Tag: Islam

  • Zulfikar Shariff: Muslims Must Let Islam, Not Political Affiliations, Be Foundation Of Decisions

    Zulfikar Shariff: Muslims Must Let Islam, Not Political Affiliations, Be Foundation Of Decisions

    Yesterday I asked how a Muslim PAP supporter will choose if weakening the PAP is beneficial to Islam. Will they support weakening their party for Islam’s sake?

    The only response from someone who rejected the question based his discussion on the minority position of Muslims in Singapore. The response was based on standing as a candidate in an SMC.

    Political action should not be restricted to standing as candidates or being in a political party. Anyone who participates in society is a political actor. Your relationship with society, with the state, your public (and at times private) interactions are political. We are political beings, whether we believe in a political system, support a party or actively participate in an election.

    To simply restrict political action to being a candidate is to ignore a large portion of our socio-political interactions.

    We need to free ourselves from the confines that LKY and GCT tried to impose on us.

    Let us look at another argument that needs to be refined.

    Muslims have over the years, argued that we are the swing votes. While we do not have the numerical ability to stand on a platform based on our religious values, the belief is that we can be kingmakers.

    But let us not deceive ourselves on our own importance. We are about 15% of the population. There are guesstimates as to how many Muslims support the PAP. Some claim the majority of Muslims will always vote for the PAP while others argue its a minority.

    For ease of discussions, let us assume it to be 50%.

    The PAP won a 60% majority in the last elections. The 30%+ who rejected them included half of the Muslim community.

    Even if we vote en bloc, the PAP nationally, will not be affected. If every Muslim in Singapore vote for opposition, the PAP would still get 50%+ of the votes. And if all of us vote for the PAP, they would still get 60%+.

    We are not kingmakers.

    But this does not fully discuss the possibilities. While we may not be kingmakers, we can have an effect in several constituencies.

    The PAP won 51% at the Joo Chiat SMC. It has now been absorbed into Marine Parade GRC (57% in 2011).

    A swing of Muslim votes in this GRC can result in a shift.

    There are several other constituencies that were won with very slim majorities (less than 5%).Similarly, the WP won Aljunied with less than 5% majority.

    If we truly want to expand our political options, look beyond party lines.

    The PAP obviously will not want Muslims to be politically effective. They would prefer our participation to be based on the system they defined. This has now been normalised such that opposition parties may similarly demand the rejection of religious values in a population’s political decisions.

    As though their religious or non-religious beliefs do not inform and dictate their own values and decisions.

    If we truly care about Islam, let us think beyond party lines. We have been indoctrinated into thinking our interests should not matter. As though Islam should have no part in our decisions on politics.

    Islam defines us. Every decision, every action, should be based on Islam.

    Let us return Islam to the forefront of all our decisions.

     

    Source: Zulfikar Shariff

  • Did Supermodel Gisele Bundchen Go In Burqa To Clinic For Breast Job?

    Did Supermodel Gisele Bundchen Go In Burqa To Clinic For Breast Job?

    Supermodel Gisele Bundchen is a laughing stock among fellow Brazilians for an apparent boob job.

    She is being ridiculed not so much for the boob job, as plastic surgery is common in Brazil.

    The supermodel received the flak because she hid under an all-covering burqa as she walked into the clinic, reported New York Post.

    It showed the model mum, 35, wearing the burqa to disguise herself while entering the plastic surgeon’s office in Paris last month.

    She was with her sister Rafaela, who was also wearing a burqa.

    Sources told the New York Post that after Gisele and Ms Rafaela posed as devout Muslims to secretly enter the clinic, they both underwent overnight surgical procedures.

    The two were seen wearing open-toed sandals in the photos, which some Muslim women consider inappropriate in public, reported the Daily Mail.

    Some Brazilians went online to criticise her hypocrisy.

    “She went through all this trouble just so she could say that her beauty is absolutely ‘natural’, ” said Paulo, commenting on a Brazilian news website.

    “It’s laughable!”

    The world’s highest paid supermodel had previously said there was “no way” she would ever consider plastic surgery.

    “I have never had plastic surgery, nor have I ever felt the need to do any kind of intervention,” she had said in 2011, when asked about rumours of a nose job.

    Bundchen, who took to social media on Friday for the first time since the burqa episode by posting an Instagram photo of herself in a yoga pose, has not commented on the incident yet.

    Last year, more than two million Brazilians – roughly 1 per cent of the country’s total population – had plastic surgery, according to the International Society of Aesthetic Plastic Surgery.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Bangunkan Rasa Kesyukuran, Kecukupan Dalam Hati Dan Fikiran, Berhenti Mengelu

    Bangunkan Rasa Kesyukuran, Kecukupan Dalam Hati Dan Fikiran, Berhenti Mengelu

    Beri jawapan di tempat kosong di bawah ini dan mohon dijawab dengan jujur di dalam hati masing-masing..

    1. Allah menciptakan tertawa dan ______
    2. Allah itu mematikan dan ______
    3. Allah menciptakan lelaki dan ______
    4. Allah memberikan kekayaan dan ______

    Kebanyakkan kita tentu akan dengan mudah menjawab:
    1. Menangis
    2. Menghidupkan
    3. Perempuan
    Tapi bagaimana no. 4? Adakah Kemiskinan menjadi jawapannya???

    Untuk mengetahui jawapannya, mari kita lihat rangkaian firman Allah dalam Surah An-Najm ayat 43-45, dan 48, sebagai rujukan:
    ﻭَﺃَﻧَّﻪُ ﻫُﻮَ ﺃَﺿْﺤَﻚَ ﻭَﺃَﺑْﻜَﻰ
    “dan Dia-lah yang menjadikan orang tertawa dan menangis.” (QS. An-Najm : 43).
    ﻭَﺃَﻧَّﻪُ ﻫُﻮَ ﺃَﻣَﺎﺕَ ﻭَﺃَﺣْﻴَﺎ
    “dan Dia-lah yang mematikan dan menghidupkan.” (QS. An-Najm : 44).
    ﻭَﺃَﻧَّﻪُ ﺧَﻠَﻖَ ﺍﻟﺰَّﻭْﺟَﻴْﻦِ ﺍﻟﺬَّﻛَﺮَ ﻭَﺍﻟْﺄُﻧﺜَﻰ
    “dan Dia-lah yang menciptakan berpasang-pasangan lelaki-lelaki dan perempuan. ” (QS. An-Najm : 45).
    ﻭَﺃَﻧَّﻪُ ﻫُﻮَ ﺃَﻏْﻨَﻰ ﻭَﺃَﻗْﻨَﻰ
    “dan Dia-lah yang memberikan kekayaan dan kecukupan.” (QS. An-Najm : 48).

    Ternyata jawapan kita semua betul untuk no. 1-3, tetapi jawapan untuk no. 4 ramai keliru.
    Jawapan Allah Ta’ala dalam Al-Qur’an bukan Kemiskinan, tapi KECUKUPAN.

    Subhanallah..
    Sesungguhnya Allah Ta’ala hanya memberi Kekayaan dan Kecukupan kepada hamba-Nya. Dan ternyata yang “menciptakan” kemiskinan adalah diri kita sendiri.

    Itulah hakikatnya, mengapa orang-orang yang sentiasa bersyukur; walaupun hidup serba kekurangan ia akan tetap tersenyum dan merasa cukup, bukan merasa miskin!

    Jadi, marilah kita bangun rasa kesyukuran dan kecukupan di dalam hati dan fikiran kita, berhenti mengeluh, berhenti mengatakan rezeki kecil, agar kita menjadi hamba-Nya yang selalu bersyukur.

    Semangat menjemput rezeki yang halal, biar semakin berkat.. Insha’Allah

     

    Source: Khairudin Samsudin

  • What Does Islam Say About Being Gay?

    What Does Islam Say About Being Gay?

    ISTANBUL — On June 29, Turkey’s 12th Gay Pride Parade was held on Istanbul’s crowded Istiklal Avenue. Thousands marched joyfully carrying rainbow flags until the police began dispersing them with water cannons. The authorities, as has become their custom since the Gezi Park protests of June 2013, once again decided not to allow a demonstration by secular Turks who don’t fit into their vision of the ideal citizen.

    More worrying news came a week later when posters were put up in Ankara with a chilling instruction: “If you see those carrying out the People of Lot’s dirty work, kill the doer and the done!” The “People of Lot” was a religious reference to gays, and the instruction to kill them on sight was attributed to the Prophet Muhammad. The group that put the posters up, the so-called Islamic Defense Youth, defended its message by asserting: “What? Are you offended by the words of our prophet?!”

    All of this suggests that both Turkey and the Muslim world need to engage in some soul-searching when it comes to tolerance for their gay compatriots.

    Of course this intolerance is not exclusive to either Turks or Muslims. According to the International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual, Trans and Intersex Association, Turkey scores slightly better on measures of gay rights when compared with some nearby Christian-majority nations such as Russia, Armenia and Ukraine. Indeed, Turkey’s secular laws don’t penalize sexual orientation, and some out-of-the-closet L.G.B.T. icons have long been popular as artists, singers or fashion designers. Among them are two of the most popular Turkish entertainers of the past half-century: The late Zeki Muren was flamboyantly gay and the singer Bulent Ersoy is famously transsexual. Their eccentricity has apparently added to their popularity.

    But beyond the entertainment industry, the traditional mainstream Islamic view on homosexuality produces intolerance in Turkey toward gays and creates starker problems in Muslim nations that apply Shariah. In Saudi Arabia, Iran, Sudan or Afghanistan, homosexuality is a serious offense that can bring imprisonment, corporal punishment or even the death penalty. Meanwhile, Islamic State militants implement the most extreme interpretation of Shariah by throwing gays from rooftops.

    At the heart of the Islamic view on homosexuality lies the biblical story of Sodom and Gomorrah, which is narrated in the Quran, too. According to scripture, the Prophet Lot had warned his people of “immorality,” for they did “approach men with desire, instead of women.” In return, the people warned by Lot tried to expel their prophet from the city, and even tried to sexually abuse the angels who came down to Lot in the guise of men. Consequently, God destroyed the people of Lot with a colossal natural disaster, only to save the prophet and a few fellow believers.

    The average conservative Muslim takes this story as a justification to stigmatize gays, but there is an important question that deserves consideration: Did the people of Lot receive divine punishment for being homosexual, or for attacking Lot and his heavenly guests?

    The even more significant nuance is that while the Quran narrates this divine punishment for Sodom and Gomorrah, it decrees no earthly punishment for homosexuality — unlike the Old Testament, which clearly decrees that homosexuals “are to be put to death.”

    Medieval Islamic thinkers inferred an earthly punishment by considering homosexuality as a form of adultery. But significant names among them, such as the eighth-century scholar Abu Hanifa, the founder of the popular Hanafi school of jurisprudence, argued that since a homosexual relationship did not produce offspring with an unknown father, it couldn’t be considered adultery.

    The real Islamic basis for punishing homosexuality is the hadiths, or sayings, attributed to the Prophet Muhammad. (The same is true for punishments on apostasy, heresy, impiety, or “insults” of Islam: None come from the Quran; all are from certain hadiths.) But the hadiths were written down almost two centuries after the prophet lived, and their authenticity has been repeatedly questioned — as early as the ninth century by the scholar Imam Nesai — and they can be questioned anew today. Moreover, there is no record of the prophet actually having anyone punished for homosexuality.

    Such jurisprudential facts might help Muslims today to develop a more tolerant attitude toward gays, as some progressive Islamic thinkers in Turkey, such as Ihsan Eliacik, are encouraging. What is condemned in the story of Lot is not sexual orientation, according to Mr. Eliacik, but sexual aggression. People’s private lives are their own business, he argues, whereas the public Muslim stance should be to defend gays when they are persecuted or discriminated against — because Islam stands with the downtrodden.

    It is also worth recalling that the Ottoman Caliphate, which ruled the Sunni Muslim world for centuries and which the current Turkish government claims to emulate, was much more open-minded on this issue. Indeed, the Ottoman Empire had an extensive literature of homosexual romance, and an accepted social category of transvestites. The Ottoman sultans, arguably, were social liberals compared with the contemporary Islamists of Turkey, let alone the Arab World.

    Despite such arguments, the majority of Muslims are likely to keep seeing homosexuality as something sinful, if public opinion polls are any indication. Yet those Muslims who insist on condemning gays should recall that according to Islam, there are many sins, including arrogance, which the Quran treats as among the gravest moral transgressions. For Turks and other Muslims, it could be our own escape from the sin of arrogance to stop stigmatizing others for their behavior and focus instead on refining ourselves.

    The writer, Mustafa Akyol, is the author of “Islam Without Extremes: A Muslim Case for Liberty.”

    Source: www.nytimes.com

  • Muslim Women In Singapore Did Not Wear The Hijab Before Early 1970s

    Muslim Women In Singapore Did Not Wear The Hijab Before Early 1970s

    As proof that the cultural trend of wearing the hijab is a fairly recent phenomenon in Singapore’s history, here are some photos of Muslim women in Singapore/Malaya before early 1970.

    In everyday life:

    4ef53e31-f3d7-4348-a420-92f2e86bbfa5

    54eaba5f-7ff8-4c06-9aa2-e01a310be376

    7836ccdb-8fef-4036-a7d8-0340a2a2c1ec

    Malay ladies

    old-tekka-market-1971

     

    In special occasions:

    malay wedding

    malay wedding 2

    malay wedding 4

     

    In film and pop culture:

    tunang pak dukun

    rachun dunia

    Cinta

    beer ad

     

    From the above photographs, it is evident that before the early 1970’s, the hijab was not part of the Islamic dress code. Then, most Muslim women went about bareheaded or even sporting perms that were popular during that era. Even the more conservative did not wear the hijab, but rather draped a loose shawl or scarf over their head.

    The increasing religiousity of Muslims around the region has obviously impacted Muslims in Singapore, as evident from the changes in our daily habits and dress code. While this in itself is not necessarily a bad thing, but we should not be so quick to also import the customs and culture of other Muslim nations, and in doing so, erode away our own beautiful Malayan heritage.

     

    Source: www.aiseyman.com

deneme bonusu