Tag: law

  • Survey Finds That Local Muslim Respondents For The Donning Of The Hijab In Schools, Autonomy Of Madrasahs

    Survey Finds That Local Muslim Respondents For The Donning Of The Hijab In Schools, Autonomy Of Madrasahs

    Between 6th to 13th March, we ran a survey to identify Singapore Muslim community perceptions on several socio-political issues. The survey was based on the Suara Musyawarah report, responses to the report and several AMP studies of the Malay community.

    Summary

    The survey indicates strong concerns on the cost of living, perception of discrimination and the community’s legal and education standing.
    Study

    The online survey was published on Almakhazin.com. Surveygizmo.com provided the engine.

    Five broad categories were addressed: socio-legal, Leadership, Foreign workers/ demography, economy and education. Responses are based on the Likert system with respondents indicating on a 5 point scale from “Strongly agree” to “Strongly disagree”.

    This survey is by no means a comprehensive study of the Muslim community. It serves as an indication on several specific issues. Over the next few months, we plan to expand and deepen the understanding of community preferences through with more community surveys. We hope that it will provide a little insight as to how sections of the community perceive various issues.

    We used social media to gather respondents for the survey. Invitations to participate were placed in several Singapore Muslim pages such as Suara Melayu Singapore, Almakhazin SG and Singapore Muslim Students Overseas. None of the groups are based on any political or religious persuasion.

    According to ShareThis count, the survey page was shared 603 times. It was shared through Facebook 578 times, by Twitter 18 times, once by email and Liked 235 times. 6 shares were unaccounted by ShareThis.

    Caveats

    As is inherent in any online survey tool, we rely on respondents’ self identification (religion, gender, age etc) and responses. There is no way to determine if what they declare for themselves are true. However, this is not a unique problem. It exists in online and offline surveys.
    There was also initial concerns of multiple responses from the same person. To minimise the possibility of such behaviour, we filtered responses through IP address. Only the last response per IP address is recognised.

    Responses

    Total number of responses: 334
    After filtering repeats through IP address: 314
    Muslim respondents: 313
    One respondent identified as Christian. Since the survey is on the Muslim community, we had to remove the response.

    Demography
    Age
    The youth age group (defined here for those between 18-35) makes up a slight majority of respondents. However, there was strong representation from 35-54 year olds at 38.7%.

    Gender
    There was an over-representation of male respondents. 2/3 of respondents identified as male. The survey did not seek specifically male or female groups or participants.

    Highest qualifications
    About a third of respondents have tertiary qualifications with Bachelors degree making up a quarter of respondents. A further 34.5% have diplomas.

    Race
    As expected, a large majority of respondents (78.6%) identify as being Malays. 10.2% as Indians.

    Categorisation
    The survey was set up into 5 categories:
    1. Socio-legal
    2. Leadership
    3. Foreign workers and demography
    4. Economy
    5. Education

    In this analysis however, we will recategorise the survey. There are five categories that make up our analysis:
    1. National issues
    2. Community concerns- government
    3. Social contract
    4. Community concerns-Internal
    5. Autonomy

    National issues

    Economy
    In terms of the economy, there appears to be uncertainty in the way the government is managing it even as the respondents tend to believe it is not going very well. There are also concerns with the way the CPF is managed. However, there is a strong concern with the cost of living in Singapore.

    96.8% of respondents are worried about the cost of living in Singapore with 76.4% stating they strongly agree with the statement “I am worried about the high cost of living.”

    However, slightly less than half of the respondents believe the government is not managing the economy well. 30.4% are neutral and about 20% think the government is managing it well.

    62% are concerned about the way CPF is managing their funds with 33.9% indicating they “strongly disagree” with the statement “I am confident with CPF’s management of our funds.”

    Foreign workers
    There appears to be concern on the number of foreign workers and as it relates to the percentage of Malays.

    59% disagree with the statement “I believe the government is right in its foreign worker policies.” 77% feel there are too many foreign workers in Singapore.

    About 63% are “concerned that the number of foreign workers will result in a reduction in the percentage of Muslims in Singapore.”

    Concerns-government
    Policies that affect the community negatively appear to get a strong response.

    There is strong support among the respondents for hijab to be allowed in school and at the workplace. In reference to the ban of hijab in school, 90% of respondents “believe that Muslim students should be allowed to wear hijab in school” with 68.1% saying they strongly agree. 8.6% were neutral to the question. Only 1.3% disagreed and no one strongly disagreed.

    A stronger response was received for question on whether anyone should be denied employment because of hijab. About 98% believe that no one should be denied employment due to hijab with 87.9% believing strongly. 1% were neutral and only 0.6% (even split) believing they can be denied employment due to hijab.

    89% “believe that Muslims should be allowed to enlist in any branch of the armed forces.”

    Further to the concerns of discrimination, 93% “believe that Singapore should enact an Anti-discrimination law to ensure no one is discriminated.”

    Social contract
    Article 152 of the constitution states:
    “Minorities and special position of Malays
    152.
    —(1) It shall be the responsibility of the Government constantly to care for the interests of the racial and religious minorities in Singapore.

    (2) The Government shall exercise its functions in such manner as to recognise the special position of the Malays, who are the indigenous people of Singapore, and accordingly it shall be the responsibility of the Government to protect, safeguard, support, foster and promote their political, educational, religious, economic, social and cultural interests and the Malay language.”

    Signifying the strong sense of the existing social contract 75% of respondents believe in retaining Article 152 of the constitution. Only 3% believed the Article should not be retained.

    About 20% believe the government is living up to its responsibilities as specified in the Article. 34% are neutral about the government’s performance and 43% believe the government has not lived up to it.

    We received several queries in the comment section indicating the respondents’ unfamiliarity with Section 152.

    Community concerns- Internal

    The Malay statistic for imprisonment and educational underachievement has been a disconcerting discussion in the community for some time. Another issue that has received some attention is of the erosion of Malay language use in Singapore.

    With 79% being concerned about the over-representation of Malays in prison, it indicates not only the concern of the severity but also the recognition that the Malays are over-represented.

    Similarly, the perception of Malay educational underachievement is strong with 83% indicating their agreement that it is a concern. Only about 4% are not concerned about the over-representation in NA/NT streams and ITE and the underrepresentation in Universities.

    However, it should be noted that with a growing recognition of the value of ITE education, respondents may have indicated their lack of concern due to their acceptance of ITE as a viable and valuable educational pathway.

    There is also a strong position taken on Malay language. 80% are concerned about the erosion of the language in Singapore. 14% are neutral.
    The concern however may also be due to the greater public statements and campaigns encouraging the use of the language. With enhanced recognition, the belief in its lack and improper use may have become stronger.

    Autonomy
    There is also a strong sense of the necessity of community autonomy from government control. About 80% of respondents believe madrasah should be independent of government control and for the highest Islamic authority to not be appointed by the government. About 63% also believe that community leaders should not be involved in politics.

    Discussion
    There appears to be disenchantment within the community in various government policies. There also is a strong sense of communal concern among respondents. This can be due to the possibility that those who participate in such surveys to already be concerned about the questions asked, that the issues are current and significant or there is a socio-political alignment among those who participate in such community based surveys.

    It may also be due to respondents who participate in social media based discussions to be more concerned about the issues in the survey.

    The demographics indicate a wide variety of respondents. If this can be taken as a cross section of Malay community response, then it indicates a substantial disagreement with current policies especially with regard to community-government relations.

    There appears to be a greater sense of disenfranchisement between members of the community and the government. Discrimination, control and high cost of living apart from community underachievement are real concerns that need to be resolved.

    This survey provided the broad strokes in community perception. We will follow up with surveys that go in depth on the issues discussed above with special attention on community-government relations.

    The survey results can be viewed at:
    http://app.surveygizmo.com/reportsview/?key=345590-4188929-4606949383d247e91eebedc49140b4e8

     

    Source: http://almakhazin.com

  • Training Contracts Unable To Meet Demand From Increased Supply Of Law Graduates

    Training Contracts Unable To Meet Demand From Increased Supply Of Law Graduates

    A 47 per cent increase in students studying law, in the UK and Australia over the past three years, has led to increased competition for training contracts with law firms in Singapore.

    Numbers were revealed by Senior Minister of State for Law Indranee Rajah in Parliament on Tuesday (Mar 10), following recent news that eight UK law schools would be dropped from the list recognised for admission to the Singapore Bar.

    The number at UK universities has doubled over four years, hitting 1,140 students in 2013. For Australian universities, that number has gone up by more than 25 per cent, hitting around 390 students in 2013.

    Speaking in Parliament, MP Hri Kumar Nair, who is the Government Parliamentary Committee Chair for Home Affairs and Law, said that the glut of law graduates had given way to a shortage of training contracts.

    “From a dearth of lawyers a few years ago, we are now faced with law graduates not being able to secure training contracts. Last year there were about 650 law graduates, but only about 490 training contracts.”

    “Figures from the Ministry show that only about 70 per cent of foreign-trained graduates managed to secure training contracts with firms here, compared to around 94 per cent of local graduates.”

    TRAINING CONTRACT FRAMEWORK UNDER REVIEW

    Ms Indranee said that work was already underway by the Singapore Institute of Legal Education (SILE) to fix the problem.

    “SILE has put in place measures to facilitate more training contracts. Senior lawyers can now supervise up to four practice trainees, instead of two, at any time. The SILE has also set up a Working Party to review the practice training framework,” she said.

    “However, it ultimately depends on the number of trainees that senior solicitors can effectively supervise, and which the firms can eventually retain.”

    She added that the Law Ministry’s objective is to ensure a sufficient pipeline of quality legal talent to support Singapore’s legal needs.

    “We uphold high standards to maintain quality. We do not try to beat the market mechanism by controlling numbers, but have the responsibility to inform aspiring lawyers of the situation to enable them to make informed choices on whether, and where, to pursue a law degree.”

    Ms Indranee also pointed out that while there is no overall shortage of lawyers, many are keen to practise commercial and business law. This means a shortage in some areas of practice, like criminal and family law.

    LOCAL LAW GRADUATE NUMBERS FAIRLY CONSTANT

    While overseas law graduate numbers climb, the number of local law graduates has remained fairly constant. Fewer than 400 students graduate with a local law degree each year.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • NUS Law Assistant Professor Convicted Of Assaulting 70 Year Old Taxi Driver

    NUS Law Assistant Professor Convicted Of Assaulting 70 Year Old Taxi Driver

    An assistant law professor with the National University of Singapore (NUS) assaulted a cabby over the change for a $20 fare, leaving him bloodied and in need of multiple stitches, a court heard yesterday.

    Sundram Peter Soosay, 43, had vomited in Mr Sun Chuan Hua’s vehicle in the wee hours of Christmas Day in 2013.

    He got out near King Albert Park in Bukit Timah and started to walk away without paying, but handed over a $50 note after the 70-year-old cabby chased him.

    It is alleged that Soosay then attacked Mr Sun from behind as he returned to the vehicle to retrieve the change, knocking him to the ground and punching him several times in the face and body, an incident that was seen by an eyewitness.

    In a trial that began yesterday, Mr Sun told the court he could smell alcohol on the breath of Soosay, who had boarded the cab along Serangoon North Avenue 1 to go to Clementi Road.

    To get the passenger to pay, Mr Sun said he asked him several times and touched him “lightly” on the arm. Soosay paid when Mr Sun threatened to make a police report.

    As he was walking back to his cab, someone hit him in the head, causing him to fall face down, said Mr Sun.

    He tried to get up but Soosay forced him back on the ground, sat astride him, and continued punching him in the face, the cabby claimed.

    Mr Sun, who needed 17 days of medical leave, told the court in Mandarin that he had got his taxi licence in 1983 and this had never happened to him before.

    The eyewitness claimed he saw the two men scuffle before the alleged assault.

    In his cross-examination of the witness, defence counsel Amarjit Singh said his client had walked away after the scuffle and did not attack the cabby. He suggested that the cabby had provoked Soosay by pushing him repeatedly in the back and throwing a punch of his own.

    Mr Sun will stay on the stand when hearing resumes on Feb 5.

    If convicted, Soosay, a permanent resident here, could be jailed for up to two years and fined up to $5,000.

    An NUS spokesman said Soosay joined the university in 2008. “NUS will await the conclusion of legal proceedings before determining what action, if any, should be taken.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • No Hard And Fast Application Of Law In Proposed Bill On Drinking Alcohol In Public Areas

    No Hard And Fast Application Of Law In Proposed Bill On Drinking Alcohol In Public Areas

    Police will take action based on the situation and there will be no hard and fast rules when it comes to arresting people who drink in public.

    Under a new Bill tabled in Parliament on Monday, drinking in public places – anywhere the public can access – will not be allowed between 10.30pm and 7am. This ban will cover parks and common areas in Housing Board estates, for example. It excludes residences and common areas within condominiums.

    Retail shops may also be banned from selling alcohol after 10.30pm.

    Exceptions will be allowed on a case-by-case basis.

    The proposed law has drawn a flurry of reactions, with many saying that it is too restrictive and harsh.

    In response to queries about enforcement, a spokesman for the Ministry of Home Affairs (MHA) said that the police will be able to “take a more calibrated approach…based on the circumstances of the situation.”

    For example, police will first ask the person drinking in a public place during the restricted hours to dispose of the liquor, and take down his particulars. If the person is a public annoyance, police can then ask him to leave .

    “If he complies, no further action will be taken,” said the spokesman.

    “Should the person ignore the advice, or if he is a recalcitrant offender, police may consider stiffer action such as issuing him a composition fine or arrest.”

    The penalty for first-time offender is a fine not exceeding $1,000. A repeat offender may be fined up to $2,000 and jailed up to three months.

    On Tuesday night, Deputy Prime Minister Teo Chee Hean, who is also Home Affairs Minister, visited a coffeeshop in Hougang with MP Gan Thiam Poh, and assured patrons that they can continue drinking there.

    He wrote on his Facebook page: “Uncle you can continue enjoying your beer at the coffeeshop as before. Coffeeshops can carry on according to their current licensed hours.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com