Tag: Lee Hsien Loong

  • Court Application Filed On Lee Kuan Yew Interview Agreement With Government

    Court Application Filed On Lee Kuan Yew Interview Agreement With Government

    The executors of the estate of Mr Lee Kuan Yew have filed an application seeking guidance from the Courts on proper interpretation of an interview agreement between the late Mr Lee and the Government.

    The court application was filed by Mr Lee’s younger children, Dr Lee Wei Ling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang, on Sep 2 and a pre-trial conference was held on Tuesday (Sep 22).

    The agreement relates to the custody and use of certain interviews given by Mr Lee, Singapore’s founding Prime Minister, to the Oral History Department, a spokesperson for the Attorney-General’s Chambers (AGC) said.

    The Government will establish the proper interpretation and status of the agreement before the Court, the AGC added.

    The next pre-trial conference will be held on Oct 27.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Ang Yong Guan: Transferred Gratitude May Explain Vote Swing

    Ang Yong Guan: Transferred Gratitude May Explain Vote Swing

    I have been reflecting on this big swing towards PAP in GE2015. There is one factor which stands out in my mind: giving PM Lee and PAP a massive mandate as a way of honouring his late father. I call it transferred gratitude.

    This swing of 10% happened in spite of 1) cooperation amongst opposition parties to avoid 3-cornered fights, 2) opposition fielding quality candidates, 3) huge turnout at opposition rallies and 4) post 2011 momentum towards having more Opposition MPs in Parliament? Many have also spoken about the positive impact of SG50, LKY legacy, goodies, PAP making changes in response to GE2011, fear of opposition taking over at this stage and the impending worsening of the world economy.

    The attempt to separate father (SG40; the first 40 years) and son (SG10; the last 10 years) to show their differences did not work either because it was not adequately publicised in the main stream media or it did not resonate well with voters. An overwhelming sense of transferred gratitude thus prevailed. Seeing PM Lee’s photograph all over the island aroused nostalgia and strong emotional feelings in the voters towards his late father who had passed away less than 6 months ago. Hence, the transferred gratitude: a vote for him was a vote for his father.

    If transferred gratitude is indeed the main factor, then all other factors pale in comparison. Is there a need to analyse too deeply why opposition fared so badly in the presence of the emotionally-charged transferred gratitude which defies logic? That is why this nation-wide massive swing took everyone by surprise.

    Given another 5 years, in GE2020, will people give PM Lee and PAP this advantage of transferred gratitude?

     

    Source: Ang Yong Guan

  • Lee Hsien Loong: Opposition Party Like ‘Mouse In The House’

    Lee Hsien Loong: Opposition Party Like ‘Mouse In The House’

    Nine parties may be contesting this election but to most observers, the keenest contests will be in wards featuring the People’s Action Party (PAP) and the Workers’ Party (WP).

    The exception is Potong Pasir where PAP faces the Singapore People’s Party (SPP).

    PAP and WP clash in wards including Aljunied, East Coast and Marine Parade GRCs and single seats in Fengshan and MacPherson.

    The clash between the two rival parties underscores two differing agendas.

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong sees it as an election to find leaders for the next generation while WP says it needs to entrench opposition for a healthier parliament.

    For the first time in independent Singapore’s electoral history, all seats will be contested. And for the third time since 2006, PAP did not return to power on Nomination Day.

    A two-party system is common in some developed countries like the US and Australia. The question is whether Singapore is on the cusp of a similar system.

    WP’s success at GE 2011 has allowed it to attract better qualified candidates – 12 out of the 19 WP candidates introduced started volunteering with the party from 2011.

    For GE 2015, the party was able to field its largest slate ever – 28 candidates – to contest in five GRCs and five SMCs.

    Yesterday, at a press conference at the PAP headquarters, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong spelt out the battle lines after the close of nominations. “This is an election where there is a lot at stake and where we have to take very seriously people’s concerns, people’s aspirations, their outlook in a new world and also the way the election is going to be fought,” he said.

    Reports and pictures by Ariffin Jamar, Azim Azman, Benjamin Seetor, Chai Hung Yin, Choo Chwee Hua, David Lee, David Sun, Elizabeth Law, Foo Jie Ying, Koh Hui Theng, Hariz Baharudin, Jennifer Dhanaraj, Jeremy Long, Jonathan Choo, Mohd Ishak, Ng Jun Sen, Nurul Nabilah, Phyllicia Wang, Ronald Loh, Shahriya Yahaya and Tan Tam Mei

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Ten Uncomfortable Statements Made By Lee Hsien Loong At National Day Rally

    Ten Uncomfortable Statements Made By Lee Hsien Loong At National Day Rally

    Ten uncomfortable statements made by our Prime Minister at last night National Day rally:-

    1. Earn less than $1000 can buy HDB flat – to compound the misery of low wage Singaporean workers, our PM states that if you earn $1000 and below you can now buy  2-room HDB flat. The previous low was $1000 and they may throw in the paint for you as well.

    This kind of wild baseless electioneering is the stab to the morale of many of our low wage workers who sometimes could not even buy food for themselves let alone purchase a brand new HDB flat with a salary of $1000 and below.

    We need a comprehensive minimum wage system so our poor can live in dignity while working hard.

    2. Protection for Singaporean workers – PM talks alot about protecting the Singaporean core but on the ground we saw companies replacing us like changing cheap underwear with foreign labour.

    Young people who recently graduate continue to face difficulties at the job front and matured PMETs turn to cab driving in order to survive.

    This kind of senseless rhetoria may probably hurt him and his party at the polls badly.

    3. Recognition of a EM 3 student making it through SUT – though PM tries to deliver due recognition to a EM 3 student working his way up through SUT, there is still much to be done to deter fake degree fraudsters from entering our shore as foreign talents.

    Singaporeans are shocked that degrees from dubious third world universities from our foreign talents for the past decades are not properly verified and their skills autheticated.

    This is more worrying for positions like doctors, civil engineers, nurses and accountants.

    Can we trust our foreign-trained doctors now with their diagnosis and worse operating skills?

    Its also a slap to the faces of our professionals who work their way up to acquire degrees from our first world universities only to be beaten at the door by a fake certificate when they go for job interview.

    4. Pioneer generation package – the government will spend $9 billion on the pioneer generation package but much of it is done through the medical subsidy at clinics and the hospital using a CHAS card.

    There is nothing much to celebrate about as so far no cash has pass through to our seniors of whom many still need to toil under the sun to haul cardboards for a living.

    At best, its a propaganda scheme meant to entrap 150,000 senior citizens for their valuable votes.

    5. Paternity leave and baby bonus enhanced – paternity leave for fathers will be enhanced from one to two weeks and baby bonus will be given to all married mothers with no limit on the number of baby born. There is still zero benefit for babies born out of wedlock.

    Its unsure how many dads could claim this benefit even though the government will pay for the extra one week of paternity leave as many are feeling insecure about their jobs in a very lopsided job market.

    What if their employers are unhappy that the caring father takes two weeks off to care for his new-born baby and decide to find a replacement for him?

    Civil servants will in all likelihood be able to claim this fringe benefit so fathers can do more at home during a very difficult period at home but those sloughing in the private job environment are unlikely to encash their entitlement for fear they may lose their jobs.

    PM has all along warn us about taking care of our lunch as many on the outside are looking to eat it if we are not careful.

    6. Income ceilings for buyers of new Build-to-Order flats will be raised from S$10,000 to S$12,000 – this is good news for newly-wed who have a high combined income and still qualify for our subsidized BTO flats.

    It will benefit those who belong to the middle income earners and want to be conservative in their first home purchase.

    Many new citizens who work their way up here must be happy that such a ruling is in effect now as they can claim their citizenship benefit with a higher income ceiling for BTO flats.

    7. Re-employment age raised to 67 – another useless scheme as many of our matured PMETs could not get ready employment once they cross the 50-year-old mark.

    Many professionals turn to cab driving when they could not find any viable employment in order to survive. We probably have the most educated cabby force in the world next to US and Australia.

    This re-employment age enhancement probably benefits those at the civil service which harbours a more balanced work-place environment.

    It seems that the civil service will implement most of the PM’s suggestions but during his speech he cautions against burdening employers at the private sector which hires almost 70% of our workforce.

    Why the double standards?

    8. Racial and religious segregation – PM spent quite alot of time trying to instill fear into the population by highlighting the racial tensions since independence and the recent racial outbreak in KL.

    By doing that, he is not doing much to integrate the society into one united country as race and religion divides us if we keep on emphasizing its differences and dangers.

    We indeed have come a long way from a fragmented small country to one that imports foreigners by the million to enhance our economy.

    Right now, we probably have harbour 200,000 PRC Chinese, 250,000 Filipinos, 200,000 Indians, 300,000 Malaysians, 50,000 Indonesians and 50,000 Vietnamese among others.

    Its a sizeable foreign legion which is capable of upsetting any racial harmony we have all along try to protect.

    The Chinese bus strike and Little India riot were two classic examples of a foreign-dominated economy that went very wrong if we don’t try to help these people integrate with our way of life.

    9. Emphasis on infrastructure and economic developments – many Singaporeans by now are used to such rhetoria in every PM national day rally speeches.

    One can simply download last year’s speech and there is not much difference in both contents and substance.

    We all know about the world’s best airport, busy highway and highest-GDP – its already being ingrained in us for the past few decades.

    We hope to hear more visionary speeches like those from his father – bringing the nation together despite the wide wage gap between the have’s and the have-not.

    We want to hear how he could empathsize with those who have lost their jobs to a incoming foreigner because of his economy-driven open-door policy – that he knew their pain their sufferings and their sacrifices so we can have a better Singapore.

    We want to hear more of his software than the hardware stuff which frankly doesn’t benefit the downtrodden who struggle from hand to mouth every month due to the lack of a minimum wage system.

    Moreover, we don’t need a leader who always give us empty promises but seldom deliver when the time arrives.

    10. “No corruption, no dishonesty!” such words echoed through my mind throughout the night after hearing the PM’s speech.

    I was troubled as its like a statement made without much substantiation when the facts spoke otherwise.

    I also asked myself: “What will his father do in such a situation?”

    Years of cushioned rule by the PM has rendered our civil service of it’s efficiency and pride.

    Many serve the country because they do it for their rice bowl rather than serving the people whole-heartedly.

    The lack of a proper system of accountability also gives way for some to manipulate the public funds for personal use.

    The AGO audit flagged out alot of our ministerial financial lapses and they were subsequently covered up later on without much transparency and openness.

    The ruling party hopes Singaporeans will forget about the matter before going to the polls – suspected to be next month.

    With the help of social media, such serious lapses will be played up over and over again so Singaporeans will know what kind of government they are putting up with for the next five years!

    Written by: Gilbert Goh

     

    Source: www.transitioning.org

  • Masyarakat Berbilang Kaum, Budaya Berdikari Faktor Kejayaan Negara

    Masyarakat Berbilang Kaum, Budaya Berdikari Faktor Kejayaan Negara

    Perdana Menteri Lee Hsien Loong menggariskan tiga prinsip asas yang membawa kepada kemakmuran Singapura.

    Tiga prinsip itu adalah tekad untuk menjadi masyarakat berbilang kaum, budaya yang berdikari dan sokongan antara satu sama lain serta kepercayaan antara pemerintah dengan rakyat.

    Encik Lee menggesa rakyat Singapura supaya memastikan negara ini terus kekal istimewa – dan menjadi “titik merah bersinar”- yang menerangi perjalanan masa depan.

    Berucap di Rapat Umum Hari Kebangsaan hari ini, Encik Lee berkata Perbarisan Hari Kebangsaan tahun ini bukan setakat sambutan ulang tahun kemerdekaan. Namun, ia meraikan iltizam negara ini untuk mempertahankan diri sendiri dan bertahan sepanjang lebih 50 tahun.

    “Kami bemula hanya dengan dua batalion infantri, di kejiranan yang susah. Namun para perintis kita berazam untuk mempertahankan diri mereka.

    “Kami membina SAF (Angkatan Bersenjata Singapura). Dalam masa empat tahun, beberapa unitnya menyertai Perbarisan Hari Kebangsaan 1969,” ujar Encik Lee, yang turut memberi penghormatan kepada beberapa anggota perkhidmatan perintis yang hadir di rapat umum dan menyertai Perbarisan Vintaj.

    Encik Lee berkata SG50 juga meraikan bagaimana Singapura mengubah kelemahannya menjadi satu kekuatan.

    Meskipun ekonomi Singapura mulanya lemah, Encik Lee berkata rakan-rakan kerja perikatan tiga pihak, yang terdiri daripada pemerintah, kesatuan kerja dan para majikan, bekerja keras untuk membina tenaga kerja terbaik di dunia.

    Singapura juga kian kurang bergantung kepada Malaysia untuk bekalan airnya. “Hampir kesemua bekalan air kita datang dari Johor (ketika itu). Sekali sekala, apabila ada isu-isu dengan Malaysia, ada sahaja ahli politik yang mengugut akan ‘tutup paip’. Tapi kita tidak mati kehausan.

    “Kita bersihkan sungai-sungai kita, dan membina empangan untuk menjadikannya kolam air. Kita membina Bendungan Marin, dan mengubah Marina Bay menjadi Kolam Air Marina. Seluruh pulau ini dijadikan kawasan tadahan air. Kita mencipta AirBaru. Dan pada Hari Kebangsaan 2002, kita meraikan kejayaan ini bersama,” kata beliau.

    RAIKAN SEBAGAI RAKYAT BERSATU

    Encik Lee berkata kepercayaan rakyat Singapura tentang perlunya membina masyarakat berbilang kaum, adalah satu sebab utama di sebalik kejayaan Singapura. Malah, dasar-dasar negara ini juga mempertahankan pendirian ini.

    Encik Lee menarik perhatian bahawa sambutan-sambutan SG50 melibatkan semua masyarakat di Singapura, kerana kesemuanya maju bersama negara.

    “Dalam satu acara, saya duduk semeja dengan wakil-wakil dari kesemua agama utama di negara ini. Saya memuat naik gambar ini di Facebook. Rabbi Singapura bersama dengan Mufti Negara, dan juga Encik Gurmit Singh, seorang pemimpin Sikh yang mempengerusikan Pertubuhan Antara Agama (IRO). Setiap dari mereka dihidangkan makanan menurut keperluan agama masing-masing, namun ini tidak menghambat mereka daripada makan bersama dan bersahabat antara satu sama lain,” kata Encik Lee.

    Namun, beliau memberi amaran bahawa sesetengah orang fikir keharmonian agama dan kaum bukan lagi satu masalah. Katanya, pemikiran ini salah dan menarik perhatian, isu-isu perkauman dan agama kian rumit dan sukar dikendalikan.

    Encik Lee menambah sebagai masyarakat berbilang kaum dan agama, Singapura berisiko menghadapi ketegangan, dan rakyat tidak seharusnya mengambil mudah keharmonian yang dinikmati sekarang ini.

    SIKAP BERDIKARI, SOKONGAN

    Satu lagi faktor bagi kejayaan Singapura ialah budaya berdikari dan sokongan antara satu sama lain di negara ini, kata Encik Lee.

    “Semua orang perlu menyumbang dan mempunyai peranan masing-masing. Kita tidak mampu menampung ‘penumpang percuma’ . Itulah sebabnya Encik Lee Kuan Yew kerap kali menggesa kita supaya menjadi masyarakat yang ‘lasak,’ ujarnya.

    Namun kata Encik Lee, ini tidak bermakna kita tidak membantu antara satu sama lain, dan semangat ini perlu dipupuk sejak usia muda lagi.

    Beliau memberi contoh bencana gempa bumi di Sabah yang mengorbankan tujuh pelajar Sekolah Rendah Tanjong Katong, dua guru, dan seorang malim gunung.

    “Kita meratapi pemergian mereka bersama-sama keluarga mereka. Kita juga mengadakan Hari Peringatan Negara. Ia akan mengambil masa yang lama untuk kita menerima tragedi ini. Namun, kehidupan perlu diteruskan,” ujar Encik Lee.

    KEPERCAYAAN ITU PENTING

    Faktor terakhir bagi kejayaan Singapura ialah kepercayaan antara pemerintah dan rakyatnya.

    Pemerintah, kata Encik Lee, menunaikan janji-janjinya dan memastikan politiknya jujur, termasuklah apabila ia perlu membuat pilihan-pilihan sukar.

    Pemerintah tidak mengelak hakikat yang sukar diterima, dan sebaliknya, rakyat percaya pemerintah akan menunjukkan prestasi yang baik, dan mengambil kira kepentingan mereka, dan menyokong keputusan-keputusannya.

    Source: http://berita.mediacorp.sg