Tag: government

  • Epic Fails And Fashionistas Of The Singapore Parliament

    Epic Fails And Fashionistas Of The Singapore Parliament

    Politics, while a dirty business, can be sexy too.

    We round up some of the hits and misses in Parliament this year.

    A for effort. Or is it E? – Tin Pei Ling

    The bros at Hardware Zone are going crazy over this picture:

    tin pei ling FB

    Source

    It’s a pity that she has to make herself look serious with garb like this.

    Tin Pei Ling 5 Nov

    Tin Pei Ling 13 March

    Let your hair down, Pei Ling.

     

    Best hair – Lily Neo

    Lily Neo 10 Nov

    No fight. Let these pictures speak for themselves.

    lily neo fb2

    Source

    lily neo fb

    Source

    Not one strand of hair is out of place. Even during walkabouts.

     

    Studious look – Lee Li Lian

    Lee Li Lian 9 Sept

    Definitely rocking the motherly look too with that clean pixie cut.

     

    Stuck in a time warp look – Fatimah Lateef

    Fatimah Lateef  10 july

    Not sure what you call this look. Throwback?

     

    Second best hair – Rita Soh 

    Screen Shot 2014-11-22 at 10.42.03 am

    New Nominated Member of Parliament Rita Soh making her first impression count.

     

    The one with the most accessories – Amy Khor

    Amy Khor 21 Jan

    Nice brooch.

    Amy Khor 5 Nov

    Nice brooch and necklace.

    Amy Khor

    Nice pearl necklace.

     

    The Fashionista – Josephine Teo

    Josephine Teo 9 Sep

    Be it the little black dress…

    Josephine Teo 8 Oct

    A colourful whatchamacallit…

    Josephine Teo  3 Nov

    Or matching reading glasses with an asymmetrical necklace , Josephine Teo can rock any outfit.

    So much so that Indranee Rajah tried to copy follow her look. Both wore similar blazers on April 14, 2014.

    indranee vs josephine

    Uh oh. Someone call the fashion police.

     

    The androgynous look – Indranee Rajah

    Indranee andro

    Luckily, she bounced back with this very fashion-forward look.

     

    Flower power – Sylvia Lim

    Sylvia Lim 9 Sept

    Not bad. Not bad at all.

     

    The guys, however, are less adventurous. They are usually in three standard styles.

    1. The Shenton Way look

    Tan Chuan-Jin 5 Aug

    Khaw Boon Wan 14 April

    Tan Chuan-Jin and Khaw Boon Wan will not look out of place at Lau Pa Sat.

    Screen Shot 2014-11-22 at 10.54.44 am

    PM Lee in his signature pink shirt.

     

    2. The I-didn’t-suit-up-but-hey-here’s-a-random-jacket look

    Yeo Guat Kwang 10 July

    Is that a NTUC jacket on Yeo Guat Kwang?

    Faishal Ibrahim 9 Sept

    Here’s Faishal Ibrahim channeling the LKY look.

    Zainudin Nordin 9 Sept

    One would expect Football Association of Singapore President Zainudin Nordin to be in a Lions windbreaker, but he chose Ralph Lauren in this occassion.

     

    3. The suits

    Chen Show Mao 30 May

    Chen Show Mao with his white, flowy locks.

    Vikram Nair 5 Nov

    Vikram Nair looking spiffy after drinking that glass of water.

    Pritam Singh 4 Nov

    Pritam Singh with the best beard in the house.

    K Shanmugam 4 Nov

    K Shanmugam looking serious as usual.

    Screen Shot 2014-11-22 at 10.51.49 am

    Low Thia Khiang in his classic one-size-too-big suit.

     

    Best dressed dude

    Baey Yam Keng 5 Nov

    Well, not everyone is the King of Selfies.

     

    Source: http://mothership.sg

  • Ngiam Tong Dow Not Only Insider To Criticise The PAP

    Ngiam Tong Dow Not Only Insider To Criticise The PAP

    This was not the first time Ngiam Tong Dow had critiqued the PAP leadership. In 2003, he asked for more competition for PAP elites. His retraction is a desperate play of power by PAP, it may even be LKY bleeding for retraction. Given what Ngiam had said earlier in 2003, his retraction cannot be sincere.

    1. About political competition.

    “It is the law of nature that all things must atrophy. Unless LKY allows serious political challenges to emerge from the alternative elite out there, the incumbent elite will just coast along.

    At the first sign of a grassroots revolt, they will probably collapse just like the incumbent Progressive Party to the left-wing PAP onslaught in the late 1950s.

    I think our leaders have to accept that Singapore is larger than the PAP.”

    2. Spreading of top talents between government and private sectors.

    “When ten scholars come home, five should turn to the right and join the public sector or the civil service; the other five should turn to the left and join the private sector.”

    3. Economics.

    “Take our industrial policy. At the beginning, it was the right thing for us to attract multinationals to Singapore.

    For some years now, I’ve been trying to tell everybody: ‘Look, for God’s sake, grow our own timber.’ If we really want knowledge to be rooted in Singaporeans and based in Singapore, we have to support our SMEs.

    I’m not a supporter of SMEs just for the sake of more SMEs but we must grow our own roots. Creative Technology’s Sim Wong Hoo is one and Hyflux’s Olivia Lum is another but that’s too few.

    We have been flying on auto-pilot for too long. The MNCs have contributed a lot to Singapore but they are totally unsentimental people. The moment you’re uncompetitive, they just relocate.”

    Ngiam Tong Dow is not exactly alone among the insiders to criticize PM LHL’s government in recent years.

    a. Dr Tommy Koh had called the income inequality as socially unconscionable.

    b. Professor Lim Chong Yah, had a dramatic proposal to narrow the economic gap – raising low-level salaries by 50 per cent over three years and freezing top-end incomes for a similar period.

    c. Yeoh Lam Keong, former chief economist at the Government Investment Corporation (GIC) headed by Lee Kuan Yew:

    “What we need to do is to be much more stringent on admitting such unskilled labour. We’ve really got no excuse to be so relaxed about this kind of immigration.”

    At every level of society, nothing is quite right for PAP. Even the insiders who are closely related to PAP feel that the policies are alienating people from the government. And Ngiam has correctly pointed to the way a closeted culture without competition had made the PAP too comfortable.

    Contrary to their insidious assertion that Singaporeans are becoming too ‘dependent’, PAP is the one that is uncompetitive, unimaginative and relying on a compliant citizenry to have an easy life.

    Well, no more! No more.

    BK

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

     

  • Gilbert Goh: 10 Ministers To Ship Out Of The Cebiner After The Next Elections

    Gilbert Goh: 10 Ministers To Ship Out Of The Cebiner After The Next Elections

    Ten ministers we want to see out of the cabinet after the next election:-

    1. Lim Swee Say – a minister without portfolio, Mr Lim is in charge of the labour department here but is seldom seen advocating for our workers.

    In fact, he earns his million-dollar salary by discouraging the implementation of minimum wage as he says that wage increase should be accompanied by higher productivity.

    Termed the tooth-pick minister because he is only concerned about the lack of tooth pick when he visited a Dai Tai Fong restaurant two years ago, Singapore will not miss him at all if he is out of the cabinet after the next election as he is seldom saying anything useful for the people.

    Certainly not deserving of his million-dollar salary.

    2. Admiral Lui Tuck Yew – in his first term as transport minister, Admiral Lui mishandled the many train mishaps that occurred the past few years by simply brushing them off as ordinary occurrences and seldom spoke out convincingly against any annual PTC fare hike even though SMRT made millions in profits for many years.

    When he tried to travel in public transport to get a real personal feel of the daily grind of average Singporeans, he was jeered at by many as trying to score cheap political points.

    He was also the first minister in Singapore to almost have a effigy burnt in his name at Hong Lim park early this year during the transport fare hike protest.

    A minister that is best left to manage ships than trains and buses.

    Deserve a pay-cut if he continues to perform this manner.

    3. Gan Kim Yong – Mr Gan was transferred to take care of the health ministry after the 2011 election when he couldn’t manage the problematic manpower ministry during his first term.

    An average minister at best, Mr Gan could not inspire in his parliamentary speeches and lack the charisma and leadership to helm a ministry.

    Singaporeans will not miss him if he is taken out as a minister after the next election.

    He probably only has the capacity to be a state minister.

    Singapore can get someone to replace him as minister after the next election.

    4. MG Chan Chun Sing – he led the social work ministry of the country even though he is an army officer for the best part of his career.

    Parachuted in by the prime minister when the party lost its first-ever GRC after the 2011 GE, MG Chan quickly established himself and became the kee-chu minister.

    In many of his speeches to the constituents, he asked people to raise their hands in hokkein “kee-chu” if they agreed with his points.

    Since taking over the social work ministry, MG Chan has not really introduced any policies that deserve mention so far.

    Touted as the next prime minister material, MG Chan is labelled a hardliner and prefer to use the rod than spoil the child type.

    If he does eventually take over as prime minister, Singaporeans will have many sleepless nights and human rights activists will be busy trying to escape lawsuits.

    5. BG Tan Chuan Jin – helming the massive heavyweight manpower ministry, BG Tan quickly established himself as a good communicator and used his fast oratory wit alot to side-step important issues.

    Seldom wanting to take side on any matter, he generalises alot in his speeches and sometimes one could not really tell what he is trying to communicate to the people.

    He has charming baby-face look and could be a poster boy for the government.

    Many people speculated that he didn’t do a good job as manpower minister when they didn’t confirm him as a full-fledged minister like they have done for MG Chan – he was acting minister for another 6 months before turning permanent.

    Also seen as best left to serve in the army than helming a complicated ministry that requires alot of private sector and industrial experience, BG Tan is seen lacking as the manpower minister. He seldom speaks as if he truly understand what is happening on the ground.

    He has really done nothing much during his term as manpower minister to remedy the serious flaw in our manpower dilemma right now. People get terminated easily without proper redress and foreigners on social tourist visas could look for work without repercussion.

    So far, besides Mr Gan, none of the minister could boast of any solid private sector experience that is vital in many portfolio ministry and this is seriously exposed through BG Tan.

    This lack of private sector experience is a serious flaw in our current cabinet make-up right now and Singaporeans are paying the price.

    6. Dr Vivian Balaikrishnan – taken out from the heavyweight MCYS social work ministry after the 2011 GE after his massive controversial remark on our poor – three hot meals and hotel stay, Mr Balaikrishnan now helms the public works department.

    He also says that there is no homeless people staying in Singapore and thus ridiculed the intelligence of Singaporeans.

    Often seen as speaking arrogantly and completely out of line with the ground, he will remain minister for the minor ministry for the rest of his political career and public works suits him best.

    Singaporeans won’t miss him if he is taken out of the cabinet altogether.

    7. Admiral DPM Teo Chee Hean – DPM Teo is also seen as a hardliner and often took on duties that our prime minister shrink from.

    He was the man who handled the two top civil servant corruption cases and also got embroiled in the Michael Palmer disgraced exit as Speaker of Parliament.

    Lacking charisma and hardnosed, DPM Teo lacks empathy and seldom inspires with his speeches.

    He is also dull looking and has sleepy eyes that hardly could wake up.

    A deputy prime minister that Singapore could do without.

    8. Khaw Boon Wan – Mr Khaw shone in his ministerial term as health minister but is seen lacking as national development minister after taking over in 2011. He could not pacify a population that is crying for transparency in the actual costing of our HDB flats.

    Cost of new HDB flats have rose considerably but the build-in size has shrank much.

    However, to his credit, he manages to speed up the building of new HDB flats and the waiting time has being slashed by almost one-third from the tenure under previous minister Mah Bow Tan.

    Mr Khaw has performed ordinarily as housing minister and we expect more from him as he is capable of doing much more like when he helmed the health ministry.

    9.Dr Yaacob Ibrahim – deemed the minister for Malay affairs, he seldom however speaks up for the plight of Malays and is the much-hated mouthpiece for the government.

    He also helms the ministry for communication and information.

    Caught in the unenviable position of having to speak up for the Malays and yet not trampling on the tail-coat of our government, Dr Yacob could not function well in his role except to collect his million-dollar paycheck every year.

    Singaporeans, especially the Malay community, will not miss him if he is out of the cabinet either by the loss of his GRC or a downgrade in portfolio duties.

    10. Ng Eng Hen – the surgeon minister is now handling defence after trying out education in his first term.

    Not many people know of his ministerial effort as he is often soft-spoken and stay in the shadow.

    The best thing he has done is to reduce national service to 24 months from 30 months and he seldom inspires with his speeches.

    Its also strange a surgeon led the defence portfolio when we have more than seven generals in the cabinet team.

    A minister that will not be missed if he is gone after the next election as so far his contribution is really very minimal.

    He can then get back his 5-million dollar job as a top private surgeon.

     

    Gilbert Goh

    *Article first appeared on https://www.facebook.com/goh.gilbert/posts/10153402207138975

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

     

  • PAP Government Giving Free Scholarships to Filipinos!

    PAP Government Giving Free Scholarships to Filipinos!

    The PAP government is giving out scholarships specifically for Pinoys in Philippines to come to Singapore to study in our local universities (NUS, NTU, SMU). Each award is for three to four years of tertiary study and covers return air fare, full tuition, an accommodation allowance and a living allowance of S$4,300 (around P150,000) per annum. Applicants of the scholarship must be Filipino citizens with excellent academic records and a good command of English. A recipient of the scholarship may not concurrently hold any other scholarship, fellowship, grant or award without prior approval of the Singaporean government. (Source: http://globalnation.inquirer.net/114414/singapore-giving-out-scholarships/).

    Except for Medicine, Dentistry, Architecture and Law, all other disciplines are open to recipients of the scholarship. As Medicine, Dentistry and Law are elite courses, the Filipino scholars will instead be competing with average Singaporeans who usually take arts, science, business or engineering courses. It is therefore hard to imagine that most Singaporeans will not notice the privileges given to these special Pinoys.

    The PAP government seems to be keen on investing in Filipino talent development even though they do not even serve National Service. It is also stated in the terms of the scholarship that “the scholars are expected to return to their respective countries at the end of their studies to contribute to the development of their nations”. That means there is NO BOND so it is not required that these Pinoys serve NS or contribute to Singapore. The scholarship appears to be a charitable act by the PAP government towards Filipinos.

    Moreover, it has been revealed that many Filipinos have fake qualifications from universities like Recto University (http://edition.cnn.com/2012/01/17/world/asia/philippines-recto/index.html). With its failure to scrutinize foreign talents like Anoop Shankar, can NUS be totally sure that these Filipinos are talented?

    There was also no attempt to disguise the fact that the scholarship was provided by government agencies in Singapore. The following was stated:

    “For eligibility criteria, terms of award and application procedures, applicants may go to the website: http://www.mfa.gov.sg.scp.

    Completed applications must be submitted to the Singapore Embassy in Manila by Dec. 10. Applicants are encouraged to use the online application portal, http://singaporescholarship.scp.gov.sg., in addition to submitting the hard copies.”

    So if you’re a Pinoy hoping to live out the Singapore Dream and have a successful career, please go ahead and apply.

    I feel angry that the Singapore government is using taxpayers’ money to fund the development of a bunch of Pinoys. It shouldn’t be totally surprising, considering that we are already paying $25000 just to teach one PRC officer English.

    As a Singaporean, I am extremely disappointed with the PAP government for neglecting its own citizens while putting foreigners first. Many of our local Singaporeans are not on scholarships in local universities and they are burdened with a huge debt upon graduation. Several other Singaporeans, mainly poly graduates have to work part-time and pay higher fees to study at private universities because they couldn’t get into local universities. And it is not because their grades are bad; it’s because there aren’t enough vacancies available for Singaporeans. Finally, there’s the group of Singaporeans whose families have paid enormous amounts to send them abroad just so they can have a quality university education. The vast majority of Singaporeans are not on scholarships even though they are keen to get a degree and contribute to Singapore’s development.

    Why must we compromise our own human capital development just to do charity for third world countries?

     

    Muhd Hafiz

    TRS Contributor

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • 10 Things To Love And Hate About  A Government Job

    10 Things To Love And Hate About A Government Job

    Author’s Note

    My interviewee once joined a government agency straight out from university, excited at the prospects of being able to help shape the future of Singapore. He left the organisation a couple of years later, feeling jaded but also thankful for the things he has learnt and contributed to. Following that, he swung to the other extreme to do sales in a fast-paced private MNC environment. Having been on both sides now, he’d like to share his candid thoughts about working in the government.

    Note that his experience may differ from others in the public sector, and the culture differs between various government bodies too. This article hence seeks not meant to be a factual generalisation but rather a personal observation based on his limited time there. For ease of reading, it will henceforth be written in the first-person.

    “Not for me now; maybe at retirement”

    “Will you consider work in the government sector?”

    This is the question I posed to 3 fellow Singaporeans recently, all of whom replied with a similar answer, “Not now, but perhaps later when I want a slower pace of life, or if I’m about to retire”. For manySingaporeans, a government job seems to have a strong stereotype of being slow-paced and bureaucratic. But a government position is typically well respected in most countries worldwide; you’d think that this will hold true especially in Singapore which has, undeniably, one of the most efficient government organisation in the world. Why then are so many locals dissing at the suggestion of a government job? Being there, I do agree that there’s some parts that can be better, but to be fair, it’s not all bad.

    To set the record straight, allow me to share the 10 things I love and hate about a government job.

    5 things I hate about a government job

    1. Budget papers and long procurement processes

    We have to start the list with the dreaded budget paper of course! To carry out any projects that require spending anywhere above $3000, you will have to write an official budget paper to justify the expenditure to get it approved. A moderate budget requires at least 2 to 3 levels of approval, and the process is dragged if one of the signatories is away. It’s common to have budget papers thrown back for better justification or re-wording (sometimes it’s down to grammatical errors!). It sometimes makes you feel like you’re submitting your communications 101 homework.

    Once budget is approved, you’ll still need to launch a public invitation-to-quote on Gebiz*, and evaluate which vendor is the best. The entire whole process takes anywhere between 3 weeks to 3 months, which is a long time (it could take longer with tender processes if much bigger budgets are needed). The entire process is painfully slow and frustrating, and you’d constantly wonder why you’re wasting so much time and effort on the procurement process rather than implementing the project.

    *Gebiz is Singapore’s government electronic procurement system.

    2. Endless meetings (and minutes to write)

    There’s a huge number of meetings that government officers are pulled into; there will always be multiple agendas related to your organisation’s industry that requires an inter-departmental or whole-of-government approach, but there’s only so few officers. Within my first few months in the job, I was already ‘arrowed’ to participate in various task force and inter-governmental discussions. Many a times, I was questioning why I’m part of the discussion, and it’s common to see some officers typing away on their emails instead of participating in discussions.

    Then there’s minutes. Most meetings, both internal and external, require someone to document minutes or notes. There is typically a standard template to adhere to, and you may need to have to have your minutes vetted or approved. Writing minutes in this way, in my personal opinion, is a chore and a waste of time. While it’s important to note down key discussion points and next steps, a more efficient way is to send everyone a simple summary email with follow-up items.

    3. Hierarchical… and some bosses still expect to be served

    While the hierarchical structures are slowly giving way to modern, open-office concept, it may take another full generation to fully change this. There’re many stories of officers being told not to skip the chain of command, or being blamed for approaching another department head directly. I personally had been stopped by the Personal Assistant of my director when I wanted to knock on his door for a quick chat. I didn’t expect to have to schedule a time through the Personal Assistant to meet my own boss..

    4. Urgency please?

    The most common stereotype of working in government seems to be that things move slowly. It takes forever to start something (remember the budget papers and internal approval processes?), and it takes even longer to get everyone on board to implement a project quickly. Everyone has their own projects on priority, and your project seems to always be on the backburner. It takes numerous discussions for all stakeholders to agree on something, which would already have taken weeks if not months. If you’re a young officer eager to make your mark and shape the future of Singapore, I’m afraid you’ll have to be extremely patient as your enthusiasm is most likely to wear off before any actual work gets done due to the many layers of approvals required.

    A side note to this is the way remuneration works in the government: one is sometimes “punished” for doing fast and effective work by receiving more work. On the other hand, if you do what’s expected well enough, you will enjoy a long stable career. Nothing fanciful, but it works. Maybe that explains the lack of urgency. To be fair, this is a common problem in many organisations, but in the government it’s especially prevalent, since hires and fires don’t happen as rapidly, and profits aren’t the only bottom line.

    Maybe another explanation for the lack of urgency, is…

    5. Strategy overdo

    Strategy is a big word thrown out often too many times in the government, though the frequency varies among various organisations. While the job of the government is to develop strategic policies, it becomes frustrating when projects are always stuck at the strategy phase, or when long-term strategies change, ironically, every year. I’ve seen how strategic plans are revised multiple times a year to the point where employees roll their eyes when they hear the big word. It is especially frustrating when your personal performance indicators and projects are part of an approved strategy and is now on hold because management is re-looking into the strategy. With this in place, any form of urgency gets squelched for practicality: let’s go slow and see if they change their mind, again.

    5 things I love about a government job

    Its not all gloom and doom though, and here are the 5 things I loved about my time in the government.

    6. Strategic thinking skills

    Ironically, getting involved in strategy work also means that you get to develop your strategic thinking skills. Since any projects or policies you implement will involve taxpayers’ money, you have to make sure that it’s sustainable, fits into the bigger Singapore growth roadmap and pays off in the long run. While it can be frustrating at times, it did force me to think strategically all the time, and over time, it developed me to be more strategic, and think in a big-picture manner. Even the dreaded exercise of writing budget papers trained me to be focused in my thoughts, giving them clarity.

    7. Leaving a legacy and making an impact on society

    The impact you make in a government body benefits the society you live in. You’d feel good knowing that you’ve contributed back to society in a big way, having satisfied the inner desire to make a difference to the community. You’re not just working towards the bottomline of a company, but sacrificing your time and efforts for the greater good. There’s not many other workplaces where you can say the same thing, and it is deeply fulfilling and meaningful.

    If you are in the Singapore Economic Development Board (EDB), you will be opening industries and attracting MNCs that will employ thousands of people. If you are part of the Infocomm Development Authority of Singapore (IDA), you will be helping to build a futuristic smart nation. If you are in the National Environment Agency (NEA), you will be creating a sustainable environment for us and our children. And these are just three of the many agencies around. I once established a strategic partnership (during my days in the government sector) that brought revenue contribution to local businesses, and I felt proud knowing that it had contributed to the economy of the country, akin to leaving an important legacy behind.

    8. Involved in latest events and community news

    Being the champion of an industry (eg. Tourism Board for tourism) also means that you get the first chance to experience new stuff. If you like to be seen as the hipster who’s been to the River Safari first or launch of the National Gallery, then being part of the government is for you.

    9. Family-oriented, good benefits, and lunch culture

    The public sector is a family oriented environment in general, with generous benefits and family-oriented policies. Leave entitlements in particular trump many private sector companies, which is why it is the pro-baby workplace as most people know it as. It is also not uncommon for employees to take no-pay-leave for sabbaticals, or exam leaves for studies. And on the compensation side, there’s always the sweet 13th month bonus every year and the occasional mid year bonuses.

    There’s typically a strong local (food) culture as well (you can trust Singaporeans to love their food!). I always look forward to lunching together in groups, sometimes even travelling out far for the best food. There’s typically no strict lunch hours, and there’ll always be celebratory meals for new joiners or birthday colleagues.

    10. Gain global outlook and CEO exposure

    Depending on your role and employer, public officers do enjoy quite a bit of opportunities to travel overseas for work. These could be market study trips, meetings or representing Singapore in overseas conferences and seminars. You’ll be exposed to international best practices, different cultures and they all help you develop a global outlook.

    As a young, inexperienced employee in many other companies, you may not get a chance to interface with senior leaders in other organisations. However, because you represent the government of Singapore, senior business leaders are willing to meet you for various reasons such as gaining tax concessions for locating regional HQs here or to obtain government grants for their businesses. With the government’s trust in the abilities of its young officers, you could use the experience to develop into a well-rounded professional. For example, EDB is especially known for exposing young officers to senior management leaders of MNCs.

    Concluding thoughts

    When people ask me what’s the difference between my previous government role and the current private sector role, I have lots of mixed feelings. When I was in my prior role, I was feeling worn-out (and sometimes cynical) by the long drawn processes. I wanted to go faster and do more, but I felt hampered by bureaucracy. But it wasn’t all bad. In retrospect, I realised that the training and exposure I had helped me develop very useful skills that will carry me far. And I do sometimes miss the noble mission that every government officer is set on – the mission to create a better home for us all.

    Every sector has it’s good and bad side. I sure have grumbles about working in the government sector, as with many others I believe. But I do admit too that it can be a great place for professionals to develop into an all-rounder and do meaningful work for their country at the same time.

    Look beyond the stereotypes associated with a government job, and you may perhaps find your dream job in this sector.

     

    *Article first appeared on www.17wakinghours.com

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com