1994
    “Singapore opposition politician fined for libel.”– Reuters News, 15 April 1994
    Chee to pay fines for defamation “THE High Court yesterday awarded Dr S. Vasoo $210,000 in damages in                 his defamation suit against Dr Chee Soon Juan over remarks made by the latter after Parliament had debated his sacking by the National University of Singapore last year.”
    – Straits Times, 16 April 1994

     

    Do you trust him enough to empower him to be your voice in parliament?

     

    Source: https://thoughtsofrealsingaporeans.wordpress.com

     

  • Goh Chok Tong: Aljunied Voters Still Undecided

    Goh Chok Tong: Aljunied Voters Still Undecided

    Many residents in Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC) seem to be unable to decide which party to vote for in the upcoming election, said Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong, who urged voters in the Opposition-held ward to consider their own interests when casting their vote.

    “My sense of the ground is that many are caught in a dilemma. They told us quite openly they want to support the People’s Action Party (PAP), but at the same time, they are afraid that if they vote for the PAP, then the Workers’ Party (WP) may be out. And therefore, there’ll be no Opposition party headed by Mr Low Thia Khiang and Ms Sylvia Lim in Parliament,” he said after a visit to Bedok North and Hougang Central, his second visit to the GRC in three weeks.

    To solve their problem, Mr Goh advised residents to consider their own interests as voters.

    “Because when you vote for somebody, you must vote for candidates whose values you appreciate — values like humility, sincerity, hard work, integrity, honesty,” he said.

    Apart from that, residents should also vote for their own as well as their children’s future, he added. “Who can help you better in the future? If you rationalise and look at these two (criteria), then you can come to a decision.”

    Mr Goh, who is contesting in the neighbouring Marine Parade GRC, likened the choice between the PAP and the WP to one of choosing which cruise ship to take.

    “If you go with the PAP, you’re actually embarking on a cruise ship with a definite destination. You know the destination, you know the journey, the path taken by the cruise ship. You know the captain, the crew members, you know the quality,” he said.

    “The other choice you’re given is, ‘Take my cruise ship (that is) going nowhere’ … These are gambling ships (with) casinos, very exciting. They say, ‘Take my ship, you can gamble, but we go nowhere, just go round and round,’” he added.

    Mr Goh said: “If you’re a gambler, then of course, you take the casino ship. But if you’re not a gambler and you worry about your children’s future, you’ll take the other ship.”

    On voters’ concern that the Opposition would lose its presence in Parliament if residents voted for the PAP, Mr Goh said the WP can “have their cake and eat it”, referring to the Non-Constituency Member of Parliament scheme, which gives the top Opposition losers seats in Parliament. If the WP loses the election, it will still have a strong voice in Parliament, but not have to run a town council.

    The WP’s management of Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council’s finances has been the subject of a series of heated exchanges between the PAP and the WP during the hustings.

    “They would be more free to write more great speeches, to make more great rhetoric in Parliament,” Mr Goh said.

    The PAP’s team in its contest for Aljunied GRC consists of Mr Yeo Guat Kwang, who is a four-term Member of Parliament, as well as four newcomers — lawyer Muralidharan Pillai; Mr Victor Lye, chief executive of an insurance firm; Mr Chua Eng Leong, a private banker; and Mr Shamsul Kamar, a former head of department at a school.

    They will face WP chief Low Thia Khiang, party chairperson Sylvia Lim, Mr Pritam Singh, Mr Chen Show Mao and Mr Faisal Manap, who are incumbents.

    Mr Goh’s visit comes a day after Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong visited the Opposition-held ward.

    Asked if his and Mr Lee’s visits could sway residents to vote for the PAP, Mr Goh said that for the people whom they have met, it would. But he added that those who were not present at their visits were the ones whom the party needed to reach out to.

    “We can’t take things for granted. It is still very much an uphill task for the team over here. It’s not easy … They’ve got to work for every vote,” he said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Aljunied Residents Lauds Area’s ‘Human Touch’

    Aljunied Residents Lauds Area’s ‘Human Touch’

    Since Aljunied Group Representation Constituency (GRC) came under Opposition rule four years ago, some residents interviewed have noticed fewer grassroots activities, and a handful felt that there were fewer large-scale estate upgrading projects, and repairs for town amenities seem to take a longer time.

    But with parts of the constituency currently undergoing the Neighbourhood Renewal Programme, and with the blocks of flats recently given a fresh coat of paint, the 50 or so residents interviewed by TODAY — which spent several weeks visiting the GRC — were hard-pressed to cite any material differences in their lives since the GRC changed hands.

    The biggest change, they felt, was the greater human touch by the town council and Members of Parliament (MPs). Anecdotes abound of how the town council employees are prompt in attending to issues and MPs being more visible and approachable, with most residents interviewed able to tell who the MP looking after their estate is.

    Shopkeepers interviewed also preferred the more laid-back approach in terms of enforcing regulations — for example, the town council usually closes one eye when they flout the regulations on how much space they can use outside their shops to display their wares.

    In the 2011 General Election (GE), the Workers’ Party team won 54.7 per cent of the vote, defeating the People’s Action Party (PAP), which garnered 45.3 per cent of the vote.

    The financial management lapses at the Aljunied-Hougang-Punggol East Town Council have dominated headlines, particularly since the hustings started last week. By and large, however, the residents TODAY spoke to were not seized by the issue.

    The general consensus is that as long as their basic needs are taken care of, and the constituency is adequately maintained — corridors are kept clean, rubbish is cleared, lifts are working, as several residents put it —they said they did not understand the town council’s complex financial details.

    They also noted that four years might be too short a period to judge the performance of the WP in running the estate.

    Still, Mr Alex Toh, 37, who has stayed in the Serangoon North precinct for close to two decades, said there was a stark difference in the responsiveness of the town council when the constituency changed hands after the 2011 GE.

    The town council officers are friendly and responsive, he said, whenever he calls them — be it to highlight a lighting problem or enquire about other municipal matters. He added that he would frequently see Ms Sylvia Lim, who is the sitting Member of Parliament for the Serangoon Division, in his neighbourhood — sometimes as early as 7am, and in the evening on the same day. “I thought she stays in Serangoon because I see her around often and she is in the estate so early in the day,” said Mr Toh, who was surprised to learn that Ms Lim resides in the western part of the island.

    Madam Ade Huang, 59, who has been staying in Bedok Reservoir for the past eight years, said that the town council would clear the rubbish in her estate quickly whenever she calls to complain about it. “Last time … (the town council) didn’t even pick up the phone,” said Mdm Huang.

    Madam Yeo Ah Gek, 47, who stays opposite the Hainanese Market and Food Centre, noted how the town council installed lifts at the food centre — which was built without government funding, Ms Lim had said at a recent election rally — after some issues that elderly residents faced with the escalators. Mdm Yeo said: “At least now with the lifts, I don’t have to worry about my elderly mother falling down if she goes to the market.”

    Nevertheless, residents said they have felt the impact of having their estate run by a town council that has fewer resources compared with its predecessor. A Serangoon North Avenue resident of 10 years, who only gave her name as Mel, said she noticed that repair works seemed to take longer compared with the past. Referring to a mini exercise park in the constituency, she noted that the restoration works took at least six months. “I am not sure why it took so long to complete when it was just minor repair work and they blocked up a large portion of it, so residents could not use (the facility) for quite a while.”

    Another long-time resident, who declined to be named, felt that upgrading work has been slower since Aljunied GRC came under the Opposition. “I don’t see a lot of upgrading work here compared with my friends staying in other estates such as Marine Parade,” said the part-time worker, who has been staying in Kaki Bukit for four decades.

    In terms of the general maintenance of the estate, residents interviewed said they do not have any problems with the cleanliness, although some noticed that the washing of the corridors are less frequent.

    Sprawling across several mature estates, Aljunied GRC is well-served by roads and public transportation. Facilities and amenities are also abundant, residents said.

    RESIDENTS SUGGEST IMPROVEMENTS

    Nevertheless, some residents sug­gested certain improvements to the amenities. Madam Serene Chai, 49, who stays along Bedok Reservoir Road, noted the lack of a bank branch near her home, with the nearest one located at Bedok Bus Interchange.

    Madam Atmi Hamid, 57, who stays along Hougang Avenue 1, also felt there are insufficient Muslim food options. “Sometimes, you need something last-minute and it can be quite hard to get something ‘halal’ nearby,” she said.

    Some residents said there was less buzz in the neighbourhood, even though they acknowledged that WP’s grassroots volunteers have been organising community activities.

    A resident, 60, who only gave her name as Madam Low, remarked that the Serangoon area where she is living in “just doesn’t seem as lively anymore”. In the past, there would be more activities during festive occasions and the PAP MP would visit the neighbourhood with much fanfare, she recalled.

    Shopkeepers lamenting the tough business environment, due to the proliferation of online shopping as well as new supermarkets and malls sprouting up in the area, said they were grateful for what they described as the town council’s “more relaxed approach”.

    For example, the town council would not come down hard on the shopkeepers when new goods arrive and are temporarily placed outside the shops beyond permitted limits. A hardware shop owner, who wished to be known only as Mr Goh, said: “Last time, the PAP town council people always came and took photos, and threatened to issue me a summons when I put my things outside … Now, they don’t bother me as much … We are all happy.”

    Other shopkeepers interviewed expressed the same sentiments. “(They) used to come almost every other day to tell me I cannot put my things outside,” said another shopowner, Mr Ho.

    The town council was also responsive to their needs, the shopkeepers said.

    Mrs Anchelly Devi, who owns a minimart selling Indian goods and spices, remembered calling the town council to ask to use the space outside her shop to sell some goods.

    The officers came to her shop the very same day to look into the matter. “When business takings are already low … it is really nice when the town council is efficient,” she said.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • WP’s Leon Perera – He’s Immensely Awesome

    WP’s Leon Perera – He’s Immensely Awesome

    So, previously, when we covered the Workers’ Party’s final candidate introduction, where Leon Perera was unveiled, attention was regrettably drawn away from him and to (what else but) AHPETC.

    We now regret this unfortunate event, for my, were we impressed with Perera’s latest speech at the WP’s East Coast GRC rally on Sunday night.

    Perera was the eighth speaker to take to the podium that evening, following candidates from Nee Soon and Jalan Besar GRC, and also after running teammates Daniel Goh and Mohamed Fairoz Shariff — but what he said in his speech made any concern about him being dwarfed by Goh or his succeeding speaker Gerald Giam combust quicker than a cartoon character being fried to a crisp.

    Now, the Oxford double-first-class degree-holder spoke for 15 minutes, so we understand it might not be easy to sit through it all. But just like how we said DPM and Finance minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam’s video was totally worth watching (and it’s double the length), we’re going to strongly recommend you hear the words directly from him too.

    (He even calls you “friends”; wouldn’t you want to be his friend too?)

    Photo by Gerald Chan
    Perera (far right) with his teammates (R-L) Daniel Goh, Mohamed Fairoz Shariff and Gerald Giam. Photo by Gerald Chan

    Nonetheless, we shall once again be helpful (as always) and share the key points he made in his speech:

     

    1. He said the PAP needs to stop praising itself.

    – He said in the numerous countries he’s been to (especially for his company, which is based in eight countries), he never hears

    “a never-ending barrage of statements about how superior they are to everyone else, about how things are so much better than everywhere else. But in Singapore, we hear this, all the time.”

    – Sharing a story about how he heard a Korean documentary presenter say their state of tourism is something to be ashamed of, he said it’s rare to hear such talk here.

    “Has anyone in the PAP ever said that we should be ashamed that so many elderly Singaporeans have to work in food courts, or collect cardboard boxes and that we should solve this problem?”

    – He said even when it seems like there are problems with something, the party’s way of “admitting” it is by saying it’s good, but they will make it better.

    “We hear statements like for example the CPF is a good system but we are going to make it even better. Our education is among the best in the world, but we’re going to make it even better. Do you think that the PAP admits frankly when it makes a mistake?”

     

    2. It also doesn’t know how to admit it made mistakes, he says.

    – He said they attempted to explain away the resale market rocketing out of control as “unanticipated” and us being “in a bad place in the property cycle” and the government’s foreign manpower policy as being “right for that era”, with the current measures to tighten inflows being “right for today”.

    Really? When you control the number of foreigners given work passes, when you own most of the land in the country, when most housing is public housing, when you know the rate of new household formation every year, is this the fault of the property cycle?? Or is it a failure of government-forward planning?

    – Even the most clear “policy failure” on the part of the PAP that happened in what Perera calls “the lost decade before the 2011 General Election” was resolved with just one apology from PM Lee Hsien Loong at the party’s lunchtime rally, days before the end of the campaign.

    “Did the PAP admit these mistakes squarely? did they explain in detail how such a massive failure of planning could happen? did they explain why the ministry in charge of granting permits to foreigners did not plan with the ministries in charge of building infrastructure? Did the ministries talk to one another or did they just bochap and do their own things? … Friends, up to today they ahve not explained how exactly they will ensure this will never happen again to the country that we love.”

     

    3. He reminds us that the PAP likes to say things are “perfect or close to perfect, because we are in charge. So keep voting for us”.

    My friends, this is going to breed complacency. Ultimately it will lead to the decline of Singapore… A few days ago I represented the Workers’ Party in a TV debate. I started by thanking the PAP for its contributions to Singapore.
    Ms Denise Phua replied by thanking the WP for acknowledging the achievements of the PAP.

    Friends, the PAP likes to accuse the Workers’ Party of claiming credit. But honestly my friends, they are number 1, they are the Olympic gold medallists when it comes to claiming credit! They have claimed credit for everything that goes right in this country. When something goes wrong it is airbrushed from history, or it’s the fault of the world economy or some other anonymous force, or it’s the fault of the Workers’ Party. The PAP slogan is “with you, for you, for Singapore”, but actually it’s all about them, not you!

     

    4. The ever-accomplished student reminds us of his book-smarts by critiquing the PAP’s manifesto as “backward-looking” (because admit it, you didn’t read it, or at most skimmed through it.)

    It’s not just the manifesto, the PM’s national day rally last week; the entire PAP campaign in this general election, friends, is all backward-looking, designed to make you think that this election is about the past 50 years. But you are voting for the PAP leaders today, not the PAP leaders 50 years ago.

    What is the PAP’s vision? What is the PAP’s programme for the next 5 years? They have outlined no specific programme, they expect your blind faith. But the WP has a manifesto with a coherent vision and specific plans. You can disagree with our proposals, you can say it is boring. But when you look at the WP manifesto there is a vision and there are plans. What are their plans?

     

    5. And here’s where he wins our vote (alongside that of possibly-frustrated mainstream media journalists): he talks about actual things the WP plans to champion in parliament.

    Balance instead of dominance. Passionate striving for improvement instead of complacency, admitting mistakes and preventing their recurrence instead of pretending that there were no mistakes, humility instead of arrogance.

    Our way is not to depend only on a strong state dominated by an entrenched party. It is to rely on a strong civil society, a strong private sector, an active citizenry, a strong responsible opposition.

    Our way, my friends, is about all stakeholders in Singapore finding solutions together. Not just ramming policies down our throats through speed-reading bills in parliament. We want to ensure free and fair debate about Singapore’s problems and Singapore’s solutions, not a debate where we only hear the good stuff.

    In our manifesto we propose a public consultation select committee and standing select committees in parliament to debate bills before they become law, and to scrutinise each ministry’s spending policies and operations. We propose freeing up our newspaper and braodcasting industry to open, regulated competition.

    And we call for an end to the requirement that internet news websites need to comply with cumbersome registration requirements. (woohoo! -our addition)

    From the looks of social media reaction, it seems like we aren’t alone in our assessment. Here are the top Twitter trends for the night, for instance:

    Twitter trends don't lie. (Screenshot from Twitter)
    Twitter trends don’t lie. (Screenshot from Twitter)

    Sounds like a pretty solid team the WP is fielding for East Coast. Tough choices ahead, East Coast voters…

    Meanwhile, watch his speech here:

     

    Source: http://mothership.sg