Tag: Public Transport

  • Lui Tuck Yew: Drop In Oil Price Could See Decrease In Public Transport Fares

    Lui Tuck Yew: Drop In Oil Price Could See Decrease In Public Transport Fares

    The drop in energy prices seen in 2014 could translate to a reduction in public transport fares in the next fare review exercise at the end of the year.

    Based on available data for 2014, the fare adjustment could be “in the region of negative one per cent”, said Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew in Parliament on Monday (Jan 19), in response to a question on the fall in oil prices.

    MP Gan Thiam Poh had asked, with regard to the ongoing 2014 fare review exercise, whether the Public Transport Council would consider a reduction of transport fares, as a result of the fall in oil prices since June 2014.

    However, Mr Lui noted that the ongoing fare review exercise, which started in November 2014, looks at changes in indices for 2013.

    “We will have to leave it to the Public Transport Council to assess the public transport operators’ applications for fare increase, the fare adjustment quantum as given by the formula and the affordability of public transport for Singaporeans, amongst other things, and decide on the fare adjustment,” the minister said.

    The fare formula is pegged to changes in the core consumer price index, wage index and energy index over the preceding year. This reflects the operating cost structure of public transport operators, said Mr Lui.

    The core consumer price index and wage index account for 40 per cent of the formula each. The energy index component, which accounts for energy and fuel costs, makes up 20 per cent.

    In the ongoing 2014 exercise, the value of the energy index component was negative 12.6 per cent – due to lower energy prices in 2013 – but the core consumer price index went up by 1.7 per cent, while the wage index saw an increase of 4.3 per cent.

    The fare adjustment quantum yielded by the formula would have been negative 0.6 per cent for the 2014 fare review exercise. However, the previous fare review exercise had announced a fare increase of 6.6 per cent in two steps.

    A 3.2 per cent hike was introduced in April last year, with the 3.4 per cent increase to be carried over to the ongoing review. Mr Lui explained that is why there is a 2.8 per cent fare adjustment quantum for the ongoing fare review exercise.

    The next fare review exercise is set to take place towards the end of 2015 and is based on data for the full year of 2014.

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • More Scope For Improvements In Public Transport

    More Scope For Improvements In Public Transport

    Years after the Government had pledged to improve the state of public transport — given the growing discontent with breakdowns and overcrowding — the biggest question on everyone’s minds is this: Have the aggressive measures worked and are the billions of dollars pumped in to lift the transport industry out of the doldrums reaping results?

    Official figures indicate some measure of improvement, but not all is rosy.

    Though the number of major train service delays — episodes lasting more than 30 minutes — for the entire MRT network has hit a new high this year, analysts said these were probably due to structural wear and tear of the ageing infrastructure, which takes time to rectify. They pointed to the occurrence of shorter delays — those lasting five minutes or so — and train withdrawals as evidence that the overhaul to the MRT and bus systems has seen incremental improvement.

    Still, more intermediary options can be added to augment the system, the experts felt.

    For instance, the number of City Direct Services — express bus routes run by private operators — could be ramped up, said National University of Singapore professor Lee Der-Horng.

    Nanyang Technological University (NTU) transport economist Walter Theseira added that as long as headline-grabbing major delays are still happening, it is difficult for commuters to feel the benefits from the improvement in the number of short delays.

    He also felt that what could make a difference to the commuter experience are a reduction in overcrowding and better reliability. Demand management policies, such as free travel during early hours and flexible work hours by companies, can make a perceptible difference in peak-hour crowding, he said, providing a respite until infrastructure improvements are completed.

    Indeed, the Government has been aggressively ramping up the capacity of existing train lines.

    The first of the 18 new North East Line and 24 new Circle Line trains are undergoing testing and will be progressively put into service from the middle of next year.

    Stage 2 of the Downtown Line, which comprises 12 stations running through the Bukit Timah corridor, is also set to open in a little more than a year, in the first quarter of 2016.

    The target of doubling the rail network from about 180km to about 360km in 2030 also appears to be on track.

    The Thomson-East Coast Line — a joint line between the Thomson Line and the Eastern Region Line with 31 new stations and seven interchanges — will be ready in stages from 2019. Two new rail lines, the Cross Island Line and the Jurong Region Line, are also being planned.

    Meanwhile, existing lines will get a facelift. Commuters staying between the Yishun and Sembawang MRT stations on the North South Line (NSL) can look forward to Canberra station, slated to be completed in 2019, with work starting in the middle of next year.

    On the maintenance front, re-sleepering work along the northern portions of the NSL, particularly the stretches between Bishan and Woodlands, has been progressing well. As of last month, about 76 per cent of sleepers on the line have been replaced and trains are now travelling at full speed from Yio Chu Kang to Khatib, said the Land Transport Authority (LTA).

    Other stretches will soon see a gradual lifting of speed restrictions next year. Work on the NSL is slated to finish by the middle of next year and the East West Line (EWL) by the end of 2016.

    An upgrade to the North South-East West Line signalling system is also set for completion in 2016 for the NSL, with the new signalling system installed at more than 73 per cent of the stations and tracks. New signalling equipment has also been installed and is being tested on 14 trains in the existing fleet. The EWL will begin its upgrade early next year and is expected to be completed by 2018.

    As for buses, the LTA’s billion-dollar Bus Service Enhancement Programme (BSEP), which aims to add 1,000 more buses by 2017, is showing preliminary results.

    Associate Professor Gopinath Menon, who teaches transportation engineering at NTU, acknowledged that there had been visible improvement in the bus industry under the BSEP. The recent reliability framework also helped in better assessing expected delays to passengers at bus stops, he added.

    With more than half of the buses under the BSEP having been added so far, the LTA said waiting times for commuters had been shortened by three to seven minutes on more popular services. The number of bus services that were persistently crowded during peak hours has also been reduced by 60 per cent. Thirty-six new bus services have been rolled out since the programme began in 2012, along with nine City Direct Services and 10 Peak Period Short Services.

    The authorities have also been rolling out “soft approaches” to improve the commuting journey, such as offering free travel to commuters who hop on before peak hours to eye-catching graciousness campaigns.

    An LTA spokesman said the shift of commuters from morning peak periods to pre-peak periods has been consistent since the introduction of free pre-peak travel in June last year, at around 7 per cent.

    This has resulted in a more even distribution of morning peak hour crowds, she noted, adding that capacity during the pre-peak period remained adequate.

    The Corporate-Tier Travel Smart Rewards programme has also seen results. Introduced in July after a two-year pilot, the scheme offers monetary incentives to companies that implement flexible travel arrangements. From only 12 organisations in the pilot in 2012, the scheme has seen 39 companies and about 6,700 employees signing up to date, said the LTA. New sign-ups include Standard Chartered Bank, DBS, Barclays and Arup.

    “As travel patterns typically take some time to stabilise, we expect to see preliminary results from the … participants some time mid-next year, with more definitive results around the end of 2015,” added the LTA spokesman.

    Despite the various efforts, it could be worthwhile to consider more alternative transport modes besides electric-vehicle sharing, for example, said Professor Lee. The authorities can explore “making use of low air space to allow cable cars or even elevated Personal Rapid Transit (PRT) to come into the picture”, he suggested. PRT, also known as a podcar, is a system of small automated vehicles operating on a network of specially-built tracks.

    With Certificate of Entitlement prices remaining high, there are more people scrapping their vehicles than new vehicles being registered, he said, signalling that more people could be switching to public transport.

    Assoc Prof Menon pointed out that the current usage ratio during peak hours for public to private transport is 63:37, still some distance away from the Government’s target of 70:30 by 2020.

     

    Source: www.todayonline.com

  • Public Transport Fare Set To Increase Again:  “Review” Underway

    Public Transport Fare Set To Increase Again: “Review” Underway

    The Public Transport Council (PTC) on Wednesday (Nov 19) announced it has started the annual fare review exercise.

    Public transport operators may submit their applications for fare review to the PTC for consideration by Dec 19. The decision will be announced in the first quarter of 2015, according to the press release.

    Responding to media queries, SMRT’s Vice-President for Corporate Information and Communications Patrick Nathan said: “We seek a better alignment of fares and operating costs, and will be submitting our application for a fare review in the coming weeks.”

    To evaluate applications robustly, the PTC will take guidance from the fare review mechanism and fare adjustment formula recommended by the Fare Review Mechanism Committee and accepted by the Government in Nov 2013.

    The new fare adjustment formula is now based on core inflation (excluding property and car prices), average wage increase and an energy component.

    “This will ensure a good balance between meeting the needs of the commuting public and keeping the public transport system financially sustainable. In discharging its responsibilities, the PTC will pay particular attention to fare affordability for the more vulnerable groups of commuters,” the PTC said.

    Public transport fares were last adjusted in Apr 2014 as part of the 2013 fare review. There was a fare increase of 3.2 per cent – just half of the total fare cap of 6.6 per cent. It means the remaining 3.4 per cent will be brought forward to this year’s fare review exercise.

    Mr Cedric Foo, chairman of the Government Parliamentary Committee for Transport, said: “If you look at the new formula, it has a new component called the Energy Index and that constitutes 20 per cent of the formula.

    “As we have seen lately, fuel prices are coming down. Therefore, they hope that if you apply this formula, and core inflation is also not high, wage inflation is also not high, they hope that this may be zero or even negative. So I am hopeful that the full 3.4 per cent rollover from last year will not be implemented in full.”

    INSULATING VULNERABLE GROUPS

    In a Facebook post on Wednesday, Transport Minister Lui Tuck Yew commented on the fare review exercise, stating that public transport must continue to be affordable for all Singaporeans.

    “I hope that the Public Transport Council will study if we can insulate vulnerable groups such as senior citizens from a fare increase, or at least mitigate the impact on them,” he wrote. “In the same regard, the Ministry of Transport will also study how we can similarly enhance the concession schemes Government introduced for lower-wage workers and persons with disabilities earlier this year.

    Mr Lui added that this exercise builds on the improvements of last year’s fare review, and he has received “positive feedback” from Singaporeans who have benefited from new and enhanced travel concession schemes.

    These include monthly concession passes for polytechnic students, and the introduction of the Adult Monthly Travel Pass, which frequent commuters can purchase to cap their transport expenditure.

    “I hope the PTC can consider not raising the prices of these travel passes,” wrote Mr Lui. “I have also asked the Land Transport Authority to study whether we can strengthen our ongoing travel demand management efforts, and encourage more commuters to travel during the off-peak hours. Perhaps the Government can introduce off-peak monthly passes; which should also help reduce the travel expenditure for this group of commuters.”

    Still, Mr Foo said that one still has to look at the overall trend of fare increases: “If you look at it over the last six years, actually the compound annual growth rate in fare is well below half a per cent.

    “If we look at wages, wages have clearly increased by more than half a per cent at each point. So, in the context of long-term fare trend, fare increases cannot remain at zero for good. That’s unrealistic because it’s not sustainable. But let me stress at even if there is a modest increase in fares, we have to look after the vulnerable groups.”

     

    Source: www.channelnewsasia.com

  • Is PAP the solution or the problem?

    0% of the population voted for PAP during 2011 elections. The PAP vaingloriously considers this achievement as an indication that they have gotten a HUGE majority of support from the citizens as compared to other democratic nations. As we know, this figure belies the actual truth. Taking into consideration that the climate of fear still plays a crucial role in punching up the percentage, Im pretty sure their think-tank have its own analysis as to what the actual support is.

    We had seen how support for PAP has been sliding south at each general election. Again, I’m sure they conducted extensive research on why this is happening. While the frugal Lee Kuan Yew (LKY) was very fortunate to have a docile population whom he can twiddle with his imaginary hatchet, his prodigal son, Lee Hsien Loong (LHL) had to content with an electorate equipped with plethora of information from the emergence of the social media.

    Make no mistake. The PAP has absolute control over our print media. Those who think that our newspapers provide unbiased reporting, must have been living in ‘Batu Cave’ and have no other sources of information except receiving news via a subscription plan from SPH.

    Unable to control the outflow of information which has been fastidiously guarded during LKY’s term, the people are now beginning to realise that PAP is not the solution to the problems that the country is facing. In fact, they are the problem. Policies were passed down without extensive deliberations and they are reactive rather than proactive.

    Often times, when problems start to appear, it was not promptly addressed. They make it a habit of ignoring valid small feedbacks from the public as being inconsequential. Thus problems regularly get compounded.

    Now let’s examine a few bread and butter issues to ascertain the facts on whether im blowing hot air.

    Public housing – We have seen prices skyrocketing. The scholars from PAP were the one that peg new public housing prices to the open market. This is now almost irreversible as detaching it will only have dire consequences to existing owners. What’s the solution from PAP then? Except meaningless tweaking and more taxes implemented, PAP has offered no long term solution to this predicament. In fact, they are compounding it by bringing in more immigrants without building adequate supply.

    Public transport (SMRT) – Who’s the genius one who decided to privatize our public transportation? Although this process is still reversible, it will take insane amount of tax payers’ money to nationalise it again. The citizens are now at the mercy of these big organizations as and when they decide to increase the fares. What’s the solution from PAP to keep transportation cost down? Nothing except throwing in tax payer’s money to fund part of SBS and SMRT’s expenditure to keep cost from rising while tax payers were made to pay for their mistakes. For how long are we going to inject billions of public funds to feed these big organizations?

    Healthcare – Who’s the smart aleck who created this severe brain drain of doctors in Singapore when he capped the number of students allowed to take medicine at NUS? Singapore now has to attract doctors from all over to come and practice here, paying premium salaries to them. Inevitably, part of the cost is passed on to patients. We also heard many stories of how a family is burden with hospital bills amounting to hundreds of thousands of dollars after a patient is diagnosed with terminal illness. Obviously our 3M has failed to provide adequate coverage to prevent such situation from happening. What’s the solution to these?

    COE – It is now a luxury to own a car in Singapore. At the present moment, Cat A and B quota premium is $85k and $93k respectively. The main purpose of implementing the COE system was to curb vehicle population growth. It had to a certain degree met its objectives albeit at the expense of the average citizen when COE prices shoot up to almost 30 times of the median income. It’s not rocket science to know that with an impending population increase and more affluent foreigners being converted into citizens, this regressive tax system will only impose a greater burden on the poor. Being a reactive government rather than proactive one, we can expect this problem will not be approaching any solution soon.

    It’s time that citizens think critically without prejudice on various issues that is affecting Singaporeans. Many of the problems were the result of bad decisions and policies. Achieving economic success alone is never a true measure of how successful a nation is. Citizen’s welfare and well-being should be placed in tandem with any economic progress.

    PAP has shown that its problem solving skills are limited to only imposing additional taxes on the citizens without any concrete solutions. It has failed the acid test and it is now time for a new holistic government to take it over for the next lap.

    Regards,
    Osman Sulaiman

    Source: http://www.facebook.com/notes/osman-sulaiman/is-pap-the-solution-or-the-problem/10151696941793372