Tag: Islam

  • This Black Sheep Is Proof That Racism Still Exists In Singapore

    This Black Sheep Is Proof That Racism Still Exists In Singapore

    Dear A.S.S. Editor

    Racism in Singapore I thought was something on the decline. Everyone around me is so kind. Everyone is more and more understanding towards racial equality and racial understanding. But someone people just like to prove that they are the black sheep of the bunch. Posting on social media acting unafraid of consequences.

    Being a Chinese myself, I can’t stand this kind of behavior. I have contacted facebook about it but no actions have been taken. Posts with racist comments are all over his facebook.

    My purpose is to show that racism in Singapore isn’t gone and we have to take action when such an injustice is done. Keeping silent isn’t helping.

    (yalams is another term for Malays)

    UpDog

    A.S.S. Contributor

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

     

  • Pergas Wrote Letter To Lee Hsien Loong, Expressed Concerns On Israeli-Palestine Conflict

    Pergas Wrote Letter To Lee Hsien Loong, Expressed Concerns On Israeli-Palestine Conflict

    The Singapore Islamic Scholars and Teachers Association (Pergas) has written to Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to highlight the Muslim community’s concerns about the “situation in Palestine”, saying the ongoing Israeli-Palestinian conflict is “regrettable and worrying”.

    The letter, written in Malay and dated 17 February, expressed Pergas’ hopes that Lee would bring up the matter during the two-day official visit to Singapore by Israel’s Prime Minister, Benjamin Netanyahu, on Monday and Tuesday (20-21 February).

    In the letter, the President of Pergas, Ustaz Hasbi Hassan, said, “Israel’s occupation has lowered the value of human lives. It has caused the lives of children, women and the elderly.

    Pergas has expressed our concern and the Singapore Muslim aspiration to the Singapore government on the Palestine situation. Alhamdulillah, our concern has been conveyed by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong to the Israeli’s Prime Minister during his two-day Singapore visit earlier this week.

    “The blockage and control of Gaza has ravished the basic human rights for protection, housing, health, education and more. The upholding of these rights has been agreed upon by the resolutions of the United Nations Security Council (UNSC), which urge Israel to stop illegal housing on Palestinian land,” he said in the letter.

    Ustaz Hasbi stressed that as Muslims and citizens of Singapore, Pergas stands by the values of harmony and justice and, like any other community, rejects any form of tyranny, invasion and repression.

    “Violence will only beget violence, and peace could never be achieved as long as discrimination, tyranny and repression still exist,” he said.

    Pergas understands the Singapore government’s policy on such matters, which has been affirmed by the appointment of former Senior Parliamentary Secretary, Hawazi Daipi, as Singapore’s new non-resident representative to the Palestinian Territories. Hawazi assumed the position in November last year.

    “We support the government’s policy and hope that Israel and Palestine can work together towards peace and harmony. We also hope that all forms of repression and violence will cease with justice prevailing for both parties,” Ustaz Hasbi said.

    Prime Minister Lee’s reply to Pergas

    In a letter addressed to Ustaz Hasbi dated Tuesday (21 February), Lee thanked Pergas for expressing its concerns about the situation in Palestine and the Israeli-Palestinian issue.

    Lee said he fully understands these concerns. Singapore is friends with both Israel and the Palestinian National Authority, and many Arab countries, he added.

    “While the situation is complex and progress is difficult, Singapore has always urged Israel and Palestine to resume direct negotiations and work towards a just and durable solution to this longstanding conflict,” Lee said in the letter.

    Lee also reiterated Singapore’s position in the letter, saying that the Republic is convinced that “a two-state solution for Israel and Palestine, however hard to achieve, is the only way to bring peace and security to both peoples.”

    The prime minister has stated Singapore’s position and concerns to Netanyahu during his visit here and last year. In the letter, Lee said he has explained to the Israelis that the Middle East matters to Singapore.

    “People all over the world are seized with the Israeli-Palestinian issue, and with the plight of the civilians caught up in the conflict. For Muslim communities particularly, it is an emotional matter.

    “Singapore is in Southeast Asia, surrounded by Muslim-majority countries. And we ourselves have a substantial Muslim population, who are an important part of our harmonious multi-ethnic population,” Lee said.

    He added that “Singapore fervently hopes for peace between Israel and the Palestinians”, which will contribute to a more stable Middle East and a safer world.

    “I thank you for supporting Singapore’s position, which reflects the interests of our nation,” Lee concluded in the letter.

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • This Muslimah Wears A Hijab, She Is A Scholar

    This Muslimah Wears A Hijab, She Is A Scholar

    As the child of a prison officer, Ms Siti Madinah Mohamed Salim grew up in prison staff quarters, close to where inmates who had committed various crimes were incarcerated.

    “This made me wonder how they got into prison, how it would change them and how their families were coping while they were inside,” says the 32-year-old social worker.

    She encountered more people with troubled lives during an internship at the Syariah Court when she was pursuing a diploma in Islamic law at Ibnu Sina Institute of Technology in Malaysia. “I observed couples with different needs and issues applying for divorce. There were many emotional moments when the divorces were finalised and I often wondered if more could have been done to save their marriages,” she says.

    In for the long haul
    These experiences led Ms Madinah to think about a career in social work. When a friend told her about the Social Service Scholarship offered by the National Council of Social Service (NCSS) during the final year of her degree course in Islamic law at the Al-Azhar University in Egypt, her interest was piqued.

    After she completed her studies and returned to Singapore at the end of 2009, she applied successfully for the scholarship.

    A temporary stint at a Malay Muslim organisation after her return cemented her decision to join the social service sector. “Again, I observed a lot of families in need and from there I felt that I could do this as a profession,” she says.

    On the scholarship, she studied at the Social Service Institute for a bachelor’s degree in social work awarded by Australia’s Monash University. This programme is no longer offered at the institute.

    Upon graduation in 2013, she started work at Ang Mo Kio Family Service Centres Community Services. The scholarship required her to serve a four-year bond in a social service organisation.

    During that period, she was also accepted into the Sun Ray scheme following a career dialogue with NCSS. “In this scheme, I am given the opportunity to go for leadership training, mentoring and coaching, and as a result, it allows me to network with various leaders and community partners to broaden my perspectives,” she says.

    Gaining experience
    In February, she was seconded to SPD, formerly known as the Society for the Physically Disabled, where she is currently working as a social worker in the Early Intervention Programme for Infants and Children (EIPIC).

    At the two places she has worked since graduating, she has gained experience in different areas.

    She says: “At the family service centre, I handled cases dealing with a wide range of issues, such as financial, behavioural, marital and family violence. Currently, in EIPIC, I am more focused on working with parents and caregivers of children with special needs such as autism, global developmental delay and speech delay.

    “Each journey with a client is different and meaningful. I feel that I learn and gain as much as the client as we work together to build resilience and overcome challenges. I feel a deep sense of satisfaction when my clients are able to achieve their goals.”

    She remembers, in particular, a case involving an elderly woman and her daughter who was in university at that time. They lived in a rented room and had limited money for food and daily expenses.

    “After a few years journeying with them, it was satisfying for me to hear from the daughter that they were doing fine and did not need further assistance. The daughter had secured a job as a primary school teacher and her pay was sufficient to support her mother and herself. I am happy that, in some small way, I have made a positive contribution towards someone’s life,” she says.

    Another aspect of the job that Ms Madinah enjoys is being part of a team focused on one main goal — “the well-being of the client”.

    She elaborates: “We have all heard about the many helping hands approach, which means there are other resources available that clients can tap for further assistance. As a social worker, I tap these resources as well so that I have other professionals working with me towards the best outcome for the client.

    “This common purpose makes for a good working environment and a great source of motivation during challenging periods.”

    She hopes to have a long and productive career in this sector. She is also mindful of the need to give back, having enjoyed the privilege of a scholarship. “Accepting a scholarship means that there is a responsibility for you to do as well as you can and contribute as much as you can back to the community,” she says.

     

    Source: http://sphclass.com.sg

  • Mengapa Masih Wujud Fahaman Sempit Terhadap Kaum Wanita?

    Mengapa Masih Wujud Fahaman Sempit Terhadap Kaum Wanita?

    Peranan kaum Hawa sering kali tidak diberikan pengiktirafan dan penghargaan yang sewajarnya. Ini meskipun bilangan wanita yang menyandang jawatan berprofil tinggi semakin meningkat. Mengapa pemikiran dan tanggapan yang mempersoalkan keupayaan dan kewibawaan kaum Hawa terus membelenggu minda masyarakat? Muhammed Shahril Shaik Abdullah, Pustakawan Bersekutu di Lembaga Perpustakaan Negara yang juga anggota The Reading Group mengongsi beberapa sebab yang mungkin menyebabkan pemikiran sedemikian menyempitkan persepsi terhadap kaum Hawa.

    Jika dibandingkan zaman sekarang dengan zaman dahulu, boleh dikatakan kaum wanita pada zaman sekarang ini menikmati taraf kehidupan yang lebih tinggi. Ini dapat dilihat dari jumlah wanita yang kian ramai memegang jawatan-jawatan yang suatu ketika hanya dikhaskan buat kaum lelaki, baik di bidang pekerjaan mahupun di arena politik.

    Namun, sejauh manakah perubahan sosial sedemikian mencerminkan arus perubahan yang sehaluan dari segi sikap serta tanggapan sesebuah masyarakat terhadap kaum wanita? Walaupun peluang pekerjaan serta pendidikan buat kaum wanita pada masa kini jauh lebih luas berbanding beberapa dekad yang lalu, tanggapan terhadap wanita masih lagi berdasarkan fahaman sempit yang nyata menghambat kemajuan ke arah masyarakat yang bersifat adil.

    Barangkali ramai di antara kaum suami dan bapa dalam masyarakat kita yang bersifat penyayang terhadap keluarga masing-masing. Kita tidak berada di dalam sebuah masyarakat yang sadis di mana kaum lelaki sewenang-wenang memukul bantai isteri dan anak-anak.

    Namun di sebalik sifat penyayang tersebut, tersembunyi satu ketidaksadaran (subconsciousness) yang terpendam kian dalam di lubuk hati dan sanubari si penyayang. Ketidaksadaran tersebut, yang dibentuk dan didorong oleh pengaruh luaran seperti struktur serta kondisi sosial, lingkungan hidup dan juga penyebaran pengetahuan dalam segala bentuk informasi dari pelbagai sumber termasuk akhbar, filem serta media sosial, tidak akan dapat dikesan di tingkatan sadar (conscious level) dari segi perbualan mahupun perbuatan. Malah, apa yang diucap dan diperlakukan di tingkatan sadar seringkali bertentangan dengan apa yang terpendam di peringkat tidak sedar (subconscious level).

    Sebagai contoh, sebuah negara yang dikuasai oleh pemerintahan yang berasaskan prinsip patriarki akan membentuk serta menjalankan dasar-dasar negara yang mendiskriminasi dan menindas kaum wanita. Dasar-dasar tersebut, jika tidak dipersoalkan, pada gilirannya akan meresapi akar pemikiran masyarakat lantas membuahkan warga-warga negara yang berfikiran patriarkis, meskipun hadir di tingkatan tidaksadar. Barangsiapa yang menentang atau mempersoalkan fahaman tersebut akan dianggap pengkhianat atau pemberontak lantas disingkir sebagai seorang yang tidak sehaluan dengan masyarakat.

    Apabila norma sosial sesebuah masyarakat berlandaskan pemahaman yang tidak mempedulikan kesucian kehidupan malah cenderung terhadap kebinasaan, akibatnya akan ada pengorbanan jiwa-jiwa yang tidak bersalah. Di dalam buku beliau The Great Theft, Khaled Abou El Fadl menceritakan tentang kejadian di Arab Saudi, yang berlaku pada pertengahan bulan Mac 2002, di mana sekumpulan murid perempuan di sebuah sekolah awam terbunuh sewaktu terperangkap di dalam bangunan sekolah yang sedang dijilat api kebakaran.

    Apa yang lebih menyedihkan ialah, menurut Abou El Fadl, pintu-pintu sekolah tersebut telah dikunci dari luar oleh sekumpulan polis agama Saudi yang menghalang dengan kekerasan segala upaya untuk menyelamatkan murid-murid berkenaan. Penjelasan yang diberi atas perbuatan mereka ialah disebabkan murid-murid perempuan tersebut tidak menutup aurat – bermaksud mereka tidak mengenakan hijab serta niqab mereka pada waktu itu – dan juga buat mengelakkan sentuhan fizikal di antara pasukan penyelamat dengan murid-murid perempuan terlibat.

    Dari peristiwa di atas, kita dapat melihat masalah yang timbul, malah yang menjurus kepada pembunuhan, apabila manusia bertindak atas dasar dan pengaruh fahaman yang parokial. Di dalam benak pasukan polis agama Saudi tersebut, hanya satu kekhuatiran yang harus difikirkan, iaitu muka dan rambut murid-murid perempuan terlibat – yang terperangkap di dalam bangunan yang sedang dijilat api – tidak seharusnya kelihatan di tempat awam. Pada mereka, penutupan aurat itu lebih penting dari menyelamatkan nyawa yang sedang dalam bahaya. Demikian akibatnya apabila fikiran dikuasai oleh ketidaksadaran yang sentiasa berlegar di lubuk hati.

    Pengaruh luaran seperti media sosial juga memainkan peranan yang amat penting dalam membentuk ketidaksadaran sedemikian, selain membentuk minda serta pemikiran seseorang malahan sebuah masyarakat. Tidak boleh dinafikan pentingnya peranan media dalam menyampaikan berita serta informasi buat membina pengetahuan terhadap segala perihal di sekeliling kita. Namun, ini tidak bererti segala apa yang dilapor atau dikongsi harus diterima secara membabi-buta tanpa kritikal.

    Sikap yang kritikal akan membolehkan kita mengesan ideologi di sebalik penulisan yang bersifat cauvinis mahupun patriarkis. Jika disoal, kemungkinan besar si penulis tidak akan bersetuju malah akan menafikan dirinya sebagai seorang yang cauvinis. Malah tidak akan ada seorang lelaki yang akan mengaku dirinya sedemikian. Ramai yang akan mengatakan kaum wanita harus dihormati, disanjungi dan disayangi.

    Namun pernyataan-pernyataan tersebut barangkali hanya hadir di tingkatan sadar. Pada tingkatan tidaksadar, masih ramai yang menganggap serta mempercirikan kaum wanita sebagai satu kaum yang lemah dan serba kekurangan, yang harus patuh dan tunduk pada supremasi kaum lelaki. Amat sukar untuk seseorang yang didorong oleh ketidaksadaran sedemikian mengakui serta menganggap kaum wanita sebagai kaum yang mampu berdikari.

    Seorang isteri harus disayangi, dibelai, dihormati – pada masa yang sama beliau juga wajib patuh dan taat pada suami. Bahkan apa yang diajarkan di merata kelas-kelas agama, di setiap ceramah dan syarahan, dan juga di kaca televisyen melalui drama dan filem, ialah syurga isteri itu terletak di kaki suami. Maka apabila isteri menderhakai suami, beliau tidak akan dapat mencium pun bau syurga.

    Ajaran dan pesanan yang bermasalah sebegini jarang dipersoalkan, oleh kerana kepercayaan mutlak terhadap yang berbicara sebagai pakar dalam bidang yang dibicarakan. Di sini juga kita dapat melihat peranan asatizah serta penulis dan penerbit media dalam membentuk dan mempengaruhi pemikiran masyarakat.

    Sebagai contoh, di dalam filem Suami Aku Ustaz yang ditayangkan pada tahun 2015, kita akan dapat mengesan idea-idea yang amat bermasalah apabila ditontoni dari lensa yang kritikal. Misalnya, ibu bapa yang melihat anak perempuan mereka sebagai sebuah objek yang boleh diperlakukan sekehendak hati tanpa menghiraukan hak si anak sebagai seorang manusia; pendewaan guru-guru agama yang menjurus kepada ketaksuban serta perhambaan diri pada golongan tersebut hingga sanggup melepaskan diri dari tanggungjawab dengan berserah dan mengikut membabi-buta segala apa yang diajarkan sang ustaz, walaupun bercanggah dengan nilai-nilai kemanusiaan; pandangan hidup patriarkis yang menetapkan kaum lelaki sebagai golongan yang dianugerahi Tuhan darjat yang lebih tinggi justeru lebih layak menentukan apa yang baik dan buruk buat kaum wanita.

    Dari filem ini, kita dapat melihat bagaimana industri budaya yang dikuasai golongan inteligensia yang tidak berfungsi, akan mencipta karya-karya yang sarat dengan idea-idea yang bermasalah, yang berasaskan pemikiran feudal dan cauvinis, lantas meluas dan menyerap masuk ke minda masyarakat.

    Kenyataan yang dibuat penerbit filem tersebut sewaktu diwawancara, bahawa cinta serta kepatuhan isteri kepada suami merupakan nilai yang penting dalam rumah tangga, menjadi bukti kepada pemikiran patriarkis beliau. Rumahtangga yang penuh dengan kasih dan sayang bermula dari perasaan saling hormat menghormati serta faham memahami, bukan berasaskan kepatuhan yang bersifat perhambaan dan pengabdian. Tidak akan wujud sifat kasih dan sayang, bahkan tidak akan ada rasa cinta, apabila seseorang menuntut supaya dipatuhi dan ditaati oleh pihak yang lain.

    Lebih bermasalah lagi apabila agama dijadikan sandaran bagi pendirian yang patriarkis. Misalnya menggunakan hadis-hadis daif yang menuntut agar wanita harus patuh dan tunduk pada supremasi kaum lelaki. Nabi telah diutuskan Tuhan untuk membebaskan masyarakat di kota Makkah dari segala bentuk penindasan dan ketidakadilan dengan membasmikan segala praktik jahiliyah Arab yang tidak berperikemanusiaan, seperti menanam hidup-hidup bayi perempuan yang baru dilahirkan.

    Perbuatan jahil sedemikian tiada bezanya dengan pemikiran jahil yang sedang tersebar luas pada hari ini melalui agensi-agensi luaran yang telah disebutkan di atas. Nabi telah berhasil membasmi praktik jahiliyah pembunuhan bayi perempuan. Oleh itu amat penting untuk kita memastikan supaya kita pula tidak terjebak dengan pembunuhan jiwa kaum wanita serta anak-anak dalam masyarakat kita.

    Sebagai permulaan, kita perlu mendidik dan menanamkan dalam diri anak-anak kita sikap adil serta sifat saling hormat-menghormati di antara lelaki dan perempuan, dengan menghindari sebarang perkataan atau perbualan yang bersifat patriarkis. Misalnya, usahlah kita berkata kepada mereka “Jangan nangis seperti perempuan” atau “Kalau nak jadi lelaki, mesti kuat. Tidak boleh lemah seperti perempuan.” dan sebagainya.

    Pendidikan awal akan menentukan cara pemikiran serta pemahaman yang akan mereka terap apabila dewasa kelak. Maka perlunya kita membantu mereka dalam proses tersebut dengan harapan membasmi ideologi-ideologi yang merosak seperti patriarkalisme.

    MENGENAI PENGARANG:
    Muhammed Shahril Shaik Abdullah ialah Pustakawan Bersekutu di Lembaga Perpustakaan Negara

  • I Was Muslim In Trump’s White House And I Lasted 8 Days

    I Was Muslim In Trump’s White House And I Lasted 8 Days

    In 2011, I was hired, straight out of college, to work at the White House and eventually the National Security Council. My job there was to promote and protect the best of what my country stands for. I am a hijab-wearing Muslim woman––I was the only hijabi in the West Wing––and the Obama administration always made me feel welcome and included.

    Like most of my fellow American Muslims, I spent much of 2016 watching with consternation as Donald Trump vilified our community. Despite this––or because of it––I thought I should try to stay on the NSC staff during the Trump Administration, in order to give the new president and his aides a more nuanced view of Islam, and of America’s Muslim citizens.

    I lasted eight days.

    When Trump issued a ban on travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries and all Syrian refugees, I knew I could no longer stay and work for an administration that saw me and people like me not as fellow citizens, but as a threat.

    The evening before I left, bidding farewell to some of my colleagues, many of whom have also since left, I notified Trump’s senior NSC communications adviser, Michael Anton, of my departure, since we shared an office. His initial surprise, asking whether I was leaving government entirely, was followed by silence––almost in caution, not asking why. I told him anyway.I told him I had to leave because it was an insult walking into this country’s most historic building every day under an administration that is working against and vilifying everything I stand for as an American and as a Muslim. I told him that the administration was attacking the basic tenets of democracy. I told him that I hoped that they and those in Congress were prepared to take responsibility for all the consequences that would attend their decisions.He looked at me and said nothing.It was only later that I learned he authored an essay under a pseudonym, extolling the virtues of authoritarianism and attacking diversity as a “weakness,” and Islam as “incompatible with the modern West.”

    My whole life and everything I have learned proves that facile statement wrong.My parents immigrated to the United States from Bangladesh in 1978 and strove to create opportunities for their children born in the states. My mother worked as a cashier, later starting her own daycare business. My father spent late nights working at Bank of America, and was eventually promoted to assistant vice president at one of its headquarters. Living the American dream, we’d have family barbecues, trips to Disney World, impromptu soccer or football games, and community service projects. My father began pursuing his Ph.D., but in 1995 he was killed in a car accident.

    I was 12 when I started wearing a hijab. It was encouraged in my family, but it was always my choice. It was a matter of faith, identity, and resilience for me. After 9/11, everything would change. On top of my shock, horror, and heartbreak, I had to deal with the fear some kids suddenly felt towards me. I was glared at, cursed at, and spat at in public and in school. People called me a “terrorist” and told me, “go back to your country.”
    My father taught me a Bengali proverb inspired by Islamic scripture: “When a man kicks you down, get back up, extend your hand, and call him brother.” Peace, patience, persistence, respect, forgiveness, and dignity. These were the values I’ve carried through my life and my career.

    I never intended to work in government. I was among those who assumed the government was inherently corrupt and ineffective. Working in the Obama White House proved me wrong. You can’t know or understand what you haven’t been a part of.

    Still, inspired by President Obama, I joined the White House in 2011, after graduating from the George Washington University. I had interned there during my junior year, reading letters and taking calls from constituents at the Office of Presidential Correspondence. It felt surreal––here I was, a 22-year-old American Muslim woman from Maryland who had been mocked and called names for covering my hair, working for the president of the United States.

    In 2012, I moved to the West Wing to join the Office of Public Engagement, where I worked with various communities, including American Muslims, on domestic issues such as health care. In early 2014, Deputy National Security Advisor Ben Rhodes offered me a position on the National Security Council (NSC). For two and a half years I worked down the hall from the Situation Room, advising President Obama’s engagements with American Muslims, and working on issues ranging from advancing relations with Cuba and Laos to promoting global entrepreneurship among women and youth.

    A harsher world began to reemerge in 2015. In February, three young American Muslim students were killed in their Chapel Hill home by an Islamophobe. Both the media and administration were slow to address the attack, as if the dead had to be vetted before they could be mourned. It was emotionally devastating. But when a statement was finally released condemning the attack and mourning their loss, Rhodes took me aside to to tell me how grateful he was to have me there and wished there were more American Muslims working throughout government.  America’s government and decision-making should reflect its people.

    Later that month, the evangelist Franklin Graham declared that the government had “been infiltrated by Muslims.” One of my colleagues sought me out with a smile on his face and said, “If only he knew they were in the halls of the West Wing and briefed the president of the United States multiple times!” I thought: Damn right I’m here, exactly where I belong, a proud American dedicated to protecting and serving my country.

    Graham’s hateful provocations weren’t new. Over the Obama years, right-wing websites spread  an abundance of absurd conspiracy theories and lies, targeting some American Muslim organizations and individuals––even those of us serving in government. They called us “terrorists,” Sharia-law whisperers, or Muslim Brotherhood operatives. Little did I realize that some of these conspiracy theorists would someday end up in the White House.

    Over the course of the campaign, even when I was able to storm through the bad days, I realized the rhetoric was taking a toll on American communities. When Trump first called for a Muslim ban, reports of hate crimes against Muslims spiked. The trend of anti-Muslim hate crimes is ongoing, as mosques are set on fire and individuals attacked––six were killed at a mosque in Canada by a self-identified Trump supporter.

    Throughout 2015 and 2016, I watched with disbelief, apprehension, and anxiety, as Trump’s style of campaigning instigated fear and emboldened xenophobes, anti-Semites, and Islamophobes. While cognizant of the possibility of Trump winning, I hoped a majority of the electorate would never condone such a hateful and divisive worldview.

    During the campaign last February, Obama visited a Baltimore mosque and reminded the public that “we’re one American family, and when any part of our family starts to feel separate … It’s a challenge to our values.” His words would go unheeded by his successor.

    The climate in 2016 felt like it did just after 9/11. What made it worse was that this fear and hatred were being fueled by Americans in positions of power. Fifth-grade students at a local Sunday school where I volunteered shared stories of being bullied by classmates and teachers, feeling like they didn’t belong here anymore, and asked if they might get kicked out of this country if Trump won. I was almost hit by a car by a white man laughing as he drove by in a Costco parking lot, and on another occasion was followed out of the metro by a man screaming profanities: “Fuck you! Fuck Islam! Trump will send you back!”

    Then, on election night, I was left in shock.

    The morning after the election, we lined up in the West Colonnade as Obama stood in the Rose Garden and called for national unity and a smooth transition. Trump seemed the antithesis of everything we stood for. I felt lost. I could not fully grasp the idea that he would soon be sitting where Obama sat.

    I debated whether I should leave my job. Since I was not a political appointee, but a direct hire of the NSC, I had the option to stay. The incoming and now departed national security adviser, Michael Flynn, had said things like “fear of Muslims is rational.” Some colleagues and community leaders encouraged me to stay, while others expressed concern for my safety. Cautiously optimistic, and feeling a responsibility to try to help them continue our work and be heard, I decided that Trump’s NSC could benefit from a colored, female, hijab-wearing, American Muslim patriot.

    The weeks leading up to the inauguration prepared me and my colleagues for what we thought would come, but not for what actually came. On Monday, January 23, I walked into the Eisenhower Executive Office Building, with the new staffers there. Rather than the excitement I encountered when I first came to the White House under Obama, the new staff looked at me with a cold surprise. The diverse White House I had worked in became a monochromatic and male bastion.

    The days I spent in the Trump White House were strange, appalling and disturbing. As one staffer serving since the Reagan administration said, “This place has been turned upside down. It’s chaos. I’ve never witnessed anything like it.” This was not typical Republican leadership, or even that of a businessman. It was a chaotic attempt at authoritarianism––legally questionable executive orders, accusations of the press being “fake,” peddling countless lies as “alternative facts,” and assertions by White House surrogates that the president’s national security authority would “not be questioned.”

    The entire presidential support structure of nonpartisan national security and legal experts within the White House complex and across federal agencies was being undermined. Decision-making authority was now centralized to a few in the West Wing. Frustration and mistrust developed as some staff felt out of the loop on issues within their purview. There was no structure or clear guidance. Hallways were eerily quiet as key positions and offices responsible for national security or engagement with Americans were left unfilled.

    I might have lasted a little longer. Then came January 30. The executive order banning travelers from seven Muslim-majority countries caused chaos, without making America any safer. Discrimination that has existed for years at airports was now legitimized, sparking mass protests, while the president railed against the courts for halting his ban. Not only was this discrimination and un-American, the administration’s actions defending the ban threatened the nation’s security and its system of checks and balances.

    Alt-right writers, now on the White House staff, have claimed that Islam and the West are at war with each other. Disturbingly, ISIS also makes such claims to justify their attacks, which for the most part target Muslims. The Administration’s plans to revamp the Countering Violent Extremism program to focus solely on Muslims and use terms like “radical Islamic terror,” legitimize ISIS propaganda and allow the dangerous rise of white-supremacist extremism to go unchecked.

    Placing U.S. national security in the hands of people who think America’s diversity is a “weakness” is dangerous. It is false.

    People of every religion, race, ethnicity, sexual orientation, gender, and age pouring into the streets and airports to defend the rights of their fellow Americans over the past few weeks proved the opposite is true––American diversity is a strength, and so is the American commitment to ideals of  justice and equality.

    American history is not without stumbles, which have proven that the nation is only made more prosperous and resilient through struggle, compassion and inclusiveness. It’s why my parents came here. It’s why I told my former 5th grade students, who wondered if they still belonged here, that this country would not be great without them.

    Source: www.theatlantic.com

deneme bonusu