Tag: Lions

  • Safuwan Baharudin Scores His First A-League Goal In Melbourne City’s Comeback Win

    Safuwan Baharudin Scores His First A-League Goal In Melbourne City’s Comeback Win

    Safuwan Baharudin scored his first A-League goal for Melbourne City since joining on a three-month loan from the LionsXII last month, as the Singapore defender sparked a 3-1 comeback win at their AAMI Park home ground over title hopefuls Adelaide United.

    Safuwan, 23, started at right wingback after being left out of the team’s 0-0 draw with A-League leaders Perth Glory last week.

    He had played the whole of City’s 0-0 draw away at Wellington Phoenix at right back the week before, and lasted 60 minutes in the centre of midfield during the 3-0 local derby defeat by Melbourne Victory two weeks ago.

    The home side started the match brightly but fell behind to Pablo Sanchez’s goal in the 32nd minute.

    In search of a way back into the game, City coach John van’t Schip then tinkered with his line-up at the break and Safuwan began the second 45 minutes on the left side of a four-man defence.

    What a masterstroke it turned out to be.

    Just seven minutes into the second half, Safuwan scored the crucial equaliser for City when he swept home a loose ball at the back post past Adelaide’s Australian international goalkeeper Eugene Galekovic.

    The goal rejuvenated City, and they scored a second through Josh Kennedy three minutes later.

    The home side made sure of the three points in the 87th minute when substitute Iain Ramsay finished from close range after good work from David Williams and Massimo Murdocca.

    The only blight on Safuwan’s game was a yellow card he picked up in the dying minutes of the game as City defended their lead.

    But chances are he won’t be too worried about the booking after putting up a solid performance which had match commentators touting him as a candidate for Man of the Match.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • Safuwan Baharudin: Everyone Involved Should Shoulder Blame For Lions’ Suzuki Cup Exit

    Safuwan Baharudin: Everyone Involved Should Shoulder Blame For Lions’ Suzuki Cup Exit

    By his own admission, it was not a good 2014 ASEAN Football Federation (AFF) Suzuki Cup outing for Safuwan Baharudin.

    Two years ago, he and fellow Lion Baihakki Khaizan were feted as the region’s top central defensive pairing in Singapore’s winning campaign.

    But after their exit on Saturday from the group stage of this year’s competition, the team, their coach and the Football Association of Singapore are bearing the brunt of criticism from the football fraternity and fans who had expected more from the defending champions.

    While media reports have cited disharmony in the squad and dissatisfaction with head coach Bernd Stange as reasons for the poor showing, Safuwan would not be drawn to adding more fuel to the fire.

    Instead, the 23-year-old told TODAY: “(The blame for) Singapore’s exit from the Suzuki Cup has to be shouldered by everyone in the team and not just coach Bernd Stange. We cannot push all the blame on him. Every member of the team has to share the responsibility, Stange included.

    “But he is only the coach; he decides the line-up and the tactical formation, but at the end of the day, what the players do on the field decides the outcome of the game.

    “In short, all of us are in it together. Sink or swim.”

    Calling it a nightmare outing for the Lions, Safuwan said losses to Thailand and Malaysia showed that the team still had plenty to learn.

    “Especially in our attacking part of the game, we did not score a single goal from open play, apart from Khairul Amri’s header against Thailand,” he pointed out. “The other goals came from set pieces: Free-kicks and corner kicks.

    “We lacked creativity up front. We didn’t have someone brave and confident enough to take on opposing defenders in the 18-yard box and do the damage.”

    Until the free-kick he took, which resulted in Amri equalising against Malaysia, Safuwan’s campaign this year had been teetering on disaster. His handball late in the opener against Thailand led to the visitors’ winning penalty. In the following match, his foul on Myanmar striker Kyaw Ko Ko led to yet another penalty in a poor second half for the Lions that heralded the disaster against Malaysia.

    “I must admit that I had a very quiet tournament, especially in the opening two matches. But I know I had a better game against Malaysia, and I thought I could get better if we had entered the semi-finals,” said Safuwan.

    “The Suzuki Cup is over for us. We have the World Cup qualifiers next year. And while we’re frustrated with the early exit from the Suzuki Cup, maybe we should not dwell on it anymore and move on.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Bernd Stange The Wrong Choice From The Beginning

    Bernd Stange The Wrong Choice From The Beginning

    It would be a miracle if Singapore national team head coach Bernd Stange were to see out the remainder of his two-year contract with the Football Association of Singapore (FAS) after an Asean Football Federation Suzuki Cup campaign that concluded with a 1-3 loss to Malaysia last night.

    For the 66-year-old German to see out his first and last competitive regional campaign was already remarkable. A poor AFC Asian Cup qualifying campaign could have seen him being given the boot by more impatient football associations.

    It was not too long ago that under Avramovic, Singapore were punching above the weight in Asia. However, our elimination following last night’s 1-3 loss to Malaysia showed how far we have fallen after just less than two years under the German.

    While the effort was there, the lack of direction under Stange’s stewardship prior to the tournament should have sounded more than just a few alarm bells.

    The final panel of four responsible for the selection of Stange in 2013 – comprising of FAS President Zainudin Nordin, FAS Advisor Associate Professor Ho Peng Kee, FAS Secretary-general Winston Lee and 2014 Asian Games chef-de-mission and Singapore Bowling Federation President Jessie Phua – showed a lack of thoroughness in putting his career under intense scrutiny.

    Had they gone over his record as the head coach, especially with the national teams of East Germany, Iraq and Belarus, more closely, they might have come to the conclusion that his record in leading these teams has been pretty mediocre – teams which had much better players and stronger football infrastructure and culture than Singapore, based on results in qualifying alone.

    While he might have laid the framework for the Iraqi national team, he would not have inspired them the manner Jorvan Vieria did as they embarked on a fairy-tale run towards the historic 2007 Asian Cup triumph.

    Thus, bereft of any significant achievement despite his journeyman reputation in trawling across clubs and national teams across Europe, Asia and Australia, Singapore looked like a tempting opportunity to create his own legend – even if it meant destroying all the decent work his predecessor Radjoko Avramovic made during a ten-year tenure before him.

    Knowing our country’s obsession with rankings and capitalising on it, he declared his first target to raise our world football ranking. That was to be his first of several missteps he would make during his one-and-a-half year reign with the Lions thus far.

    While that sounded noble, the flawed nature of the rankings, which was based on a mathematical formula over a four-year period with previous years’ points earned depreciating in value, would not correctly reflect the relative strength of the Southeast Asian football region.

    For that to happen, Stange and the FAS National Teams Department would have to arrange regular sparring matches against nations higher ranked than them. Easier said than done though, chiefly because the leading Asian football nations would already have their friendly match schedule packed at least a year in advance, making any chance of a Singapore friendly slim.

    Furthermore, unless they had a specific reason to prepare, like dealing with another Southeast Asian country in a qualifier, a friendly match with Singapore would not be of much competitive value and thus undesirable.

    Distance – given the humongous stretch of land and sea mass from Amman to Canberra – and cost were further challenges.

    Avramovic faced these challenges too, but yet he was usually able to bring the national team out for regular trips to the Middle East partially due to his sound reputation as a coach in that region, while Stange did not have the credibility to replicate the same.

    Reduced to scouring for similar or lower-level opponents in Asia, the incumbent sought to remove as many signs of the Serb’s legacy as he could.

    That would lead to dropping several players who had served so loyally under Avramovic as he tried – as he mentioned several times early in his term – to impose his own preferred tactical system to the national team.

    From removing all the foreign-born nationals to deliberate errors of omission in some experienced locals, he opted to disregard their prior experience in taking on second-tier Asian football nations. Those who had been deeply ingrained in the Avramovic system, save for a few, would be slowly sidelined.

    What he was trying to do would have been more suitable for the inculcation of local children and teenagers as a technical director, rather than the adults who went through the Serbian’s football lessons while making their breakthroughs in the national team under the predecessor.

    That insistence to have the Lions play his way – and no other way – has often left his players befuddled, with the last straw coming from the uninspiring 4-2 win over Cambodia.

    To the Lions’ brave credit, they chose to abandon that concept and do what they knew best during the Suzuki Cup. While it was too late to erase the confusion that resulted in defeats against Malaysia and Thailand, their labour saw them lauded by our compatriots who are no fools when it comes to appreciating effort given.

    The most fatal misstep Stange committed was to ignore the usefulness of those experienced hands that could have come in handy against regional opposition in the biennial tournament. His explanation given at the post-match conference following the Malaysia debacle was they would have been disadvantaged in terms of pace as today’s game was one “for the young men”.

    People can say that he removed the foreign-born players from the national team and had to deal with a transitional squad ahead of the tournament. While these arguments were valid, the game at this level is still quite sedate, in comparison to the fast-paced game often seen at the higher echelons of world football.

    While that would have been plausible against the teams outside of the region, Malaysia and Thailand were similarly paced and the likes of Fahrudin Mustafic and Shi Jiayi would have brought composure in such high-pressure situations. By discarding them at the first go, he clearly believed the Avramovic influence would undermine what he – and his ego – desired to achieve.

    As if that was not enough, dropping one of the most experienced internationals, Isa Halim, by deeming him unsuitable for his football system in the national team was puzzling because the 28-year-old LionsXII player could still offer something despite a poor season at club level. He would certainly have provided more protection for the defence with his resoluteness on the pitch and versatility in occupying the right-back position, one he has played several times in his career.

    While the starting right-back Ismadi Mukhtar had a decent tournament debut at the age of 31 until his late horror show against the Causeway rivals, his call-up raised questions. As credible as the Tampines player is, he lacks the international experience and composure Juma’at Jantan and Ismail Yunos, who were both also overlooked, could have offered.

    His choices of Ismadi and several Courts Young Lions players were primarily motivated the fact that he was too keen to erase any trace of Avramovic, and these were the ones who were not influenced by the Serbian then and would make easy moulding for him to shape how he desired in his ideal Lions set-up.

    In his desperate attempts to stamp out the shadow of Avramovic that was still lurking large in the local set-up, he got himself into a huge mess thanks to these major mistakes he committed. Six out of eight wins during his 20-match stint with the Lions came against Asean minnows – Myanmar (twice), Laos (thrice) and Cambodia. Another came against lowly-ranked Oceania side Papua New Guinea and the last was a lucky 2-1 Asian Cup qualifying home win over Syria.

    Failure to deliver results when it really mattered – in the Asian Cup qualifiers and Suzuki Cup – showed he had failed miserably at his job. If Vincent Subramaniam and Jan Poulsen were sacked after failing to get past the group stage of the biennial regional showpiece – and losing to Malaysia in the group, why should Stange be given the a of execution after similarly poor results in the tournament capped by a deserved loss to our causeway rivals?

    Never in the class of his more esteemed compatriots Otto Rehhagel, Ottmar Hitzfield and Jupp Heynckes, the only viable option is for Stange to go. Only then can Singapore football be freed from a tragi-comedy that has lasted way too long.

    Whether it is a foreigner or a local, the next person to take the hot seat has to show confidence and not to be overawed by Avramovic’s shadow. Any incoming coach needs to build on the decent legacy the Serbian has left, instead of indulging in the shambolic mess we are now left with.

    Please go, for your own good, Bernd Walter Stange. You are out of depth, even in Southeast Asia, and talk too much of a good game but fail to deliver. Singapore has seen and heard enough.

     

    Source: http://www.fourfourtwo.com/sg

     

  • Lions Suzuki Cup Debacle: Replace Bernd Stange With Local Coach?

    Lions Suzuki Cup Debacle: Replace Bernd Stange With Local Coach?

    The Lions’ ignominious group-stage exit from the ASEAN Football Federation (AFF) Suzuki Cup after Saturday’s 3-1 defeat to Malaysia has prompted fans and former national footballers to call for swift changes to local football and its management.

    The brickbats came fast and furious after the defending champions’ poor showing, with some calling for national head coach Bernd Stange to resign, while others pointed to issues within the sport that have seen Singapore’s world ranking slide to No 158 this month as well as the S-League’s recent brouhaha with the decision to reduce the number of clubs and implement age restrictions for players.

    Former national defender R Sasikumar and veteran footballer Aleksandar Duric have joined in the chorus for Mr Stange to quit. Mr Sasikumar told TODAY: “I don’t think the calls are premature as the coach is there to get a result. It is time for him to go and to let us rebuild with local coaches. Ninety per cent of the public would want V Sundramoorthy or Fandi Ahmad as national coach.”

    But Mr Sasikumar — who won the Tiger Cup with the team in 1998 — believes the root of the Lions’ problems lies much deeper. “There are fundamental issues that need to be addressed … The Germans did it after they were kicked out of Euro 2000. It is also time for us to take stock of how we play football and how we approach football and we need to fix it,” said Mr Sasikumar.

    “After the 2010 AFF Suzuki Cup loss, what was done was aesthetic and we didn’t make changes to the philosophy of football. Right now, we talk about (the Football Association of Singapore) Strategic Plan, but where are the key performance indicators? Is it winning the Suzuki Cup consistently or qualifying for the AFC Cup?

    “If you are a private organisation, it’s natural that when you don’t give shareholders (what they want), they will look at the management. Football is no different, and that is accountability.”

    Added local football fan Navin Nambiar: “I’m not calling for Bernd Stange to be sacked as coaches need time. But looking at this, will a local coach do any worse? Some local flavour will be good and it would have been nice to see Fandi come up against Malaysian coach Dollah Salleh.”

    While players such as Hariss Harun, Shahril Ishak and Shakir Hamzah drew praise for their performances on the field, others came under fire. Former Lions player Rafi Ali attributed the poor performances to the lack of technical ability, saying: “My observation of teams such as Thailand, Vietnam and Myanmar is that their technical ability is good. Thailand are very comfortable with the ball, they move the ball nicely and are exciting to watch.

    “What is most glaring (about Singapore) is the lack of basic technique, such as passing and movement. We have to look at it and stop giving excuses. The most important thing is to grow the players technically, so the national coach has a lot of players to look at.”

    Aside from next year’s 2018 FIFA World Cup Asian qualifiers, the next big tournament will be the 2015 SEA Games to be held here from June 5 to 16. The gold medal is the target for the national Under-23 side, and former Singapore international Terry Pathmanathan said: “Players will be under tremendous pressure. They have to identify the players quickly and move them into regular training together.

    “I don’t know how much help it is for the Young Lions to play in the S-League as playing there and against Under-23 opponents is different.”

    Local fan Yusuf Kay, 39, is not hopeful of the team’s chances just yet, saying: “I don’t expect much for the SEA Games as a lot more needs to be done.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Better Atmosphere Needed at National Stadium

    Better Atmosphere Needed at National Stadium

    I have not always been a fan of the local football scene, be it the Prime or S.League but I do come down and support for home games that involve the Singapore National Football Team.

    Today on the 29th of November, Singapore loss to Malaysia with a score of 3-1 . I won’t rant on how the game was conducted by those awfull referees (Let’s face it, hands down – Malaysia did outplayed us and we did give our best.The ref’s decision making was totally not agreeable and that made the game more bitter than it ever should) but rather I would want to talk about SingaMania.

    For some of you who doesn’t know, “Singamania” is a group made up of smaller die hard football fan groups in Singapore. They can be said as the voice of Singapore Fans when it comes to National Games like how the Ultra Malaya are to Malaysia.

    What made me dissapointed was on a few factors:

    1) Game was played at home. We should have had bigger national flag than what the Ultras brought. It was disgusting to see how these Ultras had a huge Flag over their entire seat stand but SingaMania had two smaller national flags – nothing compared to half of what the Ultras had. Probably the Ultras had support from the Malaysian football federation for they could not have acquired a large flag if they were an independent group so does SingaMania has support from F.A.S?

    It’s Kallang Stadium not Bukit Jalil Stadium. We should have a flag as big as them, if not bigger.

    2) It is known that the match tickets sold out in a few hours so I presume 50,000+ people were present including me. The Ultras were louder even though they were only a handful. They were more organised in cheers and their rythm was as close to as a marching band.

    Singamania on the other hand couldn’t be clearly heard and the rythm was too fast paced and long. For God’s sake, if you want us to sing & shout with you, make it slower and repetitive so we could know what you guys are chanting. Even when we do get what we think you are saying, you guys just change to another cheer that will be faster than the previous.

    I have done my research after the match & I have watched almost all the ultras video that I could find on the net and youtube. It seems they have upload their own songs with lyrics in it. Songs that are easy to learn and sing. I could only found one Singamania cheer video but it wasn’t as catchy neither was it short. It wasn’t a cheer anymore, it was a song.  An uncatchy song.

    What I could suggest for Singamania: Rather than you guys keep and stay together at one spot like a flock of birds, why don’t you guys divide yourself into smaller groups and stand infront of each wing to teach and get us going. How to coordinate it? Simple, use walkies. Walkies that are sold in Giants or Challenger are affordable to say the least. Sure, it might be expensive but in the long run, Singapore Football Players could finally feel that they are playing at home and not away.  They would know that every single fan are standing behind them, cheering them on in every home games.

    Don’t forget to make videos on the cheers that you want us to sing. Please do include lyrics in it.  Make it short and catchy. Listen to some ultras cheers for inspiration but do not copy any of them. Let’s have our own cheer rather than we, Singaporeans be known as football fans who copy ideas from other Ultras. (I say this because I realised one of your cheer is exactly the same as a cheer made by the Ultras in Pahang, Malaysia)

    But hey, if this doesn’t come into effect as soon as possible, i wouldn’t be surprised either. Afterall the Football Association of Singapore doesn’t really encourage home fans to support the team since Horn Makers (such like the vuvuzelas and the Air Horn – all this info can be found on their website) are not allowed.

    F.A.S, please do change your policy. Please revived the old kampong spirit in every football fan. Please revived the Kallang Stadium into what it was before –  a Lion’s Den. A lion’s den that every away fan wouldn’t even dream of coming to cheer for their teams and be louder than us.

    Thank you.

    – From a Fan.

    TRS Contributor

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com