Tag: Israel

  • Benjamin Netanyahu: Israel Is Also Your Home

    Benjamin Netanyahu: Israel Is Also Your Home

    JERUSALEM – Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu coupled a show of solidarity with France on Sunday with a reminder to shaken French Jews that Israel is keen to welcome them as immigrants.

    Netanyahu and two far-right members of his cabinet flew to Paris on Sunday to join dozens of foreign leaders and hundreds of thousands of French citizens in a march honoring the victims of Islamist militant attacks this week.

    The timing of his message that “Israel is also your home” could clash with attempts by French leaders to reassure Europe’s largest Jewish community after the shock assaults that included hostage-taking at a kosher supermarket.

    In a statement late on Saturday, Netanyahu said an Israeli governmental committee would convene in the coming week to find ways to boost Jewish immigration from France and other European countries “which are being hit by terrible anti-Semitism”.

    “To all the Jews of France and to all the Jews of Europe, I wish to say: the State of Israel is not only the place to which you pray, the State of Israel is also your home,” he said.

    In 2004, then-Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon angered Paris by urging French Jews to flee “the wildest anti-Semitism” in their native country and come to Israel.

    In remarks to reporters as he boarded the flight to Paris, Netanyahu avoided any outright call for France’s 550,000 Jews to leave. He said only he would tell them that “any Jew who wants to immigrate to Israel will be received here with open arms”.

    Under Israel’s Law of Return, anyone with at least one Jewish grandparent has a right of immigration to Israel and, once there, can receive Israeli citizenship automatically.

    Faced with an upsurge in anti-Semitic attacks and threats, some 7,000 French Jews immigrated to Israel last year, an unprecedented number for that community, according to Israel’s quasi-governmental Jewish Agency.

    Moshe Sebbag, rabbi of Paris’ Grand Synagogue, told Israel’s Army Radio he believed that figure could double this year.

    Seventeen people, including journalists and policemen, lost their lives in three days of violence that began with a shooting attack on the satirical newspaper Charlie Hebdo on Wednesday and ended with a hostage-taking at a kosher supermarket on Friday. The three gunmen were also killed.

    After his arrival in Paris, Netanyahu said in a statement he had agreed to requests from the families of the four Jews killed in the supermarket to bring them to Israel for burial. Their funerals have been tentatively scheduled for Tuesday.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Hamas Condemns Charlie Hebdo Attacks

    Hamas Condemns Charlie Hebdo Attacks

    GAZA – The Hamas group that controls the Gaza Strip on Saturday issued a condemnation of the deadly attacks by Islamist gunmen in France this week, saying there was no “justification for killing innocents”.

    The Palestinian Islamist faction, which is designated as a terror organization by most Western countries, also challenged Israel’s “helpless attempts” to draw comparisons between its activities and the violence in France.

    In the worst assault on France’s homeland security for decades, 17 victims lost their lives in three days of violence that began with an attack on the Charlie Hebdo satirical newspaper on Wednesday and ended with Friday’s dual sieges at a print works outside Paris and a kosher supermarket in the city.

    “(Hamas) stresses that its position on the latest events in Paris is in line with the statement issued by the International Union of Muslim Scholars which condemned the attack on the Charlie Hebdo newspaper and that any differences in opinion are no justification for killing innocents,” Hamas said in a rare statement in French.

    Islamist Gaza militants led by Hamas, whose charter includes a pledge to destroy Israel, fought a 50-day war against Israeli forces which ended in August.

    According to the Palestinian Health Ministry, more than 2,100 Palestinians, most of them civilians, were killed. Sixty-seven Israeli soldiers and six civilians in Israel were also killed.

    Hamas added in its statement that Israelis should be tried for war crimes and condemned Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s “helpless attempts” to draw parallels between “the resistance of our people from one side and the terrorism across the world in the other side.”

    The Palestinians will formally become a member of the International Criminal Court (ICC) on April 1, when the court could exercise jurisdiction over war crimes committed by anyone on Palestinian territory, without a referral from the U.N. Security Council.

    Israel is not a member of the Hague-based ICC but its citizens could be tried for actions taken on Palestinian land. Palestinians could also be liable for prosecution for actions against Israelis.

    On Friday, the leader of Lebanon’s Shi’ite group Hezbollah said the attacks in France had done more harm to Islam than any cartoon or book, a reference to the attack on Charlie Hebdo.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • EU Court Ruled For Hamas To Be Removed From EU’s Terrorist List

    EU Court Ruled For Hamas To Be Removed From EU’s Terrorist List

    BRUSSELS – The Palestinian Islamist group Hamas should be removed from the European Union’s terrorist list, an EU court ruled on Wednesday, saying the decision to include it was based on media reports not considered analysis.

    In its ruling, however, the bloc’s second highest tribunal said member states could keep Hamas’s assets frozen for three months to give time for further review or for an appeal.

    The EU’s foreign policy arm said the bloc continued to view Hamas as a terrorist group. “This was a legal ruling of the court based on procedural grounds. We will look into this and decide on appropriate remedial action,” spokeswoman Maja Kocijanic said.

    The United States urged the European Union not to change its stance.

    “We believe that the E.U. should maintain its terrorism sanctions on Hamas,” U.S. State Department spokeswoman Jen Psaki told a regular news briefing.

    Israel, which has clashed repeatedly with Europe in recent years over Palestinian statehood ambitions, demanded Hamas remain blacklisted and said the ruling showed “staggering hypocrisy” toward a Jewish state founded after the Holocaust.

    “It seems that too many in Europe, on whose soil six million Jews were slaughtered, have learned nothing. But we in Israel, we’ve learned,” Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu said. He branded Hamas “a murderous terrorist organization”.

    Hamas holds sway in the Gaza Strip and its founding charter calls for the destruction of Israel. It has regularly battled Israel, most recently in a 50-day war this summer.

    Most Western countries say it is a terrorist organization, pointing to years of indiscriminate rocket strikes out of Gaza and waves of suicide attacks, primarily between 1993 and 2005.

    HAMAS BUOYED

    Hamas says it is a legitimate resistance movement and contested the European Union’s decision in 2001 to include it on the terrorist list. It welcomed Wednesday’s verdict.

    “The decision is a correction of a historical mistake the European Union had made,” Deputy Hamas chief Moussa Abu Marzouk said. “Hamas is a resistance movement and it has a natural right according to all international laws and standards to resist the occupation.”

    The EU court did not ponder the merits of whether Hamas should be classified as a terror group, but reviewed the original decision-making process. This, it said, did not include the considered opinion of competent authorities, but rather relied on media and Internet reports.

    It said if an appeal was brought before the EU’s top court, the European Court of Justice, the freeze of Hamas funds should continue until the legal process was complete.

    In a similar ruling, an EU court said in October the 2006 decision to place Sri Lanka’s Tamil Tigers on the EU list was procedurally flawed. As with Hamas, it also said the group’s assets should remain frozen pending further legal action and the European Union subsequently filed an appeal.

    The European Parliament has approved a non-binding resolution supporting Palestinian statehood. The text was a compromise, representing divisions within the EU over how far to blame Israel for failing to agree peace terms.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Palestinians Afraid Of Criticising Mahmoud Abbas

    Palestinians Afraid Of Criticising Mahmoud Abbas

    RAMALLAH — Two-thirds of Palestinians say they are afraid to criticise Mr Mahmoud Abbas, according to a poll, and some of the Palestinian president’s recent actions only seem to confirm claims that dissent comes at a price.

    Last month, Mr Abbas outlawed the West Bank’s largest labour union and briefly jailed its two leaders for organising strikes. Security agents routinely monitor social media and send threats or complaints to some of those criticising Abbas. Meanwhile, the Palestinian leader’s Fatah movement continues to purge supporters of an exiled rival.

    Critics say that after a decade in power, Mr Abbas is overseeing a largely authoritarian system with shrinking room for dissent — a claim denied by Mr Abbas supporters who say Palestinians enjoy more political freedoms than most in the Arab world.

    Complaints of heavy-handedness come at a time of paralysis on all fronts. Mr Abbas’ strategy of setting up a Palestinian state through negotiations with Israel has hit a dead end, while the bitter rivalry between Fatah and the Islamic militant group Hamas continues to fester.

    With his approval rate down to 35 per cent, Mr Abbas lashes out against those he views as a political threat, such as former aide Mohammed Dahlan, now based in the United Arab Emirates, and ex-Prime Minister Salam Fayyad.

    In 10 years in office, the 79-year-old has avoided grooming a successor.

    Mr Abbas defenders say Israel and Hamas are largely to blame for the gridlock: Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu adopted harder negotiating positions than his predecessors, while Hamas seized Gaza in 2007 and set up a mini-state there.

    The Hamas-Fatah split was largely responsible for eroding political institutions, such as parliament, and blocking presidential and parliamentary elections, now five years overdue, analysts said. This has opened the door for Mr Abbas to consolidate power, they said.

    “We face an autocratic regime that doesn’t believe in any freedoms, in freedom of unions or freedom of speech,” said Mr Jihad Harb, a writer and Fatah member. “The people are now terrified. They don’t speak up, fearing reprisal.”

    Mr Ahmed Assaf, a Fatah spokesman, said criticism is permitted — provided it does not cross a line by accusing Mr Abbas or members of his government of being traitors or infidels.

    “If you look around and see what is going on in the Arab world, you realise how much freedom we enjoy here,” Mr Assaf said.

    Most Palestinians in the West Bank appear to disagree, according to a poll published last week by the independent Palestinian Centre for Policy and Survey Research. Sixty-six per cent said they believe they cannot criticise Mr Abbas without fear, according to the survey among 1,270 respondents, with an error margin of 3 percentage points.

    One recent controversy centred on the largest Palestinian union, which represents about 40,000 employees of the Palestinian Authority.

    Last month, Mr Abbas outlawed the union and had two top officials jailed for a week. The decision followed strikes by the union demanding more benefits.

    Critics said Mr Abbas and Fatah had used the union in the past as a tool against rivals. They said Mr Abbas went after the union last month because it was causing problems for his hand-picked prime minister, Mr Rami Hamdallah.

    Mr Bassam Zakarneh, one of the union leaders who was briefly jailed by Mr Abbas, said the union is being targeted because “they don’t want anyone to stand up to the government”.

    Mr Abbas’ aide Nimer Hamad said the union was never registered and that strikes “caused huge damage to the interests of the people”.

    Meanwhile, others defending the union also got in trouble.

    Senior Fatah official Azzam al-Ahmed, who criticised the decision to ban the union, found himself accused by Mr Hamdallah of nepotism for pushing his sister-in-law for the post of education minister — a rare “outing” of one member of the ruling elite by another.

    The incident played out on a talk show earlier this month on government-run Palestine TV. Asked about his sister-in-law, Mr al-Ahmed denied he used his influence to get her the Cabinet job. Mr Hamdallah called the show, contradicting Mr al-Ahmed’s version on the air.

    The episode confirmed a perception — held by more than 80 per cent of Palestinians, according to last week’s poll — that Palestinian Authority institutions are tainted by corruption, with nepotism cited as a major problem.

    Some speculated the showdown over the union could also be linked to internal power struggles in Fatah ahead of a party convention next month.

    Regardless of intentions, the crackdown on the union is unpopular, with two-thirds of the public opposed, said pollster Khalil Shikaki.

    Mr Abbas’ approval rating has dropped to 35 per cent, from 50 per cent last summer. “There is no doubt that the crackdown on freedoms and liberties, particularly unions, is certainly one of those factors that are pushing in that direction,” said Mr Shikaki, who conducted last week’s poll.

    Mr Abbas also continues to engage in battles with perceived foes, even though they have not declared themselves as challengers.

    Earlier this year, he began purging supporters of former Gaza strongman Dahlan from the ranks of Fatah. He has warned others they would be expelled if they maintain ties with Mr Dahlan, some in Fatah said.

    Beyond curbs on expression in the self-rule areas, Palestinians face multiple restrictions — including those on movement imposed by Israel, which retains overall control in the West Bank.

    In this environment, many use social media as an outlet for their views, but that’s also fraught with risk.

    Mr Ahmed Zaki, the news director of Palestine TV, said he was recently demoted after a Facebook post in which he criticised the choice of a talk show guest on his station — an Egyptian commentator who supported Israeli attacks against Hamas targets in Gaza.

    After that post, Mr Zaki said he received a call from Mr Abbas’ office and was told he would no longer serve in his job, though he remains on the station’s payroll.

    Ms Tami Rafidi, a 35-year-old Fatah activist in Ramallah, said she has been admonished for Facebook posts critical of Mr Abbas and told by party members and security officials to tone down her comments. She said she has not been threatened because of her role in Fatah.

    “But I am aware of others who were pressured or threatened to stop criticism,” she said. “The margin of freedom in the social media is narrow in the Palestinian territories.” AP

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Israel’s Status As National Homeland Of Jewish People Enhrined In Constitution

    Israel’s Status As National Homeland Of Jewish People Enhrined In Constitution

    JERUSALEM (AFP) – Israel’s government on Sunday endorsed a proposal to anchor in law the country’s status as the national homeland of the Jewish people, drawing fire from critics who said it weakened democracy.

    “The cabinet today approved a draft basic law: ‘Israel the national state of the Jewish people’,” said a statement from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu’s Likud party, one of whose MPs was a sponsor.

    Netanyahu also announced a separate initiative to strip Arabs of their residency and welfare rights if they or their relatives take part in unrest.

    Following a stormy meeting, the cabinet voted 14 to six in favour of the national homeland proposal, with ministers from the two centrist parties – HaTnuah led by Justice Minister Tzipi Livni and Yesh Atid of Finance Minister Yair Lapid – voting against, media reports said.

    The proposal would mean Israel would no longer be defined in its Basic Laws as “Jewish and democratic” but instead as “the national homeland of the Jewish people”.

    Critics, who include the government’s top legal adviser, say the proposed change to the laws that act as Israel’s effective constitution could institutionalise discrimination against its 1.7 million Arab citizens.

    By giving preeminence to the “Jewish” character of Israel over its democratic nature, the law in its current format is anti-democratic, they say.

    The Israel Democracy Institute said that the state’s Jewish identity is already contained in its 1948 declaration of independence.

    “However, that declaration also emphasises the Jewish State’s absolute commitment to the equality of all of its citizens – an essential component missing from the proposals being presented to the government today,” IDI president Yohanan Plesner said in a statement.

    Netanyahu insisted the law would give equal weight to both characteristics.

    “There are those who would like the democratic to prevail over the Jewish and there are those who would like the Jewish to prevail over the democratic… both of these values are equal and both must be considered to the same degree,” he said.

    The proposal has provoked uproar among MPs and ministers from the centre and the left, who fear the text only institutionalises discrimination.

    There are also concerns about a plan to revoke the rights of any Arab resident who took part in or incited violence, even stone-throwing.

    “It cannot be that those who attack Israeli citizens and call for the elimination of the State of Israel will enjoy rights such as National Insurance – and their family members as well, who support them,” Netanyahu told ministers.

    Israel’s Arab minority, comprising some 20 per cent of the population, are descendants of Palestinians who stayed after the establishment of Israel in 1948.

    If the Jewish homeland proposal becomes law, it would mean “the institutionalisation of racism, which is already a reality on the street, in both law and at the heart of the political system”, warned Majd Kayyal of Adalah, the Legal Centre for Arab Minority Rights in Israel.

    “Democracy guarantees that all citizens have the same rights and are equal before the state, but this racist change introduces a distinction on the basis of religion,” he said.

    Attorney General Yehuda Weinstein, the government’s legal adviser, has also criticised the proposal, saying it weakens the state’s democratic character.

    The version of the bill approved by ministers on Sunday represents a nod from Netanyahu to the most hardline elements of his party and ruling coalition as talk grows of an early election.

    But it will be incorporated into a hybrid proposal approved by Netanyahu, the Likud statement said.

    “The bill will pass a preliminary reading in the Knesset this Wednesday and will be revised to conform with a government bill which will be drafted and approved by the cabinet soon,” it said.

    The final version of the text submitted to parliament for approval is likely to be softened, predicted Denis Charbit, a political scientist at Israel’s Open University.

    “The text proposed by Netanyahu is more moderate but it is still problematic because he disassociates the Jewish character from the democratic character of the state and this institutionalises a hierarchy between them, to the detriment of democracy,” he said.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com