Tag: Islam

  • Singapore’s Sunni Muslims And Shiites Live In Harmony

    Singapore’s Sunni Muslims And Shiites Live In Harmony

    Muslims from the religion’s two major sects in Singapore have been living harmoniously with a sense of mutual respect for over a century, said Syed Hassan Al-Attas, a respected Sunni imam (Islamic leader).

    The comments by the imam from Ba’alwie Mosque came amid tensions in the Middle East arising from the recent execution of Shiite cleric Nimr Baqr al-Nimr by Saudi Arabian authorities, which has highlighted a schism between Sunni and Shiite Muslims in the region.

    “For Sunnis and Shiites in Singapore, the relationship is very deep, and has existed in Singapore for more than 100 years… we don’t identify ourselves as Sunnis or Shiites in Singapore, we identify ourselves as Muslims. We’ve never pointed fingers (at each other),” said Syed Hassan in a recent interview with Yahoo Singapore.

    When asked about the perception of some Sunnis around the world that Shiites are not true believers, the imam disagreed.

    “If they are not Muslims, how can the Saudi government approve their visas to enter Mecca? They are Muslims too,” he said.

    He felt that the squabbles between Sunni-majority Saudi Arabia and its allies, and Shiite-majority Iran are political in nature and have nothing to do with religion.

    About 15 per cent of the Singapore population practice Islam, with the majority being Sunnis, according to the 2010 Census of Population statistics.

    Of the 70 mosques in Singapore, only the Burhani Mosque at Hill Street belongs to the Shiites.

    View photos

    Photo: Ba’alwie Mosque on Lewis Street 

    Historical background of Sunnis and Shiites

    Sunni and Shiite Muslims believe in Prophet Muhammad and that he revealed the monotheistic religion to the people of Mecca. The key difference in the beliefs of the two sects is over the choice of the prophet’s immediate successor.

    Sunnis believed that the successor should be Abu Bakar, who was the prophet’s father-in-law, while Shiites believe Ali ibn Abi Talib, who was the prophet’s son-in-law, should be chosen instead.

    Both sects share similarities in terms of some of the obligations of Muslims, such as the performing of the Haj, fasting and reading of the Koran.

    Sunnis and Shiites working to build the Muslim community

    Syed Hassan said the believers from both sects in Singapore see each other as part of one religion and have joined together in building the Muslim community.

    For instance, both Sunnis and Shiites in Singapore had worked together to establish the Islamic Religious Council of Singapore (MUIS).

    “(During) the formation of MUIS in 1970, the legal adviser was the late (prominent Persian lawyer) Mohamed Javad Namazie, who is a Shiite.”

    Other Shiites have also contributed to the Sunni-dominated Muslim community here, Syed Hassan pointed out.

    “MKAC (Muslim Kidney Action Association) Ameerali (Abdeali), he’s a Shiite. Jumabhoy, the one from Scotts, Dr Kutubuddin, Mr Tayebali, and many others, are all Shiites who contributed to the betterment of Singapore, but nobody goes around saying ‘I’m Shiite, I’m Sunni’,” he said.

    Ameerali Abdeali is the president of MKAC while the Jumabhoy family once owned property developer Scotts Holdings (now called The Ascott Limited) from 1975 to 1984.

    J.M. Jumabhoy, who was the minister for commerce and industry between 1956 and 1959, was a Shiite too.

    A Shiite with deep roots in Singapore

    Gholamreza Kashkooli, a 58-year-old Iranian Shiite who has lived in Singapore for 35 years, is happy to see Sunnis and Shiites in the country working together.

    The relationship between the two sects is peaceful, contrary to how it is depicted in the media, Gholamreza told Yahoo Singapore.

    “In Iran, the majority of them (citizens) are educated. They do not look into this matter and create problems between themselves,” said Gholamreza, the owner of an import and export company.

    Gholamreza pointed out that there are many Sunni scholars in Iran, and there is no discord between the minority Sunnis and the majority Shiites in the country over the differences in their beliefs.

    Sunnis and Shiites agree that there is “one God, Muhammad is a prophet, and the Koran”, he said.

    Singapore’s strong legal framework protects religious harmony

    Lawyer Noor Mohamed Marican, who is a Sunni Muslim, said the violence that was seen in the Middle East recently would never happen in Singapore.

    He said the strong legal framework in Singapore is in place to prevent such a scenario. In any event, there is no reason for concern as the local Muslim community’s relations are cordial.

    “You are given your space (to worship), so don’t abuse your space. If you are here to create disharmony, the law will come in,” said Marican in a recent interview with Yahoo Singapore.

    “We are all Muslims living together; our fundamentals are the same,” he added.

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • I’m Not A Fan Of Madonna But I Feel It’s Unfair For Her Fans To Attend A Watered-Down Version Of Her Concert

    I’m Not A Fan Of Madonna But I Feel It’s Unfair For Her Fans To Attend A Watered-Down Version Of Her Concert

    I am writing regarding the Madonna concert here being given an R18 rating (“Madonna to perform in Singapore on Feb 28”; Jan 7).

    I am not a Madonna fan and cannot afford to attend the concert, but I know some of her music.

    And I think that anyone, even a religious person, who intends to go to the concert knows what the music icon is all about and will not get offended. It is a Madonna concert.

    It would be unfair to fans if the concert is going to be a watered-down version of her current world tour, and other countries get the full value.

    It is now 2016, and the majority of Singaporeans are not as conservative as the authorities think, so let those who are attending the concert get what is expected of a Madonna concert.

     

    Editor’s Note: The views of Elvis Chua Hock Thiam, was published in Voices, Today, on 11 Jan 2016.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Event On Malaysian TV Was Islamic, Not Arabic

    Event On Malaysian TV Was Islamic, Not Arabic

    In the commentary “Malaysia, truly Arab?” (Jan 7), the writer referred to an event held on Dec 31 at Dataran Merdeka in Malaysia to question whether the country has become Arab.

    Prophet Muhammad was born in the month of Rabiul Awal in the Islamic calendar. This fell on Dec 13 this time. Some Muslims celebrate it for the whole of Rabiul Awal. The event referred to was one such event, called Mahallul Qiyaam Selawat. The organisers could have chosen that time because the next day was a public holiday. The event coincided with New Year’s Eve in the Gregorian calendar, hence the article.

    But it should be looked at in the context of an Islamic event televised by a Malaysian television channel.

     

    Editor’s Note: The views of Haj Mohamed was published in Voices, Today, on 16 Jan 2015.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Zaid Ibrahim: The Rise Of The “Neo-Malays”

    Zaid Ibrahim: The Rise Of The “Neo-Malays”

    The neo-Malays are the “new Malays”. They are younger than me and the members of G25, and some are seriously wealthy, although we don’t know how they earned their money or whether it was inherited. They also have a serious mission in mind, which is to change the world and to do it as Muslim warriors. But to do that, they first have to take power.

    This past New Year’s Eve some 50,000 of them gathered at Dataran Merdeka. Led by Deputy Prime Minister Datuk Seri Ahmad Zahid Hamidi and other well-known personalities such as Federal Territories Minister Datuk Seri Tengku Adnan Tengku Mansor, they held what I believe was a prayer session and sang praises to God Almighty and the Prophet Muhammad.

    My liberal (and religious) Malay friend Datuk A sent me a photograph of the event. The men were dressed in robes, serban and skull caps, and they were all doing a salute with their clenched fists, not unlike how the Nazis used to salute their Fuhrer.

    Now that was something else, and it worries me.  Is this a new brand of Malay power?  It certainly is different from Datuk Seri Najib Razak’s brand.  Najib loves to celebrate New Year , just like you and me , except that he does it in his inimitable style ( he is after all seriously wealthy).

    I guess the Dataran celebration by Zahid marks a new path for the country. It shows that when he comes to power, most probably our politics and our New Year celebrations will drastically change as well. The very idea of it should send a chill through all our spines.

    Why were the neo-Malays celebrating a Gregorian New Year in the first place? Why did they gather at Dataran Merdeka for an event that had no Islamic element or historical significance?

    My guess is that these Malays wanted to celebrate the New Year like everyone else, but because of their image and their brand of politics, they had to be different.

    They probably wanted to enjoy the new year but were worried they would be accused of mimicking the West. Enjoying themselves, they thought, would make them unislamic. They had to be different because that is the new world they wanted to create. They wanted to send a new message.

    As “good Muslims”, they believed they could not allow themselves to enjoy or celebrate the New Year; even if in their hearts they would have much rather preferred watching Siti Nurhaliza, Zainal Abidin or the Blues Gang perform and let loose some fireworks – but politics had to come first.

    I hope the Chinese, American and European ambassadors living comfortably in the Ampang precinct take a more serious view of our politics. Stop being naive. Enough of the nice brand of diplomacy.

    Just because our leaders wear Brioni suits does not mean they are the usual types found in the world’s capitals. If you care enough about freedom and democracy, you must take the time to understand their thinking.

    The Chinese (and by that I mean those from Beijing and not the DAP Chinese) are taking a strong hold of the economy by making huge investments in our country.

    They must therefore be careful that our burgeoning fascist ideas—does not destabilise the other communities or the country’s stability.

    The Americans and the Europeans must also stop taking things at face value. Many of the neo-Malays here are different from those in Indonesia and Iran.

    They are closer to the Taliban and Isis in their values and outlook. Make some effort to understand this new Muslim mindset. Countering these dangerous ideas now will be less costly and better for world peace and stability. – zaid.my, January 5, 2016.

    * Datuk Zaid Ibrahim is a lawyer turned politician and a former minister in the Prime Minister’s Department in charge of legal affairs and judicial reform.

    * This is the personal opinion of the writer, organisation or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of The Malaysian Insider.

     

    Source: www.themalaysianinsider.com

  • Zulfikar Shariff: What Is A Melayu?

    Zulfikar Shariff: What Is A Melayu?

    What is a Melayu? A common mistake is to view Malayness by ancestry.

    I have discussed this issue several times. A Melayu is not based on genetics. It is a nation.

    This nation is defined by language, culture and Islam.

    In his book “Kerajaan”, Anthony Milner provided some characteristics of the Melayu. He argued that unlike some other nations, the Malays never belonged to a single empire.

    The Malays did not “consider themselves members of a race which owed its origins to a single ancestor or homeland.” But as Raffles noted, the Melayu nation is “one people, speaking one language, though spread over so wide a space, and preserving their character and customs.”

    For Milner, even though the Malays did not belong to one race or empire, there is unity to the nation “that permits us to talk of a ‘Malay world’”.

    Zainal Abidin Ahmad (also known as Za’ba), in 1917, stated that, any person “may be considered to be of the one Malay bloodline in the Malay World as long as they originate from the Indo-Malay archipelago, profess Islam as their religion, and adopt the Malay language, worldview, temperament, and customs” (Chong).

    Milner provided similar assessments. He provided 3 conditions for Malayness: Malay culture, language and Islam.

    Insha Allah in the next post, I will elaborate on the three conditions that Milner wrote about.

    But we can here understand the concept of “masuk Melayu”.

    The Malays is a welcoming and hospitable nation. They welcome others into their society. The Chinese traders, Indian merchants, Arab businessmen. They are all accepted into our society and accorded respect and welcome as is known of the Malays.

    And if they are Muslims, speak the Malay language and follow our customs, they are accepted as a Malay.

    Very few, if any, society has such openness and acceptance.

    References:
    Chong, Jinn Winn. “” Mine, Yours or Ours?”: The Indonesia-Malaysia Disputes over Shared Cultural Heritage.” Sojourn: Journal of Social Issues in Southeast Asia 27.1 (2012): 1-53.

    Milner, Anthony Crothers. Kerajaan: Malay political culture on the eve of colonial rule. No. 40. University of Arizona Press, 1982.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

deneme bonusu