Tag: Lee Kuan Yew

  • Halimah Yaacob: In Grief We Have Become More United As Singaporeans

    Halimah Yaacob: In Grief We Have Become More United As Singaporeans

    Speaker of Parliament Halimah Yacob today (March 26) paid homage to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew in a Special Sitting of Parliament. Here is her speech in full:

    On behalf of this House, and with a heavy heart, I wish to place on record the demise of Mr Lee Kuan Yew, the Honorable Member of Parliament for Tanjong Pagar GRC, and founding Prime Minister of Singapore, on March 23, 2015.

    Mr Lee’s demise is a great loss to Parliament and the people of Singapore, and it is with great sadness that this House pays tribute to the man we know as the Founding Father of Singapore. Mr Lee was an outstanding Parliamentarian and his speeches in this House were never dull or inconsequential. It was in this House that he fought many battles and shaped numerous policies to set Singapore on the right trajectory.

    Mr Lee founded the People’s Action Party in 1954, and took part in the landmark 1955 Singapore Legislative Assembly election. At the age of 31, Mr Lee secured the seat of Tanjong Pagar — a seat he held for 14 successive General Elections and one by-election. His parliamentary career spanned nearly 60 years, earning him the honour of being the longest-serving Member of Parliament in Singapore and, undoubtedly, the most illustrious of them all.

    Mr Lee became the first Prime Minister of Singapore after the People’s Action Party secured 43 of the 51 seats in the Legislative Assembly during the General Election of 1959. He took the reins of leadership for 31 years and led the then fledgling Singapore through a most uncertain time. He gave the founding generation hope and a clear sense of direction, especially when Singapore was taking its first, tentative steps as an independent nation. This was just what our forefathers needed.

    Mr Lee was a “conviction politician”. When asked in his memoirs, what it took to be a politician, he said “You must have convictions”. Mr Lee, himself, did not set out with the aspiration to be a politician. In his memoirs, he recounted that he returned to Singapore from his overseas studies to be a lawyer. But he was driven to assume public office by two convictions: One, he wanted a Singapore without a colonial master, and two, he wanted a system that focused on meritocracy.

    In Parliament, Mr Lee set very high standards for himself and expected the same from all the other Members of Parliament too. In a speech to Parliament in 1999, Mr Lee said that he wanted Members of Parliament whose “instincts are immediately for Singaporeans”. He reminded us that “Parliament as an arena for the contest of wits and wills over matters of policies will always remain important because of our system of parliamentary democracy” but that we must “make no mistake…. In this Chamber, we are playing for keeps. The future of Singapore and its people…. is not a question for light-hearted banter.” Even when he was ill and quite frail,
    Mr Lee would make tremendous effort to attend Parliament Sittings as he took his duties very seriously.

    Mr Lee never flinched from taking hard decisions, many of which were taken in this august Chamber. In 1968, when speaking on the Employment Bill, he said: “We will be judged as a government by results. These results depend, among other things, upon the morale and enthusiasm of the people, and the pace set by their leaders in Parliament and outside.”

    Mr Lee’s abiding concern was the interest and welfare of the people, even if there were painful adjustments to be made in the short term. People respected and followed him because of one very important element and that is trust. They trusted that he did not make decisions for his own self-aggrandisement or personal benefit but truly for the benefit of Singapore.

    Mr Lee’s personal leadership and his style and values helped shape the tone and the kind of parliament that we have inherited today. Deeply committed to Singapore, passionate to ensure not just Singapore’s survival but also its success, he was a leader par excellence. He had devoted his entire life to make the life of all Singaporeans better. Mr Lee has left a deep impact on this House and we will feel the vacuum. The least that we as Parliamentarians can do now is to uphold the values that he held dear when he was alive.

    In 1999, when we moved to this Chamber from the old Parliament House, Mr Lee said, “The importance of this Chamber did not, and does not, depend on its size and its grandeur, but upon the quality of men and women who occupy it as representatives of the people. By the standards of other public and private buildings in Singapore, it is modest by comparison. But that is a virtue. Behind the understatement lie great strengths of character, integrity and determination. That is what will see Singapore through not the grand statements and monuments in brick and mortar or steel and concrete, with which so many other new nations try to impress themselves and their followers”. Mr Lee could very well have described himself and his own life when he made that statement.

    Mr Lee reminded us that, “Nobody believed that we could make it, but we have. But there is no reason to believe that we will continue to make it. We will continue to make it only if there are tough-minded people who know the difference between the froth and the substance.”

    Honourable Members, it now falls upon us as Members of this House to ensure that we continue Mr Lee’s legacy of a responsible and effective Parliament, a duty we owe to the people of Singapore.

    The House records with deep regret the passing of the Honourable Member of Parliament for Tanjong Pagar GRC and founding Prime Minister of the Republic of Singapore, Mr Lee Kuan Yew. On behalf of all Members, I wish to express our deepest sympathy and condolences to the family of the late
    Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

    I also wish to thank the thousands that have braved the hot sun to pay their last respects to Mr Lee for your support and sympathies. In this moment of grief, we have become even more united as Singaporeans. Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s death is indeed a grievous loss to Singapore and this House.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Masagos Zulkifli: Lee Kuan Yew Is A Father Of A Harmonious Nation

    Masagos Zulkifli: Lee Kuan Yew Is A Father Of A Harmonious Nation

    Senior Minister of State (Ministry of Home Affairs and Ministry of Foreign Affairs) Masagos Zulkifli today (March 26) paid homage to the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew in a Special Sitting of Parliament. Here is his speech:

    Mr Lee Kuan Yew’s children — that was the nickname given in jest by Pangar when we visited him in Kota Tinggi whenever his friends asked about us. At that time, Singapore had recently separated from Malaysia and my uncle may be unconvinced that we will be protected in country with a Chinese majority. Before he passed away, I had the opportunity to meet him. My uncle still teases us as Lee Kuan Yew’s children among his friends. However, this time my uncle added that he was proud and full of admiration because we were able to become professionals and could compete in the Lion City with the other races.

    Similarly that is how the global community views our achievements in Singapore. The attitude of doubt and concern, whereby some even looked down at us when we separated from Malaysia, had transformed into admiration and respect. In any country whenever we flash our passport, we can feel that we are respected because we are Singaporeans. The best things that we currently enjoy in our lives would not be possible without the vision, the passion and the determination of Mr Lee. He built a developed nation that provides for the well-being of Singaporeans even though our country do not have natural resources and at that time, many Singaporeans were unemployed. In addition, racial conflicts flared up easily during that period. The whole country was tense.

    Without a doubt, I can say Mr Lee established an administration that is transparent, eradicated corruption and crime. Singapore gained the confidence of international investors who came here to work and to do business. Nonetheless for me, the most outstanding policy of Mr Lee’s came in the form of his unique social compact. After his failure in advocating a Malaysia for Malaysians, Mr Lee was determined to create a Singapore for all citizens regardless of race, language and religion. Everyone will have a space to cultivate their language, culture and religion. But at the same time, they were cajoled into accepting the government’s policy of expanding the common space so that they can mingle in housing estates, schools and their workplaces. The ghetto areas have disappeared. Slowly but surely, a multiracial society living together peacefully is embedded in the DNA of Singaporeans. That is the view of Professor S Jayakumar, whereas DPM Teo is thankful that Singapore prospers because all the leaders are mature and understood that harmony existed not because everybody got what they demanded, but harmony existed because everybody was willing to make sacrifices that may be painful at times, so that we can all prosper together.

    As a result, places of worship like the mosques, churches and temples can exist side by side and residents take turns to celebrate each other’s festivals by having open houses for their friends. And friends became closer because they shared same interests, and not because they speak the same language. It was Mr Lee who supported the creation of the Mosque Building Fund (MBF) which helped build many mosques that are magnificent and thriving. However, no matter how much funds are collected, it will be useless if the foundations of harmony are weak and are not upheld by everyone. Because mosques that will be built will face protests and those that have been built will be burned down. You can see the prove everywhere. A harmonious, multiracial society is his most precious legacy that had helped our progress while protecting the minorities.

    If a harmonious society enables the minority Muslim community to carry on with their religion peacefully, Mr Lee’s system of meritocracy became the benchmark in education and employment for everyone. The Malay community should be proud because they have proved to the world that their excellence in education and employment did not happen because there was special treatment for the minorities. We were able to achieve our success and compete in the world-class educational systems and funds were given to the Malays to succeed in education. We were successful in our careers due to our performance and our self-esteem was safeguarded and is respected by the other communities.

    When I accompanied him to Malaysia, he spoke to a leader who spread lies about the Malay community in Singapore. He challenged that the Berita Harian paper is distributed there and so that everyone can see how prosperous the Singapore Muslim community is in Singapore, and how many of their children became engineers, became scientists and became doctors. I (was) so proud to stand beside him on that day. Clearly he was proud of our achievements. Therefore it comes to no surprise the global community and world leaders I have met like Mr Tony Blair and the Grand Mufti of Egypt Shawki Alam expressed admiration toward the racial harmony that is evident in Singapore. In fact they were enthusiastic about the confidence among Muslims, who would not only perform prayers diligently in the magnificent mosques that they had built themselves but they were also able to integrate easily as Singaporeans who are able to live successfully in a meritocracy system without any favouritism. This is the identity of Singapore Muslims that was built by him.

    My heart is heavy not just because Singapore lost a leader. He has created a name for our small nation in the world. We, child of Lee Kuan Yew, as the father who was the architect of modern Singapore. Without him we would not have thought of Mendaki or the MBF. May the future generations honour Mr Lee’s contributions and build on his legacy (and) beware about instigations that may separate us … Thank you Mr Lee for leaving us a harmonious nation and identity.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Malay and Muslim Organisations Pay Tribute To Lee Kuan Yew

    Malay and Muslim Organisations Pay Tribute To Lee Kuan Yew

    The Malay and Muslim community came together on Thursday to honour Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

    Yayasan Mendaki was joined by other Malay and Muslim organisations such as the Singapore Muslim Women’s Association or PPIS, and Singapore Kadayanallur Muslim League (SKML) in paying tribute to Singapore’s first Prime Minister at Telok Ayer Hong Lim Green Community Centre.

    Ms Rahayu Mohamad, president of PPIS, read a poem titled A Great Man, which described Mr Lee’s dedication to building Singapore as a tribute to him.

    She said Mr Lee’s firmness educated Singaporeans to be pragmatic and to focus on development, which she thinks the younger generation has to continue to learn to ensure stability and progress.

    Dr Yaacob Ibrahim, Minister-in-charge of Muslim Affairs, who started the tribute session, said it is a difficult moment for everyone, especially for him as he had worked closely with Mr Lee.

    “We are indeed very lucky to have someone like Mr Lee who was always on the lookout for things that he could do to help improve the state of the Malay and Muslim community and I think we can point to many of his contributions,” he said.

    “He may have been misunderstood at times; I think that is inevitable. But at the end of the day, I think we have to look at the good of what a man has done.”

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Bertha Henson: Mourn Now Fight Later

    Bertha Henson: Mourn Now Fight Later

    Such a strange thing is happening in the ether. The normally silent majority seemed to be speaking up. They are thumping those who had hogged the online space with their cutting, unkind comments about anything to do with the Government. Or the People’s Action Party. Or Mr Lee Kuan Yew.

    I was surprised at first at the outpouring of online emotion, so protective of Mr Lee and his legacy. I can’t help but think that those who have been sitting at the sidelines of the Internet space have decided to put their gloves on. Woe is you who dare to say anything rude about Singapore’s first prime minister! Whack! Bam! Slam!

    As for those who think that the Internet is about letting anyone speak their mind, however inane and insane their words, they are finding out that this is not the case. The internet herd, typically anti-establishment and even rude, is turning the other way.

    Yet I wish we could stop fighting, at least for the next few days. Can we stop arguing about the merits and demerits of the man who’s just died? About whether people are right to want to wear black this Sunday or whether some MP’s idea of a tribute being a workout is daft? About whether too much expression is symptomatic of the mentality of sheep or any kind of criticism of the man is out of line?

    I gather that online friendships have been broken; a lot of “unfriending’’ going on these days.  Some people are vying to be more demonstrative of their admiration than others, at least that is how it is being construed in some quarters. Others who have always taken a hard anti-LKY line have softened, prompting charges of bending with the wind. Gosh. The death of Lee Kuan Yew is inspiring a lot of emotions. May we not let them pit ourselves against each other.

    Last night, friends and I encountered an admittedly drunk young woman alone in a bar, telling us about how she had split up with her boyfriend after an argument about the kind of leader Mr Lee had been. It seemed to be fundamental point of difference for her. I guess at any other time, the couple wouldn’t have had such a big blow-up. The difference is the timing: Mr Lee has just died.

    Yes, he has died, which is why I don’t think we can have much meaningful or rational discussion – at least online – at the moment. Think of those times when you lost a loved one, you would sit quietly and cry, recall last moments or reminisce about good times. Friends at the wake will be respectful, even if they did not know the deceased.  Mr Lee has a large family, and I don’t mean his immediate one. That’s why people jump at any sign of impropriety. Even family members will quarrel about funeral arrangements, like whether wearing black is the right protocol. I, for one, had wondered if it was “good form’’ to clap while his funeral cortege passed along the road earlier today and decided to close the FB discussion because I was worried that it would get out of hand.

    Therefore, we are now commenting on the eulogies. Should eulogies be positive or are they actually propagandistic? Should they have some critical comments or would this be considered nasty? Or should they be balanced? And “balanced’’ according to who? It is inevitable that when a public figure has passed on, people feel the need to pass judgment.  On him. And on others who have passed judgment on him Methinks Mr Heng Swee Keat wrote the best eulogy and that is because he did “reporting’’ – he told us what we didn’t know about Mr Lee’s working style. His use of the “red box’’ (plus picture) to hold all the parts together is brilliant.

    Frankly, I am beginning to have my fill of foreigners weighing in on the man’s legacy, after not being able to get enough of it earlier on. The key players have weighed in, and now the fringe actors are doing so. I can’t even recognize the Mr Lee whom some of them have described. He was either saint or Satan. Then there are those who put a sting in the tail, to conform to their own ideals of what a leader should be like. I think Mr Lee would have waved away all these speeches and eulogies. He had said before that it was for Phd students to mull over. In other words, history will decide.

    I agree. I think we should mourn now – and fight later.

     

    Source: https://berthahenson.wordpress.com

  • Death Of Lee Kuan Yew A Personal Clarion Call For Singapore

    Death Of Lee Kuan Yew A Personal Clarion Call For Singapore

    I understand how some feel about the tributes to Mr Lee Kuan Yew being overwhelming and maybe even overbearing. Speaking for myself, 95% of my newsfeed on Facebook is filled with news of his bereavement, eulogies, and almost “real time” coverage of his body lying in state in Parliament building.

    However, the thing is this. An event like this doesn’t happen often. To me, Mr Lee’s passing is a turning point of sorts – not in the way foreign media or political pundits may paint it to be, but as a kind of communal yet personal clarion call for Singapore.

    This is perhaps best reflected by 5 Rs…

    1) Reflection – Mr Lee’s demise compels us to reflect upon many things. How much Singapore has changed over the past 50 years since its founding. What we have done well – and not so well – and what lessons do we bring into the future? This applies not just for us collectively but individually too (yes, I’ve done a fair amount of soul-searching).

    2) Reminiscence – Reading on Singapore’s history and LKY’s role in it brings forth a deep sense of nostalgia. There are so many chapters in our nation’s story that are deeply intertwined with our daily lives. This is a time to sit back and re-live those times. To me, it is the real ‪#‎SG50‬ event.

    3) Resolution – I don’t know about you, but watching the old videos of how LKY turned around Singapore and looking at the long winding queues of people waiting hours to pay their respects ignited something fierce in me. Somehow, the problems and issues I face pale in comparison to what is being stirred inside.

    4) Revolution – No, I am not talking about a political revolution more so than a national one. Love him or loathe him, Mr Lee’s death has sparked something in many of us. For the first time in like forever, the silent majority have made their feelings felt everywhere – online and offline. We are not emotionless and passionless. We care and we show it when the occasion calls for it.

    5) Reunification – I am not sure about you, but I feel that there is a certain coming together of Singaporeans with this event. People from all walks of life, young and old, educated and less educated, rich and poor, all united in one spirit to offer their respects. The process of queuing and waiting, the generous giving of drinks and snacks, the willingness to extend the opening hours – from 10 am to 8 pm, then till midnight, and then 24 hours – binds us together like nothing I’ve seen here in a long time.

    Let us put aside our ideological differences temporarily, at least for 4 more days this week, and spend our time ‪#‎RememberingLeeKuanYew‬.

    There will always be time enough to resume our battles and pit our wits later.‪#‎ThankYouLKY‬ ‪#‎RIPLKY‬

    Source: Walter Lim