Tag: Heng Swee Keat

  • Heng Swee Keat: Remember Lee Kuan Yew – Keep Politics Clean

    Heng Swee Keat: Remember Lee Kuan Yew – Keep Politics Clean

    Today is Mr Lee’s birthday. He would be 92.

    It reminds me of the day he turned 90. That morning, I spoke at a conference on Mr Lee’s defining policies. I shared about the quality that left the deepest impression on me when I worked for him – his unwavering dedication to Singapore. He had been in his 70s at the time, and he had been tireless. His every breath, his every waking moment, went towards the survival and success of Singapore.

    After the conference, I planned to go to Parliament, where we hoped Mr Lee would join us. But while I was still at the conference, I heard that Mr Lee was not feeling well, and his doctors advised him against coming out. The MPs had ordered a birthday cake in the shape of the numbers “90”, but prepared to send it to Mr Lee’s home instead.

    Then in the afternoon, we got news from Dr Lee Wei Ling, Mr Lee’s daughter, that her father insisted on coming to Parliament that day.

    When Mr Lee was wheeled into Parliament that day, it was like history come alive. Here was a man who had been an MP for 58 years. We gave Mr Lee a 30-second standing ovation.

    Later, in the members’ room, we brought out the cake for Mr Lee and sang him a birthday song. I was very happy to present Mr Lee with a series of Chinese books, “Singapore Chose Lee Kuan Yew”, that we launched earlier that day.

    We asked Mr Lee what his birthday wish was, and what he said touched me deeply. He told us that his 90th birthday wish was for the Singapore Government to stay clean and honest, for all of us to uphold the highest moral standards.

    No matter how old he was, no matter the occasion, Mr Lee never stopped thinking about Singapore. Even when he was asked to make an impromptu birthday speech, he had only one instinct, only one wish – that we keep politics clean. It is a wish that we keep Singapore an exceptional place where Singaporeans can thrive.

    I hope Mr Lee will rest in peace knowing that we will take good care of Singapore and fellow Singaporeans in his absence. Happy birthday, Mr Lee.

     

    Source: Heng Swee Keat

  • Parents, Pupils Will Get Time To Adjust To PSLE Changes

    Parents, Pupils Will Get Time To Adjust To PSLE Changes

    The makeover of the Primary School Leaving Examination (PSLE) is still some time away, with the announcement to come next year at the earliest, said Education Minister Heng Swee Keat.

    Parents and pupils will be given enough time to respond and adjust to the changes when they are implemented, he added.

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong had said two years ago in his National Day Rally speech that the high- stakes exam would be revamped, and the aggregate T-score done away with.

    Instead of getting a score out of 300 points, pupils will get grade bands – similar to how students get graded from A1 to F9 for the O levels or A to E for the A levels. The grades will then be converted to points to be used for admission into secondary schools.

    Mr Heng said the Ministry of Education (MOE) is already putting diverse programmes in place in primary and secondary schools to meet the needs of different children. For instance, each secondary school has to develop two distinctive programmes by 2017 to cater to students’ interests.

    “It is about choosing the school that has the programme, the emphasis and the fit, rather than about that one school that you must go to,” he said.

    Recent SkillsFuture initiatives – such as the Earn and Learn programme for polytechnic and Institute of Technical Education graduates as well as the introduction of modular courses at the post-secondary level – also aim to send a message to parents and students that the emphasis is on lifelong learning and helping students enter their areas of interest, said Mr Heng.

    “Some of us may take a longer pathway to reach our peak. Some of us may take a shorter pathway, and some will take a path less travelled and go do something completely different,” he said.

    “There are many good pathways and I don’t need to cram at just the PSLE level and say that I must get into that one school.”

    The MOE is still in the process of implementing programmes in secondary schools – especially in neighbourhood schools – to create differentiation, said Mr Heng.

    These initiatives to create a more diverse secondary school landscape, with different schools offering different niche areas, will come before the PSLE revamp.

    “Some parents believe that a certain school will help their child succeed better… It will take some time for this mindset to change,” said Mr Heng, adding that the end goal is not just about grades, but also about finding success in life.

     

    Source: http://youthphoria.stomp.com.sg

  • PAP’s Tampines GRC Team Unveiled

    PAP’s Tampines GRC Team Unveiled

    The People’s Action Parts (PAP) today (Aug 22) announced its slate of candidates for Tampines Group Representation Constituency (GRC). New face Ms Cheng Li Hui will join the five-member GRC team, along with NTUC deputy director Desmond Choo who previously contested the Hougang Single Member Constituency (SMC) during the 2011 General Election and the 2012 by-election.

    Ms Cheng, who is the deputy chief executive of Hai Leck Holdings, has been Councillor in the Northwest CDC since 2004. She is also the Vice-Chairperson of the Tampines East Citizens’ Consultative Committee and the Tampines East Community Club Management Committee.

    It was earlier announced that the two current Members of Parliament (MPs) for Tampines, former National Development Minister Mah Bow Tan and Ms Irene Ng will be leaving politics

    The other PAP candidates to contest in Tampines GRC are Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, Second Minister for Home Affairs and Foreign Affairs Mr Masagos Zulkifli and Mr Baey Yam Keng.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Illegal Display Of PAP Flags In Tampines GRC In Violation Of Elections Act?

    Illegal Display Of PAP Flags In Tampines GRC In Violation Of Elections Act?

    Dear Editors,

    PAP has violated the Election advertisement laws and it looks like they may get away with it. I refer to this photo:

    https://www.facebook.com/SinRakSinParty/photos/a.308021379315957.73097.295323107252451/803777386407018/?type=1&theater

    Why are PAP flags being put up alongside the National flags in Tampines GRC? This photo was taken at Heng Swee Keat’s ward. The PAP flags were spotted near Block 842 in Tampines.

    Soon after the photo was posted online on that site, PAP removed their flag as fast as they could, and this is how the place looks like now:

    The parliament has yet to be dissolved but PAP is already campaigning with their flag out. Are they campaigning with the slogan “PAP = Singapore, remember that as you celebrate SG50“?

    Can opposition parties also hang their banners in the GRCs where they are contesting? Can hang beside the Singapore flag too? I strongly believe that the PAP has violated the Elections Act, with regards to the election advertisement laws.

    It is not yet nomination day but PAP is already hanging their flag.

    Furthermore, they haven’t received a permit from the Returning Officer to put up their banners and flags. The PAP branch responsible for this should be taken to task and punished to the fullest extent of the law!

    Grace

    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Kenneth Jeyaretnam: International Scholarship Program Discriminates Against Singaporeans

    Kenneth Jeyaretnam: International Scholarship Program Discriminates Against Singaporeans

    In my last article (Has Lee Hsien Loong Forgotten Who Pays His Salary?) I wrote about the way that Lee Hsien Loong and the PAP Government treat expats as more valuable than the Singaporeans who voted them in in the first place.

    There can be no better illustration of this than the way our Government subsidises foreign students to come here and take our jobs. Yet the PAP have been evasive on the numbers and cost of the foreign scholarships it awards.

    At the last sitting of Parliament on 13 July 2015, the Education Minister Heng Swee Keat, in response to a question from NCMP Yee Jenn Jong, revealed that about 900 foreign students were given scholarships each year and the total cost of each scholarship was about $25,000 p.a. including school fees, accommodation and allowances. If there were 900 foreign scholarship holders in each year that would make the total number of scholarship holders in Singapore around 3,600. The total cost would then be around $90 million p.a.

    This is of course not a huge sum of money given the size of Singapore’s economy and reserves. However when Heng was asked another question, this time by Lina Chiam, as to how many foreign students in Singapore benefited from the tuition grant, Heng revealed just how many foreign students there are and how much taxpayers here are subsidising them:

    In 2014, around 3,650 international students in the 2014 matriculation cohort in the polytechnics and autonomous universities received the tuition grant. 

    As this is just the 2014 cohort, the total number of international students is likely to be four times as large. This would make the number of international students receiving tuition grants at any one time about 14,600. Assuming very roughly an average tuition grant of around $18,000 p.a. (the poly and ITE tuition grant is around $16,000 while the university grant is over $22,000) the total cost is then around $262 million p.a.

    The $90 million annual cost of the international scholarships  should then be added to the tuition grant subsidy since the $25,000 scholarship comes on top of the tuition grant which all foreign students receive. So the total cost of the PAP’s subsidy to foreign students is about $350 million a year. To put this in context that is close to the estimated $400 million annual cost of the entire Pioneer Generation Package for our seniors. It is also at least 50% of the subsidy that the Government claims to provide for pre-school education.

    However the real shock was the Minister’s revelation as to how low the bar is set for these so-called “scholars”. To keep their scholarship they only had to maintain a Grade Point Average (GPA) of 3.5 out of a possible 5. This is consistent with achieving a Lower Second Class Honours degree. Heng revealed in his Parliamentary answer  that 68% of international scholarship holders achieve at least an Upper Second Class Honours degree. This compares with almost all Singapore students holding PSC scholarships. Compared to the average Singapore student, 38% of whom get Upper Seconds, the foreign scholars are not much better.

    mediocrity

    Why then are we giving our money away to these distinctively average students? And worse than that why are we offering them the chance to live and work in Singapore after graduation? In fact the scholarship is conditional on the foreign student working at least six years in Singapore. Even the other foreign students have to work here for three years after graduation. If they are unable to find jobs they are given one year Long Term Visit Passes to allow them to remain in Singapore and look for work.

    Requiring these foreign students to work in Singapore after graduation is actually deeply discriminatory against Singaporean males who have to do National Service. They thus have to compete with this influx of foreign graduates, both male and female, who do not have any NS obligations and have a two year head start over our men. During this two year period NS men are paid well below what they could earn in the market.

    This forced labour at slave rates is a form of taxation that foreign workers, like these international students, who come here to work do not have to pay. Every time expats rave about Singapore’s low tax regime and how grateful they are to the PAP for allowing them to accumulate wealth, remember that you are directly paying for it through your forced labour!

    In effect Singaporean men are directly paying the cost of subsidising foreign graduates to compete with them. Because of their lower costs and the fact that they cannot seek employment elsewhere these foreign graduates then are prepared to accept jobs at lower wages and this reduces the earnings and job prospects of Singaporeans who, if they can find work, are often forced to take jobs for which they are massively overqualified.

    This is an absurd state of affairs. We have ended up with a system that looks rational from a corporate viewpoint but does not benefit and is no way to run a country. Because the PAP Government is the major employer it has a vested interest in cheap labour and it sees that this is the easiest way to achieve its goal. This bonded scholarship cynically arbitrages the fact that foreigners have a choice over where to work whereas Singaporean men are legally required to do NS and cannot pursue higher education till they complete it at which point they are less competitive in the labour market and it is more difficult for them to leave and seek better employment opportunities elsewhere.  Of course many still do. However the PAP is happy for them to go while it feels it can replace them with cheaper graduate labour from abroad, even if the quality of that labour is mediocre.

    How can we end this? We can stop offering generous scholarships to mediocre foreign students and make any successor scheme much more selective. I would also want to see free university or poly education offered to all those who complete NS or serve in the armed forces similar to the GI Bill in the US. And NS should be drastically reduced from the current twenty-one months to under a year at most.

    But we are unlikely to get any changes while the PAP Government sees Singaporeans as lacking in options and possessing no bargaining power, like the workforce of one of the global MNCs whose CEOs Lee Hsien Loong so loves to socialise with and benchmark his compensation against.

    As I wrote in my last blog, you have only yourself to blame for this state of affairs by not standing up for your rights. The foreign scholarship programme is a perfect example of the way you are discriminated against and treated as second class by the PAP Government. The question is, are you prepared to do anything about it or will behave like turkeys voting for Christmas once again?

     

    Source: http://sonofadud.com