Tag: GE2015

  • Mahu AP Terus Perjuangkan Isu Keprihatinan Masyarakat

    Mahu AP Terus Perjuangkan Isu Keprihatinan Masyarakat

    SAYA merujuk kepada laporan di Berita Harian semalam bertajuk: Sokongan Melayu jelas pendirian teguhkan lagi perpaduan.

    Keputusan cemerlang bagi pihak Parti Tindakan Rakyat (PAP) dan Menteri Melayu menunjukkan bahawa mereka diberi kepercayaan untuk menerajui Singapura.

    Ini juga mencerminkan kepercayaan yang kuat datang daripada masyarakat Melayu/Islam.

    Walaupun ada beberapa perkara yang masih belum dapat dihuraikan, masyarakat telah membuat keputusan, sebagaimana warga kita membuat keputusan 50 tahun yang lalu, bahawa masa depan untuk kita adalah di tempat ini yang kita panggil Singapura.

    Walaupun memang ada beberapa perkara yang harus dihuraikan, ia baik jika dilakukan dengan kebijaksanaan dan teratur.

    Masyarakat telah memilih dan menyokong PAP, yang juga menunjukkan yang ada semacam pertalian erat di antara masyarakat dan pemerintah.

    Ayuh kita bekerjasama dalam menghuraikan masalah yang ada.

    Kepercayaan yang kukuh menunjukkan bahawa masyarakat memberi isyarat yang terang bahawa ia mahu terus bekerjasama dengan pemerintah.

    ZAINUDIN HJ HAROON

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

  • Menjadikannya Isu Hijab Satu Isu Pilihan Raya Boleh Jejas Proses Huraian

    Menjadikannya Isu Hijab Satu Isu Pilihan Raya Boleh Jejas Proses Huraian

    SAYA menyaksikan beberapa rapat Pilihan Raya Umum dan dapati ramai ahli Melayu calon pembangkang menyentuh tentang isu hijab.

    Malang sekali tiada satu pun daripada mereka yang ada cara untuk menyelesaikan isu tersebut melainkan mereka akan menimbulkan isu itu jika dipilih.

    Tetapi isu sebenar ialah dengan memilih untuk menjadikan isu hijab sebagai satu isu di rapat Pilihan Raya Umum, ahli calon pembangkang hanya menjadikan masyarakat kita lebih payah melakar penyelesaian terhadap isu tersebut dalam jangka masa pendek ini.

    Jika kita sudah hampir untuk mendapatkan agar hijab dapat dipakai di tempat kerja sebelum pilihan raya umum, dengan menjadikan isu hijab sebagai isu pilihan raya umum, ia sudah semestinya menjadikannya lebih sukar.

    Malangnya ahli calon pembangkang telah menggunakan isu ini sebagai isu pilihan raya.

    Maka mereka telah membuat lebih banyak ketidakselesaan dalam kalangan masyarakat bukan Islam.

    Setelah pilihan raya berakhir isu ini boleh menyebabkan jurang yang lebih jauh di antara masyarakat kita dan rakyat Singapura yang lain.

    ABDUL KADIR ABDUL RAHMAN

     

    Source: http://beritaharian.sg

  • Behind PAP’s Victory, A Rising Star

    Behind PAP’s Victory, A Rising Star

    Singapore’s ruling party is celebrating a resounding re-election victory, thanks partly to its economic Tsar, an ethnic Tamil politician whose voter appeal poses an awkward question for its leaders: can a non-Chinese ever become prime minister?

    As the People’s Action Party (PAP) settles down to another five years in power, the guessing game of who will succeed Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong has begun – and the name of Tharman Shanmugaratnam keeps coming up.

    The odds of Shanmugaratnam, who is deputy prime minister and finance minister, making it to the top job should be long.

    All three of Singapore’s prime ministers to date have been of Chinese origin and, in a country where three-quarters of the residents are ethnic Chinese, it would be hard to break that tradition. Just one in 10 Singaporeans can, like Shanmugaratnam, trace their roots back to South Asia.

    PAP officials declined to comment on the question of who will come after Lee, 63, who has hinted that he may step down by 2020, because it is a sensitive subject in a party that is in any case instinctively secretive.

    Lee has said that the chances of a non-Chinese becoming prime minister are better for the new generation of leaders but a lack of Mandarin, widely spoken here, could be a problem.

    For some Singaporeans, though, the idea is as outlandish as a non-Malay prime minister in Malaysia or an Indonesian from outside the political heartland of Java becoming president.

    In a book published two years before his death this year, Lee Kuan Yew, Lee’s father and the deeply respected first prime minister of this tropical city-state, listed four ethnic Chinese men as the new generation of up-and-coming leaders.

    Still, Shanmugaratnam’s hustings performance in the run-up to last week’s election was so impressive that even an opposition candidate, Paul Tambyah of the Singapore Democratic Party, openly longed for him to lead a grand coalition of parties.

    “People would like to see Tharman around to set the tone for a new PAP leadership,” said Catherine Lim, a long-time political commentator and critic of Lee Kuan Yew.

    “It’s time now for a completely different one, and the only person whom I can think of to set that tone convincingly and who can appeal to Singaporeans across ethnic groups would be Mr Tharman,” she said.

    Shanmugaratnam, 58, said in July he was not keen on the prime minister’s job, though he expected Singapore to have a leader from one of its minority ethnic groups at some point.

    He was not available to comment for this article.

    A TRANSITIONAL PRIME MINISTER?

    The PAP won almost 70 percent of the popular vote in the election, a stunning recovery from its record low of 60.1 percent in 2011. In his own district, Shanmugaratnam led a handful of lawmakers to a win with about 80 percent of the vote.

    Analysts say that rebound was helped by a wave of patriotism after the death of Lee Kuan Yew and independent Singapore’s 50th birthday celebrations, but also by a slight shift from unbridled capitalism to Western welfarism that was led by Shanmugaratnam.

    In his campaign speeches, Shanmugaratnam pressed the right buttons for an electorate that has in recent years begun to question the hard-nosed growth-at-all-costs policies of the PAP that left many marginalised and struggling to make ends meet.

    In a calm baritone and with his trademark avuncular style, he crunched numbers to show how social welfare is working.

    He also explained changes the PAP has embraced after 50 years of unbroken rule, but conceded still more were needed.

    “It used to be a top-down government, often quite heavy-handed,” he told one rally. “It’s no longer that way … Strong leadership is listening, engaging, moving with people.”

    Shanmugaratnam spoke some Mandarin on the campaign, and when he quoted from an ancient Chinese poem at one rally the crowd exploded with cheers.

    He was educated at the London School of Economics, Cambridge and Harvard, and spent most of his career at the Monetary Authority of Singapore, the island state’s central bank and financial regulator.

    He got into a legal tangle in the 1990s when he was fined for failing to protect the secrecy of official information after economic data was published in a newspaper ahead of its release. Shanmugaratnam had pleaded not guilty.

    He is also well known on international circuits: a darling of international investors, he was appointed chairman of the International Monetary Fund’s policy steering committee in 2011.

    Eugene Tan, a law professor at Singapore Management University and a political commentator, said one obstacle for Shanmugaratnam is that he is seen as part of the prime minister’s generation, when perhaps ideally a new generation would be coming forward.

    “However, if it is assessed that a transitional prime minister is needed while the fourth generation is ready to take over, then … Tharman is well-positioned to step up,” Tan said.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Citizens, Not Opposition Parties, Who Should Feel Ashamed Of Opposition’s Electoral Performance

    Citizens, Not Opposition Parties, Who Should Feel Ashamed Of Opposition’s Electoral Performance

    We did our round of thanking voters of CCK for their support this evening. There were quite a number of pairs of guilty conscience eyes in the coffeeshop but we just ignore. I always believe people deserve what they voted for.

    Someone ask me don’t we feel shameful of going around to thank voters when we only get 23%? I laughed and said, people will only feel shameful when they have done something wrong. We have done no wrong and in fact we should be holding our heads up high because we have done a great public service and making sacrifices of money, time and effort to put up the contest. We should not be the ones who will worry about being shameful lah!

    Goh Meng Seng

     

    Source: People’s Power Party

  • PAP Does Not Have A ‘Strong Mandate’

    PAP Does Not Have A ‘Strong Mandate’

    There appears to be a “swing” towards PAP in votes compared to the last election in 2011. Some Singaporeans are disappointed because the outcome seems to contradict the evidence on the ground.

    The turnouts for opposition rallies, especially those of the WP, were much bigger than the last election. Social media also reflected the sentiments of the majority of Singaporeans months and years leading to the election. Almost everyone in coffee shops and among friends had a bone to pick with the PAP, and the ranting has gone on since the last election.

    Singaporeans have been ranked the world’s unhappiest people and we all know the cause of this. Even new political opportunists jumped onto the campaigning bandwagon this time round. Internet videos show Singaporeans booing and avoiding PAP candidates while they campaign. Yet, the results fail to match the sentiments on the ground. This sentiment is further confirmed by the size of the turnout of people at PAP’s winning speeches last night.

    This morning I saw a large group of men wearing white standing at Bedok market, as if waiting for residents to come up to congratulate them. But none went up to them. Lim Swee Say had to go and shake the hands of a few foreigners who work at the shops. The MIW left in a jiffy.

    On first reaction, it seems that there must be some rigging going on with the results. Why are there so few supporters at the winning speeches? Why have a new counting system? What are they up to this time round? However, on further reflection, it is quite obvious that the “swing” came from the following groups of Singaporeans:

    The Pioneer Generation: This population segment was an easy target for the PAP. These elders were literally won over with generous subsidies and personal selling. This group is unlikely to come out and support their heroes.

    New Citizens: Needless to say. Why jeopardise a future in “paradise”? Why show their faces at PAP rallies when they know they are hated all over the island?

    Government Employees: Like most Singaporean voters, they desire to vote for the opposition but despite their unhappiness with the PAP, they are obligated to vote for them. Same reason as new citizens – why jeopardise my position at work?

    The Poor: Many of these have been “won” over by government subsidies and are dependent on monthly handouts. Even though the desire is to vote for the opposition, they see a threat that their lifeline might be cut off.

    Government Contractors: Many businesses and proprietors are making a living as a result of government contracts and projects. The HDB upgrading programmes engage thousands of contractors and sub-contractors. I doubt any one of them would want to put their livelihood at risk. What about other industrial sectors? There are many more in the same situation.

    Other Government-Reliant Persons: Would they vote for the opposition if they are waiting for a housing loan from the HDB or a medical subsidy or a scholarship? Or for that matter would they vote for the opposition if they have just received such benefits?

    Now, all these groups of people may sit at coffeeshops, attack PAP policies and attend opposition rallies instead of PAP rallies. However, they will eventually vote PAP because of the fear of losing their benefits.

    The conclusion is this: the PAP has leverage over the voting of the above groups of Singaporeans. Also, the election system has been designed by the PAP for PAP to win the majority of seats: GRC, electoral boundary redrawing, revealing campaigning date with little forewarning, etc. They have a two-pronged winning strategy.

    So, do not read PAP’s win as a mandate from the people of Singapore. If it were so, Singaporeans all over the island would be jubilant this morning but their faces are clearly depressed and disappointed. Clearly, PAP does not have the heart and the mandate of the people.

    So, who are PAP’s real supporters?

    RC Members: Every few blocks has an RC chairman and members, with a hierarchy of chairmen and members across each precinct. All of them are benefitting from their associations. This is a large group even without including their family members who are also voters. They are the ones in white supporting the PAP at rallies, but they alone cannot make up the winning votes.

    Who are the Opposition’s supporters?

    The only group that PAP has no power over is the educated, working adults. These are the most economically active Singaporeans. They are those who are waiting for jobs, building families and have school-going children and can see that the government policies are not benefitting them and their future. This is the vocal and eloquent group you find on social media. Unfortunately, this group is now outnumbered by the above groups as the election outcome shows.

    Being vocal and eloquent is the last thing the government wants Singaporeans to be. This is why they dissuade Singaporeans from taking degrees. They learnt about this a long time ago in the persons of Francis Seow, Jeyaratnam and now, Chee Soon Juan. It is better for the government to give more seats in tertiary institutions to foreigners than Singaporeans and keep Singaporeans lowly educated.

    The most intelligent and most important population group for Singapore’s future is being marginalised because of their collective criticism of the PAP – just like the marginalisation of the professionals 15 years ago because of their critical views of PAP. As a result, the PAP allowed “FTs” to come in overnight to take over their jobs resulting in a large group branded as the world’s most educated taxi drivers. The children of these professionals are now suffering the same fate as their parents. The Opposition can serve only this group. So, how?

    Politics is about leverage and the PAP has it. What leverage has the Opposition got?

    I think the picture is clear. And the problem too.

    Savvy Artist

     

    Source: www.tremeritus.com