Tag: PAP

  • Roy Ngerng: Business Costs Rising, SMEs Suffer, But PAP Not Helping

    Roy Ngerng: Business Costs Rising, SMEs Suffer, But PAP Not Helping

    We were at Ang Mo Kio early this morning with our volunteers and some residents.

    One resident, who said that he is a business owner, shared that business costs have been rising, primarily due to exorbitant rents. This has been a top concern among businesses for some time now.

    The resident shared that over the last few years, rents have been increasing by 30% to 40% every year. He said that these few years, the landlord would increase the rents, with a take it or leave it attitude and does not even speak to the tenants beforehand before increasing the rents. But where else could he go, since all the landlords or controlled or in some way related to the PAP government, he asked.

    The businesses have no way to negotiate on the rents and have to bite the bullet or move out, which means closing their business. The resident said that the other option these landlords gave were for the tenants to sign contracts with fixed built-in rent increases, but this is also very uncertain as well. If they were to sign such contracts, won’t they lose out if rents were to increase at a lower rate?

    In the past, the business owner said, contracts are signed on the basis that they will be honoured and businesses would not have to deal with uncertain rises in rents. But he said that today the landlords with links to the PAP government are only concerned about money, and do not care for the viability of local businesses like his.

    The resident explained that this is why many of our Singaporean small and medium-sized businesses have had to close down, and even multinational corporations have had to leave Singapore because of the high costs. But this is unsustainable. How can Singapore sustain on a high-cost approach when even big businesses find it difficult to survive in Singapore?

    For the resident, he felt that the way the PAP is doing things is wrong – how can the PAP only focus on profit while not caring for how local businesses can function? He feels that such a sole profit-making mindset is dangerous for Singapore.

    Indeed, this is something many of our local businesses have been saying for some time now.

    This is why, my fellow candidates at the Ang Mo Kio GRC is proposing to reduce rents to let small and medium-sized businesses have a breather.

    Jesse Loo has said that high rents are the key impediment to why local businesses are finding it hard and he believes that rents should be reduced. Similarly, Osman Sulaimanwho is a business director for a local firm said the same.

    Over the past many years, the PAP has been driving up rents by far too much that this has squeezed out businesses. In order to allow businesses to become competitive again, we need to reduce rents to allow our local businesses to thrive and allow Singapore to grow our own domestic industries which can compete internationally.

    The resident also shared with me that the government is earning from the foreign workers, via the foreign worker levies. Don’t blame the foreign workers, he told me. He said that for each foreign worker, the PAP government gets to earn as much as nearly a thousand from each of them, because businesses have to pay foreign worker levies to be able to hire foreign workers.

    Indeed, it is known that the PAP government earns several billions in levies from these foreign workers.

    But these levies not only hurt the workers, but it hurts the businesses too. First, workers are not able to earn higher wages. Also, businesses have to pay out such foreign worker levies which do not add to the productivity of the workers, but becomes money that is mindlessly given to the government.

    Clearly, the foreign worker levy is a bad policy. The business owner told me that he would rather these foreign worker levies be returned to the workers instead.

    Indeed, the reason why businesses in Singapore have to depress wages is also because they have to pay such high foreign worker levies and cannot give it to their workers. As such, because foreign workers earn depressed wages, this also causes the wages of Singaporeans to be depressed as well.

    Evidently, the foreign worker levy and the cheap labour substitution therefore depresses the wages of Singaporeans and is a bad policy. It has to change.

    I told the Ang Mo Kio resident that I agree with him. I said that if the foreign worker levies are returned to the worker, each worker could be earning as much as $2,000. When that happens, many Singaporeans would be willing to do the service jobs that is shunted now because of the low and inadequate wages.

    It has been estimated by many that a minimum wage of $1,500 to $2,000 is indeed what is needed for Singaporeans to earn today, to have the most basic living.

    And this is what many of our candidates, including me, Goh Gilbert, Jesse and Osman have been campaigning for all these while.

    A minimum wage is necessary to protect Singaporeans and to improve our livelihoods.

    Not only that, there are real and tangible benefits to our economy. With increased wages and purchasing power, this would enable workers to be able to spend more. The increased domestic consumption will also add to economic growth and benefit the country.

    As my fellow candidates Jesse and Osman have also said, much of the economic growth has not gone back to Singaporeans. This is why Singaporeans no longer believe in the growth-at-all-costs model.

    As such, our team at the Ang Mo Kio GRC believe that it is time we have a fairer and more equal Singapore, where we return the goods of the country to the people, and where all Singaporeans benefit from the hard work that they have put into bringing Singapore to where it is.

    Our team wants to advocate for policies that will protect Singaporeans, that will allow us to earn higher wages, so that we will all be able to live decently and with dignity.

    Singapore is today a wealthy nation, on a national level, but as my fellow candidate,Siva Chandran, has said, as long as there are still many Singaporeans living in one- and two-room flats and even bigger-sized flats, who are still struggling and suffering, while having difficulties making ends meet, then Singapore cannot be considered a First World country.

    Our team believe that for Singapore to prosper once again as a nation and for Singaporeans to be proud of our country once again, we need to build a Singapore that puts Singaporeans at the heart of it all and where Singaporeans are respected and valued for who we are, as people.

     

    Source: Roy Ngerng

  • Tan Cheng Bok: PAP Will Lose Elections Because Of Foreigner Issue

    Tan Cheng Bok: PAP Will Lose Elections Because Of Foreigner Issue

    The PAP Government may be trying hard to fix problems caused by the large inflow of foreigners, but it has got itself in a tight bind, said 73 year-old former presidential candidate Tan Cheng Bock.

    Its difficulties could help the opposition Workers’ Party in the next general election, he said.

    The former PAP MP for Ayer Rajah spoke on the future of both political parties in an hour-long interview with the media at his home.

    Since the watershed 2011 General Election, the Government, especially its younger ministers, has been “trying very hard” to resolve issues – like immigration – that contributed to its loss of votes, he said.

    In 1999, when he was still an MP, he had called on the Government to tone down its talk on attracting foreigners, earning rebukes from ministers, including then Senior Minister Lee Kuan Yew.

    “Now, (the Government) has a quota system for foreigners in HDB,” noted Dr Tan.

    But they have got themselves into “a very tight situation” by letting in too many foreigners.

    “The original lax policy has created a lot of problems. If you suddenly pull the brakes too hard…you titrate wrongly, you have a big, big problem, because the companies will suffer,” he said, adding that the Government may now be “overdoing it” in tightening labour flows, as businesses are facing a manpower crunch.

    This means there is “a very likely chance” the WP could win more seats at the next election, given that some wards in the last election were won narrowly by the PAP.

    “I think it’s good because the WP can make the Government work harder, and also I think debate on issues will be much better,” he said.

    Asked what he thought of PAP’s criticism that WP often sits on the fence or does not voice out its position on several issues, Dr Tan said: “They don’t have to put forth an alternative every time an issue comes up. You can always wait. Timing is very important in politics… So they will know when to push their agenda.

    “I think the PAP is the same, because (when rolling out) some of their policies they will wait.”

    With next year marking 50 years of independence, “if I were the Government, I would capitalise on it”.

    One thing working for the party now is its renewed vigour in fighting for votes, he noted.

    But despite efforts to communicate more with citizens, “I don’t think they have really nailed it yet…there is still a lack of trust” in the Government and its leaders, he said.

    They have also yet to solve the “divide” in the party, where grassroots activists can feel snubbed after “they work like hell but they don’t get to be MP” when the leadership parachutes elite “prefectorial, army, navy types” who are not in touch with the ground.

    One exception is Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam, whom he praised as “down to earth”.

    “Tharman is the type of person we should look for, and if we can get many people like him, I think the PAP will win (future elections) hands down,” he declared.

    “I think Tharman is a very practical chap, he knows how to move the ground…he’s got the charisma to convince me that I want to go along with him,” he said.

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Kahar Hassan Was Hardworking But PAP Needed Change

    Kahar Hassan Was Hardworking But PAP Needed Change

    Elaborating on why ex-People’s Action Party (PAP) Kaki Bukit branch chairman Kahar Hassan (picture) was asked to step down last month, former PAP chairman Lim Boon Heng said yesterday the party felt that it needed a change, even though Mr Kahar had been a “very hardworking person”.

    Mr Lim also thanked Mr Kahar — who was dropped from the PAP slate totally — for his work in Kaki Bukit and for letting residents know that the party has “not forgotten about them”.

    Speaking at a press conference to unveil the PAP’s team for Aljunied Group Representation Constituency, Mr Lim said the PAP has deployed their potential candidates on the ground much earlier compared with previous elections. This gave the party the opportunity to assess how the potential candidates relate with people and different stakeholders in the constituency, he added.

    “In other words, it allows us what you might say in management jargon, a 360-degree assessment of the candidates. This time round, we have been more comprehensive in the assessment of our candidates and whether they fit in the constituency where we intend to field them,” he said.

    “So, the party decided that they needed a change in Kaki Bukit although Kahar Hassan had been a very hardworking person. We should make a change if we could find somebody that is a better fit.” Mr Lim said the party was “very glad” that they were able to find a “better fit” in Mr Shamsul Kamar, the former head of Student Management at Spectra Secondary School.

    Mr Kahar, 46, was asked to step down late last month, after working the ground for the past 16 months.

    The business development director of an engineering company could not respond to media queries by press time. Mr Kahar announced his departure on Facebook on July 31 and in his earlier comments to TODAY, he said it was a party decision and his thoughts went out to the residents.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Vivian Balakrishnan: Don’t Be Seduced By Notion That Politicians Can Work Without Incentives

    Vivian Balakrishnan: Don’t Be Seduced By Notion That Politicians Can Work Without Incentives

    Suggestions that politicians can work without incentives is a seductive notion, especially during an election period, says the Minister of the Environment and Water Resources (MEWR), Vivian Balakrishnan.

    The minister was speaking at a National Day Rally public forum organised by the government’s feedback outfit, REACH.

    A participant had questioned the honorarium which Members of Parliament (MP) receive – which is S$16,000 a month, or $192,500 annually.

    If an MP sat for the full parliamentary term of five years, he would have been paid almost a million dollars – S$962,000.

    Ministers receive salaries which run into the millions.

    In his response to the question raised at the forum, Dr Vivian said there are only two kinds of people who would work without incentives – those who are wealthy, and those who are corrupt.

    “Don’t be seduced,” he was quoted by the TODAY newspaper as having said. “The danger with elections is it’s an auction. Everybody would promise you the moon. Everybody would say they don’t need pay on the assumption either they don’t need to deliver, or things will go wrong.”

    The amount of honorarium being paid to MPs and the salaries received by ministers have been hot topics for many years, particularly for MPs whom some see as just a part-time job, given that MPs themselves have their own private careers.

    But REACH chairman, Amy Khor, said that being in the industry would help her to contribute more.

    “You have to look at it more broadly,” said Dr Khor, who is also Senior Minister of State for Manpower and Health. “Is the MP contributing as you expect? In fact, if I can do that, and I still can add value because I have a better understanding of what’s going on outside in the real world. Isn’t that giving you more value?”

    In recent weeks, after an online website published a list of the number of times each MP has spoken in the last parliament (2011 – 2015), some were shocked to learn that some MPs had spoken up in the House for only a handful of times in those four years, and questioned the amount of taxpayers’ money paid to these MPs.

    These included former ministers such as Mah Bow Tan and Wong Kan Seng.

    It was also reported that the former Transport Minister, Raymond Lim, had not made a single parliamentary speech since being replaced as Transport Minister in 2011.

    Mr Lim has since announced that he will be retiring from politics at the upcoming elections.

     

    Source: www.theonlinecitizen.com

  • PAP’s Ang Mo Kio GRC Activists Tell Coffeeshop Owners To Chase Away Reform Party Team

    PAP’s Ang Mo Kio GRC Activists Tell Coffeeshop Owners To Chase Away Reform Party Team

    Two coffeeshops in Ang Mo Kio Blk 338 and Blk 340 along Avenue 1 chased away the contesting Opposition Party Reform Party from making use of their empty compound to hold a press conference despite having agreed so in the first place.

    Both coffeeshop owners did not explain why but simply asked the Reform Party to “go somewhere else”.  After being chased away twice, the Reform Party team humbly conducted their press conference on two small tables located outside a shop house. According to an eyewitness on site, a few PAP activists were spotted in the vicinity and one of them was seen complaining to the coffeeshops on both occasions.

    Photo from Raj Nadarajan today

    The Reform Party team for Ang Mo Kio GRC announced their six candidates today to take on the Prime Minister’s ward. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong will be facing three familiar faces of which he have faced them in the Singapore court and HongLim Park: Activist Gilbet Goh, CPF blogger Roy Ngerng and Lawyer M Ravi.

    The 6 Reform Party candidates featured are:

    1. Roy Ngerng, Former Financial-aid officer and current CPF writer
    2. Gilbert Goh, Councillor and Founder of volunteer organisation Transitioning
    3. Osman Sulaiman, Director of Interior Design Company
    4. M Ravi, Lawyer
    5. Jesse Loo, Banker
    6. Siva Chandran, former RC manager of Teck Ghee (Ang Mo Kio) and Video Editor

    Photo of AMK GRC RP candidates from Facebook

    Photo from channelnewsasia

    The Ang Mo Kio GRC constituency will be a major battle because of the Prime Minister’s position. If Lee Hsien Loong is voted out, it will signify the beginning of the fall of the ruling People’s Action Party and its major policies like 6.9 million population proposal, public transport policies and its plan to increase retirement age.

    Key issues in Ang Mo Kio GRC will be national issues concerning CPF and 6.9 million population. Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s performance in this election will be a report card of how popular his policies are among Singaporeans.

     

    Source: http://statestimesreview.com

deneme bonusu