Tag: profiteering

  • Suspect In Borussia Dortmund Team Bus Attack Wanted To Profit From Stocks

    Suspect In Borussia Dortmund Team Bus Attack Wanted To Profit From Stocks

    Police commandos on Friday arrested a German-Russian suspect, 28-year-old Sergej W, behind a bomb attack on Borussia Dortmund’s team bus, prosecutors said, indicating the motive was financial and not terror-related.

    “The accused is suspected of having carried out the attack on the team bus of Borussia Dortmund on April 11,” prosecutors said.

    He is charged with attempted murder, setting off explosions and causing serious physical injury.”

    He was staying in the same hotel as the team, had a view of the scene where the attack was to be staged and had bought so-called put options on the team’s shares on the day of the incident, they said.

    These 15,000 options could have been sold at a pre-determined price by June 17, with a sharp fall in the share price promising a high profit.“A significant drop in the price could have been expected if, as a result of the attack, players had been seriously injured or even killed,” the prosecutors said.

    Sergej. W had allegedly taken out a loan on April 3 to pay for the put options and bought them online from the IP address of the Hotel L’Arrivee, where the team was staying.

    He had reserved the room in mid-March for the periods April 9-13 and 16-20 – coinciding with the team’s two scheduled matches against Monaco, though it was not yet clear at the time which one would be held in Dortmund.

    He hoped to earn as much as 3.9 million euros ($4.2 million), the Bild newspaper reported.

    The team’s share price has fallen by about 5.5 percent on the Deutsche Boerse since the attack and closed at 5.36 euros on Thursday.

     

    Citing unnamed investigators, Bild said police believed the suspect was capable of building a remotely-triggered bomb, having won an educational award in electronics and engineering in 2005.

    Three purported claims of responsibility stating a radical Islamist motive were found at the scene, on paper bearing no fingerprints, prosecutors said.

    But Islamic studies scholars voiced “considerable doubts” about their authenticity, they said.

    An Iraqi man was taken into custody over a suspected Islamist link but was later cleared of involvement in the attack.

    Similarly, a purported claim stating a far-right motive sent to German media bore “contradictions and inconsistencies”, prosecutors said, adding that there was “no indication that it was sent by the perpetrator”.

     

    Interior Minister Thomas de Maiziere labelled the arrest “a great success” and said that, if confirmed, “this would be a particularly repugnant motive”.

    Federal prosecutors scheduled a press conference for 1030 GMT on the investigation, which has involved several hundred police officers.

     

    Source: www.tnp.sg

  • CASE: Petrol Companies Profiteering From Petrol Tax Implementation

    CASE: Petrol Companies Profiteering From Petrol Tax Implementation

    The consumer watchdog here has accused some petrol companies of profiteering, after petrol prices across the island were raised yesterday by up to S$0.25 for a litre of 98-octane grade petrol and as much as S$0.18 for 95-octane grade petrol — a day after it was announced in the Budget statement that petrol duty rates would be increased with immediate effect.

    Noting that some of the petrol prices were raised beyond the levels of the duty hike, Mr Seah Seng Choon, executive director of the Consumers Association of Singapore (CASE), said it was understandable for the petrol companies to increase prices following the levy hike. But he pointed out: “They should not increase more than what the tax requires them to and if they do that, they are profiteering from the situation.”

    As of last night, a litre of 98-octane-grade petrol at Shell cost S$2.28 — S$0.25 more than on Monday. Other brands also adjusted their prices, with Caltex, Esso and Singapore Petroleum Company (SPC) charging S$2.25, S$2.23 and S$2.20, respectively. The increment ranged between S$0.17 and S$0.21 for the three brands.

    For 95-octane-grade petrol, which is most popular with drivers, Shell raised the price by S$0.18 to S$2.04 per litre. The other three brands raised their prices to S$2.01 or S$2.02 — with the increases ranging between S$0.12 and S$0.16.

    “(The) pump price adjustments reflect the increase in petrol duties as announced in the 2015 Budget,” said a spokesperson from Chevron, which owns the Caltex brand. The other brands could not be reached for comment by press time.

    Deputy Prime Minister and Finance Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam announced on Monday that petrol duty rates would increase by S$0.20 to S$0.64 per litre for the premium grade and by S$0.15 to S$0.56 per litre for the intermediate grade. To cushion the impact of the hike, motorists would be given a one-off road tax rebate for a year. Mr Tharman noted that with falling oil prices, pump prices after the duty hikes would remain lower than the levels in the past two-and-a-half years.

    Salesman Andrew Koh, 58, welcomed the road tax rebate, but felt it was not enough to mitigate the higher petrol prices. “I was happy when crude oil prices started falling … But now, all the drivers are going to suffer from the increase in levy and petrol prices,” he said.

    Yesterday, Mr Tharman said the taxes related to vehicle ownership and usage would have to be adjusted from time to time, to create a greener environment. Adding that the previous adjustment to petrol levies was done a dozen years ago, he said it was better to raise duties when oil prices are falling, compared with the opposite situation. It was also unlikely the duty hikes would filter down to overall consumer prices as commercial vehicles use diesel, he said. As for middle-income families who own cars, Mr Tharman said other measures in the Budget could alleviate the cost of living.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Are HDB Flats Affordable For Low-Income Singaporeans?

    Are HDB Flats Affordable For Low-Income Singaporeans?

    Can a Singaporean who earns $850 a month afford to buy a Housing Board flat?

    Mr Mohammad Charlie Jasni says yes.

    The odd-job labourer earns that amount, and he and his family will be moving into a new two-room HDB flat in Punggol by the end of the year.

    He had successfully balloted for the 45sq m build-to-order unit in August 2009.

    It cost $99,220, but because he earns less than $5,000 a month, he qualifies for a government housing grant that gives him $40,000 to offset the flat’s price.

    This means he has $59,220 left to pay, which he will do using his Central Provident Fund (CPF) savings.

    He and his wife already have about $40,000 in their CPF accounts, and this will grow as he continues to work.

    Based on HDB’s calculations, he needs to pay a monthly housing instalment of $83 over 30 years.

    ‘By paying the $83 out of my CPF, it means I have that little more for daily expenses,’ said Mr Charlie, 33.

    He is currently living with his wife and two children in a two-room rental flat in Beo Crescent. They pay $44 a month for that flat.

    They are excited about their upcoming home and are already discussing renovation ideas and shopping for furniture.

    ‘It is good to have a home of our own,’ he said.

    Mr Charlie’s story puts a face to a statistic that has been debated in the last week.

    In Parliament last Thursday, Deputy Prime Minister Tharman Shanmugaratnam revealed that ‘a family with $1,000 income can now, through our housing subsidies, purchase a small flat’.

    He was responding to Workers’ Party member Gerald Giam’s comments about Singaporeans being unable to afford a flat.

    The minister’s remarks sparked off much discussion in both cyberspace and coffee shops alike. Some wondered how $1,000 could buy anyone a flat, given that sum was hardly enough to support a family’s daily living expenses.

    The next day, National Development Minister Khaw Boon Wan explained that Mr Tharman was referring to a new two-room flat.

    He added that the subsidised price of such flats was about $100,000 if the applicant was a first-time buyer. He would also be entitled to housing grants of up to $60,000.

    The net selling price would thus be $40,000, and the monthly mortgage payment can be fully paid from his CPF contribution, Mr Khaw said.

    In response to queries from The Straits Times, the HDB said it was unable to say how many households earning $1,000 a month own two-room flats. But it pointed to how that it has two schemes that target low-income, first-time buyers.

    The Additional CPF Housing Grant Scheme (AHG) benefits households whose income is not more than $5,000 a month. The maximum grant quantum is now $40,000, and it benefits 8,000 households every year, said the HDB.

    The Special CPF Housing Grant (SHG) is given to first-timer families earning up to $2,250 a month to buy a small flat. Those earning $1,500 or less get a $20,000 grant. SHG is over and above regular housing subsidies and the AHG.

    The HDB estimated that about 700 tenants currently renting flats under the Public Rental Scheme can benefit from the SHG if they decide to buy a flat. To date, the scheme has benefited 53 households who have bought two-room flats.

    The HDB also gave The Straits Times five recent case studies of households with monthly income of about $1,000 who bought two-room flats. Four managed to buy new flats with the help of both housing grants. The fifth used only AHG as SHG had not been implemented when he bought his flat.

    Out of the five families, three were rental tenants who have bought a new flat without taking any loan because they used the housing grant and their own CPF savings. The other two were families currently living with relatives who have bought new flats using both grants and their CPF savings.

    In one case, a couple who lived in a rental flat bought a new flat in Bukit Panjang. At the point of applying for a flat, their monthly income was $900.

    The flat cost $106,350. They got the maximum total housing grant of $60,000 – $40,000 AHG and $20,000 SHG. This, together with their CPF savings, meant they did not have to take any loan.

    In another case, a man and his mother bought a new flat in Sengkang for $117,750. They got $60,000 in grants, and took a 17-year loan with a monthly instalment of $131.

    Schemes to help with expenses

    THE Straits Times visited five blocks of two-room flats in the Woodlands and Ghim Moh areas this week and spoke to people in over 30 homes.

    Most of the residents there were renting their units.

    Of the four who owned their flats, one had downgraded from a four-room unit, while three others had downgraded after selling their previous flat in the Selective En Bloc Redevelopment Scheme.

    Among those renting, many were in their 60s and 70s and retired. They said they do not have much in their CPF or bank accounts, which is why they cannot buy their own units.

    Madam Tan Chui Eng, in her 70s, and her husband, Mr Teo Kim Wee, in his 80s, said they have been living in a two-room rental flat in Ghim Moh for six years.

    Most of the money in their CPF accounts has been used for medical expenses, they said. They have three daughters who pay their monthly rental of $61 and utility bills. ‘Of course, we would like to buy our own flat, but we cannot afford it,’ said Madam Tan in Teochew.

    MPs said that with grants and other assistance schemes, households earning $1,000 should be able to afford a two-room flat.

    Mr Vikram Nair, an MP for Sembawang GRC, said he knows of such households who rely on CPF contributions to finance their purchases.

    As to whether $1,000 is enough for a family to survive, he said there are public assistance schemes, such as GST vouchers and Workfare Bonus, which can help low-income families cope with daily needs.

    Mr Liang Eng Hwa, MP for Holland-Bukit Timah GRC, said regardless of whether they buy a flat, low-income households have little cash on hand. But rather than use cash to pay rent, ‘why not use the CPF to pay for a flat?’

    ‘The cash they save by not paying rent may not be much, but still it gives them that little more for daily expenditure,’ he added.

    For odd-job labourer Mr Charlie, every bit saved helps to pay for living expenses. His wife does part-time administrative work.

    He did not think he could afford a flat ‘but when HDB re-introduced two-room flats again, I felt that perhaps I could afford one’.

    In 2006, HDB resumed construction of two-room flats after 20 years, to give more housing options to low-income households.

    He decided to wait a bit because he wanted to build up his CPF account first. Now that he has bought a home, he feels the pressure of maintaining his CPF account so that the flat can be paid off.

    ‘Some companies are cutting back on manpower and I’m scared that I may lose my job,’ he said.

    But he does not regret buying the unit. He hopes to pass the flat – or a bigger one should they ever upgrade – to his children.

    How he pays for his flat

    Monthly income: $850

    Total household CPF: $40,000

    Cost of build-to-order flat in Punggol: $99,220

    Additional CPF Housing Grant Scheme: $40,000

    Remaining cost of flat: $59,220 ($99,220 less $40,000)

    Estimated monthly instalment for payment: $83 for 30 years

    Deduction from CPF: $83

    Cash outlay: $0

    _________________________________________________

    Housing help for low-income families

    THE Housing Board (HDB) offers two grants to low-income families so they can buy their own flats:

     

    • Additional CPF Housing Grant Scheme (AHG)

     

    THIS was introduced in 2006 to help lower-income Singaporean families buy their first HDB flat. It is targeted at households with incomes of not more than $5,000 a month.

    The size of the grant is based on the applicant’s average gross monthly household income. The grant varies between $5,000 and $40,000. Households earning $1,500 or less a month will get $40,000.

    AHG is an additional subsidy over and above the regular market subsidy and CPF Housing Grant. Both new and resale flat buyers are eligible for AHG.

    It offsets the purchase price of the flat, thereby further reducing the loan a flat buyer needs to take. It is estimated to benefit 8,000 households a year.

     

    • The Special CPF Housing Grant (SHG)

     

    THIS was introduced last year as an additional grant for first-timer low-income families earning up to $2,250 a month, so they can buy a small flat from the HDB.

    The SHG is given out over and above regular housing subsidies and the AHG. Households earning $1,500 or less a month will get $20,000 in SHG. About 700 tenants currently renting flats under the Public Rental Scheme can benefit from the SHG if they choose to buy a flat.

     

    Source: http://www.stproperty.sg

  • DAP: Toll Hikes Reap Exorbitant Profits for Malaysia Resource Corporation Sdn Bhd

    DAP: Toll Hikes Reap Exorbitant Profits for Malaysia Resource Corporation Sdn Bhd

    Toll concessionaire Malaysian Resources Corporation Berhad (MRCB) will reap “exorbitant profits”, Malaysia’s opposition said on Monday after the government revealed that 1.5 million paying vehicles crossed the Causeway in August after a toll-hike that has begun to hit Johor’s economy.

    Malaysia’s works ministry revealed in Parliament last week that in the month following the August 1 hike, 729,657 paid the toll to enter Singapore while 721,384 shelled out the increased fare going the other way.

    Malaysia added RM6.80 (S$2.63) each way to the existing RM2.90 to enter Johor from Singapore for cars, while buses saw a RM5.50 increase in both directions on top of the RM2.30 already paid heading north.

    According to opposition Democratic Action Party (DAP), this totals close to RM11 million per month, the same as the compensation paid by the government to MRCB since 2012 when the toll hike was to come into effect but was delayed ahead of last year’s closely-fought general elections.

    DAP assistant publicity chief Teo Nie Ching said yesterday this would mean that the government-linked MRCB would rake in RM4.3 billion by the end of its 34-year concession, despite the Eastern Dispersal Link (EDL) highway – which terminates at the Johor Baru immigration complex – only costing RM1.2 billion.

    “The profit that they are going to make from toll collection is still exorbitant and astronomical,” the Johor-based MP said, adding that this was before taking into consideration future toll hikes written into the concession deal and increasing traffic volume over the next three decades.

    Singapore matched Malaysia’s collection on Oct 1, bringing the cost of a roundtrip to $13, from just $2.35 as recently as July.

    The double hike caused alarm over the chilling economic impact especially to the Iskandar region – crucial to both nations – in Johor, which has just begun booming in the past two years after a quiet start.

    Even Malaysian ruling party leaders were critical of the hike, such as Public Accounts Committee chief Nur Jazlan Mohamad who told The Straits Times “both governments have to decide if they want Iskandar or not because instead of promoting it, they are imposing a de facto tax.”

    MRCB has insisted that the financing cost incurred to build the EDL – an elevated highway connecting the Johor Baru immigration complex to the North-South Expressway – alone is RM11 million a month, with an additional RM1 million needed for operations and maintenance.

    It also claims that it only collects RM6.80 upon exit and entry at the immigration complex (and not the existing RM2.90) but that up to 200,000 motorists use the EDL for free within Johor without crossing the border.

    Ms Teo added that Kuala Lumpur “should immediately declassify concession agreement with MRCB so that Malaysians will know if our government has again abused its power to enrich its crony.”

    [email protected]