Tag: Indonesians

  • Indonesia Activists Apologise For Planning Demonstration At Singapore Embassy

    Indonesia Activists Apologise For Planning Demonstration At Singapore Embassy

    The group supporting Jakarta governor Basuki “Ahok” Tjahaja Purnama on Sunday (Jun 5) apologised for planning to stage a demonstration in front of the Singapore embassy in Jakarta.

    Singgih Widiyastono, one of the founders of Teman Ahok, or “Friends of Ahok”, said he regretted that the group reacted in a provocative manner when two of its members, Amalia Ayuningtyas and Richard Saerang, were questioned by Singapore officials on Saturday.

    “We issued a statement saying that we will deploy a mass movement. We were just being emotional because (Amalia and Richard) were supposed to return home at 10pm, but they didn’t,” said Mr Singgih during a news conference held at the Friends of Ahok secretariat in Jakarta on Sunday (Jun 5).

    Teman Ahok is a volunteer-run group campaigning for Mr Basuki’s attempt to contest as an independent candidate in Jakarta’s gubernatorial election next year.

    On Saturday, the group said that if Amalia and Richard were not released immediately, it would go to the Singapore embassy in Jakarta with its “entire strength that the Friends of Ahok possesses.”

    Their threat went viral on social media. Numerous social media posts in Indonesia had alleged that the two Indonesian activists were detained at Changi Airport.

    The Singapore Embassy in Jakarta on Sunday denied claims that they were detained, saying the pair were denied entry into Singapore as they were intending to carry out political activities in the city-state.

    “Two members of ‘Teman Ahok’ were not detained while they were in Singapore,” said the statement issued by the embassy. “They arrived in Singapore on Jun 4, 2016, and were interviewed by Singapore officials.

    “They informed immigration authorities that they were in Singapore to conduct political activities including raising campaign funds. They were therefore denied entry into Singapore and arrangements were made for them to return to Indonesia,” it said.

    The Indonesian Embassy in Singapore also issued a statement saying that the pair were “not detained” in Singapore, and reiterated that “Singapore law forbids political activities from being conducted in Singapore, and this law should be respected”.

    The statement added: “The embassy had been in communication with Singapore authorities to facilitate their return to Jakarta on Jun 4, 2016. However, because of technical difficulties in the field, the two activists could not return on the last Garuda flight departing Singapore and would depart on the first Garuda flight out of Singapore on Jun 5, 2016, instead.

    “Singapore immigration authorities had provided accommodation and sufficient services to the two activists,” the statement said.

    The two Indonesians arrived back in Jakarta at 11am on Sunday.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • 5 Reasons Why Singaporeans May Not Like The Idea Of Live-Out Maids

    5 Reasons Why Singaporeans May Not Like The Idea Of Live-Out Maids

    This article was originally on GET.com at: 5 Reasons Why Singaporeans May Not Like The Idea Of Live-Out Maids

    We’re all so accustomed to the idea of having our domestic maids live under the same roof as us, aren’t we? I don’t know how feasible it would be if the Indonesian authorities got their way with wanting maids to stop being live-ins, and how it’ll ultimately affect Singaporeans who pay good money to employ helpers to ease their domestic burdens. According to this piece of fresh news, Singaporeans who employ maids are antsy about Indonesia’s recent declaration to have Indonesian maids live separately from their employers – a complete contradiction of the Employment of Foreign Manpower Act that illustrates that ‘foreign domestic workers must live with their employers at the addresses stated on their work permits’.

    Indonesian authorities put forth that this move is supposed to protect the Indonesian domestic workers’ welfare and in exchange, they’ll seek to formalise these helpers’ training so that they’ll be better trained in areas like cooking, eldercare and childcare. Well, we at GET.com will share with you 5 reasons why Singaporeans may not be keen on the idea of live-out maids.

    5 Reasons Why Singaporeans May Not Like The Idea Of Live-Out Maids

    1. Heightened Inconvenience For Both Employers And Helpers

    People hire domestic helpers to help take a burden off their shoulders whether it be cooking, cleaning or taking care of the young and old at home. When the domestic helpers whom we hire can’t be there when we need them especially in times of emergencies at home, who are we supposed to turn to?

    From the helpers’ perspectives, I would imagine it to be a lot more troublesome for them since they’ll have to travel to and fro wherever they’ll be living at to their workplace. The time wasted on commuting could have been spent catching up on sleep or exercising as a matter of fact.

    Plus, we don’t know when the public transportation system is going to break down or cause delays, do we?

    2. Some Employers Treat Their Helpers As Family

    Extending from the point above, some employers genuinely care for their domestic helpers and treat them like their own blood-related family. I have a friend my age (24, that is) who’s grown up with the same helper since she was born. They have forged such a close, fulfilling relationship that some biological parent-child pairs would be secretly envious of.

    For such cases, helpers and employers may feel more at ease if they’re living under the same roof so that both parties can look out for each other.

    3. The Cost Of Hiring Indonesian Helpers May Creep Up

    Will Singaporean employers have to shoulder these new Indonesian maids’ lodging, daily commuting and meal costs if their helpers do not live with them?

    If the answer is yes, would it be more cost effective for Singaporeans to hire local hourly helpers instead or maids from other neighbouring countries like Myanmar and the Philippines? That’s for us to find out in due time, so take heart that we have options.

    4. Increased Strain On Our Public Transport System

    According to the news, there are approximately 125,000 Indonesian maids employed in Singapore currently.

    Though this new initiative in discussion applies for only new Indonesian domestic helpers looking to work here in Singapore, we do not know exactly how many much more will our public transport system be strained to have a sizeable number of people squeezing with us on already jam-packed trains and buses.

    Similar to what we’ve recently shared about our two cents’ worth on car-lite Singapore, having domestic helpers squeeze with the rest of the working population during peak hours isn’t going to help improve our quality of life at all. Neither will it improve theirs if they have to go to work via the same platforms as us commoners.

    5. Live-Out Maids Have Higher Chances Of Being Led Astray

    If they were to live elsewhere, who knows what they’ll be up to after work hours, if they’ll mix with bad company and whether they will put their own livelihood and lives at risk by moonlighting or getting pregnant?

    I’m sure time-strapped employers wouldn’t want to be kept on their toes all the time, needing to put in the extra time and effort to ensure that their helpers remain dutiful and responsible.

    The Notion Of Singaporean Employers Being The Bully Is An Unfair Generalisation

    As well-intentioned as the Indonesian authorities’ concerns may be, not all employers are errant, demeaning or nasty.

    Besides, there have been plenty of cases where Indonesian maids have abused or even killed their employers or their employers’ elderly parents or little ones. It is certainly unfair to just make sweeping statements that slap Singaporean employers with such accusations in general.

    Also, everybody would have worked overtime at some point in their working life, it’s just part and parcel of work. Not everyone, Singaporeans included, get compensation for all those extra hours slogged.

     

    Source: https://sg.finance.yahoo.com

     

  • How ISIS Supporters Passing Through Singapore Were Nabbed

    How ISIS Supporters Passing Through Singapore Were Nabbed

    On a Thursday evening three weeks ago, three men and a teenage boy from a boarding school in Bogor, West Java, got off a budget airline at Changi Airport.

    They were dressed in T-shirts, jeans and casual jackets, and carried backpacks – not unlike many young Indonesian travellers.

    But something about the group seemed odd to the undercover officer monitoring the passengers coming through the arrival gate at 9pm on Feb 18. His hunch proved right when they took the escalators a floor down to the immigration counters.

    Mukhlis Khoirur Rofiq, 22, had a passport expiring the same day as that of his brother Muhammad Mufid Murtadho, who was just nine days away from his 15th birthday.

    The brothers approached different counters. One followed Risno, 27, and the other, Untung Sugema Mardjuk, 48. The brothers could speak English, but their travel companions could not.

    Once they cleared customs, they took public transport to Woodlands Checkpoint. By midnight, they were on a bus that crossed the Causeway and was heading to Johor Baru. When it stopped at Larkin bus terminal in Johor, the four travellers went to a nearby prayer room to sleep.

    The next morning, Friday, Feb 19, they boarded a bus and returned to Singapore.

    Their unusual travel pattern prompted immigration officers to stop them at the passport counter and they were subsequently questioned by the Internal Security Department.

    They were put on three separate ferries to Batam two days later on Feb 21, and handed over to Indonesia’s counter-terrorism police.

    BUILDING A TRAVEL FOOTPRINT

    Mukhlis had booked a one-night stay for that Friday at a budget hotel in central Singapore on a popular Indonesian travel site. The group also had plane tickets to fly back to Jakarta on Saturday, Feb 20.

    Unlike the two Indonesians who were detained on Nov 5 at the HarbourFront Ferry Terminal and were on their way to join Islamic State in Iraq and Syria (ISIS), this group was not bound for Syria immediately. They did not have enough money to head there yet.

    Rather, in the first case of its kind detected here, the four wanted to build a travel footprint so that the authorities would regard them as legitimate travellers when they eventually had enough funds to head to the conflict zone.

    “Singapore was not a launch pad for their travel – they came here just to get their passports stamped,” said Professor Rohan Gunaratna, who heads the International Centre for Political Violence and Terrorism Research at Nanyang Technological University’s S. Rajaratnam School of International Studies. “They have also admitted to the authorities in Indonesia that their intention was to travel to Syria and be part of ISIS.”

    DEEPLY RADICALISED

    Videos and material related to ISIS were found on the men’s mobile phones, sources from intelligence agencies in the region familiar with the case said.

    All four were from a school, the Pondok Pesantren Ibnu Mas’ud in Bogor, West Java.

    Mukhlis taught religion and mathematics, while his younger brother was a student. Risno and Untung were cooks at the school, which had some 180 students.

    Investigations by the Indonesian authorities found the school is associated with radical ideologue Aman Abdurrahman, who is in Nusakambangan prison in Central Java. Even from his cell, Aman has been influential in reaching out to ISIS supporters across the country.

    He has also been in touch with Indonesian ISIS fighters in Syria and Iraq, many of whom are members of the South-east Asian unit Katibah Nusantara.

    And Mukhlis, Mufid and their family were loyal supporters of that cause. Their father Armeidi was in a chat group with ISIS fighters and planned to sell his house and migrate to Syria with his family.

    He and several of his family members took the bai’ah (oath of allegiance) to ISIS leader Abu Bakr al-Baghdadi in a ceremony in south Jakarta in 2014.

    They believed that suicide bombing was justified, and were also prepared to kill other Muslims – because those who did not follow their ideology could be deemed disbelievers. The school also propagated these hardline ideas.

    Mr Muh Taufiqurrohman, a senior researcher at Indonesia-based non-governmental organisation Centre for Radicalism and Deradicalisation Studies, told The Sunday Times that the school is one of at least three boarding schools to have emerged in recent years where ISIS supporters study or find work, and enrolled their children.

    At least a dozen people from the school have travelled to Syria.

    They include Mukhlis’ elder brother Ghozian, a former treasurer at the school who left for Syria early this year with three others.

    Ghozian had travelled through Singapore and Malaysia on transit to Thailand and then Turkey.

    A senior Indonesian police source said Singapore’s Changi Airport is a favoured stop for Indonesians travelling to fight in Syria given its proximity to home and flight connections. Yet, many also go undetected as transit passengers are not subject to immigration checks.

    A former principal of the school, Abu Umar, also left for Syria with his wife and four children, and was last known to be in Mosul, Iraq.

    The current principal – Mashadi, who is in his 30s – is said to be an ISIS supporter from Riau Islands.

    PERSISTENT DANGER

    Around 700 Indonesians are estimated to have travelled to Syria to fight, and the authorities in the region are concerned that when they return home, they will sow hatred.

    More worrying, however, are those who never left but stayed in touch with Katibah fighters in Syria online. There are also those who are indoctrinated through schools like Ibnu Mas’ud.

    The four who travelled to Singapore held hardline views – that suicide bombing was permissible, and killing other Muslims was all right if they did not subscribe to their beliefs. They also wanted to kill Shi’ites in Syria.

    They did not meet people in Singapore, and Prof Rohan noted that the fact that they were detected shows the authorities are vigilant. There is also strong counter-terrorism cooperation between Indonesia, Malaysia and Singapore, he said.

    When the four were sent back in three ferries – for security reasons – they were detained by Indonesian counter-terror police for questioning. The police recorded their statements, but had to let them go as there were no provisions under Indonesian law to detain them longer.

    Mr Taufiqurrohman noted that other radicalised Indonesians, who were stopped before they could reach Syria, would still want to carry out attacks on Indonesian police as well as Shi’ite and other minority communities in Indonesia.

    “The Indonesian security apparatus needs to monitor their activities closely, especially to find out with whom these four associate themselves,” he said. “If they communicate with Indonesian ISIS fighters in Syria, they will pose a threat because they will continue to receive online bomb-making instructions, funding and orders to carry out terrorist attacks.”

    Even as the four were found out, it remains unclear just how many others have travelled to Singapore without being detected. Who else might have transited here on their way to Syria?

    Observers like Prof Rohan say governments can be alert only up to a point. Much more remains to be done to step up vigilance and harden laws to tackle the terror threat.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Indonesian Coordinating Minister For Politics, Law and Security: Singapore’s One Aircraft Offer Is “Insulting”

    Indonesian Coordinating Minister For Politics, Law and Security: Singapore’s One Aircraft Offer Is “Insulting”

    JAKARTA — Singapore’s offer in September of only “one aircraft” to Indonesia to help fight forest fires that have caused thick haze to descend around the region was “insulting”, said Indonesian Coordinating Minister for Politics, Law and Security Luhut Binsar Pandjaitan.

    Speaking in an interview last Friday (Oct 16) with the country’s Tempo magazine, Mr Luhut defended Indonesia’s perceived tardiness in putting out the fires and in accepting foreign aid.

    “During the dry season, peatlands tend to be very flammable. When we bombard the land with water to put out the flames, they just come out again. So I get a headache when people get upset. What are we supposed to do?” he replied when asked why this year’s forest fires are worse than those of last year’s.

    “Then someone asks why we didn’t accept the assistance offered earlier. There are many reasons for that. Firstly, we wanted to try and do it on our own. Secondly, we didn’t realise the process would be so long. Thirdly, (Singapore) offered only one aircraft. It was insulting.”

    In September, Singapore offered a C-130 aircraft for cloud-seeding operations, a Chinook helicopter with a water bucket for aerial fire-fighting, and up to two C-130 aircraft to ferry the Singapore Civil Defence Force fire-fighting assistance team.

    Mr Luhut’s comments in the latest issue of the magazine came after Indonesia finally accepted help from Singapore on Oct 7 after repeatedly ­declining offers of help for weeks. Singapore Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen had even flown to Jakarta at the end of September to meet his Indonesian counterpart at one of the meetings. During his visit, Dr Ng also met Mr Luhut.

    On October 11, aircraft from Singapore and Malaysia began water-bombing missions to put out the raging fires in South Sumatra.

    Singapore sent a Republic of Singapore Armed Forces (RSAF) Chinook helicopter with a 5,000-litre heli-bucket and 34 SAF personnel to help fight the ongoing forest fires, together with a six-man Disaster Assistance and Rescue Team from the Singapore Civil Defence Force. Two RSAF C-130 aircraft were also deployed to transport SAF and SCDF personnel.

    In an interview on Oct 7, Indonesian Cabinet Secretary Pramono Anung told CNN Indonesia that Jakarta had earlier rejected Singapore’s offers of assistance because it was concerned that the city state would claim credit for solving the problem, despite being worried about the rapidly deteriorating situation.

    In the Tempo interview, Mr Luhut also pledged to confiscate the land and revoke the licences of big companies that practise illegal burning next year.

    “This haze problem is also about injustice. When a company controls 2.8 million hectares of land, where is the justice? Then there are those who own 600,000 hectares of land but own not a single fire extinguisher. Should the government be dousing fires all the time? If we call it a national disaster, they will benefit by it.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Singapore Reiterates Offers Of Assistance To Indonesia To Fight Forest Fires

    Singapore Reiterates Offers Of Assistance To Indonesia To Fight Forest Fires

    Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Vivian Balakrishnan on Monday (Sep 14) spoke with Indonesian Minister of Environment and Forestry Siti Nurbaya Bakar and reiterated Singapore’s offer of help to combat forest fires, the National Environment Agency (NEA) said in a statement. The offer came as the number of hotspots in Indonesia’s Sumatra island soared to a two-month high of 982 on Monday, and a state of emergency has been declared in Riau province.

    Indonesia had earlier accepted the Singapore Armed Forces’ offer to send C-130s for cloud seeding and Chinooks for large water buckets to douse fires, only to decline it later. “While the Indonesian authorities accepted our offer of assistance initially, they have since expressed appreciation for the offer, and said they have sufficient resources of their own for now,” Singapore’s Defence Ministry said on Sunday.

    “WE HAVE DONE EVERYTHING”: INDONESIAN MINISTER

    Dr Siti Nurbaya told Dr Balakrishnan that Indonesia has already deployed a host of resources to tackle the fires but said she would consult Indonesian President Joko Widodo who is personally overseeing the effort again on Singapore’s offer.

    “We have deployed soldiers. We have conducted water bombing in Riau with 18 million litres of water, in South Sumatra and Jambi with 12 million liters of water. Cloud-seeding in Riau with 120 tonnes of salt and 56 tonnes of salt in South Sumatra,” Dr Siti Nurbaya said.

    “We have done everything. I was trying to convince the minister that we are serious in putting out the fire.”
    NEA said Minister Siti Nurbaya agreed to Dr Balakrishnan’s request for Indonesia to share the names of companies which are suspected to be causing the forest fires once they are able to verify this with checks on the ground. She also said she would inform him if there are links for these firms to Singapore.

    As of 9pm, the 3-hour Pollutant Standards Index (PSI) is 249 and the 24-hour PSI is 133 – 166. This is the highest 3-hour PSI reading this year.

    NEA noted that there was a brief respite in hazy conditions on Monday morning, but haze from Sumatra was again blown in by the prevailing winds in the afternoon.

    Thundery showers are expected in the pre-dawn and early morning hours of Tuesday, but NEA said the 24-hour PSI in the next 24 hours is still expected to be the mid to high sections of the Unhealthy range, and may enter the Very Unhealthy range.

    WILL A “TOUGH COP” APPROACH PAY OFF?

    Chairman of the Singapore Institute of International Affairs, Associate Professor Simon Tay said being a “tough cop” may not be the best approach for Singapore when tackling the transboundary haze issue. NEA on Sunday said it would conduct investigations into the situation.

    “I think in any investigation of this nature, the temptation is to say you have to play a really tough cop,” said Mr Tay. “But while the Singapore Government could do that, it probably isn’t the best approach.

    “In the end, many of the companies now – the bigger ones in Singapore – have actually put their maps online. They’ve taken steps, they have firefighting equipment that even the provisional officers don’t have. So I would hope, in a sense, that the first response must be cooperation.

    “In many of these cases, the companies may claim whether it’s true or not, they didn’t start the fires, the fires came on their land. So I think the first step we can agree on is that, for whoever started these fires, are the companies able and willing to try and put these fires out? Then, and again we have to give them some room because the scale of these fires and the scale of the land won’t make it easy, even if they’re trying their best.”

    Under Singapore’s Transboundary Haze Pollution Act which came into effect in 2014, fines of up to S$2 million can be imposed on companies which cause or contribute to haze pollution in Singapore.

    Haze pollution is said to have occurred if the 24-hour PSI remains at 101 or higher for 24 hours or longer. NEA said this had taken place from 10am on Sep 10 to 2am on Sep 12 – a full 41 hours.

    NEA said it is closely monitoring the hotspots in the region. It is also drawing on information from maps, meteorological data, and satellite imagery in its investigations.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com