Tag: PAP

  • Chee Soon Juan: Let SDP Reform And Modernise Education System

    Chee Soon Juan: Let SDP Reform And Modernise Education System

    Our schoolchildren are driven to psychological despair as they struggle to cope with their schoolwork and exams: 22% of Singaporean children between 6-12 yrs thought of killing themselves. Many children actually commit suicide as a result.

    Of those who survive, the majority are conditioned to hate books because they associate reading and learning with exams. Experts warn that such a system deprives society of creativity and innovation, hurting our economy in the longer term.

    Even PAP MPs have voiced their concerns about the tuition culture but have not the courage to point out that it is the education system put in place by their party that is driving parents and pupils to such desperate lengths.

    If elected, SDP MPs will work to reform and modernise our education system which is stuck in the past.

    The recent mathematics question, now popularly called the Cheryl’s Birthday problem, seems to have amused (and stumped) the world. It first appeared on the Internet when it was reported as primary 5 level question.

    The problem is that such difficult questions are not a rarity in exam questions for primary schoolchildren. These questions are meant to identify top performing students so that the Government can groom them for high-paying state positions.

    Such a narrow practice of education feeds the fear in parents that their children’s future well-being is tied to doing well in exams. This drives them to absurd levels of expectations where they engage expensive private tutors to help their children perform – even to the extent of engaging tutors to do their children’s homework.

    The MOE is only too happy to allow such a system to carry on because the billion-dollar tuition industry enables it to out-source the teaching of pupils to the private sector.

    All this comes at a horrendous price. Our schoolchildren are driven to psychological despair as they struggle to cope with their schoolwork and exams:

    • 22% of Singaporean children between 6-12 yrs thought of killing themselves.
    • The no. of children warded for “aggressive, suicidal or hallucination tendencies” at IMH jumped by 35% between 2005-2010. Mental health professionals attribute these problems to academic stress.
    • One in three students say they sometimes think that life is not worth living because of the fear of exams.

    Many children actually commit suicide as a result. One is 10-year-old Lysher Loh who jumped to her death when she fared poorly in her mid-year exams. (Read Why do we do this to our children?)

    Of those who survive, the majority are conditioned to hate books because they associate reading and learning with exams. Experts warn that such a system deprives society of creativity and innovation, hurting our economy in the longer term.

    In fact, studies show that overloading our pupils with work and tuition harm, rather than help, their school performance and acquisition of life-skills.

    Even PAP MPs have voiced their concerns about the tuition culture but have not the courage to point out that it is the education system put in place by their party that is driving parents and pupils to such desperate lengths.

    Let’s stop the madness already. If elected, SDP MPs will work to reform and modernise our education system which is stuck in the past. Specifically, we will:

    1. Remove PSLE. As pointed out, the stress of exams inflict horrific psychological trauma on our children. What’s more, it is not an intelligent approach to assess the abilities of primary-school students on a single exam.

    2. Cultivate creative minds. Build confidence in children by helping them adopt an attitude of independent thinking, willingness to make mistakes, and persevere in the face of failed attempts.

    3. Reduce syllabus, broaden curriculum. The syllabi for existing subjects will be reduced while subjects such as music appreciation, speech and drama, literature, etc. as well as periods for students to collaborate and interact to develop creativity will be introduced to provide a well-rounded curriculum.

    4. Reduce class size. The SDP will reduce class size in our schools to 20 pupils/class from the current 40 to provide students the individual attention they need to succeed.

    5. Scrap school and class ranking. Comparing exam results and ranking students and classes will detract from the real purpose of education which is self-improvement and self-actualisation.

     

    Source: http://yoursdp.org

  • Lee Kuan Yew DVD In High Demand

    Lee Kuan Yew DVD In High Demand

    More than 10,000 DVDs on the late Mr Lee Kuan Yew have been sold over the week of April 6 to April 11.

    The three-part documentary, Time Nor Tide, was part of a series of special programmes broadcast by MediaCorp to commemorate his life and legacy. The documentary can be watched online, but was made available on DVD due to public request.

    Net proceeds of the first public sale will be donated to the Community Chest, said MediaCorp, adding that they will also be releasing other programmes on Mr Lee on DVD by end-April.

    These include In His Own Words: A six-part series of his key speeches over the years, and Forging A Nation: A compilation of short stories capturing significant moments and issues in Singapore’s history.

    The DVDs have been flying off the shelves since they hit the stores on Monday (April 6) and by the evening of the first day of its release, there were more than 1,000 people on a waiting list across Poh Kim stores.

    Video CD store Poh Kim says its customers usually ask for more than one copy with some reserving as many as 10 to 40 copies. Bookstore Popular set a limit of 2 copies per customer due to overwhelming demand.

    One lady at Poh Kim told Channel NewsAsia on Monday that she had bought 10 DVDs on the late Mr Lee – both for herself and her friends who live overseas.

    “I was very surprised,” she said. “I understand that it is being launched today, but 15 minutes into store opening, I called up several stores — at least five or six of them — everyone told me they were out of stock.”

    Another lady at Popular said: “I had already put my name on the waiting list. So I quickly rushed here because I was scared the second batch might be snatched away by the people.”

    “I can view at my own leisure and I don’t have to worry about it being taken down anytime soon,” said a man at Popular after he bought the DVD.

    One lady at the bookstore said it was expected that there was such high demand for the documentary.

    “He is our founding father,” she said. “And everyone will want to keep a copy of that for memory’s sake.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Remembering The First National Day Parade In 1966

    Remembering The First National Day Parade In 1966

    Hours before the Ministers and VIPs arrived at 9am, the marching contingents stood in neat rows under the morning sun at the Padang.

    Some 23,000 took part in the National Day Parade in 1966, just a year after Singapore’s independence.

    For Mr Chia Hearn Meng of the People’s Defence Force, whose memories were mentioned by Defence Minister Ng Eng Hen on his Facebook page, the day started at 2am, when he collected and cleaned his rifle from the armoury.

    The students had to assemble at 5am, and they were still practising on the Padang before the parade started.

    For many, marching was something new, and they had spent months making sure their steps were synchronised. Some participants, tired and hungry, collapsed on the Padang as they waited in the sun.

    Here are snippets from the 1966 Parade from four people who were there:

    “Marching practices were chaotic, because many only spoke dialects.”

    Mr Chia Hearn Meng, then a 29-year-old construction supervisor, heeded the call to join the People’s Defence Force (PDF) after he saw how racial riots rent the nation.

    He was assigned to the 3rd PDF, which was stationed at Pearl’s Hill.

    “There were many labourers and cleaners; we were all grouped together,” he told The Straits Times. “Marching practices were chaotic, because many of the workers only spoke dialects.

    “When the NCO gave commands in Malay and sometimes English, they would shout for the instructions to be given in Cantonese or Hokkien.”

    Just learning how to march took them many months, due to the difficulties of communication.

    “Some cannot differentiate kiri (left in Malay) and kanan (right in Malay),” he said. “When they turn they will face each other.”

    Each weekend, they would rehearse in the hot sun wearing thick uniforms, steel helmets and heavy leather boots.

    “In the old days, the uniform was very thick and we had to swing our arms upright. My armpits had bruises!” he recalled.

    Mr Chia, now 78, took part in five parades, and he remembers the routine clearly:

    At 2am, they collected their Mark 4 rifles and blank bullets from Pearl’s Hill, then cleaned and checked them, he said.

    After that they fell in and waited for the army clerk to lead them to Beach Road where the contingents assembled. At 6am, they marched to the Padang.

    “It took us about an hour, and we would wait from 7am till the VIPs arrived,” he said.

    After the march past at the City Hall, they continued to High Street, South Bridge Road, Chinatown, Tanjong Pagar, Neil Road, Outram Park and Queenstown, he said.

    Along the way, people jammed the streets and cheered.

    “It would be pretty awesome if I can march alongside my son and my grandson in this year’s parade. That will make three generations of soldiers serving Singapore,” said Mr Chia.

    “We slept in school classrooms the night before”

    The night of August 8, 1966, the boys from the St Gabriel’s Secondary School brass band slept in their classrooms to make sure they would not be late for the Parade.

    They had to assemble at the Merdeka Bridge at 5am.

    “We disturbed each other, and didn’t get much sleep,” said Mr Bernard Chiang, who played the baritone.

    Then 15 years old, Mr Chiang and his friends were excited to be performing for the inaugural National Day.

    They had trained hard – with sessions of three to four hours at least twice a week- to perfect their marching and their music.

    “We sacrificed many hours practising foot drills and our formations to sharpen our precision and synchrony in marching and playing the instruments,” he wrote in an email to The Straits Times.

    It was tough because they had just set up the school band a year before, and there was a lot to learn.

    After assembling at Merdeka Bridge, they marched down to the Padang.

    “While we were positioned at the Padang,we still had to go through few rounds of practices to ensure that the parade was ready and perfect,” he wrote.

    That was when some participants started to collapse and they were carried away on stretchers, he said.

    “It was probably due to long hours of standing under the hot sun, lack of sleep, dehydration and no proper breakfast,” he said, adding that this was the first NDP and they were better prepared for later parades.

    Still, this was nothing compared to the torrential downpour in 1968, he recalled.

    “The instrument was frozen and waterlogged, we couldn’t blow it,” he said. The dyes on their uniforms ran in the rain.

    They marched a longer route that year too, all the way to Queenstown.

    “Our uniforms got wet, and we marched till they dried in the sun, then they got wet again from our sweat,” he laughed.

    He was quick to add that they were proud to be pioneers in the NDP, and the camaraderie forged then has stayed with them for a lifetime. He still meets up with his band mates, the 64-year-old florist said.

    “We had no cameras, no phones back then to take videos!”

    Mr Ramadas Palanisamy, now 85, was nominated to represent the former Woodbridge Hospital in the nurses’ contingent.

    The nursing officer, then 36, joined dozens of others from local hospitals including Singapore General Hospital, Tan Tock Seng Hospital, and the now-defunct Toa Payoh Hospital.

    “I was very happy and excited to be nominated,” he said, being one of only two representatives from Woodbridge.

    The training took about three months, and an army officer taught them how to march at first, he said. Later, one of the nursing staff took over.

    On the day of the Parade, they had to “go early in the morning and stand there”, he said. All the nurses were neatly turned out in their freshly-ironed uniforms and white shoes.

    “Everybody was in a joyous mood, and it went fantastically,” he recalled fondly. “The only thing was, I couldn’t watch the parades. We had no cameras, no phones back then to take videos!”

    He took part in the Parade from 1966 to 1968, but when he was nominated again in 1969, he decided to let others have a chance, he said.

    “I saw Lee Kuan Yew and the cabinet ministers sitting on the City Hall steps”

    Mr S. Sivakolunthu, 78, was with the first People’s Defence Force, but he was “on loan” to the Tamil Teachers’ Union for the 1966 National Day Parade.

    The teacher, who taught Tamil and English, was a volunteer soldier for three years. He marched in the PDF contingents in the 1967 and 1968 parades.

    For the 1966 parade, the lance corporal helped to train about 70 Tamil teachers at Monk’s Hill Secondary School every Saturday, he said.

    “I had six months of training with the PDF,and it was tough, but I could do the marching,” he said. “There were teachers in uniformed groups, and they helped too.”

    He recalls leading the contingent of teachers in their march past the City Hall.

    “I saw Lee Kuan Yew and the cabinet ministers sitting on the City Hall steps,” he said.

    The retiree, who is still active in community work, said he has watched the National Day Parade on television every year since.

     

    Source: www.straitstimes.com

  • Masagos Zulkifli Sworn -In As Full Cabinet Minister

    Masagos Zulkifli Sworn -In As Full Cabinet Minister

    Mr Masagos Zulkifli was sworn in yesterday as a full Cabinet Minister, following Wednesday’s Cabinet reshuffle announcements.

    With his promotion, Mr Masagos will be a Minister in the Prime Minister’s Office and Second Minister for Foreign Affairs and Home Affairs. He had been Senior Minister of State in both ministries since 2012. The news of his promotion — which means there are two Malay-Muslim full Ministers for the first time — had garnered strong support from the Malay and Muslim community leaders.

    Writing on his Facebook page today, Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong said he had witnessed Mr Masagos’ swearing in. “His sincerity, ability and hard work have earned him the respect of colleagues and Singaporeans,” Mr Lee noted.

    Foreign Minister K Shanmugam wrote on his Facebook page: “(Mr Masagos’) appointment strengthens our MFA work. The world is shrinking, and our interests around the world, economic, political, have grown. We need to engage many countries actively, much more so than we have had to … Masagos has promoted Singapore at every opportunity, and has been very good for us. We are fortunate at MFA to have Masagos with us. With his promotion, I will now be able to give him even more responsibilities, at MFA.”

    Emeritus Senior Minister Goh Chok Tong congratulated Mr Masagos on his Facebook page. “He is humble, sincere and dedicated. A good addition to the Cabinet team,” he said. “The Cabinet reshuffle will add depth and breadth to those who will lead Singapore forward. Stretching the younger Ministers will strengthen their resilience. Best wishes to them.”

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Two Men Involved In Istana Protest Reveal Why They Did It

    Two Men Involved In Istana Protest Reveal Why They Did It

    Background Story: PROTESTERS SEEN HOLDING PLACARDS OUTSIDE THE ISTANA TODAY

    TRS got in contact with the two men who were involved in the peaceful protest outside the Istana on Saturday afternoon and found out why they chose to do what they did despite knowing that they would be arrested. They shared that they wanted to exercise their constitutional rights and believe strongly that they have not disturbed public order.

    Here is what they wanted to tell the public about their peaceful protest:

    We are the two men who held the demonstration outside the gates of the Istana on the 4th April 2015. You can simply address us as X and Y. Our names are irrelevant, but not our cause. Martyrdom is not the goal. We apologise if the subject of the protest (Freedom of Speech for Singaporeans) was not very clear. It was intentionally vague so as to sidestep any unnecessary charges that could be pinned on us by the Authorities; such as Libel/Defamation.

    The both of us are Singaporeans, and not FTs (as some of you have speculated). We do not represent any political party, nor are we affiliated with any groups/organisations. Who we are, are simply two men who believe there has been Injustice done towards those who offered a differing opinion and dared to raise questions considered to be “touchy”.

    Let us clarify: We are not anti LKY. We take our hats off to him, and appreciate all that he has done for Singapore; giving his life in creating a “safe”, prosperous nation and environment for us to thrive in. However, for far too long, dissent has been dealt with very severely, and sometimes, downright inhumanely. We believe in Change, and correcting Injustice wherever we see it.

    The defamation suit against Mr Roy Ngerng was ridiculous. He simply raised questions on the behalf of the citizens of Singapore. Instead of getting a proper, well structured reply from the relevant authorities, he was dealt with by a lawsuit, and subsequently fired from his job in Tan Tock Seng Hospital. Ruining a person’s life when he simply asks questions (not for his own sake, no less) seems to be the norm in Singapore. Is this not Injustice? Should we turn a blind eye to this?

    We also refer to the action taken on Mr Amos Yee. While we do think that the commentary was vulgar, rude, and frankly, a little insensitive (given the time); we do not see the need for him to be brought to court. Any sane society would have challenged all his points based on the facts and opinions he presented (in the video), and negated the points of his arguments with sound logic and reasoning. Instead, we as a society has chosen to shy away from the difficult questions raised, and opted to cower behind the might of the SPF.

    To be subjugated to arrest for airing an opinion (unpopular as it is) borders on the unthinkable. When someone takes office, they sign all rights to privacy away. They become a Public Figure, subject to the scrutinity of everyone. Such is the burden of representing the People. It is only logical that if tributes and praise flow free; so should criticism and insult.

    Some have questioned us why did we not go through the “proper” channels (such as Speaker’s Corner in Hong Lim Park). The appointment of a “place to speak” seems as if the park was designated to be a “dumping ground” for dissent, masquerading as a “designated place” for “Freedom of Expression”. What Change was there to be had if this was the case? Why should Singaporeans be confined to the space of Hong Lim Park? Is this truly “Freedom of Expression” then? We think not. It is perfectly within our rights in the Constitution (Article 14) to hold a peaceful demonstration, anywhere in Singapore.

    14.— (1) Subject to clauses (2) and (3) —

    (a) every citizen of Singapore has the right to freedom of speech and expression;

    (b) all citizens of Singapore have the right to assemble peaceably and without arms; and

    (c) all citizens of Singapore have the right to form associations.

    The action that we took on the 4th of April 2015 was our right as stated in the Singapore Constitution. It did not cause disruption of the Public Order, defame anyone nor incited any form of civil unrest. We knew being arrested would be a given (and we were willing to shoulder that to make a statement), but the extent of it eluded us.

    Following our arrest, we were detained for a day by the Police. Both of us were brought in restraints to our homes. Electronic devices like desktop CPUs and handphones were seized for investigation.

    The right/wrong of our action, although open for debate, is not the point. The red we wore was to signify Change. So long as it sparked Singaporeans questioning what Freedom truly means to them, then our objective has been reached. Whoever is in Power (the ruling party) matters not to us; it could be the PAP, the SDP, or the WP. That is immaterial. What matters, is that they realise that we are ready for Change as a society. If you equate Freedom with wanton acts of violence and instability, then you are sorely mistaken and have missed the point entirely.

    Alejandro Jodorowsky – “Birds born in a cage think flying is an illness.”

    X and Y

     

    Source: www.therealsingapore.com

deneme bonusu