Tag: Muslims

  • Calls For BBC Reporter To Resign After Mentioning Plight Of Palestinians During Coverage of Je Suis Charlie Rally

    Calls For BBC Reporter To Resign After Mentioning Plight Of Palestinians During Coverage of Je Suis Charlie Rally

    A BBC reporter has faced calls to resign after he told the daughter of Holocaust survivors in Paris: ‘Palestinians suffer hugely at Jewish hands as well’.

    Journalist Tim Willcox sparked anger during his coverage of yesterday’s rally in Paris, held in memory of the 17 victims of last week’s terror attacks, including four Jewish people in a siege at a Kosher supermarket.

    During a live report from the streets of Paris, Willcox was speaking to a number of participants in the march, including one woman who expressed her fears that Jews were being persecuted, and ‘the situation is going back to the days of the 1930s in Europe.’ 

    To this, Willcox, who was broadcasting on the BBC News channel replied: ‘Many critics though of Israel’s policy would suggest that the Palestinians suffer hugely at Jewish hands as well.’

    When the woman, shaking her head, responded saying: ‘We can’t do an amalgam’, he told her: ‘You understand everything is seen from different perspectives.’

    She was identified during the broadcast as ‘Chava’, and told Willcox when she was introduced on screen that she had lived in France for 20 years, but was originally from Israel.

    She said her parents were from Poland, and came to Israel after the Second World War.

    She had attended the rally with a friend, Aziz, who is French-born and comes from a Muslim background, with his parents being originally from Algeria.

    Willcox has today apologised for his comments, taking to Twitter to say he had not meant to cause offence.

    He wrote: ‘Really sorry for any offence caused by a poorly phrased question in a live interview in Paris yesterday – it was entirely unintentional.’

    Tim Willcox Twitter Apology

    But many viewers also used the social network to express their anger and concerns over Willcox’s rally coverage, including historian and BBC presenter Simon Schama.

    He wrote on Twitter: ‘Appalling of @BBCTimWillcox to imply any and all JEWS (not Israelis) responsible for treatment of Palestinians by hectoring lady in Paris.’

    And added: ‘Then he had gall to patronise her at the end – “you see people see it from all sides” That Palestinian plight justifies anti-semitic murder?’  

    Jewish Chronicle editor Stephen Pollard also joined the debate, tweeting: ‘What is @BBCTimWillcox’s problem with Jews? Once is problematic. Twice is a pattern.’

    The Campaign Against Antisemitism, which works to combat anti-Semitism in Britain, has circulated footage of the incident, and has called on those offended by it to formally complain to the BBC.

    Director of communications, Jonathan Sacerdoti, told MailOnline Willcox’s Twitter apology was ‘not really good enough’.

    ‘It’s an admission he has done something wrong, but it’s incumbent on the BBC to make an on-air apology and to investigate his behaviour.’

    There have also been calls for the reporter to resign.

    Twitter user I Support Israel said: ‘Retweet if you believe @BBCTimWillcox should be fired for making this anti-Semitic suggestion’.

    The comment was re-tweeted 41 times, while others expressed their views on the controversy, adding the hashtag #WillcoxMustGo.

    An online petition was also set up, demanding that Willcox ‘personally apologise’, and calling for ‘re-assurance that this constant anti-Semitic behaviour from the BBC will come to an end’.

    The petition authors said: ‘It was the wrong time and place to ask such a disgraceful question. The unity march was a time for France and the rest of the world to come together and unite against the rising threat of terrorism and anti-Semitism, as well as an opportunity to mourn and remember those killed in the horrific attacks.

    ‘Nevertheless, Mr Willcox showed no sensitivity and asked a tasteless question on live TV which has outraged those who have seen the clip, as well as leaving the interviewee speechless and defenceless.’

    It is not the first time Willcox has been accused of anti-Semitism.

    In November during a review of the following day’s newspapers on the BBC News channel, Willcox, who was anchoring the discussion, faced criticism after discussion of a story about Labour leader Ed Miliband reportedly losing Jewish support.

    The BBC said Willcox (pictured) had no intention of causing offence, and had been discussing a wide range of issues with the rally participants

    A guest on the programme, political observer Jo Phillips, had referred to a ‘Jewish lobby’, which had abandoned support for Labour over his condemnation of Israeli attacks on Gaza.

    There was anger that Willcox had not pulled up the guest on her comments, and had added: ‘A lot of these prominent Jewish faces will be very much against the mansion tax’.

    The BBC defended the comments, and said: ‘It was clear that he was not suggesting that Jewish people in particular are against the mansion tax.’

    Tim Willcox

    Mr Sacerdoti said his organisation and 33 individuals had complained to the BBC about the November broadcast.

    ‘The BBC said there was no anti-Semitism in what he said, but according to the MacPherson definition, if a minority group feels it is anti-Semitic, it should be considered as such,’ he said.

    ‘It’s obviously offending people.’

    He added: ‘And now he’s done it again in an extreme example when people are mourning the deaths of four Jews, among the other victims, and his reaction is to say this to a Jewish woman who is saying it’s like the 1930s.

    ‘To somehow bring in mitigating circumstances, is terrible.

    ‘The EUMC’s [European Monitoring Centre on Racism and Xenophobia, now the European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights] working definition of anti-Semitism includes collective blaming of Jews for the actions of Israel.’

    Alex Benjamin, Executive Director of Brussels-based group European Friends of Israel, told MailOnline he would ‘echo the calls for Willcox to resign’. 

    ‘I was not the only one who was utterly disgusted at the deeply patronising, offensive and frankly partisan way he hassled this woman – a woman who as a Parisian Jew is genuinely concerned for her well-being – seeking to justify the abhorrent murders of four jews in Paris with the Israel Palestinian conflict,’ he said.

    ‘It was tactless, arrogant and he should at resign.’

    A BBC spokesman said: ‘Tim Willcox has apologised for what he accepts was a poorly phrased question during an in-depth live interview with two friends, one Jewish and of Israeli birth, the other of Algerian Muslim heritage, where they discussed a wide range of issues affecting both the Muslim and Jewish communities in France. He had no intention of causing offence.’

    Source: www.dailymail.co.uk

  • Attack On Satirical Magazine Charlie Hebdo Leaves 12 Dead

    Attack On Satirical Magazine Charlie Hebdo Leaves 12 Dead

    PARIS: Heavily-armed men shouting “Allahu Akbar” stormed the Paris headquarters of a satirical weekly on Wednesday (Jan 7), killing 12 people in cold blood in the worst attack in France in decades.

    The assault on Charlie Hebdo headquarters in a quiet Paris neighbourhood sparked a massive manhunt as the gunmen managed to escape, executing a wounded police officer as they fled. The men remained on the run in the early evening, with few clues on their whereabouts and parts of the French capital in lockdown.

    French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said security forces were hunting for three gunmen after the noon-time attack on the weekly. French police said they have identified three suspects who were allegedly behind the attack.

    Two of the suspects are believed to be brothers – Said Kouachi and Cherif Kouachi – both in their thirties. The third suspect is named as Hamyd Mourad, who is 18 years old. Reports said the trio are linked to a Yemeni terrorist network.

    Victims included four prominent cartoonists, including the chief editor, who had been holding a morning meeting when the assailants armed with Kalashnikovs burst in and opened fire, officials said.

    President Francois Hollande immediately rushed to the scene of what he called “an act of exceptional barbarism” and “undoubtedly a terrorist attack.”

    Amateur video shot after the bloodbath showed two men masked and dressed head-to-toe in black military style running toward a wounded policeman as he lay on the pavement. The attacker says “you wanted to kill me?” before shooting the officer in the head execution style. The gunmen then climb into their getaway vehicle and drive off.

    Large numbers of police and ambulances rushed to the scene, where shocked residents spilled into the streets. Reporters saw bullet-riddled windows and people being carried out on stretchers. Two police were confirmed among the dead and four people were critically injured.

    The attack took place at a time of heightened fears in France and other European capitals over fallout from the wars in Iraq and Syria, where hundreds of European citizens have gone to fight alongside the radical Islamic State group. In a sign of such tensions, a media group’s office in Madrid was evacuated later in the day after a suspicious package was sent there.

    THESE GUYS WERE SERIOUS

    One man, who witnessed the attack, described a scene like “in a movie.” “I saw them leaving and shooting. They were wearing masks. These guys were serious,” said the man who declined to give his name. “At first I thought it was special forces chasing drug traffickers or something.”

    An employee at a nearby daycare centre said he was walking with children when panic erupted. “People leaned out of the window and yelled at me to get off the pavement,” he said. “We got out of there very fast,” said Jean-Paul Chevalier, 56. “People were  panicking. I heard shooting.”

    Hollande called for “national unity”, adding that “several terrorist attacks had been foiled in recent weeks”. US President Barack Obama condemned the attack, while British Prime Minister David Cameron called it “sickening.” German Chancellor Angela Merkel said the attack was “despicable” and Russian President Vladimir Putin as well as the Arab League condemned the violence.

    Wednesday’s shooting was the worst attack in France in at least four decades. It revived fears of a return to the dark days of the 1980s and 1990s when France was hit by a wave of extremist violence.

     

    In 1995, a bomb in a commuter train blamed on Algerian extremists exploded at the Saint Michel metro station in Paris, killing eight and wounding 119. Al-Qaeda inspired gunman Mohamed Merah killed seven people in and around the southern city of Toulouse in 2012. His victims included three French soldiers and four Jews – three children and a rabbi.

    DEATH THREATS

    The satirical newspaper attack on Wednesday gained notoriety in February 2006 when it reprinted cartoons of the Prophet Mohammed that had originally appeared in Danish daily Jyllands-Posten, causing fury across the Muslim world. Its offices were fire-bombed in November 2011 when it published a cartoon of Mohammed under the title “Sharia Hebdo”.

    Despite being taken to court under anti-racism laws, the weekly continued to publish controversial cartoons of the Muslim prophet. In September 2012, Charlie Hebdo published cartoons of a naked Mohammed as violent protests were taking place in several countries over a low-budget film, titled “Innocence of Muslims”, which was made in the United States and insulted the prophet.

    Wednesday’s attack began with the gunmen first going to the wrong address at 6 rue Nicolas Appert, where the paper’s archives are located. After realising their mistake they moved a few doors down to the weekly’s headquarters.

    Editor-in-chief Stephane Charbonnier, known as Charb and who had lived under police protection after receiving death threats, was among the victims. Others included Jean Cabut, known across France as Cabu; Georges Wolinski; and Bernard Verlhac, better known as Tignous.

    The publication’s website went down after the attack before coming back on line with the single image of the words “I am Charlie” which has been trending worldwide on social media. Thousands of people gathered on the large Republique square in Paris holding up banners of the phrase.

    The attack took place on the day the latest edition of Charlie Hebdo was published, featuring controversial author French Michel Houellebecq, whose latest book “Soumission”, or “Submission,” imagines a France in the near future that is ruled by an Islamic government.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com and www.bbc.com

  • Singapore Firm Launches “HalalTrip” App To Share Halal Culinary Discoveries From Around The World

    Singapore Firm Launches “HalalTrip” App To Share Halal Culinary Discoveries From Around The World

    A Singapore-based company on Wednesday launched a mobile application that enables Muslim foodies and travellers to share halal restaurant discoveries around the world.

    The free “HalalTrip” app, available for Apple iOS and Android devices, enables users to take and upload photos of halal dishes, write comments and share them through social media.

    Clicking on a photo gives details about the dish as well as the location of the restaurant. The app, which has English and Arabic interfaces, also uses a traveller’s location to display photos of halal dishes served in nearby restaurants.

    The term halal is used for food, products and services that comply with Islamic requirements.

    “Halal food is one of the biggest drivers of tourism for the Muslim market,” said Fazal Bahardeen, chief executive of HalalTrip, part of a Muslim-oriented business group called CrescentRating.

    “When travelling, one of the main concerns of Muslims is halal food. What we did is to bring in a social media element into discovering halal food and making it more fun and more intuitive,” he told AFP.

    Fazal predicted the Muslim travel market would be worth $192 billion a year globally by 2020, up from $140 billion in 2013.

     

    Source: https://sg.news.yahoo.com

  • Jeff Choi Posts Racist Comments Against Malays

    Jeff Choi Posts Racist Comments Against Malays

    Bro my friend share this FB user Jeff Choi kurang ajar.

    Fat fxxxxx racist!!! Ada dier cakapa Melayu semua bodoh dengan kulit gelap sebab Tuhan tak kasi makan babi.  Muka dier tu macam babi.

    Setan ni mengaku diri dier ex-gangster dier cabar siapa2 tak happy bleh cari dier. Kekek siak.

    Dier dah salah langgar ar.  Muka macam kena sampuk dengan babi.

    Share bro. Kasi ampai cari dier.

     

    Satria

  • Defining The Moderates In The Malay Muslim Community – Are Majority Of Us Extremists?

    Defining The Moderates In The Malay Muslim Community – Are Majority Of Us Extremists?

    It is indeed funny to see how the star lined up a band of people whom it called the voices of moderation.

    Well I don’t care about the non-Muslim (not Malay) in the line up because it is none of my business to interfere with how they want to define the term moderation, but it is kind of appalling to see the Malays in the list. They are

    • Marina Mahathir
    • Zaid Ibrahim
    • Razali Ismail (chairman of Global Movement of Moderates)
    • Zainah Anwar (Sisters in Islam co-founder)
    • Karim Raslan
    • Azmi Sharom
    • Anas Zubedy
    • Wan Saiful Wan Jan
    • Sharyn Shufiyan (Tunku Abdul Rahman’s great granddaughter)

    I want to clarify that I have nothing against them personally. What I am against is the people who put them in the list and claimed that they are the voices of moderation that represent the Muslims whereas many Muslims (including me) and Malays are against their thinking and ideology. What more when some of them are well known for carrying ideology that is against the main stream understanding of Islam. Take for example the ladies in the list, whom none is wearing tudung. Zainah Anwar is also known to claimed that covering one’s hair is unnecessary in Islam, whereas the mainstream Muslim understanding all over the world is that it is compulsory. So how can the person ever claimed that Zainah Anwar is the voices of moderation for the Muslim while clearly she is the minority. If Zainah Anwar represents the voices of moderation for the Muslim, does that mean 90% (or probably 99%) of Malaysian Muslim women who believe hair as aurat which needs to be covered in public are the extremist? This is indeed insulting.

    I am not sure if the person who put up the list is a Muslim or not, but for me, as a Muslim, it is a blatant misused (and wrongly used) of the term moderation for the Muslim. Firstly, the term moderation is a very misunderstood terminology. Secondly, for the Muslim, the term moderate is a religious definition where there are hadiths from the prophet S.A.W. that explains about the meaning of moderation. Therefore, to put these Malays (Muslims) as role model of moderation is an insult to the Muslim especially when some of them is known to have ideology and understanding of Islam that is against the understanding and practice of the mainstream Muslim.

    It is Tolerate, not Moderate

    When I dropped the word Moderate into Google, this is what I got

    moderate

    Moderate, by its adjective definition is the average in amount, intensity, quality, or degree. You cannot have an average if you only have one extreme. For example, what is the average of 10? No one can tell you. But if  you ask what is the average between 1 to 10, then the answer is 5. So we can say that 1 is the extreme to the left and 10 is the extreme to the right. So 5 is the moderate value which is in between the two intensities!

    extreams

    The misconception comes in the noun definition. It says that moderate is a person who holds moderate views, especially in politics. Now the problem is that views in politics are subjective. What someone view as moderate may not be viewed as moderate by others. For example, to the non-Muslim, a Muslim who is not wearing tudung is a moderate Muslim. To the many Muslims, she is not a good Muslim. To the non-Muslim, a person who drink only in social occasion is a moderate drinker. To the Muslim, if a Muslim drink at any occasion, he is a sinner. People like Marina, Zainah and Zaid Ibrahim may think that they are the moderate, but to the many they are the liberals and to some they are the deviants.

    The more correct definition that fits them is Tolerate. These people are not moderate, they are just more tolerable, for example, some are more tolerable to western lifestyle where they don’t mind to wear bikini or drinking in a party with alcohol. So does in political view. Some are more tolerable to opposing views.

    There is no point arguing who is indeed the moderate. We can never agree to such a subjective matter. What is unbecoming is for the Star to put up these people and claimed that they are the voices of moderation among the Muslim. it is like the Star trying to shovel the definition Moderation into the throats of Muslim. Who is the Star to tell the world that those people represent the moderate voices of Muslim in Malaysia? That is why I say it is insulting.

    A Religious Definition

    Islam has clear definition moderation. It is in the Quran and there are numerous hadiths from the Prophet s.a.w. about moderation.

    In the Quran, Allah S.W.T. says

    “We made you to be a community of the middle way, so that (with the example of your lives) you might bear witness to the truth before all mankind.” (Qur’an, 2:143) 

    In one of the hadith,

    ‘Abdullah ibn Masood (Allah be pleased with him) reported that once Allah’s Messenger (Peace be upon him) drew a line in the dust with his hand and said, “This is the straight path of Allah.” Then he drew a series of lines to the right of it and to the left and said, “Each of these paths has a devil at its head inviting people to it.” He then recited (Qur’an 6:153), “Verily this is my straight path so follow it and do not follow the (twisted) paths.” (Collected by Ahmad, Nisai and Darimi; see Mishkat ul-Masabih, 1/166)

    If you look back at the adjective definition, you will understand better the concept of moderation in Islam. In every moderation, there is always an extreme left and extreme right. So the moderate is the middle path in between the extremes. Picture speaks a thousand word. By looking at the picture below, you should understand better. This is off course according to Ahlul Sunnah definition.

    moderate2

    What it clearly tells you is that Zainah, Marina, and the other ladies in the list are not the moderate according to the Muslim standard. They are indeed the extremists, the liberals!

    I will list few more examples of moderation in Islam

    EXTREME LEFT MODERATE EXTREME RIGHT
    Marriage
    Priesthood, complete refrain from marriage Marriage up to 4 wives (in this respect, Sister in Islam by Zainah Anwar is against polygamy, so she is not the moderate) More than 4 and unlimited number of concubines
    Relationship with Non-Muslim
    Extreme enimity against non-Muslim irrespective of whether they have peace agreement with the Muslim or not. Treat and deal with those who have peace agreement with Muslim with kindness, honor, respect. Befriend those who are an obvious enemy to Muslim who are known of ploting to destroy Islam and the Muslim
    Ibadah
    Monastery life, i.e. spend whole life doing nothing except in prayer and worship Balance between worldly life and time spend in prayer and worship of God Only focus on world life and ignore worshipping of God
    Charity
    People who give everything and left nothing for themselves Give some part of their wealth for charity and keep the remaining for own use Do not give charity or alms at all

    So it is not difficult to understand moderation in Islam. It is something very clear cut and obvious. There is a law in Islam. Some will take it extremely lightly and some will take it rigidly. The moderate is the one who take the middle path.

    Trying to tell Muslim how to practice Islam

    This is the alter ego and ignorance of many of the non-Muslim today. What exhibits by the Star is the result of this alter ego. They believe these few figures are the “moderates” so they put them as the moderate voices of Malaysia without an iota to think if the mainstream Muslim actually agree with them. Arrogance is one thing, but such ignorance is unacceptable. Even for those non-Muslims, do you think they really represent the voices of moderate among the non-Muslims? Don’t they know that Zainah is one of the most loathe personality among the mainstream Muslim community in Malaysia. How can you ever shovel such person into throats of Muslim forcing them to accept her as role model. This is an utter demonstration of low class journalism.

     

    Source: https://grandmarquis.wordpress.com