Tag: Indian

  • Dr Tan Cheng Bock: By-Election Result Is Victory For Multiculturalism

    Dr Tan Cheng Bock: By-Election Result Is Victory For Multiculturalism

    A victory for Multiracialism.

    The results of the Bukit Batok by-election clearly show that a minority candidate can win an election on his own.

    This win by Murali is significant because he won his seat as a member of a minority race in a predominantly (75%) Chinese constituency. And the win is even more telling because it was won in a by-election. Recent past by-election results have not been in favour of the ruling party eg Ponggol East by-election.

    Apart from the many other factors that contributed to his win, an important observation was that, race did not affect his performance of 62%. It is a victory for multiracialism and a sign that voters are more discerning and colour blind.

    The fear that a minority candidate cannot win on his own, resulted in the creation of Group Representation Constituency (GRC) after GE1988. The setting up of this GRC was to address this early concern that minority races may not be represented in Parliament if Singaporeans vote along racial lines.

    This victory by Murali has put paid to this fear and should pave the way for the removal of any race-based politics in future.

     

    Source: Dr Tan Cheng Bock

  • Foreign Worker Helped Frail Auntie To Cross Road

    Foreign Worker Helped Frail Auntie To Cross Road

    Each time you voice discomfort about their dorms too near your middle-class homes,

    Each time you put a photo of them sitting in your MRT,

    Each time you feed them terrible food..

    they don’t just restore roads for our fancy cars, they restore our faith in humanity.

     

    Source: Mun Loon

  • I Don’t Wish My Hindu Neighbour Happy Deepavali But We Get Along Very Well

    I Don’t Wish My Hindu Neighbour Happy Deepavali But We Get Along Very Well

    Saya berjiran dengan keluarga berbangsa india berugama hindu untuk hampir 15 tahun. Kami saling menghormati dan menyayangi walaupun saya tidak pernah mengucapkan happy deepavali kepada mereka.

    Malahan semasa memakai kain ihram untuk berangkat menunaikan haji beberapa tahun lalu, jiran hindu ini menawarkan untuk hantar saya ke airport. dia sempat kata, kain ihram yang saya pakai seumpama kain yang dia pakai untuk upacara keugamaan hariannya.

    I am neighbours with an Indian-Hindu family for about 15 years. We respect and appreciate each other even though I never wish them Happy Deepavali.

    In fact when I was wearing the ihram before heading for the haj a few months ago, this Hindu neighbour offered to send me to the airport. He even said that the ihram that i was wearing is similar to the cloth he uses for during his Hindu events.

     

    Source:  Abdullah Othman

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew Is Self-Serving Opportunist

    Zulfikar Shariff: Lee Kuan Yew Is Self-Serving Opportunist

    The last few days, the PAP Internet Brigade had been trying to promote their party and the “late great LKY”. The way they speak of him is almost Messianic.

    Let us understand who Lee Kuan Yew was. Let us understand his values..

    He is someone who will do anything for his own benefit.

    During the Japanese occupation, Lee Kuan Yew was a collaborator.

    He worked with the Japanese Propaganda service (the Hodobu). At the Hodobu, Lee Kuan Yew translated English language news for the Japanese propaganda department.

    He admitted to being well informed about the progress of the war “because for a year and a half….(he) was working in the propaganda department…” (Han, Fernandez, Tan 28)

    And yet, this hypocritical self-interested collaborator criticised the locals who collaborated with the Japanese during occupation. He said:

    “Young locals learnt enough Japanese to be employable, but beyond that most people were decent. They did not want to cooperate or collaborate with the enemy…”

    Further, he referred to those who worked closely with the Japanese as
    opportunistic.

    The luckiest of the opportunists according to Lee Kuan Yew were “contractors whom the Japanese needed to obtain basic supplies, or who were in building construction.”

    However, he admitted to being one of this “lucky” opportunists. He was in construction and did work and supplies for the Japanese military.

    With his partner, “a Shanghainese called Low You Ling… a small contractor in the construction business…we got odd jobs from Japanese companies and from the butai, the regiments that garrisoned Singapore.”

    He also teamed up with a Japanese civilian Mr Kageyama to supply the Japanese military and companies.

    When the Japanese started to lose the war, Lee Kuan Yew became worried.

    “I decided it would be better to get out of Singapore while things were still calm, I could resign from Hodobu without arousing suspicion over my motives. I applied for leave and went up to Malaya to reconnoitre Penang and the Cameron Highlands, to find out which was the safer place.”

    When he came back from Cameron Highlands, he found out that the Japanese Secret Police had become suspicious of him. He decided to stay put.

    According to Lee Kuan Yew, after the Japanese surrender, “anti-Japanese groups took the law into their own hands. They lynched, murdered, tortured or beat up informers, torturers, tormentors and accomplices- or suspected accomplices- of the Japanese… But in the last days, many collaborators managed to melt away, going into hiding or fleeing upcountry to Malaya or to the Riau islands in the south.

    The liberation did not bring what everybody wanted: punishment for the wicked and reward for the virtuous. There could be no complete squaring of accounts…”

    If all the collaborators were arrested and punished, we probably would not have the PAP today.

    References:

    Han, Fook Kwang, Sumiko Tan, and Warren Fernandez. Lee Kuan Yew: The man and his ideas. Singapore Press Holdings, 1997.

    Yew, Lee Kuan. The Singapore Story: Memoirs of Lee Kuan Yew. Vol. 1. Marshall Cavendish International Asia Pte Ltd, 2012.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Chan Heng Chee Is Wrong – CMIO Categorisation Is Only PAP’s Tool To Subjugate And Discriminate Against The Minorities

    Chan Heng Chee Is Wrong – CMIO Categorisation Is Only PAP’s Tool To Subjugate And Discriminate Against The Minorities

    Rilek1Corner,

    As a Malay, I am insulted by the comments of the Ambassador-at-large Prof. Chan Heng Chee in http://rilek1corner.com/2015/10/05/singapore-ambassador-at-large-scrapping-cmio…. She want to defend the outdated CMIO categorisation that is her problem but what right does she have to say that scrapping it would cause so-called “unease” among minorities. She is Chinese. Not minority. Why she speaking like she macam faham?

    Worse still, she say “The majority community doesn’t feel uncomfortable. It’s (with) the minority community (where) you have to keep emphasising it’s equal language, religion, culture (and) race”. She is trying to say what? Minority races are petty? Minority races always comparing themselves with the majority? That minority races always imagining inequalities and discrimination? Then the majority race very good not racist at all?

    I want to say she is very wrong. She is from majority and she is elite. She doesn’t represent us. She ambassador she got talk to people on the ground in Singapore? Who make her expert on minority issue? She ambassador so what? Don’t mean everything she say is correct.

    I tell you, don’t be blinded by what she say. This is only wayang for them. Like she say, the CMIO categorisation is a “signal” to the minority that “every race has the same standing” and that “their place in society has not been threatened”.

    A signal. She knows reality is not like that. A signal because the categories are the PAP’s idea of what makes up the different communities, not what the communities really are. The categorisation is a construct that makes people fall within neat categories, that, most of the time, don’t fit them well. What is a Malay? Who is Malay? The rich cultural heritage of people that come together from different parts of the nusantara are lost because of this categorisation. Bawean, Bugis, Java, Johor, Aceh – so convenient all become Malay.

    This easy categorisation benefits the PAP government, not us the people. Who knows in the future Filipinos also come under the categorisation because they can easily say that Filipinos and Malays share almost the same language and physical appearance. Even now Singaporean Chinese also cannot tell the difference until they hear the accent when we talk.

    It is not ony a problem culturally. There are many legal effect on people too.

    Just because you are categorised as Malay, you have lower chance of owning a HDB flat in a neighbourhood you desire. HDB ethnic quota also a problem when you want to sell your house. You go serve NS and chances are that you will be posted to Civil Defence instead of Commando. Why in Civil Defence no ethnic quota? Why the PAP government can be fine with the over-representation of Malays in CD?

    Maybe you have not realise before but you should know now that the CMIO categorisation is a very convenient tool to discriminate against our community. To keep us economically backward, so that the majority elites can prosper.

    The ambassador talk so much about the supra-ethnic identity but if the PAP government is really serious about forging a national identity after SG50, they should do away with the race categorisation.  We will not lose our ethnic identities. Actually the opposite effect is we will explore our ethnic identities and be more in touch with it. There will be a more equal playing field. Our race will not be a factor when we decide to buy a house or when called up to serve NS. Only then will a true Singaporean identity emerge.

    Danial

    Reader Contribution