Tag: MOH

  • Devadas Krishnadas: Message To MOH – When Winning Can Be Losing

    Devadas Krishnadas: Message To MOH – When Winning Can Be Losing

    Message to MOH: When Winning can be Losing

    This crisis in our health care system is non-trivial. People have died and several others have had their health seriously compromised. The cause is a mystery but the fact that this is an episode of the utmost seriousness is not.

    MOH may think that its extreme defensive posture is championing the health care system. However in effect, it runs the risk of losing credibility as an institution and confidence of the people.

    The Worker’s Party (WP) are represented in Parliament and Mr Perera sits in parliament, albeit as a Non-Constituency Member of Parliament (NCMP). As such the response to Mr Perera’s proposal should be treated with maturity and and on substantive grounds rather than petulance and predicated on a rather silly premise that the WP are alleging improper conduct of healthcare professionals – which it clearly does not.

    This matter is going to play out over sometime. Indeed the question of time and timing is a legitimate point of concentration in the review of how this episode has been managed. The MOH response to Ms Rachel Chang, who first pointing to this in public writing, is the antecedent in temperament of their response to WP.

    If the MOH thinks it is somehow winning the campaign on public relations over this episode it may find itself surprised that the result to be the opposite. What it should not be is mystified if that is so. Such a mystery would be easier solved than that concerning the origins of this tragedy.

     

    Source: Devadas Krishnadas

  • MOM Too Lax In Allowing Foreigners Wth Infectious Disease To Work Here?

    MOM Too Lax In Allowing Foreigners Wth Infectious Disease To Work Here?

    A NICU (Neonatal Intensive Care Unit) nurse from the Philippines who is a
    chronic Hepatitis B virus (Hepatitis B reactive, but HBeAg Non-Reactive)
    carrier is dreaming of having greener pastures abroad so as to increase her
    earning potential.

    She is currently applying to work overseas, but realises that the Kingdom of
    Saudi Arabia (KSA) is very strict in granting work visa to foreigners with
    her medical condition to serve as nurses in the Kingdom, so she decides to
    target Singapore and is seeking advice from her Kababayans here (See URLs
    below).
    http://www.pinoysg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=66&t=86246
    http://www.pinoysg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=67&t=86245&sid=0337ff244d14…

    Hepatitis refers to the inflammation of the liver. Hepatitis can be caused by
    viral infections, chemicals, drug abuse, some medications and immune
    disorders. There are various forms of Viral Hepatitis including Hepatitis A,
    B and C, which are caused by Hepatitis A, B, and C viruses, respectively.

    Hepatitis B Infection is the most common infection of the liver. The majority
    of infected individuals recover from Acute Hepatitis B infections and become
    immune to it.

    However some people can develop a long-term Hepatitis B infection, which may
    lead to serious complications including chronic hepatitis, liver failure,
    liver cancer and liver cirrhosis.

    Hepatitis B virus is mainly found in the blood, and it can also be found in
    semen and vaginal secretions.

    Hepatitis B can be acquired through:
    • Infected expecting mothers transmitting the infection to their newborn
    during childbirth (Perinatal)
    • Contact with an infected person (Horizontal)
    • Sharing contaminated injections among users
    • Unsafe sexual contact with an infected person
    • Blood-to-blood exposure to blood or other infected fluids (Parenteral)

    Subject to the outcome of their medical examinations, all foreigners seeking
    works in Singapore are screened for only 4 types of infectious disease
    (tuberculosis, HIV, syphilis and malaria) before they are certified fit to
    work here. However, no medical examination is needed for foreigners on Work
    Holiday Pass, Malaysian confinement nannies, Training Work Permit,
    Miscellaneous Work Pass).

    Anecdotal evidence suggest that foreigners with Hepatitis B Infection have no
    problems getting various work passes from the Ministry of Manpower (MOM) (See
    URL below).
    http://www.pinoysg.com/forum/viewtopic.php?f=68&t=40757&start=0

    The World Health Organization has a list of groups of people who are at risk
    of contracting Hepatitis B including health care workers, patients and employees in
    haemodialysis centres, people sharing unsterile medical or dental equipment
    etc.

    Migrant workers in other countries are subject to Hepatitis testing before
    the governments will grant them work passes.

    For instance, Malaysia has a more stringent medical screening process
    compared to Singapore (See URL below).
    http://www.fomema.com.my/index.php/medical-screening-process
    http://www.themalaysianinsider.com/malaysia/article/more-foreign-workers…

    In Qatar, pre-arrival Hepatitis testing are compulsory for all foreign
    workers (See URL below).
    http://portal.www.gov.qa/wps/portal/media-center/news/individualnews/pre…

    However, according to our Ministry Of Health, there is no need to ban
    foreigners working in Singapore who are hepatitis B carriers (See URL below).
    https://www.moh.gov.sg/content/moh_web/home/pressRoom/Media_Forums/2010/…

    Foreigners who wish to work in Singapore may get a medical examination done
    through an established clinic/hospital here. Most clinics in Singapore
    provide medical examination and report within a day. Completed medical
    examination forms or health declaration forms (For Employment Pass, Training
    Employment Pass, EntrePass, Dependent’s Pass, Long Term Visit Pass only)
    will be attached with the candidates’ in-principle approval letters to the
    Ministry of Manpower for their work pass issuance.

    Should Singaporeans be concerned with the current medical examination
    procedures with physical examination like blood pressure, chest and abdominal
    examination, blood test, etc. as routine tests and screening for only 4 types
    of infectious diseases. i.e. Tuberculosis, HIV, Syphilis and Malaria
    (Hepatitis excluded) before work passes are approved?

    What do you think?

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Nearly 1,000 People To Be Screened For Hepatitis C Following Outbreak At SGH

    Nearly 1,000 People To Be Screened For Hepatitis C Following Outbreak At SGH

    Nearly 1,000 people will be screened to check if they were affected by the hepatitis C outbreak at the Singapore General Hospital (SGH) — a figure that is much higher than initially thought.

    Figures provided by SGH last night said the affected renal ward admitted 678 patients from January to June, where they were cared for by 273 doctors and nurses. The first case of the outbreak, which has infected 22 patients, was diagnosed on April 17.

    As of 6pm today (Oct 8), the hospital managed to contact 298 of these patients, of whom 251 have fixed appointments. It has also screened 78 patients, as well as 169 staff.

    The 42 doctors and 51 nurses who provided direct care to renal patients have also been screened, and the hospital is extending the tests to other doctors who covered the ward during the period.

    SGH said results of these tests are available after one week. The hepatitis C virus has an incubation period of between two weeks and six months.

    The unprecedented viral outbreak, which was made public on Tuesday, is possibly due to a lapse in the use of multi-dose medication vials.

    Eight of the 22 affected patients have died. Among these deaths, four are linked to the virus infection, while a fifth is under review. Two of the remaining 14 survivors are still warded.

    The number of patients SGH is recalling for screening for the virus now differs from what was said during the media briefing three days ago.

    At that time, Professor Fong Kok Yong, chairman of SGH’s medical board, said: “We will be calling back patients who passed through the ward from January to June 2015, and to date, we’ve actually looked through all those who passed through and we’ve identified 411 of them, whom we’ll be calling back just to check.”

    Today, SGH said there were 267 patients from January to March, and 411 from April to June. Ward 64A is SGH’s renal ward, but underwent renovations from April to June. Patients were diverted to Ward 67.

    SGH did not respond to TODAY’s queries on why the lower figure was given initially.

    Since Tuesday, 157 patients who did not stay in the renal ward during that period have also made enquiries about the hepatitis C cluster, said an SGH spokesperson.

    “The hospital reassured them that patients in other wards and visitors need not be screened as the hepatitis C virus is not air-borne,” she added.

    Speaking at a book launch and awards ceremony this morning, Health Minister Gan Kim Yong spoke briefly about the hepatitis C virus outbreak.

    “As a healthcare family, we are all saddened by the hepatitis C Cluster at SGH. Our thoughts are with the patients and their families,” he said. “We will provide them with the necessary support and treatment, and we will learn from this incident and improve ourselves.”

    Mr Gan did not take questions from reporters at the event.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Amboi Susan Mariam: NUH Doctors Unprofessional And Heartless In Treating My Father, Nurses Were Apologetic

    Amboi Susan Mariam: NUH Doctors Unprofessional And Heartless In Treating My Father, Nurses Were Apologetic

    Pls Share!!!

    My Dad was having “SHINGLES”. As in the beginning

    Amboi Susan Mariam - Shingles 1

    Amboi Susan Mariam - Shingles 2

    Which my family and I brought him to “NUH” Emergency. At about 7.18pm and make a payment of $108.00. And he also have fever..

    Wait for the Q number, after which the nurse mentioned have to isolate my dad.

    A few hours later, he is admitted to Ward 61 Bed 9. He was craving for roti parta… Which I get for him… When I reach to the ward.. I was greet by a malay care taker(Malay man) he show us the room which my dad was isolated.. At that time my dad was in the toilet. While waiting the nurse who is a foreigner from China.. Explain to us the procedure to meet my dad in the room.. And also ask some questions.. She was nice and friendly..

    Amboi Susan Mariam - Shingles Ward 61

    After which, we when to the room.. To meet my dad as he is hungry.. After 10 mins a night shift doctor namely DR Julian loi came and ask the normal questions and ask us to leave the room as he would like to speak privately with my dad.

    While talking another doctor came by which she is sighing away.. Wash her hands.. Not happy looks.. Her name is DR Tay Yi Hang.. She go in to the room and speak to my father..

    Amboi Susan Mariam - Shingles Dr

    5 mins later, both came out.. Remove their gloves and wash their hands.. And are away from us about 5 to 10 steps away.. As we keep on standing directly outside my dad isolation room from the beginning..

    So I ask both of them.. Do you have anything to explain to us? As we need to explain about my dad conditions. She gave a look.. And a hand signal.. Wait…

    So we keep on looking at them for few mins.. And we ask again, and told them.. Is already very late.. And we would not want to wake the other patients up.. So we can leave and visit him again.

    Again ask to wait, will a roll eyes.. I was thinking to myself.. What’s wrong with this doctors.. Thru out, was having a very bad attitude.. Rude.. Showing a unpleasant face.. With a look… Hmmmm…

    Again I ask them with a little high tone, so they quickly came over. So I explain my dad conditions.. And ask them, do you have anything for us to know about my dad.. Again, I am not a doctor.. They are.. They should explain to us… But they said, there’s nothing for us to tell you.. And walk away just like that.. I was pissed with their behavior…

    So I when back to my dad room which in the isolation room.. And told my dad, we have to leave and not to worry.. We will come back tomorrow.. My dad was tearing and he look stress.. I ask him.. ” ok dad, we going off” he said” the guy doctor said I got HIV” I told him wat?? Why they didn’t explain to us??

    So I came out from the room and look for the doctor and ask them why u do not explain to us.. And how come you told my dad he is having HIV???

    So he explain, he was telling my dad.. Maybe he would have.. So I ask him.. Which is which.. As a doctor, you should not said that.. You should check his blood test first.. Not just said you have or maybe you have..

    So I told them, is better for you to explain.. Both of them came in to my dad room.. I told them.. You should explain to ur patients properly and tactfully.. If the patient don’t understand get a Malay nurse or caregiver to explain or one of the family members whom is there at the moment.

    So the doctor Tay Yi Hang… Use her pointer fingers and pointing to my dad shoulder which near to the chest.. And said loudly” uncle no HIV ok.. And roll her eyes and dash to door to go off.. I said” that’s all?? She said, anymore question?? I said you are being rude… As her tone was grumpty thruout.. Showing sacastics body language movements.. So I told her.. In that case I guess my dad is not safe to be in this hospital with your attitude.. Worst still you are the doctor.. And the nurse is better than you… So sad to see a Singapore doctor to have this kind of attitude which embarrass the country which the government have set a high expections when come to Medicals in Singapore .. Both the doctor walk away just like that.. And I ask them discharge my dad.. She said ok.. Will get the nurse to do it… And I said, ok… The reason why my dad left this hospital is because of the both of you.. And roll her eyes and walk away..

    Again I am shock… They allow that to happen when the patient is a isolated client.. And walk off…

    And another Malay nurse, Chinese nurse and a senior staff Chinese nurse came.. And talk to us.. They also agree, that the doctor can’t do that… And they were very sorry of wat had happen.. After which their senior doctor which is a young lady name DR NOH.. She was talking so fast and I guess she is tense up.. Again I explain to her.. And told her get the 2 doctors to apologize not to me but the patient which is my dad… She keep quiet awhile.. So I ask her, can or not?? She shake her head.. So I told her, cannot right?? So I do not want to waste my time.. I need to rush my dad to another hospital fast due to his conditions.. The nurse bring us to the lift.. Keep on apologies of wat happen… All the nurse in ward 61 night shift.. Thumbs up to you guys… But too bad your doctor is not.. But again, they did not give us any memo for us to pass to the next hospital at all..

    So we left, straight to emergency back.. Where my father was in the beginning… And get the staff that we would want to speak to the most senior doctor in the emergency department. His name was DR Victor.. He was calming and listen to us of wat happen. And advice my dad to put on the mask.. And call the ward 61 doctor to settle the issues.. He also understand the situation.. He said, he will give us a memo for the next hospital for the next doctor to review my dad case… That’s call a responsible doctor which think for the patience than his pocket… Not like the doctors in ward 61 (2 of them) whom don’t think of the patient.. But just work for the sake of the salary instead.. We still demand for the 2 to apologies for another last chance for them but did not still… So we have no choice but to take the memo from emergency and off to another hospital instead.. And we also mentioned we will viral it to the public to see what have happen for a patient which been isolated… Will like to take this opportunity to tell everyone… We have to ensure our elderly parents in a good hands when admitted to the hospital.. And must not ill treat the elderly when they are in the hospital…

     

    Source: Amboi Susan Mariam

  • E-Cigarettes To Remain Illegal In Singapore

    E-Cigarettes To Remain Illegal In Singapore

    The United Kingdom’s public health authority recently issued a report that said e-cigarettes are not only 95 per cent less harmful than regular cigarettes, but also have the potential to help smokers quit.

    But despite this stand by Public Health England (PHE), Singapore’s Ministry of Health (MOH) is sticking by its view that e-cigarettes are dangerous and will remain illegal.

    In response to queries by The New Paper, an MOH spokesman said that the ban on e-cigarettes in Singapore, which will take effect from Dec 15, “takes a high precautionary level of protection for the public’s health”.

    According to MOH, the vapour from e-cigarettes still contains cancer-causing agents, which pose a real risk to both users and bystanders.

    “Additionally, we remain concerned that e-cigarettes could attract and harm a large number of new users (who may not necessarily be current smokers), get them addicted to nicotine, and hence potentially serve as a gateway to developing a smoking habit, particularly among our young,” the spokesman added.The PHE finding suggests there is no evidence that e-cigarettes are acting as a gateway to smoking for children and non-smokers. In fact, the study suggests that the opposite is happening – e-cigarettes may be contributing to falling smoking rates among adults and young people.

    The PHE study was released on Aug 19 and led by academics from King’s College London and Queen Mary University of London.

    Its findings have not only been challenged by MOH, but also departs from those of other health bodies.

    In 2014, the World Health Organisation released a report that backed stricter regulations for e-cigarettes and supported a ban on their use indoors and sale to minors.

    Another recent study by researchers from the University of Southern California suggests that teens who tried electronic cigarettes might be more than twice as likely to move on to smoking conventional cigarettes.

    Moreover, a report published on Aug 29 in medical journal The Lancet has cast some doubt about PHE’s assertion that e-cigarettes are 95 per cent less harmful.

    This claim, according to The Lancet, originated from a 2014 study in which at least three of its 11 authors had roles in the e-cigarette industry, with one of them having served as a consultant to e-cigarette distributor Arbi Group Srl.

    FLIMSY

    This raises questions about PHE’s conclusions. The Lancet says PHE has “fallen short of its mission” to “protect and improve the nation’s health and well-being” by relying on an “extraordinarily flimsy foundation”.

    Oncologist Dr Wong Seng Weng says that e-cigarettes are still largely misunderstood.

    He said: “The discussion is that there is less harm, but some research says that fumes might be carcinogenic. There is not enough data to be safe.”

    As for the assertion that e-cigarettes can help smokers quit, Dr Leong Choon Kit, a family physician from Mission Medical Clinic, said: “It does not solve the underlying problem of addiction. It’s like taking the easy way out without getting to the root.”

    Managing director at MW Medical Centre, Dr Madeleine Chew, agreed with this.

    “Nicotine creates craving and dependence, which are not desirable traits in human beings,” she said.

    However, at least one medical expert said that the situation is not so simple, as there is a chance that e-cigarettes could help people curb their tobacco addiction.

    Psychiatrist Associate Professor Munidasa Winslow said: “Unfortunately both approaches are true. It can be a gateway to actual smoking, but it does help some with cigarette or tobacco addiction to stop or reduce their use. Unfortunately the jury is still out on whether there is any real benefit from using e-cigarettes.”

    It is an offence to import, distribute or sell e-cigarettes here.

    Since 2011, the Health Sciences Authority (HSA) has prosecuted 10 people for selling such products.

    The penalty is a fine of up to $5,000 for a first offence and a fine of up to $10,000 for a second or subsequent offence on each count.

    Anyone with information on the illegal import, distribution or sales of e-cigarettes can call the HSA’s Tobacco Regulation Branch on 6684-2036 or 6684-2037.

     

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg