Tag: graduates

  • (Reader Contribution) I’m An Engineering Graduate And I Haven’t Secured A Job For Months Now

    (Reader Contribution) I’m An Engineering Graduate And I Haven’t Secured A Job For Months Now

    The issue of our graduates still being unemployed after months of applying for one. How best do we solve the high unemployment rate among graduates?

    ***

    “So after 1 month since my convocation, 3 months since my last exam in NTU (should be 6 months since I applied for job), I still couldn’t secure a job. I am worried of not being able to get a job by end of this year as the economic is getting worse and worse.

    Only went for < 3 interviews so far… Below are the prob I can think of now:

    1. My resume sucks. Well, I have edited (don’t know how many times) my resume to make it more professional.
    2. Working experience.
    2.1 I was working in the lab and helping them in their research project. Nowadays most of research companies are hiring Phd and Science students but not engineering student.
    2.2 I did apply for engineering job which is related to my major. I worked as engineering intern when I was a poly student but most of the job I have done was just office job.
    3. Academic results. Not even 2nd upper class honours. So this maybe the reason? I’m not expecting my salary will be very high. My expected salary range: $2700/2800 to $3000

    I wonder anyone is in the same situation as me? Anyway, all the best for those still looking for a job.”

    Source: Engineering student

  • SDP: Just Whom Is The PAP’s Education Policy Serving

    SDP: Just Whom Is The PAP’s Education Policy Serving

    When he was Minister of State for Education, Dr Ng Eng Hen said that “Our universities must become engines of growth for our economy.”

    In 2012, Minister for Trade and Industry Lim Hng Kiang reinforced this point saying that our education system is “to build industry-relevant manpower capabilities for the economy.”

    We had even wanted to become the ‘Boston of the East’, with our universities modeled on Harvard University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

    But Education Minister Ong Ye Kung now says that the number of graduates will be capped at 30 to 40 percent of the student population because the government had, in the past. placed an over-emphasis on academic qualifications in education.

    This chop-and-change approach to education has damaged the country’s ability to plan for the longer term. For example, the PAP had at one time focused on Information Technology and later switched to preparing students for life sciences. Its current emphasis is on “technology adoption” – whatever that means.

    Such short-sightedness contradicts PM Lee Hsien Loong’s boast of the PAP’s “far-sighted leadership who can anticipate problems”. If the leadership is. indeed, far-sighted, how did we place emphasis on our universities being growth engines for our economy and become the Boston of the East only to realise now that we have over-emphasised academic qualifications?

    Serving local or foreign students?

    And while the PAP caps the number of Singaporean graduates, it subsidises foreign students under the Global Schoolhouse project.

    A majority of international students studying here are given Tuition Grants (totaling more than $200 million per year) as well as scholarships (some of which are not open to Singaporean students). It is reported that foreign students make up between 18 and 20 percent of the total undergraduate intake in Singapore.

    In addition, foreign students receiving the grants have to serve a bond upon graduation (which many, by the way, don’t fulfill). They further compete with local graduates for jobs, many of whom are as it is having a hard time finding employment.

    The discrimination is made even more unpalatable when one considers Singaporean parents spending an average of $21,000 a year on their child’s university education. This is more than twice the global average, with over half of the households going into debt because of it. These parents even prioritise funding their children’s education over paying their bills or saving for retirement.

    And the PAP is limiting the number of local graduates while funding foreign ones? Mr Ong Ye Kung must explain whom exactly his latest policy is serving.

    Read SDP’s alternative education policy: Educating For Creativity And Equality: An Agenda For Transformation.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Are Malay Graduates And Job Seekers Being Discriminated In Malaysia? Yes, They Are

    Are Malay Graduates And Job Seekers Being Discriminated In Malaysia? Yes, They Are

    The high number of unemployed graduates, especially Malay graduates is not news in this country. We hear them blaming everything but themselves. But what if the Malays are indeed being discriminated against?

    “Yeah right,” I muttered at first as someone who is sometimes ashamed by my own race. How could I not, when I’m assumed to be ‘easily swayed and confused’ half the time?

    Trying to keep an open mind, I read this study, and was quite puzzled by the findings. It was entitled ‘Discrimination in high degrees: Race and graduate hiring in Malaysia‘ and was published in the Journal of Asia Pacific Economy by UM and UKM researchers. Here’s the paper abstract (bold is my own):

    This paper investigates racial discrimination in hiring fresh degree graduates in Malaysia through a field experiment. We send fictitious Malay and Chinese resumes to job advertisements, then analyse differentials in callback for interview attributable to racial identity, while controlling for applicant characteristics, employer profile and job requirements.

    We find that race matters much more than resume quality, with Malays, Malaysia’s majority group significantly less likely to be called for interview.Other factors, particularly language proficiency of employees, language requirements of jobs and profile of employers, influence employer biases.

    Applicants fluent in Chinese fare better, and Chinese-controlled and foreign-controlled companies are more likely to favour Chinese resumes, indicating that cultural compatibility explains part of the discrimination. Malay resumes tend to be perceived and prejudged adversely, and employers’ attitudes towards public policy outcomes, particularly pertaining to education quality and employment opportunity in the public sector, also account for the observed racial disparities.

    Let me simplify that for you:

    When researchers sent fake resumes of Malay and Chinese fresh graduates, the Malay applicants are much less likely to be called back for an interview. Employers perceive Malays negatively, think that they have lower-quality education and always have the safety net in the form of government jobs to fall back on.

    Huh. I’ve never been pro-Malay, but I hate discrimination more. How was the research conducted to come to this conclusion?

    How the research was conducted

    The research:

    • Sent over 3000 fake resumes, divided into 4 categories: AA Malay, AA Chinese, BA Malay and BA Chinese (AA = Above average; BA = Below average).
    • CGPA, university, language and technical skills were randomly assigned.
    • Sent the resumes to job vacancies in finance and engineering sector.
    • Did not include other races.

    The researchers:

    • Found that in general, AA applicants get more callbacks than BA applicants. Interestingly, AA Malay have lower callback rate than BA Chinese.
    • Showed that Chinese resumes received a 22.1% callback rate on average while Malay resumes received 4.2% callback rate on average.
    • Malay applicants for engineering jobs get the lowest callback rate at 2.9%.
    • Malay graduates from private universities get the lowest callback.
    • Showed that UTAR graduates get higher callback rates, but there is no penalty for UiTM degrees.
    • Malay resumes stating proficiency in Chinese get higher callback rates.
    • English and Malay proficiency and good English in cover letter have ‘negligible impact on call rates’.
    • Calculated callback rates among Chinese, foreign and Malay-controlled companies. Malays get lower callback rates in ALL of them.
    • Even Malay-controlled companies favour Chinese applicants 1.6 times more than Malays.

    As I read, it dawned to me the long-forgotten early struggles in my career, where I struggled to hear back from potential employers despite sending job applications after job applications. I thought it happened to everyone. I thought all job seekers faced the same problem.

    Was it… caused by my (very Malay-sounding) name instead?

    What caused this?

    The research said that the data generated cannot give conclusive reasons. But some important points to highlight:

    • Cultural compatibility and language ability matters. Employers with predominantly Chinese employees perceive that Malays are less likely to take jobs offered anyway (or quit within a few months), as Malays have the tendency to feel uncomfortable in these settings. The researchers theorise that Malays prefer environments where their religious customs and spoken language in work environment are catered to.
    • Malay applicants are negatively prejudged. This explains why BA Chinese get higher callback rates than AA Malays. No conclusive reasons are given, except that the negative stereotypes may be reinforced by past experience and lack of contact between these two groups to prove otherwise.
    • Appears to be the result of pro-Malay affirmative actions. People tend to think that Malays have lower-quality education and higher opportunities in the public sector anyway. This is a very complex issue, and further research are needed, but the researchers suggest that pro-Malay policies may in fact hurt Malay graduates’ job prospects.

    What does this mean?

    For the longest time, I thought, “Man, Malays are complainers,” when they say they can’t get jobs or get high pay or have limited opportunities. I thought: ‘The PM is Malay, the Parliament is majority Malay, the Kings are Malay, the policies are pro-Malay… what more do you want?’

    There’s substantive proof now to back up this discrimination claim. 22.1% callback rate vs 4.2% callback rate is a big difference. 1 in 5 Chinese applicants get called for interview, while less than 1 in 20 Malay applicants get the same. Remember that the quality of resumes were already factored in.

    Less callbacks means less opportunities, more likelihood to take lower-salary but stable jobs, and being stuck in lower-economic power for longer time.

    This is only one research though, and I’m happy to be pointed to other studies to disprove this or question the methodology of this research (for example, I didn’t like that it only compared Malay and Chinese resumes). But until then, won’t you agree that discrimination is discrimination?

    How now, brown cow?

    I hate the blame game, so I’m going to end this with a few suggestions on how can we level the playing field a bit more, so deserving Malay candidates get equal and fair chance in the job market, too.

    Employers (of ALL races):

    • If your employees are predominantly composed of a single race, get more diversified. Diversified workplaces earn more profits. It’s literally to your advantage to have a racially-balanced workforce.
    • Know that you (even Malay employers) have negative bias against Malays, and that potentially makes you lose out on those good Malay candidates.

    Malay graduates and job seekers:

    • If you have Chinese proficiency, put it in your resume. If you don’t and have difficulty getting callbacks, take Mandarin classes at the same time. This research proved that Chinese proficiency increased callback rates.
    • Make more friends outside of your race. Make more friends outside of your race. Make more friends outside of your race. You’re the majority. It’s up to you to reach out to others, not the other way around. Actively attend and network in events, not just Malay-organised events. Be a good friend, be a respectful person.
    • Even though you believe in your faith and race 100%, stop making remarks that make you sound stupid, non-accommodating and even violent. Be easy to work with.

    HXSM does this best so I’m just going to leave these examples of Malay-spewed absurdity to end this. If you’re gonna comment, be nice.

     

    Source: https://vulcanpost.com

  • Fresh Graduates Face Challenging Job Search Ahead

    Fresh Graduates Face Challenging Job Search Ahead

    They’ve sent 20 to 50 job applications but some graduating students are struggling to secure interviews, much less a job offer, amid the Republic’s slowing economy.

    With the gross domestic product (GDP) projected to grow 1 to 3 per cent this year — last year’s growth was 2.1 per cent — human resource experts said they have seen a drop of at least 10 per cent in job vacancies open to fresh graduates from last year, with graduates finding it difficult to secure their ideal jobs.

    This has pushed some graduates to widen the scope of their search, even as there appears to be some bright spots amid the gloom in certain industries, such as computer engineering, software development and accountancy, as well as niche industries, such as facilities management and music.

    The latest Joint Graduate Employment Survey released in March showed that last year, almost nine in 10 economically active fresh graduates landed a job within six months after completing their final exams, in line with 2014 numbers.

    Good job prospects are expected to remain, but with employers more cautious about hiring, the job search may take longer for some, said analysts then.

    At the Singapore Management University, its Dato’ Kho Hui Meng Career Centre said in response to queries that there was a slight dip in participation from the university’s corporate partners in recruitment activities this year, due to the offshoring of roles and a cautious hiring outlook from the financial services, commodities and legal sectors.

    RecruitPlus Consulting’s assistant director Roy Yeo said the firm has seen a decline of at least 10 per cent in job vacancies for fresh graduates, compared to last year. The decline in openings was especially evident in the shipping, retail and manufacturing industries.

    A slowdown was already seen last year. Manpower Ministry figures showed that the number of job vacancies had declined for the fourth consecutive quarter to 53,700 in December 2015.

    Several graduating students TODAY spoke to said they face an uphill task in trying to find a job that suits their qualifications and interest.

    A National University of Singapore (NUS) economics graduating student, who wanted to be known only as Ms Tan, said she had sent out 20 job applications since January but did not receive any offers.

    “I feel quite desperate about my job search, because I don’t want to sit around and do nothing,” said the 23-year-old, who will graduate in July.

    Although Ms Tan hopes to eventually work in an economics-related area, she has settled for a three-month internship in a public relations firm for now, where she will be up for evaluation for a full-time offer. In the meantime, she will continue to apply for economics-related jobs.

    A spokesperson from the NUS Centre for Future-ready Graduates said that students were more open to exploring and widening job options amid a tighter job market this year. Others students are moderating their expectations and bracing themselves for a long wait before they find employment.

    Mr Stevanus Satria, a Singapore University of Technology and Design (SUTD) graduating student, is expanding the range of jobs he is applying for, after 20 unsuccessful applications with only one invitation to go for a test.

    “I’m trying to be not so picky, and applying to anything related to my expertise, like maintenance engineering, even though I prefer engineering design,” said Mr Stevanus, 23, who is also applying for further studies.

    SIM Global Education economics graduating student Jasper Ng, 26, said he expects to take six months to find a job, and is applying for a wide range of jobs unrelated to his studies, in IT and analytics. “I’ll take whatever job comes, as it’s quite hard to find a job in economics if you’re not one of the top students,” he added.

    Mr Yeo said other bright spots in employment include the media, public relations and advertising sectors are still hiring, mainly due to a growth in digital marketing and e-commerce.

    Given the tight foreign employment restrictions, there is also high demand for jobs not easily outsourced such as those in science, technology, engineering and mathematics, said Mr Adrian Tan, vice-president of technology recruitment firm HackerTrail.

    Among those in the right field is Mr Francisco Furtado, an SUTD computer engineering student, who said about 30 per cent of his peers had found jobs three months before graduation in September. “Computer engineering graduates are quite sought-after, so it’s not so much the worry about getting a job but whether it is suitable or not,” said the 26-year-old.

    Ms Tan Huiping, a Nanyang Technological University accountancy graduating student, said the job search was “not that bad” for herself and her peers as the “Big Four” accounting firms were still hiring. The 22-year-old received three job offers after sending out four applications.

    NUS Yong Siew Toh Conservatory of Music graduate Lai Yi Xuan, 21, said getting freelance performance or orchestra jobs depends on having contacts in the industry, and she continues to see a high demand for her violin lessons from parents.

    Singapore Human Resources Institute president Erman Tan noted that the unemployment rate here still remains low at 1.9 per cent, thus giving job-seekers a reason to be “cautiously optimistic”.

    He added: “It would do well for them to manage their expectations in terms of pay, job fit as well as the time it could take to find a job, and they cannot afford to be choosy.”

    Ms Lynne Roeder, managing director of recruitment firm Hays in Singapore, said graduates with relevant internship or work experience are at a greater advantage when it comes to getting hired.

    Also, graduate trainee programmes continue to be an important hiring strategy especially in the banking, finance and logistics industries, she added.

     

    Source: TODAY Online

  • Hard Truth: More Graduates But Not All Degrees Are Equal

    Hard Truth: More Graduates But Not All Degrees Are Equal

    After graduating with a second-class upper degree in human resource management, Mr Tan, 30, took some time to land a full-time job and he is currently doing administrative work — buying office supplies and processing claims. “I wished that we were taught more skills in university instead,” he said.

    Another graduate, Mr Tang, 27, who has a chemistry degree, has been working in an admin support temporary position for the past 18 months. “Unlike our parents’ time, it seems like there are many people holding a degree now but the fact is there are many jobs out there that do not require a degree holder to do the work.”

    On the other hand, there are graduates who have, by their own volition, ventured into careers that have little to do with what they had studied for in university. A PhD holder in biomedical sciences, Dr Christopher Yang, was a research fellow at the National University of Singapore’s Yong Loo Lin School of Medicine when he made the switch into the financial sector four years ago.

    The 41-year-old said his biomedical career was going well, having received a grant to advance immunology research. But a series of circumstances — including the outlook of the industry, and the birth of his fourth child — led to him making the career switch. “I had to seriously think about my career path and prospects,” said Dr Yang, who is now an accredited financial adviser.

    In Asia, Taiwan and South Korea, have been experiencing an oversupply of graduates, with double-digit youth unemployment rates. In contrast, Singa­pore enjoys close to full employment, and more than 80 per cent of graduates from publicly-funded universities and the more-established private institutions are able to find jobs within six months of graduation.

    Nevertheless, policymakers are keeping a close eye on the situation. Anecdotal evidence from interviews with graduates and human resource experts shows that even though large numbers of graduates are able to land jobs, some are underemployed, be it by choice or circumstance.

    Underemployment occurs when highly-skilled people work in low-paying or low-skilled jobs, as well as when part-time workers prefer to be employed full-time.

    Internationally, underemployment is hard to define because of the subjectivity involved — such as a worker’s preference and whether qualifications equate to skills and performance.

    In October 1998, following an international conference among labour statisticians, the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development decided to adopt “time-related underemployment” as the universal indicator for objective comparison across countries.

    Singapore’s Ministry of Manpower (MOM) uses the same indicator, which measures the proportion of part-time workers who desire to work more. Over the years, the overall proportion of underemployed graduates has stayed low, hovering around 2 per cent and reaching a three-year low last year. However, the underemployment rates for the arts as well as social services sectors stood at 9.3 and 6.4 per cent, respectively.

    Still, the overall underemployment rate here is significantly lower than in other developed countries. In the United Kingdom, for instance, one in 10 people are considered underemployed as of last year. In the United States, the proportion is 15 per cent as of March.

    Last year, then-Manpower Minister Tan Chuan-Jin flagged the issue as one to watch: “While we are not facing the unemployment and underemployment problems in other countries, we will not be immune to these trends … The proportion of degree holders in our workforce has been increasing.”

    He added: “The market has begun to differentiate between degrees that carry their full worth in knowledge and skills, and those that are essentially paper qualifications. We should, therefore, encourage our young to pursue their interests and go for substance when considering their education and career paths”.

    Agreeing, Mizuho Bank senior economist Vishnu Varathan said that, over time, the situation could be exacerbated by the exit from the workforce of baby boomers holding high-value-added jobs. With economic restructuring and as part of the evolution of the labour market, Mr Varathan said: “Not all of these jobs will be recycled back to the younger generation.”

    He noted that while attractive salaries — as a result of the tight labour market — could keep part-time workers content for now, the current level of wages for part-timers might not be sustainable in the long-term.

    Difficulties in measuring underemployment

    In order to ensure Singapore keeps a lid on the situation, Nee Soon GRC Member of Parliament Patrick Tay, who is part of the labour movement, has repeatedly raised the issue of underemployment in Parliament.

    Speaking to TODAY, he said the Government should re-examine the conceptual definition of underemployment and how it is measured. He suggested conducting a comprehensive survey for the various industry sectors to understand the required worker competencies or skills for specific jobs and whether the people holding these jobs are over-qualified.

    “There is currently a lack of data and a survey will help us assess the real extent of the underemployment problem,” he said.

    Human resource expert Linda Teo, who is country manager of ManpowerGroup Singapore, also stressed the need to analyse data on the pool of underemployed workers. She said: “Could it be a case where their qualifications are no longer relevant? Or that the affected workers have not upgraded themselves and kept up with the challenges in the industry?”

    Nanyang Technological University (NTU) economist Walter Theseira pointed out that underemployment is a growing area of research in many countries, given that the number of people around the world with advanced qualifications is higher than ever before.

    But he noted that it would require extensive efforts to conduct a study on what is essentially a grey area. It would involve, for example, looking at each job and its role and getting experts to determine the type of qualifications required. “What do you call the right level of education for a job? Workers can make up for a lack of formal qualifications with experience and other skills, so the right level of education may differ from person to person,” he said.

    Mr Varathan agreed that such an endeavour would be fraught with difficulties. Assumptions have to be made, including assuming that qualifications equate to job capabilities, he said. Also, “there is always the possibility that people think they are underpaid for a job”, he quipped.

    To better understand the underemployment situation, he proposed using productivity figures alongside unemployment data to determine if the labour force is being tapped to its full potential.

    In response to TODAY’s queries, MOM said that due to the subjectivity involved, there was no internationally established method for measuring non-time-related underemployment. Its spokesperson pointed out that MOM also tracks labour utilisation and employment outcomes, and that information on employment by occupation and education qualifications is collated and made available publicly.

    Nevertheless, the ministry acknowledged the spike in the number of degree holders here as well as the “increasing access to private educational institutions or alternative routes that offer degrees of varying quality”.
    Its spokesperson said: “We need to help individuals equip themselves with the skills needed to take on the quality jobs of today and tomorrow.”

    To this end, the SkillsFuture Council, chaired by Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, was launched in September last year to spearhead efforts to develop an integrated system of education, training and career progression for Singaporeans. “Overall, we have to create a culture where workers are motivated and able to continually acquire relevant skills and experience that will help them advance in their careers,” the MOM spokesperson said. “This includes degree holders, who must also take ownership of their individual career and training development throughout their lives.”

    Singapore labour force statistics by the Ministry of Manpower
    Employees must be skilled in multiple disciplines

    The MOM’s labour force report last year showed that the proportion of degree holders grew by more 10 per cent over a decade to 32 per cent last year. In particular, degree holders made up more than half of local workers aged 25 to 39 last year.

    The report also showed that degree holders with qualifications in education (0.7 per cent), health sciences (1.7 per cent) and engineering sciences (2.8 per cent) had the lowest unemployment rates as of June last year, and were well below the average for all residents (3.7 per cent).

    At the other end, graduates of the fine and applied arts (6.2 per cent), mass communication and information science (6 per cent), and humanities and social sciences (5.3 per cent) had higher unemployment rates than the norm.

    Over the past year, Will (not his real name), 29, had sent out more 100 applications, but the sociology undergraduate — who will be graduating this year — has yet to secure a full-time job. He enrolled in a part-time degree course offered by a private university three years ago, spending S$23,000 on fees in a bid to boost his employability. “I thought getting a degree would help me move up the career ladder, but it did not,” he said.

    But he is in the minority, though there are concerns among policymakers about students spending much time and effort in getting private degrees, only to realise later that their degrees are irrelevant to the job market.

    Graduate unemployment here remains low. As of June last year, the graduate unemployment rate was 3.9 per cent, marginally up from 3.6 per cent in 2013.

    Human resource experts advised Singaporeans to be more selective in the type of degrees that they pursue. Increasingly, employees have to diversify their skills sets to stay relevant to the labour market, they said.

    NTU’s Assistant Professor Theseira noted that while everyone might aim to attain a degree, “not all degrees are created equally”. Mr Varathan pointed to the increasing number of degree holders in regional countries who could provide stiff competition in the job market here. Having working experience alongside qualifications will also start to gain traction among employers, he said.

    ManpowerGroup’s Ms Teo urged industries and universities to put in more effort to address misconceptions about unpopular jobs.

    “Getting students to explore a wide spectrum of careers and piquing their interest in lesser-known but very viable career alternatives can go a long way in nipping underemployment in the bud,” she said.

    Mr Adrian Tan, director of Career Ladder, a career consulting firm, recounted meeting mid-career professionals such as engineers who had to take on entry-level roles after their expertise became obsolete. He said that in the future, employees have to be skilled in multiple disciplines and should find opportunities to apply these new skills even outside of work. “The old career expectation is no longer relevant. You can’t depend on your qualifications and expect your career journey (to be) catered to until your retirement,” he added.

    Paradoxically, it is partly this desire to develop himself and pick up new skills that saw Dr Yang take the leap into a second career that has little to do with his degree in biomedical sciences.

    He recalled how he had taken a 50 per cent pay cut when he first became a financial adviser and had to pound the streets, approaching strangers as he looked for potential clients. He has few regrets leaving the biomedical sciences industry. Now, he is able to provide for his family and his flexible work schedule allows him to spend more time with his children.

    Experts noted that, increasingly, workers — especially younger ones — may opt for jobs for which they are over-qualified, in the name of pursuing their passion, greater work-life balance or other intangibles. For instance, Gen Y employees tend to prefer to work in well-known companies and have “low reliance on monetary benefits”, observed Mr Mark Hall, vice-president of staffing agency Kelly Services.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com