Tag: Lee Kuan Yew

  • Family Will Respect Lee Kuan Yew’s Wish For Oxley Rise House To Be Demolished

    Family Will Respect Lee Kuan Yew’s Wish For Oxley Rise House To Be Demolished

    The late Mr Lee Kuan Yew had specified in his will that the house he shared his late wife on Oxley Road be demolished after his death, and this wish will be “administered strictly”, said his children Dr Lee Wei Ling and Mr Lee Hsien Yang.

    In a statement issued yesterday (April 12), Dr Lee and Mr Lee Hsien Yang, who are the executors and trustees of the late Mr Lee’s will, said their father had given them clear instructions directly and in his will — dated Dec 17 2013 — to demolish the house immediately after his death. If Dr Lee continued to live in the house, then the house should be demolished immediately after she moved out.

    The late Mr Lee, who passed away on March 23, had been aware of the calls to preserve his home, but his wish expressed to his children and publicly was “unwavering” — that the house to be torn down upon his passing, said Dr Lee and Mr Lee Hsien Yang.

    “He was concerned an order might be issued against his wishes. He therefore added in his Lee Kuan Yew Will that ‘If our children are unable to demolish the House as a result of any changes in the law, rules or regulations binding them, it is my wish that the House never be opened to others except my children, their families and descendants’,” they said.

    They added: “Our father has given his life in service to the people of Singapore. We hope that the people of Singapore will honour and respect his stated wish in his last will and testament.”

    Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong, the late Mr Lee’s eldest child, will address the issue of his father’s home in Parliament today (April 13).

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Remembering The First National Day Parade In 1966

    Remembering The First National Day Parade In 1966

    Hours before the Ministers and VIPs arrived at 9am, the marching contingents stood in neat rows under the morning sun at the Padang.

    Some 23,000 took part in the National Day Parade in 1966, just a year after Singapore’s independence.

    For Mr Chia Hearn Meng of the People’s Defence Force, whose memories were mentioned by Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen on his Facebook page, the day started at 2am, when he collected and cleaned his rifle from the armoury.

    The students had to assemble at 5am, and they were still practising on the Padang before the parade started.

    For many, marching was something new, and they had spent months making sure their steps were synchronised. Some participants, tired and hungry, collapsed on the Padang as they waited in the sun.

    Here are snippets from the 1966 Parade from four people who were there:

    “Marching practices were chaotic, because many only spoke dialects.”

    Mr Chia Hearn Meng, then a 29-year-old construction supervisor, heeded the call to join the People’s Defence Force (PDF) after he saw how racial riots rent the nation.

    He was assigned to the 3rd PDF, which was stationed at Pearl’s Hill.

    “There were many labourers and cleaners; we were all grouped together,” he told The Straits Times. “Marching practices were chaotic, because many of the workers only spoke dialects.

    “When the NCO gave commands in Malay and sometimes English, they would shout for the instructions to be given in Cantonese or Hokkien.”

    Just learning how to march took them many months, due to the difficulties of communication.

    “Some cannot differentiate kiri (left in Malay) and kanan (right in Malay),” he said. “When they turn they will face each other.”

    Each weekend, they would rehearse in the hot sun wearing thick uniforms, steel helmets and heavy leather boots.

    “In the old days, the uniform was very thick and we had to swing our arms upright. My armpits had bruises!” he recalled.

    Mr Chia, now 78, took part in five parades, and he remembers the routine clearly:

    At 2am, they collected their Mark 4 rifles and blank bullets from Pearl’s Hill, then cleaned and checked them, he said.

    After that they fell in and waited for the army clerk to lead them to Beach Road where the contingents assembled. At 6am, they marched to the Padang.

    “It took us about an hour, and we would wait from 7am till the VIPs arrived,” he said.

    After the march past at the City Hall, they continued to High Street, South Bridge Road, Chinatown, Tanjong Pagar, Neil Road, Outram Park and Queenstown, he said.

    Along the way, people jammed the streets and cheered.

    “It would be pretty awesome if I can march alongside my son and my grandson in this year’s parade. That will make three generations of soldiers serving Singapore,” said Mr Chia.

    “We slept in school classrooms the night before”

    The night of August 8, 1966, the boys from the St Gabriel’s Secondary School brass band slept in their classrooms to make sure they would not be late for the Parade.

    They had to assemble at the Merdeka Bridge at 5am.

    “We disturbed each other, and didn’t get much sleep,” said Mr Bernard Chiang, who played the baritone.

    Then 15 years old, Mr Chiang and his friends were excited to be performing for the inaugural National Day.

    They had trained hard – with sessions of three to four hours at least twice a week- to perfect their marching and their music.

    “We sacrificed many hours practising foot drills and our formations to sharpen our precision and synchrony in marching and playing the instruments,” he wrote in an email to The Straits Times.

    It was tough because they had just set up the school band a year before, and there was a lot to learn.

    After assembling at Merdeka Bridge, they marched down to the Padang.

    “While we were positioned at the Padang,we still had to go through few rounds of practices to ensure that the parade was ready and perfect,” he wrote.

    That was when some participants started to collapse and they were carried away on stretchers, he said.

    “It was probably due to long hours of standing under the hot sun, lack of sleep, dehydration and no proper breakfast,” he said, adding that this was the first NDP and they were better prepared for later parades.

    Still, this was nothing compared to the torrential downpour in 1968, he recalled.

    “The instrument was frozen and waterlogged, we couldn’t blow it,” he said. The dyes on their uniforms ran in the rain.

    They marched a longer route that year too, all the way to Queenstown.

    “Our uniforms got wet, and we marched till they dried in the sun, then they got wet again from our sweat,” he laughed.

    He was quick to add that they were proud to be pioneers in the NDP, and the camaraderie forged then has stayed with them for a lifetime. He still meets up with his band mates, the 64-year-old florist said.

    “We had no cameras, no phones back then to take videos!”

    Mr Ramadas Palanisamy, now 85, was nominated to represent the former Woodbridge Hospital in the nurses’ contingent.

    The nursing officer, then 36, joined dozens of others from local hospitals including Singapore General Hospital, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, and the now-defunct Toa Payoh Hospital.

    “I was very happy and excited to be nominated,” he said, being one of only two representatives from Woodbridge.

    The training took about three months, and an army officer taught them how to march at first, he said. Later, one of the nursing staff took over.

    On the day of the Parade, they had to “go early in the morning and stand there”, he said. All the nurses were neatly turned out in their freshly-ironed uniforms and white shoes.

    “Everybody was in a joyous mood, and it went fantastically,” he recalled fondly. “The only thing was, I couldn’t watch the parades. We had no cameras, no phones back then to take videos!”

    He took part in the Parade from 1966 to 1968, but when he was nominated again in 1969, he decided to let others have a chance, he said.

    “I saw Lee Kuan Yew and the cabinet ministers sitting on the City Hall steps”

    Mr S. Sivakolunthu, 78, was with the first People’s Defence Force, but he was “on loan” to the Tamil Teachers’ Union for the 1966 National Day Parade.

    The teacher, who taught Tamil and English, was a volunteer soldier for three years. He marched in the PDF contingents in the 1967 and 1968 parades.

    For the 1966 parade, the lance corporal helped to train about 70 Tamil teachers at Monk’s Hill Secondary School every Saturday, he said.

    “I had six months of training with the PDF,and it was tough, but I could do the marching,” he said. “There were teachers in uniformed groups, and they helped too.”

    He recalls leading the contingent of teachers in their march past the City Hall.

    “I saw Lee Kuan Yew and the cabinet ministers sitting on the City Hall steps,” he said.

    The retiree, who is still active in community work, said he has watched the National Day Parade on television every year since.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Two Men Involved In Istana Protest Reveal Why They Did It

    Two Men Involved In Istana Protest Reveal Why They Did It

    Background Story: PROTESTERS SEEN HOLDING PLACARDS OUTSIDE THE ISTANA TODAY

    TRS got in contact with the two men who were involved in the peaceful protest outside the Istana on Saturday afternoon and found out why they chose to do what they did despite knowing that they would be arrested. They shared that they wanted to exercise their constitutional rights and believe strongly that they have not disturbed public order.

    Here is what they wanted to tell the public about their peaceful protest:

    We are the two men who held the demonstration outside the gates of the Istana on the 4th April 2015. You can simply address us as X and Y. Our names are irrelevant, but not our cause. Martyrdom is not the goal. We apologise if the subject of the protest (Freedom of Speech for Singaporeans) was not very clear. It was intentionally vague so as to sidestep any unnecessary charges that could be pinned on us by the Authorities; such as Libel/Defamation.

    The both of us are Singaporeans, and not FTs (as some of you have speculated). We do not represent any political party, nor are we affiliated with any groups/organisations. Who we are, are simply two men who believe there has been Injustice done towards those who offered a differing opinion and dared to raise questions considered to be “touchy”.

    Let us clarify: We are not anti LKY. We take our hats off to him, and appreciate all that he has done for Singapore; giving his life in creating a “safe”, prosperous nation and environment for us to thrive in. However, for far too long, dissent has been dealt with very severely, and sometimes, downright inhumanely. We believe in Change, and correcting Injustice wherever we see it.

    The defamation suit against Mr Roy Ngerng was ridiculous. He simply raised questions on the behalf of the citizens of Singapore. Instead of getting a proper, well structured reply from the relevant authorities, he was dealt with by a lawsuit, and subsequently fired from his job in Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Ruining a person’s life when he simply asks questions (not for his own sake, no less) seems to be the norm in Singapore. Is this not Injustice? Should we turn a blind eye to this?

    We also refer to the action taken on Mr Amos Yee. While we do think that the commentary was vulgar, rude, and frankly, a little insensitive (given the time); we do not see the need for him to be brought to court. Any sane society would have challenged all his points based on the facts and opinions he presented (in the video), and negated the points of his arguments with sound logic and reasoning. Instead, we as a society has chosen to shy away from the difficult questions raised, and opted to cower behind the might of the SPF.

    To be subjugated to arrest for airing an opinion (unpopular as it is) borders on the unthinkable. When someone takes office, they sign all rights to privacy away. They become a Public Figure, subject to the scrutinity of everyone. Such is the burden of representing the People. It is only logical that if tributes and praise flow free; so should criticism and insult.

    Some have questioned us why did we not go through the “proper” channels (such as Speaker’s Corner in Hong Lim Park). The appointment of a “place to speak” seems as if the park was designated to be a “dumping ground” for dissent, masquerading as a “designated place” for “Freedom of Expression”. What Change was there to be had if this was the case? Why should Singaporeans be confined to the space of Hong Lim Park? Is this truly “Freedom of Expression” then? We think not. It is perfectly within our rights in the Constitution (Article 14) to hold a peaceful demonstration, anywhere in Singapore.

    14.— (1) Subject to clauses (2) and (3) —

    (a) every citizen of Singapore has the right to freedom of speech and expression;

    (b) all citizens of Singapore have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; and

    (c) all citizens of Singapore have the right to form associations.

    The action that we took on the 4th of April 2015 was our right as stated in the Singapore Constitution. It did not cause disruption of the Public Order, defame anyone nor incited any form of civil unrest. We knew being arrested would be a given (and we were willing to shoulder that to make a statement), but the extent of it eluded us.

    Following our arrest, we were detained for a day by the Police. Both of us were brought in restraints to our homes. Electronic devices like desktop CPUs and handphones were seized for investigation.

    The right/wrong of our action, although open for debate, is not the point. The red we wore was to signify Change. So long as it sparked Singaporeans questioning what Freedom truly means to them, then our objective has been reached. Whoever is in Power (the ruling party) matters not to us; it could be the PAP, the SDP, or the WP. That is immaterial. What matters, is that they realise that we are ready for Change as a society. If you equate Freedom with wanton acts of violence and instability, then you are sorely mistaken and have missed the point entirely.

    Alejandro Jodorowsky – “Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.”

    X and Y

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • Open Letter To Amos Yee, His Parents And PM Lee Hsien Loong

    Open Letter To Amos Yee, His Parents And PM Lee Hsien Loong

    Dear Amos,

    Wow, I am impressed. What a beautiful video and what an amazing delivery. I don’t think I have ever seen an 8 minute video with such am impact.

    Of course, the outpour of criticism your piece has caused, has been vast. The immature have made imbecile comments on your hairstyle while the too mature have been preoccupied with your use of profanities. Many of the more sophisticated commentators have been somewhat positive, but still typically in the form “he may have some points, but timing, format or something else was wrong”.

    What it seems most of your detractors fail to realize is that your video was as perfect as it was intended. They say the journey is the destination, and in communication the content is only part of the message. Other, sometimes equally important, parts of a message are style, format and timing of delivery. You wanted Lee loyalists to know what you think of their deity and you wanted the whole world to know that there is another side to the late Lee Kuan Yew. You wanted people to know that, despite his real (but often exaggerated) achievements, Lee Kuan Yew was in fact a horrible person. And wow, have you managed to get the message across.

    That Lee Kuan Yew was a horrible person should not, of course, surprise anyone. Many, if not most, leaders of countries and corporations are not nice people. You simply don’t get to the top by being Mr. Nice Guy. And although you might find exceptions to this rule, in the subclass of leaders that Lee Kuan Yew belonged to, the dictator, I doubt you will find any. The way Lee Sr. treated his political adversaries should be plenty of evidence for any doubters.

    And if more evidence is needed, the following quote by LKY himself should remove any shadow of doubt: “Between being loved and being feared, I have always believed Machiavelli was right. If nobody is afraid of me, I’m meaningless.” What kind of person would rather be feared than loved and respected? Only a very horrible person indeed.

    Not only was he a horrible person, but odds are he was not a particularly good father either. After all, what kind of father would want to put his son in a position he is so obviously unfit to have? Lee Hsien Loong lacks the three essential qualities needed to be a successful dictator: charisma, an unflinching self-confidence and ruthlessness. Lee Hsien Loong is uncharismatic, insecure and instills fear more like a cat than a tiger. Lee Jr.’s rule is bound to end in failure, and both father and son must have known that. Nevertheless, LKY put his son in this position.

    The saddest part of Lee Kuan Yew’s life is that he did not have the wisdom to leave at the right time. He did not have sufficient trust in his own people to leave the stage and set Singaporeans free. Instead he insisted on ruling by fear, first directly, then indirectly, to the bitter end. Had he had the wisdom to relinquish power, in the mid-80s for instance, his legacy could have been that of a super Pinochet: an autocratic leader that created an economic miracle with minimal bloodletting. But LKY never learned that love trumps fear every day of the week. He never understood that his people have grown up and can indeed be trusted with democracy and a free media. How sad it is that he did not set his people free, but instead relied on fear and control, not realizing how detrimental these are to human happiness.

    His reliance on fear, rather than love, respect and trust is also a personal tragedy for LKY. His legacy will now always be tainted by defamation suits, repressions of basic freedoms and allegations of nepotism. But maybe even worse: He could never know if the people who surrounded him loved and respected him, or were frightened of him. How anguishing it must have been, to lie there on the death bed and wonder: Did my people ever love me? Or were their feelings just thinly disguised fear? These sad questions he will now bring with him to eternity.

    So, Amos, your point that LKY was a horrible person is one that ever more Singaporeans will realize. You wanted to make this point and you wanted as many people as possible to get the message. You also wanted to make the point so clear so that there would be no room for you, or others on your behalf, to backtrack and say that your message had been misunderstood or misinterpreted. In a society of fear, like Singapore is today thanks to LKY, the way people mince their words and doublespeak can be deafening. So many of the intellectuals and politicians are so careful with their words to avoid being sued or lose their jobs that you sometimes need a PhD to understand what they really mean. Your 8 minute video, including the expletives (no, I don’t believe they were thrown in there for fun or out of immaturity), was crystal clear and communicated to Singaporeans and foreigners alike what you think of the late Lee Kuan Yew.

    The timing, to get maximum impact, was of course no accident either. More than a million views and unprecedented media coverage makes that abundantly clear.

    So, while the immature focus on your hair, and while the more intellectually oriented commentators, encapsulated in their PAP-fear, keep saying “he had some points, but…”, my judgment is this: what a stroke of genius your 8 minute video is. Created to have maximum impact on the waning Lee regime, you have succeeded tremendously. I congratulate you unreservedly.

    Dear parents of Amos,

    You must be scared. You must be terrified. And your fear is perfectly understandable. Your son has taken on a powerful dictatorial regime, and has done so in a way that not only reaches a dozen of his friends, but in a way that has reached millions of people. You have seen what the regime does to its critics. You have seen the faiths of Chia Thye Poh, JBJ, Chee Soon Juan and lately also Roy Ngerng. You don’t want your son to go through the miseries that these people have had to endure. That you are terrified is easy for any parent to understand.

    Yet, you must try to be strong and courageous. It is not the first time a young man has taken on a powerful regime. What your son had done is pointing out an unpleasant fact, a hard truth in the words of LKY. What Amos has done is very similar to the well-known fable: he has shouted out that the emperor is naked. And he has shouted so loud and clear that the whole world has heard. In the fable, of course, it is the emperor that is the fool, not the child yelling out the truth. And so it is with your son and the Lees: the Lees are the naked fools and what Amos has done is to help people see this. No repercussions against the child were recorded in the fable. How the dying Lee regime will react to your brave boy’s call-out is still work-in-progress. Let us be hopeful they learn from the fable.

    If you are religious, you can also take comfort in another story of a young man who took on a powerful regime: Jesus. He took on the Roman Empire and powerful priests. We all know how this story ended: Jesus was crucified in an attempt to scare others and put a definitive end to his preaching. But when his detractors thought they had won, the story took an unexpected turn: Jesus rose from the dead, his followers multiplied, the Roman Empire collapsed and Jesus’ ideas live on even today, 2000 years later.

    Your son will be spared the physical crucifixion, but the Lee family propaganda machine is working in overdrive to crucify him in the media. Maybe they think they are winning, but I think they are fighting a lost cause. Already now, the PAP regime’s harsh response to Amos’ video is shifting many Singaporean’s sympathy from the Lees to Amos. And even if Amos still may have a million or two detractors in Singapore, be not in doubt who the world sympathizes with. A Google news search indicates there are now more than 2000 news articles about your son worldwide. Maybe 200 of them are from Singapore and the rest are from the international media. And while the Lee family has used every trick in the book to try to portray Amos as a villain in the state controlled media, the international media’s sympathy lies with Amos. In autocratic regime v. 16 year old vlogger, the sympathy of the international media and public opinion will always be with the latter. So, even if Amos may have a couple of million detractors in Singapore, he has tens of millions supporters outside Singapore.

    I realize foreign support may not be too comforting all the time Amos is in Singapore. However, try to remain strong in this difficult time. Amos has already achieved more than many of us will do in a lifetime. That is something to be proud of.

    To Mr. Lee Jr,

    As Amos’ parents, must you be scared. How terrifying it must be to see that a 16 year old boy’s 8 minute video ripping your father apart resonates so well with your populace. You have held no punches in order to stop this boy. The police and judiciary are on your side, you have crucified him in the media and he has been given a gagging order. But to what effect? The only result is that the whole world has heard his message too. I assume one of your advisors have informed you about the Streisand effect by now. Well, you have learned it the hard way.

    To be true, you did not have any good options once Amos’ video went viral. Ignore it and a new precedent for freedom of expression would have been set. Attack the boy (the option you chose) and be condemned worldwide and see the video go global.

    The truth is that, the moment the video went viral, you were check mate. It is simple, your time is up. Most of the authority you had went to the grave with your father, and the rest has now vanished with your response to Amos’ video. You can try to hold on to power for a few more years, or you can leave now and in a dignified way. But be not mistaken: The ship is sinking and you can be sure your comrades are already looking for the life boats, whether it is the SDP or Switzerland. They say that the most powerful force in the world is an idea whose time has come. You are smart enough to realize that the time has come, so get out know, and save your dignity and legacy.

    I have claimed you don’t possess the qualities needed to be a successful dictator. But don’t despair; the personality traits that make you a bad dictator are the same that are likely to make you a good father. Dictators tend to be horrible people and bad fathers. Your lack of charisma, your more down to earth self-confidence and the fact you are more of a cat than a tiger, are all qualities that make you a good father.

    One of the lessons I have learned in life is that it is better to focus on what you are good at, rather than trying to fix your flaws. My not-so-humble recommendation to you is this: Resign, live the rest of your life out of the public eye, and spend your time being a good father and grandfather. That, I truly believe, is how you can achieve happiness and it is also the best way to preserve your own and the Lee family’s legacy. 11 years at the helm is a long time under any circumstances; no one can fault you for stepping down now. If you at the same time manage to shepherd Singapore peacefully to democracy, you may one day even be hailed as Asia’s Gorbachev.

    So, Amos, what the coming weeks and months will hold for you no one knows. What punishment the dying Lee regime will mete out to you is difficult to predict. They are now currently busy with your crucifixion in the media and have levelled three, clearly politically motivated, charges against you. The ensuing public backlash is already well underway, with ever more Singaporeans breaking free from the shackles of fear and speaking up for your, and their own, rights. Many people see that they could be you, or you could be their son.

    The government must be getting cold feet and try to think of ways to get out of the mess. The problem is that for Lee Jr. there is no easy way out of the hole he is in. Drop the charges and freedom of expression will have gained a foothold in Singapore that his autocratic regime cannot survive. Press on with the charges and the domestic and international fall-out will continue, gradually eroding support for the PAP.

    So, it may very well be that you have managed to check mate the Lee regime, Amos. The demise of LKY and your 8 minute video may turn out to mark the tipping point that took Singapore on a path to freedom and democracy.

    No matter how things turn out, you deserve credit, not critique, for what you have done. Watching your video and reading your blog, I could not stop to think how remarkably similar you are to the founder of Facebook, Marc Zuckerberg. In the free world, people like you go on and make great companies and make the world a better place in the process. Soon, I believe, the situation will be the same in Singapore.

    A friend of mine, a Singaporean citizen who is also impressed with what you have done, wants to help you along the way by giving you a grant of S$10,000. Consider it as credit for what you have already achieved or a small compensation for the hardship you are currently going through. There is a condition attached with the money, however. The money must be used for one, or a combination, of the following:

    • Paying for your legal defense (but not any fines, damages, etc.)

    • Studying abroad

    • Starting a company

    A boy named Sue will contact you in the near future with instructions on how you can call the money.

    Yours sincerely,

    F. Reedom

    F Reedom is a pseudonym. A pseudonym is used as the author’s family is afraid of repercussions from the PAP government if full name is used. The author hopes to one day be able to express his views in Singapore without fear.

    The author is a foreigner who has worked in financial consultancy and wealth management. He has a post graduate degree in finance and economics from a world leading university.

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

  • The Lee Kuan Yew Steamboat Battelship

    The Lee Kuan Yew Steamboat Battelship

    The day was Sep 26, 1958. The late Mdm Kwa Geok Choo, wife of Singapore’s founding Prime Minister Lee Kuan Yew, received a puzzling telegram from her husband. It read: “ARRIVING TODAY BATTLESHIP = LEEKUANYEW”.

    It was sent from Sibu in Sarawak, when the late Mr Lee was practising as a lawyer in Lee & Lee, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong wrote on Facebook on Monday (Apr 6).

    “My mother did not understand the message. Was my father coming home on a battleship? The Lee & Lee secretary called the British Naval Base at Sembawang to check if any battleship was arriving from Sarawak, but they knew nothing about it,” Prime Minister Lee recounted.

    Turns out, it was a dinner request.

    “My father did arrive home that day, but not by battleship. He explained that he wanted steam boat for dinner, but as “steam boat” was two words, and telegrams were charged by the word, he wrote “battleship” instead, to save words and money!”

    Mr Lee shared the childhood memory, after discovering the telegram while sorting through his father’s belongings at home.

    “Sadly, since we had not understood the message, we did not have steam boat for dinner that night,” he said.

    The Prime Minister’s anecdote drew hundreds of amused comments on Facebook. Many quipped that from now on, Singaporeans should refer to steam boat as “battleship”, as a nod to Mr Lee.

    Was amazed to find this old telegram when sorting through my father’s things at home. My parents had kept it all these…

    Posted by Lee Hsien Loong on Sunday, 5 April 2015

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com