Tag: parliament

  • Terrorist Khalid Masood: A ‘Nice Guy’ Turned Extremist

    Terrorist Khalid Masood: A ‘Nice Guy’ Turned Extremist

    The man who mowed down pedestrians and stabbed a policeman in Wednesday’s deadly assault outside Britain’s parliament has been identified by police as 52-year-old former convict Khalid Masood.

    Known by “a number of aliases”, London’s Metropolitan Police said he had been convicted for a string of offences but none of them terror-related.

    Born on Christmas Day 1964 in Kent in southeast England, Masood had been living in the West Midlands where armed police have staged several raids since the attack, storming properties in the city of Birmingham.

    The police confirmed he was a British citizen.

    He was brought up by a single parent in the town of Rye, on the southern English coast, according to The Times.

    Over the course of two decades, Masood chalked up a range of convictions for assault, grievous bodily harm, possession of offensive weapons and public order offences, police said, with the incidents taking place between 1983 and 2003.

    Prime Minister Theresa May said he was once investigated by the intelligence service MI5 “in relation to concerns about violent extremism”.

    But Masood had never been convicted of terrorism offences and “was not the subject of any investigations,” the police said, noting there was “no prior intelligence about his intent to mount a terrorist attack”.

    At 52, his age has been highlighted by commentators as unusual, with most Islamist extremists behind similar attacks far younger.

    Although the police believe Masood acted alone, the Islamic State group claimed he was one of its “soldiers” acting on a call to target countries fighting the jihadists in Iraq and Syria.

    ‘A NICE GUY’

    Masood rented the car used in the attack from the Solihull branch of Enterprise, on the outskirts of Birmingham, the company confirmed in a statement.

    According to the BBC, he told the car rental company that he was a teacher.

    A spokeswoman for Britain’s education ministry told AFP Masood was not a qualified teacher and had therefore not taught in any state schools.

    The Sun tabloid said Masood stayed in a hotel on the outskirts of Brighton, a seaside city south of London, on the night before the attack.

    London’s Metropolitan Police would not confirm the newspaper’s report that investigators went to the hotel following the attack after finding a receipt in the hire car.

    British media described Masood as a Muslim convert, with one source telling Sky News he was a “very religious, well-spoken man”.

    “You couldn’t go to his home in Birmingham on Friday because he would be at prayer,” said the source, who Sky said met Masood in a professional capacity.

    “He was a nice guy. I used to see him outside doing his garden,” Iwona Romek, a former neighbour of his told the Birmingham Mail.

    “He had a wife, a young Asian woman and a small child who went to school,” she said. Other media have reported that he was a married father-of-three.

    Romek said the family had abruptly moved out of their house in Winson Green, a neighbourhood in western Birmingham, around Christmas without saying goodbye.

    Romek said she could not imagine him carrying out an attack, adding: “Now I’m scared that someone like that was living close to me”.

    More recently Masood may have been living in a flat next to a Persian restaurant and a pizza parlour in the upmarket Edgbaston neighbourhood, according to reports.

    One neighbour at that address told The Telegraph newspaper they were fearful after the day’s events: “It’s left me so scared and I don’t know what to tell the children. He seemed like a normal calm and kind family man, always with a smile on his face.”

    Following an armed raid on the property overnight, a man working in a shop nearby told the Press Association simply: “The man from London lived here”.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • PAP Has Gotten Worse Since Last GE

    PAP Has Gotten Worse Since Last GE

    <Written by Joseph Tan Kheng Liang>

    The PAP has gotten worse since the last GE!

    One of the most recent landmarks in the Singaporean political calendar was the ‘watershed elections’ of 2011. The term watershed was used because it seemed highly probable at that point in time that the PAP would lose several GRCs. Lee Hsien Loong even apologised and cried in public.

    The key question is this: How has the PAP changed for the better since then? The clear and simple answer is that the PAP is back to their own arrogant ways and Singaporeans are not going to benefit from this! Let me give you some examples to illustrate.

    In 2011, they promised to work harder and apologised for their mistakes, mainly due to a liberal immigration policy and an infrastructure which did not keep up. 5 years later, they have come up with arrogant tactics and a completely befuddling “ownself-check-ownself” governing philosophy.

    We have seen numerous cases of lack of transparency in recent times, including the Hep C outbreak at SGH which was not made public until a later stage, we had the case where residents in Sengkang felt cheated after plans to build a columbarium was labelled as a ‘temple’ instead.

    When the trains have new problems such as mysterious ‘signalling fault’, there was no sound or trace of apology from their favourite fixer Khaw Boon Wan. Instead, he chose to pretend that everything was fine, celebrating openings and gatherings on his Facebook page.

    Looking at the by-election of 2016 (which was caused in part because of the actions of their own MP), ministers and even junior MPs took the liberty to ‘whack’ their opponent’s character. When another by-election took place 3 years before, they resorted to no such thing with Lee Li Lian.

    Their jokes even continued abroad! Mainstream media was so proud that Pinky got invited to a US State dinner but did not boast as much when he later ended up offending China by commenting on their territorial dispute and later prove their foreign policy lapses by offending Trump!

    If the average man thinks that these issues do not affect him, look at the price increases: parking charges and waste collection charges (which Leong Sze Hian dug and found an increased surplus)! Even though there is a drop in transport charges, it is not as much as the drop in oil prices!

    Ask yourselves: has the PAP given you a better life since the last General Elections? If the answer is no, the PAP must be very thick-skinned to tell us that they wish to check themselves! Is this even right given their recent track record?

    I can only conclude that they have gotten worse and need someone like the SDP to keep them in check!

     

    Source: www.allsingaporestuff.com

  • Faisal Manap: Malay Muslim Community Fund Patut Diagih Kepada Masjid-Masjid

    Faisal Manap: Malay Muslim Community Fund Patut Diagih Kepada Masjid-Masjid

    Assalamualaikum Wr. Wb.
    May Peace Be Upon You

    My Malay speech for MCCY’s COS debate touching on the allocation of the Malay Muslim Community Fund (MMCDF).

    MMCDF was established in 1991 to support Mendaki’s effort in enhancing the social development of the Malay Muslim Community

    My speech (in Malay):

    ‘Dalam menjawab soalan saya didewan ini, sama ada pengunaan MMCDF boleh dilanjutkan kepada institusi masjid, Menteri berkata, ini tidak dapat dilakukan kerana masjid tidak dianggap sebagai sebuah badan Melayu-Islam. Namun beliau menambah bahawa Masjid boleh meraih dari dana ini jika program-program sosial mereka dijalankan dengan kerjasama badan-badan pemerintah atau organisasi Melayu Islam yang lain.

    Saya amat kagum dengan usaha kerjasama masyarakat Islam Singapura dalam pentadbiran masjid. Lembaga Pentabdiran dan warga-kerja sesebuah masjid berusaha bertungkus-lumus dalam mentadbirkan masjid manakala masyarakat Islam pula memainkan peranan kearah kestabilan masjid melalui sumbangan kewangan dan tenaga. Seperti yang diketahui, pihak masjid amat mengalu-alukan setiap sumbangan masyarakat dalam segala jenis bentuk terutamanya sumbangan kewangan. Ini adalah kerana, apa yang saya fahami, segala perbelanjaan dalam pengurusan masjid seperti perbelanjaan utiliti, pembayaran gaji bulanan dan yang lain-lain dibiayai menerusi wang sumbangan masyarakat.

    Inilah Semangat Muafakat atau Kerjasama yang terlahir atas niat dan usaha yang ikhlas demi mencapai objektif bersama iaitu memajukan masjid di Singapura. Kestabilan institusi masjid yang dibina atas Semangat Muafakat atau Kerjasama ini akan menjadikan masjid antara penyumbang yang penting dan utama bukan hanya sahaja dalam pembentukan spiritual tetapi juga pembentukkan sosial masyarakat Islam kita.

    Salah sebuah tema pada Belanjawan ini adalah Semangat Kerjasama. Atas Nilai Semangat Kerjasama ini, saya ingin menyarankan agar Menteri dan pihak pemerintah dapat mempertimbangkan usulan agar penggunaan dana ini dapat dilanjutkan kepada masjid agar MMCDF ini dapat mendatangkan lebih manfaat terhadap pembangunan masyarakat Melayu Islam Singapura. Ini juga memperkuatkan lagi Semangat Kerjasama antara pemerintah dan badan-badan Melayu Islam.

    Saya ada 2 soalan bagi Menteri, (1) Bolehkah Menteri terangkan apakah kriteria yang diambil kira dalam mengkategorikan sesebuah institui atau badan sebagai sebuah Badan Melayu Islam (MMO) dan (2) siapakah atau pihak manakah yang menentukan kriteria yang digunakan ini.’

     

    Source: Muhamad Faisal Abdul Manap

  • Daniel Goh: I Will Do My Best In Term As NCMP

    Daniel Goh: I Will Do My Best In Term As NCMP

    Dear everyone, thank you for the congratulatory well wishes. Media partners, sorry I can’t take interviews tonight, am out with family for pre-New Year festivities. It is my privilege to be elected as NCMP and to serve my country in Parliament.

    I don’t think I can sleep tonight; I know this is a grave responsibility and I will give it my best in the coming years. I love Singapore and want this nation to last for our children, to be a “shining red dot”, as our PM puts it, for generations to come.

    To my fellow Chinese Singaporeans, a Happy New Year ahead, may the Year of the Monkey bring your family abundant vitality and good health!

     

    Source: Daniel Goh 吴佩松

  • Leon Perera: WP Working Within Flawed System To Bring About Democratic Progress

    Leon Perera: WP Working Within Flawed System To Bring About Democratic Progress

    Just finished the debate in Parliament on filling the vacated NCMP seat. Most of the People’s Action Party members of the House were present for this particular debate. Over the past few days, when the House debated national issues and Parliamentary questions, the attendance often dipped to 30 or 40 (or less). Interesting priorities. Please read the text of the PAP’s amendment to our motion. It speaks volumes about their approach to politics and Parliamentary debate.

    I was asked me why I accepted the NCMP position if I opposed the NCMP scheme as bad for Singapore in the longer-term. I believe the NCMP scheme serves the PAP’s interests by enabling it to ask voters to vote only for the PAP to entrench the current one party hyper-majority in Parliament. It is fully elected Opposition MPs who assure political balance. But, as Mr Low Thia Khiang explained (amidst occasional laughter from the PAP MPs), we need to work within a flawed system, one that keeps getting changed and “refreshed” by the ruling party.

    Why do we do this? To do whatever we can to help build a democratic society. In the 1960s, the Barisan Sosialis left Parliament in protest at what they saw as unjust policies. We choose to stay and work within the system, in spite of its many unfair aspects and challenges. A democratic society has to be fought for, step by step and brick by brick.

     

    Source: Leon Perera

deneme bonusu