Tag: NDR2015

  • $20,000 Grant To Help Extended Families Live Closer Together

    $20,000 Grant To Help Extended Families Live Closer Together

    Families intending to buy resale flats to live with or near their parents, or seniors who plan to do the same with their married children, are set to receive S$20,000 under the new Proximity Housing Grant (PHG).

    First announced by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong in his National Day Rally yesterday (Aug 23), the scheme, which kicked in today, will replace the Higher-Tier CPF Housing Grant that previously gave first-timer families S$10,000 and singles S$5,000 on top of the basic S$30,000 or S$15,000 CPF Housing Grant they receive respectively.

    Under the scheme, singles will receive grant of S$10,000, half of what a family gets. Recipients of the grant will need to live in their flats for at least five years after receiving the grant, as well the families they live near or with. The grant is available to Singaporean families once, regardless of their household income, any previous subsidies enjoyed or private property ownership.

    Details for this scheme, as well as for a slew of other measures announced by Mr Lee, were released by the Ministry of National Development (MND) and Housing and Development Board (HDB) at a media briefing today. The other measures include raised income ceilings when buying new HDB flats and Executive Condominium units, and bigger Special CPF Housing Grants.

    While more are now eligible to buy flats from the HDB, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan yesterday sought to assuaged fears that a crush of buyers could outstrip supply and drive up queue times for Build-to-Order (BTO) flats, or prices for ECs.

    Emphasising that MND and HDB will monitor the market to ramp up supply if necessary, Mr Khaw said that the market would adjust itself, with buyers flowing both ways between HDB flats and EC units.

    “Some EC buyers may move into BTOs, some BTO applicants may go up to ECs. At the border (between) EC and (private) condos, there will also be movement. Key point is because we have leverage over supply and we can always adjust the supply, expand and reduce as necessary,” said Mr Khaw.

    On whether developers of EC would capitalise on the higher income ceilings of buyers and raise prices of units, Mr Khaw said developers should be looking at lowering prices, to balance the increased supply of EC units in a market where demand has largely been satisfied.

    And dispelling notions that the measures were introduced to sweeten the ground before the upcoming General Election, Mr Khaw said it was the right time to introduce these adjustments after having cleared the queue of first-timers. Such measures could not have been introduced three or four years ago, he noted.

    “When I took over four and a half years ago, we focused on specific groups where the need was greatest. And that’s how we incrementally adjusted the policies… So now that the first-timers, newly-weds problems are largely resolved, it allows me now to begin to look at other groups – middle income groups and higher income groups … and going forward… including those who are renting HDB flats,” he said.

    Adding he “could not care less when GE is”, Mr Khaw said problems must be solved and schemes will be launched “once I’m confident that those are practical scheme(s)”.

    He also clarified that shifting the focus towards the higher income groups does not be at the expense of the lower income groups. “Even if we expand upwards to a higher income group, we are also improving or enhancing the subsidy for the low income group. But what it means is in totality, more Singaporeans get to benefit from housing subsidy,” he said.

    To that end, the September BTO and Sale of Balance Flats exercise will be slightly delayed — but still held in the same month — to ensure that the next round of buyers will be able to benefit from the changes, said Mr Khaw.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Ten Uncomfortable Statements Made By Lee Hsien Loong At National Day Rally

    Ten Uncomfortable Statements Made By Lee Hsien Loong At National Day Rally

    Ten uncomfortable statements made by our Prime Minister at last night National Day rally:-

    1. Earn less than $1000 can buy HDB flat – to compound the misery of low wage Singaporean workers, our PM states that if you earn $1000 and below you can now buy  2-room HDB flat. The previous low was $1000 and they may throw in the paint for you as well.

    This kind of wild baseless electioneering is the stab to the morale of many of our low wage workers who sometimes could not even buy food for themselves let alone purchase a brand new HDB flat with a salary of $1000 and below.

    We need a comprehensive minimum wage system so our poor can live in dignity while working hard.

    2. Protection for Singaporean workers – PM talks alot about protecting the Singaporean core but on the ground we saw companies replacing us like changing cheap underwear with foreign labour.

    Young people who recently graduate continue to face difficulties at the job front and matured PMETs turn to cab driving in order to survive.

    This kind of senseless rhetoria may probably hurt him and his party at the polls badly.

    3. Recognition of a EM 3 student making it through SUT – though PM tries to deliver due recognition to a EM 3 student working his way up through SUT, there is still much to be done to deter fake degree fraudsters from entering our shore as foreign talents.

    Singaporeans are shocked that degrees from dubious third world universities from our foreign talents for the past decades are not properly verified and their skills autheticated.

    This is more worrying for positions like doctors, civil engineers, nurses and accountants.

    Can we trust our foreign-trained doctors now with their diagnosis and worse operating skills?

    Its also a slap to the faces of our professionals who work their way up to acquire degrees from our first world universities only to be beaten at the door by a fake certificate when they go for job interview.

    4. Pioneer generation package – the government will spend $9 billion on the pioneer generation package but much of it is done through the medical subsidy at clinics and the hospital using a CHAS card.

    There is nothing much to celebrate about as so far no cash has pass through to our seniors of whom many still need to toil under the sun to haul cardboards for a living.

    At best, its a propaganda scheme meant to entrap 150,000 senior citizens for their valuable votes.

    5. Paternity leave and baby bonus enhanced – paternity leave for fathers will be enhanced from one to two weeks and baby bonus will be given to all married mothers with no limit on the number of baby born. There is still zero benefit for babies born out of wedlock.

    Its unsure how many dads could claim this benefit even though the government will pay for the extra one week of paternity leave as many are feeling insecure about their jobs in a very lopsided job market.

    What if their employers are unhappy that the caring father takes two weeks off to care for his new-born baby and decide to find a replacement for him?

    Civil servants will in all likelihood be able to claim this fringe benefit so fathers can do more at home during a very difficult period at home but those sloughing in the private job environment are unlikely to encash their entitlement for fear they may lose their jobs.

    PM has all along warn us about taking care of our lunch as many on the outside are looking to eat it if we are not careful.

    6. Income ceilings for buyers of new Build-to-Order flats will be raised from S$10,000 to S$12,000 – this is good news for newly-wed who have a high combined income and still qualify for our subsidized BTO flats.

    It will benefit those who belong to the middle income earners and want to be conservative in their first home purchase.

    Many new citizens who work their way up here must be happy that such a ruling is in effect now as they can claim their citizenship benefit with a higher income ceiling for BTO flats.

    7. Re-employment age raised to 67 – another useless scheme as many of our matured PMETs could not get ready employment once they cross the 50-year-old mark.

    Many professionals turn to cab driving when they could not find any viable employment in order to survive. We probably have the most educated cabby force in the world next to US and Australia.

    This re-employment age enhancement probably benefits those at the civil service which harbours a more balanced work-place environment.

    It seems that the civil service will implement most of the PM’s suggestions but during his speech he cautions against burdening employers at the private sector which hires almost 70% of our workforce.

    Why the double standards?

    8. Racial and religious segregation – PM spent quite alot of time trying to instill fear into the population by highlighting the racial tensions since independence and the recent racial outbreak in KL.

    By doing that, he is not doing much to integrate the society into one united country as race and religion divides us if we keep on emphasizing its differences and dangers.

    We indeed have come a long way from a fragmented small country to one that imports foreigners by the million to enhance our economy.

    Right now, we probably have harbour 200,000 PRC Chinese, 250,000 Filipinos, 200,000 Indians, 300,000 Malaysians, 50,000 Indonesians and 50,000 Vietnamese among others.

    Its a sizeable foreign legion which is capable of upsetting any racial harmony we have all along try to protect.

    The Chinese bus strike and Little India riot were two classic examples of a foreign-dominated economy that went very wrong if we don’t try to help these people integrate with our way of life.

    9. Emphasis on infrastructure and economic developments – many Singaporeans by now are used to such rhetoria in every PM national day rally speeches.

    One can simply download last year’s speech and there is not much difference in both contents and substance.

    We all know about the world’s best airport, busy highway and highest-GDP – its already being ingrained in us for the past few decades.

    We hope to hear more visionary speeches like those from his father – bringing the nation together despite the wide wage gap between the have’s and the have-not.

    We want to hear how he could empathsize with those who have lost their jobs to a incoming foreigner because of his economy-driven open-door policy – that he knew their pain their sufferings and their sacrifices so we can have a better Singapore.

    We want to hear more of his software than the hardware stuff which frankly doesn’t benefit the downtrodden who struggle from hand to mouth every month due to the lack of a minimum wage system.

    Moreover, we don’t need a leader who always give us empty promises but seldom deliver when the time arrives.

    10. “No corruption, no dishonesty!” such words echoed through my mind throughout the night after hearing the PM’s speech.

    I was troubled as its like a statement made without much substantiation when the facts spoke otherwise.

    I also asked myself: “What will his father do in such a situation?”

    Years of cushioned rule by the PM has rendered our civil service of it’s efficiency and pride.

    Many serve the country because they do it for their rice bowl rather than serving the people whole-heartedly.

    The lack of a proper system of accountability also gives way for some to manipulate the public funds for personal use.

    The AGO audit flagged out alot of our ministerial financial lapses and they were subsequently covered up later on without much transparency and openness.

    The ruling party hopes Singaporeans will forget about the matter before going to the polls – suspected to be next month.

    With the help of social media, such serious lapses will be played up over and over again so Singaporeans will know what kind of government they are putting up with for the next five years!

    Written by: Gilbert Goh

     

    Source: www.transitioning.org

  • More Support For New Parents A Welcome Move Says Observers

    More Support For New Parents A Welcome Move Says Observers

    The enhanced support for having a child in the form of a bigger Baby Bonus, additional paternity leave and a bigger Medisave Grant for babies was welcomed by parents and parents-to-be, while sociologists said the measures could help nudge society into becoming more supportive of families with children.

    Mr Marcus Lai, whose wife will give birth to their first child next year, said the added support would ease some of his worries. “My wife and I have been discussing how much we should put aside for our child, and how to manage our finances … These (initiatives) would definitely make things easier for us,” said the 31-year-old manager of Winefield’s Auctioneers Asia.

    Housewife Josephine Low, 36, welcomed the doubling of paternity leave to two weeks, but was sceptical on whether companies would offer it voluntarily. “If the company doesn’t allow us, then we might have to use our annual leave, which means that we are at the losing end,” said the mother of four, who felt it should be mandated by the Government.

    SHIFTING ATTITUDES

    A study released by the Institute of Policy Studies early last month showed the enhanced Marriage and Parenthood Package announced in 2013 was less conducive in nudging Singaporeans to marry and have more children, compared with the previous package.

    Dr Kang Soon-Hock, head of the Social Science Core at SIM University, felt the enhancements, while appearing “purely financial” on the surface, play the bigger role of shifting attitudes. Referring to the extended paternity leave, he said: “Parenthood isn’t about mothers, but about fatherhood, too. It’s a gentle nudge for fathers to rethink their role, and see it in a different light.”

    Asked if he felt the enhancement would boost birth rates in the long run, National University of Singapore sociologist Tan Ern Ser said raising children is a long-term commitment. “My view is that they are helpful, and may raise TFR to 1.3, slightly above the current 1.2 or 1.25, but not much more, unless more is done. Whatever the case maybe, such policies also serve a symbolic value. They reflect the priority the Government assigns to fertility and children,” he said.

    NUS sociologist Paulin Straughan said the policies also ride on the Golden Jubilee wave. “I think birth rates are on the rise … and (these policies) are geared towards catching this feeling of optimism of Singaporeans towards their country.”

    Commenting on the additional Government-funded paternity leave, Singapore National Employers Federation executive director Koh Juan Kiat said companies would likely need to restructure leave benefits to provide the additional days for fathers. “Hopefully, the incentive can be applied to flexible paternity leave, taken over say one year … this will encourage SMEs to consider the initiative,” he said.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Good Ministers Can Advanced Singapore’s Interest Abroad

    Good Ministers Can Advanced Singapore’s Interest Abroad

    Minister for the Environment and Water Resources Vivian Balakrishnan and Manpower Minister Lim Swee Say were singled out by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong as examples of how good ministers can advance Singapore’s interests abroad.

    At the United Nations Climate Change Conference in December last year, Dr Balakrishnan not only represented Singapore, but took on the role of an “honest broker” to bridge gaps among different countries to put together a deal agreeable to all, said Mr Lee.

    On top of Dr Balakrishnan’s competence, his effectiveness in excelling at the role was aided by the support from a strong and cohesive team of officials from different ministries. And Team Singapore helped the conference reach a successful outcome and advanced the Republic’s interests in the process, Mr Lee said.

    He also recounted how Mr Lim turned around the “miserable mood” during a dinner discussion among labour ministers at the International Labour Organisation Conference (ILO) in Geneva this year. In a manner that “only Swee Say knew how”, Mr Lee said — in reference to Mr Lim’s inimitable style — the Manpower Minister first acknowledged the common challenges faced by various countries, then talked about the kinds of opportunities that all countries wanted. Mr Lim then seized on the opportunity to share about the importance of strong tripartite relationships in achieving the desired solutions, based on Singapore’s unique approach.

    “When Swee Say had finished, the mood in the room had lifted. Everyone was discussing solutions and not moping. The (ILO) director general … proposed ‘Three cheers for Singapore’.”

    Both ministers, he said, demonstrate the quality of leadership the Republic must maintain as it strengthens the economy and defence so Singapore can hold its own on the global stage.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Lee Hsien Loong: Price To Pay For Every Decision Made On Foreign Worker Issue

    Lee Hsien Loong: Price To Pay For Every Decision Made On Foreign Worker Issue

    The issue of immigration and foreigners was cited by Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong yesterday (Aug 23) as one of the “tough” issues that will come up from time to time, and for which the Government would need Singaporeans’ support to deal with.

    Singaporeans understandably have strong views on the issue and the Government has adjusted its policies, but there are no easy choices. Every option chosen by the Government has a cost and a downside, said Mr Lee, as he laid out the different scenarios. If Singapore closes its doors to foreign workers, firms will not have enough workers. Some will close down and Singaporeans working in these companies will lose their jobs. Foreign workers are also needed to build homes and schools here and, in the case of domestic workers, to meet Singaporeans’ daily needs.

    However, if the country lets in too many foreign workers, society will “come undone”, Mr Lee said.

    Singaporeans will be crowded out, workplaces will feel foreign, the Singapore identity will be diluted. Singapore has to find something in between but even then, there is a trade-off, he said.

    Companies will still find costs going up, and they have to pass on some of this to consumers. They will also have to pass up opportunities. Yet, because there will be some foreign workers coming in, Singaporeans will still feel that the country is changing too fast, and resent having to compete with non-Singaporeans.

    “It is my responsibility … to make this judgment. And then to act on your behalf … Having acted on your behalf, to account to you for the results and for the reasons I decided the way I did.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com